HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2002 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 10 | Page No.: 1006-1009
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2002.1006.1009
Studies on Parental Variability and Heterosis in Rice
M. Nuruzzaman, M. F. Alam, M. G. Ahmed, A. M. Shohael, M. K. Biswas, M. R. Amin and M. M. Hossain

Abstract: Genetic variability was studied for eight quantitative traits in fourteen parental lines of hybrid rice. The characters were plant height, flag leaf initiation day, first panicle initiation day, days to 100% flowering, days to maturity, grain yield/10 hills, spikelet fertility/10 panicles and no. of effective tillers/hill. Two additional characters (flag leaf length and spikelet length) were included in heterosis study. In general high component of variation and coefficient of variability were observed for most of the characters. The highest component of variation, coefficient of variability and heritability were noticed in grain yield/10 hills. Characters those with high genetic variability and genetic advance were considered to be important for selecting the desirable lines. Heterosis was studied in ten F1 lines for 10 characters. In general, the hybrids performed significantly better than the respective parents. Mid parent, standard variety and better parent heterosis were observed for all the characters under study. In comparison of F1 hybrids with their respective mid parent, standard variety and better parent showed significant heterosis for most of the studied characters. Among the 10 hybrids three lines viz., IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, IR58025AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R and IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R exhibited the highest heterosis in grain yield/10 hills. In conclusion, there was an ample scope for developing suitable hybrid rice from the studied parental lines as the hybrids exhibited vigour and earliness.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
M. Nuruzzaman, M. F. Alam, M. G. Ahmed, A. M. Shohael, M. K. Biswas, M. R. Amin and M. M. Hossain, 2002. Studies on Parental Variability and Heterosis in Rice. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5: 1006-1009.

Keywords: hybrid vigour, genetic parameters, parental variability, heterosis and rice

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the most important cereal crop in developing world and is the staple food of over half of the world’s population. It is normally a self-pollinated crop. However, strong heterosis is observed in it. Heterosis or hybrid vigour is manifested as an improved performance for F1 hybrid generated by crossing two inbred parents. Heterosis can be quantitatively defined as an upward deviation of the mid parent, based on the average of the values of two parents (Johnson and Hutchinson, 1993). Both positive and negative heterosis is useful in crop improvement, depending on the breeding objectives. In general, positive heterosis is desired for yield and negative heterosis for earliness. Heterosis is expressed in three ways, depending on the reference, which is used to compare the performance of a hybrid. The three ways are: mid parent, standard variety and better parent heterosis. From the practical point of view, standard heterosis is the most important because it is desired to develop hybrids, which are better than the existing high yielding varieties grown commercially by farmers. Application of heterosis in agricultural production is a multi-billion dollar enterprise. It represents the single greatest applied achievement of the discipline of genetics. Ironically, however, the physiological and genetic basis of heterosis are not entirely understood (Griffing, 1990). Heterosis was the foundation of the great success of hybrid rice in China, from 1976, during which hybrid seeds were first released to rice farmers, to 1991 during which the planted acreage of hybrid rice accounted for 55% of total planted area of paddy rice in china, the cumulative increased grain yield from planting hybrid rice amounted to more than 200 million tons. It has been demonstrated empirically that hybrid rice varieties have 15-20% yield advantage over the best conventional inbred varieties using similar cultivation conditions. Currently, the high yielding hybrids in rice involve crosses between the two cultivated subspecies of rice indica and japonica (Xiao et al., 1995).

In order to achieve improvement of crops, there must exist variability in the materials, so that selection can be made effective. Yield is a character, which is governed by several factors and is thus very complex. This study was therefore under taken with the objective of studying the variability among parental lines of hybrids, identifying the characters for selecting better hybrids, heterosis, vigour and earliness in rice.

Materials and Methods

Rice germplasms needed for the development of hybrid rice have been collected from IRRI (International Rice Research Institute), Philippines. BRRI dhan 28 was used as a standard check. Fourteen parents and their ten hybrids were used. The experiment was conducted following randomized complete block design consisting of three replications during August to December 2000 and January to May 2001. Each plot was 1x3 m2 having 12 rows. The row to row distance was 25 cm, plot to plot was 45 cm and replication to replication was 50 cm. There was a 50 cm wide footpath around the field.

Observations were recorded for different characters, such as plant height, flag leaf length, spikelets length, flag leaf initiation day, first panicle initiation day, days to 100% flowering, days to maturity, grain yield/10 hills, spikelet fertility/10 panicles and no. of effective tillers/hills. The genotypic (G), phenotypic (P) and environmental (E) coefficients of variations (CV) were calculated according to Burton and Devane (1953). Broad sense heritability estimates and genetic gain were calculated by Hanson et al. (1956) and Johnson et al. (1955), respectively. The heterosis was calculated in terms of difference of F1 from mid parent (MP), standard variety (ST), better parents (BP) and was expressed as percentage increase or decrease over to MP, ST and BP. The level of heterosis was tested using students ‘t’ test.

Measurement of heterosis is quite simple. It is generally expressed as percent increase or decrease in the performance of a hybrid in comparison with the reference variety or a parent (Virmani et al., 1997).

Statistical analysis were performed with the help of Microsoft Excel software.

Results and Discussion

Two major hypotheses have been proposed to explain the genetic basis of heterosis: dominance hypothesis (Davenport, 1908) and over dominance hypothesis (East, 1936).

Table 1:Components of variation, coefficient of variability, broad sense heritability (Hb), genetic advance (GA) and expected genetic advance in percentage of mean for eight characters in rice
A = Cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) lineR = Restorer line
PH = Plant height (cm), FLID = Flag leaf initiation day, FPID = First panicle initiation day, D.100% F = Days to 100% flowering, DM = Days to maturity, GY/10H = Grain yield /10 hills (g), SPF = Spikelet fertility/10 panicles, NET = No. Of effective tillers/hills.
P = Phenotypic, G = Genotypic, E = Environmental, Hb = Heritability, GA = Genetic advance, GA% = Genetic advance as percentage,
PCV = Phenotypic coefficient of variability, GCV = Genotypic coefficient of variability, ECV = Environmental coefficient of variability.

Table 2:Mid parent heterosis (MPH), standard heterosis (STH) and better parent heterosis (BPH) is expressed in percent for ten characters in rice
1= IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, 2= IR62820AxIR68081-34-2-2R,
3= IR67684AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R, 4= IR68899AxIR63036-222-3-3-1-2R,
5= IR58025AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R, 6= IR68886AxIR58082-126-1-2R,
7= IR68897AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, 8= IR69626AxIR62036-222-3-3-2R,
9= IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R, 10= IR62829AxIR60819-34-2-1R
*,**= Significant at 5% and 1% level of probability, respectively,FLL= Flag leaf length (cm),SPL= Spikelet length (cm)

Dominance hypothesis states that heterosis is due to the accumulation of favourable dominant genes in a hybrid derived from the two parents. Over dominance states that heterozygotes are more vigorous and productive than either homozygote parents. This has been proved in traits controlled by single or few genes. Heterozygotes perform a given function, over a range of environments, more efficiently than either homozygotes (East, 1936). Studies on genetic basis of heterosis for polygenic traits in various crops have shown that heterosis is the result of partial to complete dominance, over dominance and epistasis and may be a combination of all these (Comstock and Robinson, 1952). Analysis of variance indicated that the studied parental lines differed significantly for the studied characters (the ANOVA tables are not presented here). The components of variation along with coefficient of variability and genetic parameters of the studied characters are presented (Table 1). The narrow difference between the phenotypic and genotypic components of variation for most of the characters revealed that the major portions of the phenotypic variance were genetic in nature. This finding is in agreement with Singh et al. (1985). Similar results were also reported by Rahman et al. (1988), Alam et al. (1998) and Alam et al. (1989). Grain yield/10 hills showed the highest phenotypic, genotypic and environmental variability followed by no. of effective tillers/hill, spikelet fertility/10 panicles and plant height.

High broad sense heritability (Hb) along with high genetic advance (GA) is usually more helpful in predicting the resultant effect for selection of the best individuals than heritability alone (Johnson et al., 1955). In present study, high heritability for plant height, flag leaf initiation day, first panicle initiation day, days to 100% flowering, days to maturity, grain yield/10 hills and spikelet fertility was associated with high GA, indicating the presence of additive gene effects in controlling these characters. Therefore, considerable scope of improvement of rice exists by selecting for these characters. Similar findings were also reported by Singh et al. (1985), Rahman et al. (1988), Alam et al. (1998) and Alam et al. (1989). Low heritability estimates were obtained in trait no. of effective tillers/hill and days to 100% flowering for restorer (R) line.

Heterosis of F1 hybrids over their respective mid parent, standard variety and better parents are presented in Table 2. For each character, the percentage values of the ten hybrids have been compared with mid parent, standard variety and high parent, the relative superiorities being termed as mid parent heterosis, standard heterosis and better parent heterosis.

The crosses IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R and IR58025AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R, have shown highly significant positive heterosis in all levels for flag leaf length, where as, the cross IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R has shown highly positive better parent heterosis for the same character. This indicated that these crosses could be the good materials for developing high yielding hybrids. In rice, flag leaf length had great contribution for high grain yield production. The crosses IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, IR67684AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R, IR68899AxIR63036-222-3-3-1-2R, IR58025AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R and IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R showed similar performance like flag leaf length in case of spikelet length. Julfiquar and Tepora (1994) reported positive heterosis for flag leaf length and panicle length in rice. Regarding flag leaf initiation day, first panicle initiation day, days to 100% flowering and days to maturity characters negative heterosis were observed in most of the crosses. Among the ten crosses, highly negative heterosis was observed in three crosses (IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, IR58025AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R, IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R) for both days to 100% flowering and days to maturity, which indicated the possibility of developing early maturing hybrid lines. Negative heterosis for earliness was also reported by Khaleque et al. (1977) in rice, and Hanna and Hernandez (1979) and Popova et al. (1980) in tomato. Heterosis rice hybrids were observed to possess varying growth duration ranging from 105 to 136 days (Virmani, 1987). In case of grain yield/10 hills most of the crosses showed highly significant positive values for three levels of heterosis. For mid parent, standard variety and better parent the heterosis ranged from -42.36 to 96.66%, -80.32 to 20% and -86.41 to 71.42%, respectively. Three crosses IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, IR58025AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R and IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R were identified as the most expected combination for developing high yield hybrid rice varieties among the ten crosses. However, the highest heterosis for grain yield/10 hills value was obtained from the cross IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R (96.66%) for mid parent heterosis. High percentage (91.8 to 150.4) of heterosis for yield per plant was also reported by Zhang et al. (1994) and Alzona and Arraudeau (1995). Those cross combinations have shown positive and significant values for all the three levels of heterosis (mid parent heterosis, standard heterosis and better parent heterosis), whose are expected to be the high yielding hybrid varieties. In radish, similar results were also reported by Hawlader (1995), Ling et al. (1986), Singh et al. (1986) and Singh and Singh (1984). Positive and significant heterosis were obtained for these crosses in case of spikelet fertility and no. of effective tillers/hill, which are expected for high grain yield. Exploitation of heterosis for increasing grain yield in rice is reported by Virmani et al. (1991).

In conclusion for selecting the desirable parents and hybrids emphasis should be given on the characters such as plant height, flag leaf initiation day, first panicle initiation day, days to 100% flowering, days to maturity, grain yield/10 hills and spikelet fertility. Because, these characters have shown high heritability with high genetic advance. For selecting the F1 hybrids, the crosses IR62829AxIR62036-222-3-3-1-2R, IR58025AxIR61614-38-19-3-2R and IR68888AxIR56381-139-2-2R were found promising for developing good hybrid rice varieties, as they have shown vigour for yield contributing characters including the earliness for grain maturity. The F1 hybrids in rice are already being exploited in many countries of the world.

Acknowledgments

Authors are very much thankful to Dr. S. S. Virmani of IRRI for providing the seeds of CMS and Restorer lines and Ministry of Science and Information & Communication Technology, People’s Republic of Bangladesh for financial supports.

REFERENCES

  • Alam, M.F., A.K.M.A.R. Siddiqui, K.M. Kabir and A. Quasem, 1998. Studies on the variability and genetic parameters in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Bangladash J. Plant Breed. Genet., 1: 72-77.


  • Alam, M.F., M.M. Rahman and K.M. Kabir, 1989. Variability and characters association in turmaric (Curcuma longa L.). Bangladash J. Plant Breed. Genet., 2: 37-40.


  • Alzona, A.V. and M.A. Arraudeau, 1995. Heterosis in yield components of upland rice. Philippine J. Crop Sci., 17: 13-13.


  • Burton, W.G. and E.H. Devane, 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron. J., 45: 478-481.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Davenport, C.B., 1908. Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Sci., 28: 454-455.


  • East, E.M., 1936. Heterosis. Genetics, 21: 375-397.


  • Griffing, B., 1990. Use of a controlled-nutrient experiment to test heterosis hypotheses. Genet, 126: 753-767.


  • Hanna, H.Y. and T.P. Hernandez, 1979. Heterosis and inheritance of fruit shape in the tomato. Hortic. Sci., 14: 120-120.


  • Hanson, C.H., H.F. Robinson and R.E. Comstock, 1956. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean Lespedeza. Agron. J., 48: 268-272.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Johnson, H.W., H.F. Robinson and R.E. Comstock, 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron. J., 47: 314-318.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Johnson, T.E. and E.W. Hutchinson, 1993. Absence of strong heterosis for life span and other life history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 134: 465-474.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Julfiquar, A.W. and N.M. Tepora, 1994. Heterosis in some quantitative characters in F1 hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). CLSU-Sci. J., 12: 30-36.


  • Khaleque, M.A., O.I. Joarder and A.M. Eunus, 1977. Heterosis and combination ability in a diallel cross of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Bangladash J. Agric. Sci., 4: 137-145.


  • Ling, X.L., Y.Li and M.J. Wang, 1986. Study on heterosis and combining ability in radish. Scientia Agric. Sinica, 2: 54-60.


  • Popova, D., M. Konstantinova and N. Petrova, 1980. Some manifestations of heterosis in the F1 of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Plant Breed. Abst., 50: 38-38.


  • Rahman, M.M., M.F. Alam, K.M. Kabir and M.A. Quasem, 1988. Genetic parameters and character association in hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus L. Seet.). Bangladash J. Plant Breed. Genet., 1: 123-128.


  • Singh, A.K., N.C. Gautam and K. Singh, 1985. Genetic variability and correlation studies in seem (Lablab purpureus). Indian J. Hortic., 42: 252-257.


  • Singh, B., V.P. Gupta and P.K. Gupta, 1986. Heterosis studies in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Indian J. Hortic., 43: 242-247.


  • Singh, J. and B. Singh, 1984. Heterosis and combining ability studies in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). J. Res., 21: 174-179.


  • Xiao, J., J. Li, L. Yuan and S.D. Tanksley, 1995. Dominance is the major genetics basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular makers. Genetics, 140: 745-754.


  • Zhang, Q., Y.J. Gao, S.H. Yang, R.A. Ragab, M.A.S. Maroof and Z.B. Li, 1994. A diallel analysis of heterosis in elite hybrid rice based on RFLPs and micro satellites. Theor. Applied Genet., 89: 185-192.
    Direct Link    


  • Comstock, R.E. and H.F. Robinson, 1952. Estimation of Average Dominance of Genes. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp: 494-516


  • Hawlader, M.S.H., 1995. Utilization of self-incompatibility and male-sterility in hybrid radish production. Ph.D. Thesis, Department Genetics and Plant Breeding Institute Postgraduate Studies Agriculture, Salna, Gazipur, Bangladesh, pp: 13-19.


  • Virmani, S.S., 1987. Hybrid Rice Breeding. In: Hybrid Seed Production of Selected Cereals and Vegetable Crops, Flestritzer, W.P. and A.F. Kelly (Eds.). FAO Plant Production and Protection, Rome, Itay, pp: 35-53


  • Virmani, S.S., J.B. Young, H.P. Moon, I. Kumar and J.C. Finn, 1991. Increasing Rice Yields Through Exploitation of Heterosis. IRRI., Los Banos, Laguna, pp: 12


  • Virmani, S.S., B.C. Viraktamath, C.L. Casal, R.S. Toledo, M.T. Lopez and J.O. Manalo, 1997. Hybrid Rice Breeding Manual. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, ISBN: 9789712201035, Pages: 151
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved