HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2002 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 491-493
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2002.491.493
Antibiogram Sensitivity Pattern of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Pus Samples
Farah Siddiqi, Madahiah-bint-e-Masood , Noor-us-Saba , Abdus Samad, Mazhar Qayyum and Ali Abbas Qazilbash

Abstract: A total of 75 pus samples (21 ear pus samples and 54 pus samples from other parts of the body - surgical wounds, acne pus samples etc.) were tested to confirm the presence of Staphylococcus aureus. Consequently, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from 33 (44%) cases, 25 (46%) from wound pus and 8 (38%) from ear pus. Of these isolates, 3 (12%) from wound and 5 (63%) from ear pus were determined to be MRSA (based on their antibiogram sensitivity tests). All these isolates were sensitive to vancomycin, however, amongst the wound pus samples, 2 MRSA were found resistant to gentamicin and 1 MRSA resistant to amikacin. As for 5 MRSA strains from ear pus, all were sensitive to vancomycin and amikacin, while 2 were found to be gentamicin resistant. The prevalence of gentamicin-resistant MRSA (GR-MRSA) is of great concern and may be attributed to indiscriminate use of antibiotics, non-compliance of patients, over-the-counter availability of drugs, improper health facilities, care and guidance.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Farah Siddiqi, Madahiah-bint-e-Masood , Noor-us-Saba , Abdus Samad, Mazhar Qayyum and Ali Abbas Qazilbash, 2002. Antibiogram Sensitivity Pattern of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Pus Samples. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5: 491-493.

Keywords: MRSA, gentamicin resistant and pus samples

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common causative agents of nosocomial infections worldwide, which also causes abscesses, boils, sties, impetigo, folliculitis, scalded skin syndrome, toxic shock syndrome, cellulitis and more serious infection in persons debilitated by chronic illness, traumatic injury, burns or immuno-suppression. These infections include, Staphylococcal pneumonia, osteomyelitis, and also secondary infections resulting from insect bites, ulcers, burns, wounds and endocarditis (Mohan and Larsen, 1995).

Various reports have confirmed that nosocomial infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are an important cause of mortality among hospitalized patients all over the world, mostly among those who use needles frequently and are hospitalized for surgery. It can easily be transferred from person to person in hospitals by contaminated hands of physicians, nurses by contaminated equipments, solutions, sinks and clothing (Lameitre et al., 1998; Cuoto et al., 1995). Simultaneously, there is growing evidence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptible to gentamicin has been reported in numerous countries (Nimmo et al., 2000). Factors such as contact with health care institutions, or workers, are the most common risk factors associated with MRSA transmission (Palmer et al., 1994; Sumrall and Nolan, 1996).

Staphylococcal infections are of particular concern because of the causative bacteria offering resistance to a wide range of commonly used antibiotics. Half of all Staph. species that circulate in hospitals are resistant to penicillin, due to over production of β-lactamase, as a result methicillin and oxacillin are used as alternative antibiotics. In 1961, shortly after methicillin became available for clinical use, methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus (MRSA) emerged in England. As a result vancomycin and gentamicin constitute the uniformly effective drug presently available against MRSA strains (Boyce, 1998).

Furthermore, some strains of Staph. aureus have shown intermediate level resistance to vancomycin and complete resistance to gentamicin in developed and developing nations At the moment fortunately such strains are encountered rarely, but are increasing. As a safeguard, clinicians are trying to tackle this problem by using a combination of antibiotics, and counseling patients regarding the deleterious effects of the over and misuse of antibiotics (Martin, 1997; Trakulsomboon et al., 2001).

The injudicious use of antibiotics in Pakistani hospitals, communities and because of the easy availability of antibiotics without prescription, the chances of the emergence of resistant strains are enhanced. Lack of public awareness has further deteriorated the situation (Haneef and Khan, 1990).

This study was designed to investigate the prevalence-identification of Staphylococcus aureus in different pus samples, their antibiotic resistance pattern (including MRSA, GS-MRSA and GR-MRSA).

Materials and Methods

The study was carried out in the Bacteriology Laboratory of the National Institute of Health (NIH), Islamabad. A total of 75 pus samples, wound pus (54) from all types of wounds, cuts, abscesses, acne pus and pus drained from any organ i.e. gall bladder, spleen, bones, breast and of ear pus (21), both from inner ear and outer pinna, were collected from patients of Rawalpindi/Islamabad area visiting the NIH hospital.

Pus samples were immediately streaked onto Blood and MacConkey agar (DIFCO), with the help of sterilized cotton swab. Plates were then incubated at 370 C for 24 hours and examined for Staphylococcus aureus colonies, which grew only on blood agar. The colonies were identified on the basis of colony morphology (β-hemolytic – clear zone around colonies), microscopy and confirmatory biochemical tests, such as catalase and coagulase tests.

Antibiotic sensitivity test: After the confirmation of Staph. aureus, antibiotic sensitivity profile was determined. Two separate colonies were mixed in peptone water in test tube. After 15 minutes this suspension was streaked with the help of sterilized cotton swab on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid) plate. Antibiotic disks (Oxoid) were applied on plate and incubated at 370 C for 24 hours. The diameter of the zone of inhibition was compared according to the guidelines of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) to determine whether Staph. aureus is susceptible, intermediate or resistant to antibiotics (Monica, 1991).

Results and Discussion

Of the 54 wound pus samples examined for the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus, 25 (46%) were positive, whereas of the 21 ear pus samples, 8 (38%) were found positive for Staph. aureus. Among these isolates, 3 from wound pus and 5 from ear pus were found to be MRSA, based on their culture sensitivity patterns. According to sex-wise distribution pattern of Staph. aureus among the positive wound pus samples, 18 (72%) were from males and 7 (28%) from females. However, with regards to 8 ear pus samples, positive for Staph. aureus, the opposite was seen, as this study reported 6 (75%) cases in females and only 2 (25%) cases in males (Table 1).

With regards to the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of the 3 MRSA isolates from wound pus, the results showed that all the strains were sensitive to vancomycin, however, one strain showed resistance to amikacin, while 2 isolates offered resistance to gentamicin (Table 2).

As for the antibiogram pattern of 5 MRSA isolates from ear pus, it was found that all the strains were sensitive to vancomycin and amikacin, while 2 strains were simultaneously resistant to gentamicin (Table 3).

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has proved to be one of the most widespread and persistent nosocomial pathogen of the late 20th Century (Ayliffe, 1997; Voss and Doebbeling, 1995) and now community-acquired MRSA is a worldwide phenomenon, appearing in France, West Indies and in children, with no identifiable predisposing risk, in the United States (Lelievre et al., 1999; Herold et al., 1998). Most of these cases caused by the strains sensitive to gentamicin (GS-MRSA), as documented evidence showed that community-acquired strains were more susceptible to gentamicin than nosocomially acquired isolates (Nimmo et al., 2000).

The appearance of gentamicin-resistant MRSA (GR-MRSA) is of great concern, as Staph. aureus continues to show its resilience against antibiotics and gradually with time build resistance against them (Pavillard et al., 1982).

According to this study, the overall incidence of Staph. aureus was found to be higher in wound pus compared to ear pus. The reasons may be that Staph. aureus constitutes the normal flora of skin, or the wounds are more exposed and there is greater chance of dissemination, contamination and secondary infections, as compared to ear pus. These results are similar to the findings by other researchers who reported that the most common infections caused by MRSA include wound infections (Boyce, 1998) and that highest incidence of Staph. aureus, amongst clinical samples, was in pus samples (Abu Saud, 1996).

Based on the antibiogram results, the present study has revealed that all of the 8 MRSA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (a useful antibiotic against gram-positive pathogens). Similar findings have been reported earlier (Trakulsomboon et al., 2001; Jawetz et al., 1995).

An increasing evidence has indicated the reduced susceptibility of Staph. aureus to vancomycin (vancomycin-resistant MRSA). Such strains have been reported in Thailand, USA, France and Korea (Martin, 1997; Trakulsomboon et al., 2001; Hiramatsu et al., 1997; Ploy et al., 1998; Kim et al., 2000).

The interesting aspect revealed in this study is the effectiveness, (as the case may be), of gentamicin on the MRSA isolates, where, among the pus isolates (both wound and pus) 4 were resistant to gentamicin - GR-MRSA (2 each for wound and pus), whereas 4 were GS-MRSA (1 from wound and 3 from ear pus samples). This is indicative of an increase in resistance to this drug that until recently was as effective as vancomycin (Collignon et al., 1998; O’Brien et al., 1999; Riley et al., 1998). This change in resistance pattern of Staph. aureus may be due to indiscriminate use of antibiotics, non-compliance of patients, (as reported by physicians), the easy access and availability of various drugs in the market without prescription (Haneef and Khan, 1990).

The study under discussion has revealed variations in sex-wise incidence of Staph. aureus in wound and ear pus.

Table 1:Incidence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among wound and ear pus samples

Table 2: Antibiogram of 3 MRSA isolates from wound pus

Table 3: Antibiogram of 3 MRSA isolated from ear pus

In wound pus, incidence of Staph. aureus was higher in males (72%) than in females (28%), which may be due to the reason that males, especially in our society, are involved in numerous outdoor activities and their work too exposes them to an increased chance of contamination and infection. Furthermore, improper use of ointments on minor cuts and abscesses during haircutting and shaving, poor postoperative care and surgical wounds may also cause the spread of infections (Boyce, 1998; Ahmed et al., 1998).

The incidence of ear pus infections caused by Staph. aureus, this study, however, showed an opposite trend i.e. a higher incidence was recorded among females (75%) than in males (25%). The reason may be that females traditionally, frequently pierce their ears, sometimes more than once, and decorate them with numerous ornamental jewelry or artificial jewelry, which may cause a sepsis to occur.

In the community, Staph. aureus infections incidence may be reduced by proper hygiene and greater awareness with the family physician playing a key role. To prevent spread of MRSA in general and GR-MRSA in particular, carriers among hospital personnel should be identified, nasal colonization should be decreased and only those antibiotics prescribed that have been tested through culture sensitivity and proven to be effective.

The prevalence of gentamicin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus is of great concern and may be attributed to indiscriminate use of antibiotics, non-compliance of patients, over-the-counter availability of drugs, improper health facilities, care and guidance.

Clinicians, pharmacists and the general public at large must be taken into confidence to spread the awareness of this problem in order to combat the spread of resistant strains. Moreover, better immune system development is also essential. This can be obtained through proper diet, exercise, low stress, adequate rest and use of antibiotics only if absolutely necessary, and that too, as a last resort.

REFERENCES

  • Abu Saud, M.J., 1996. Incidence of wound infections in three different departments and the antibiotics sensitivity pattern of the isolates in a Saudi Arabian hospital. Acta Microbiol. Immuno. Hung., 43: 301-305.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Ahmed, A.O., A.V. Belkum, H.A. Fahal, A.E. Abu Elnor and A.M. Abougroum et al., 1998. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and epidemiology of surgical site infections in a Sudanese university hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 3614-3618.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Ayliffe, G.A.J., 1997. The progressive intercontinental spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis., 24: S74-S79.
    Direct Link    


  • Boyce, J.M., 1998. Are the epidemiology and microbiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus changing?. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 279: 623-624.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Collignon, P., I. Gosbell, A. Vickery, G. Nimmo, T. Stylianopoulos and T. Gottlieb, 1998. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Australia. Lancet, 352: 146-147.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Cuoto, I., M. Cristino, M.L. Fernandes, T. Garcia and N. Serrano et al., 1995. Unusually large numbers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in a Portuguese hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol., 33: 2032-2035.
    Direct Link    


  • Haneef, S.M. and M.A. Khan, 1990. Staphylococcal infections. J. Pak. Pediatr., 5: 122-131.


  • Herold, B.C., L.C. Immergluck, M.C. Maranan, D.S. Lauderdale and R.E. Gaskin et al., 1998. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. J. Am. Med. Assco., 279: 593-598.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki and Y. Hosoda et al., 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet, 350: 1670-1673.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Kim, M.N., C.K. Pai, J.H. Woo, J.S. Ryu and K. Hiramatsu, 2000. Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol., 38: 3879-3881.
    Direct Link    


  • Lelievre, H., G. Lina, M.E. Jones, C. Olive, F. Forey and M. Roussel-Delvallez, 1999. Emergence and spread in French hospitals of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with increasing susceptibility to gentamicin and other antibiotics. J. Clin. Microbiol., 37: 3452-3457.
    Direct Link    


  • Lameitre, N., W. Sougakoff, A. Masmoudi, M.H. Fievet, R. Bismuth and V. Jarlier, 1998. Characterization of gentamicin-susceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus involved in nosocomial spread. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 81-85.
    Direct Link    


  • Mohan, C.R. and H.S. Larsen, 1995. Staphylococcus. In: Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, Mohan, C.R. and G. Jr. Manuselis (Eds.). W.B. Saunders, Co., New York, pp: 325-330


  • Martin, R., 1997. Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to Vancomycin-United States. Morbl. Mortal. Wkly Rep., 46: 624-626.


  • Monica, C., 1991. Gram-Positive Cocci and Rods. Vol. 2. ELBS Publishers, UK., pp: 225-226


  • Nimmo, G.R., J. Schooneveldt, G. Kane, B. McCall and A. Vickery, 2000. Community acquisition of gentamicin-sensitive methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus aureus in Southeast Queensland, Australia. J. Clin. Microbiol., 38: 3926-3931.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • O'Brien, F.G., J.W. Pearman, M. Gracey, T.V. Riley and W.B. Grubb, 1999. Community strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus involved in a hospital outbreak. J. Clin. Microbiol., 37: 2858-2862.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Palmer, B., R. Dula, W. Zakaria and D. Reagan, 1994. Factors associated with outpatient acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Control Hospital Epidemiol., 15: S22-S23.


  • Pavillard, R., K. Harvey, D. Douglas, A. Hewstone and J. Andrew et al., 1982. Epidemic of hospital-acquired infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in major Victorian hospitals. Med. J. Aust., 1: 451-454.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Ploy, M.C., C. Grelaud, C. Martin, L. de Lumely and F. Dennis, 1998. First clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a French hospital. Lancet, 351: 1212-1213.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Riley, D., D. Maccullock and A.J. Morris, 1998. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the suburbs. N.Z. Med. J., 111: 59-59.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Trakulsomboon, S., S. Danchaivijitr, Y. Rongrungruang, C. Dhiraputra, W. Susaemgrat, T. Ito and K. Hiramtsu, 2001. First report of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Thailand. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 591-595.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Voss, A. and B.N. Doebbeling, 1995. The worldwide prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 5: 101-106.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sumrall, B. and R. Nolan, 1996. Retrospective study of Community-Acquired (CA) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) occurring during an epidemic of MRSA at a veterans affairs hospital. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 17: 28-30.


  • Jawetz, E., L.J. Melnick, E. Adelberg and G.F. Brooks, 1995. Staphylococci. In: Medical Microbiology, Jawetz, E., J.L. Melnick and E.A. Adelberg (Eds.). 20th Edn., Appleton and Lange Publishers, East Nofalk, pp: 186-191


  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997. Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin United States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., 46: 813-815.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved