HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2000 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 246-249
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2000.246.249
Assessment of Groundwater Quality in A Selected Area of Bangladesh
S. M. Shahidullah, M. A. Hakim, M. S. Alam and A.T. M. Shamsuddoha

Abstract: A study was conducted to evaluate the groundwater quality at Phulpur thane of Mymensingh district in Bangladesh. Water samples from 14 deep tubewells were analyzed for pH, EC, TDS, Na+, K+, Ca++, Mg++, Fe, P, B, NO3-N, SO4–, Cl–, CO3– and HCO3–. In addition SAR, SSP and RSC were calculated following standard equations. The range of EC was 180-380 μScm–1 and SAR 0.22-0.80 and these two parameters indicated that three samples were in 'low salinity-low alkali' and 11 were in 'medium salinity-low alkali' hazard class. There was no chloride toxicity in the area. The presence of SO4–, NO3– and P were negligible. As regards boron and SSP, all waters were of 'good' to 'excellent' class. In respect of TDS all were 'fresh water'. On the basis of RSC values all samples were of 'suitable' class. As a whole, groundwater of the area can safely be used for long-term irrigation. But some of those may not be suitable for drinking and industrial uses in consideration of Fe concentration, TDS and pH values. Among the quality determining factors SSP and SAR were highly correlated where correlation coefficient was 0.97.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
S. M. Shahidullah, M. A. Hakim, M. S. Alam and A.T. M. Shamsuddoha, 2000. Assessment of Groundwater Quality in A Selected Area of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3: 246-249.

Keywords: irrigation and Groundwater

Introduction

Bangladesh is a land of rivers. Annual rainfall of the country is over 200 cm but its distribution is uneven. About 85 percent of the total rainfall occur during April-October. In winter rain water is unusual and the rivers also dry. So, the groundwater has become the prime source of irrigation in dry period. About 70 percent irrigation water and 90 percent of total potable water in Bangladesh is supplied from groundwater source (Mridha et al., 1996). The water quality is important for long-term irrigation system because it influences the soil properties. The toxicity or suitability of groundwater is determined by varying amounts and different species of ions. The usual toxic elements in irrigation water are chlorine, boron and sodium. These ions are toxic to sensitive crops at low concentrations (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). Irrigation water quality is judged by some determining factors like sodium adsorption ratio (SARI, soluble sodium percentage (SSP), residual sodium carbonate (RSC) and electrical conductance (EC) (Richards, 1968). Intensive irrigated agriculture with HYV crops under high inputs has already started showing problems in different regions of Bangladesh. Mridha et al. (1996) reported the quality of groundwater for irrigation use in Natore district. This study was conducted on regional basis. People of Phulpur thane in Mymensingh district are of the pioneer users of deep tubewells. Most of the arable land is usually irrigated by groundwater to grow crops mainly HYV rice during winter season at the area. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to investigate the ionic toxicity (if there is any) and also to categorize the groundwater for irrigation, drinking and industrial uses on the basis of chemical composition.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted at Phulpur thana of Mymensingh district in Bangladesh during the month of January to February, 1993. Within the study area 14 groundwater samples were collected from 14 deep tubewells. The depth of wells were within 220 to 330 feet and were commissioned during 1970-1980. The water samples were collected after 30 minutes of pumping to avoid stagnant and contaminated water. One litre white plastic containers were rinsed out 3-4 times with sampling water. Then the containers were filled up to the mouth and were immediately sealed to avoid exposure to air (Clesceri et al., 1981). The containers were labeled far proper identification and those were brought to the laboratory of Agricultural Chemistry in Bangladesh' Agricultural University, Mymensingh, for analyses.

The groundwater samples were analyzed for pH, EC, total dissolved solids (TDS), sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), calcium (Ca++), magnesium (Mg++), soluble iron (Fe), phosphorus (P), boron (B), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), sulphate (S04–), chloride (Cl–), carbonate (CO3–) and bicarbonate (HCO3–). The pH and electrical conductance were determined electrometrically (Clesceri et al., 1981). TDS was estimated after Chopra and Kanwar (1980). Calcium and magnesium were determined by complexometric titration (Page et al., 1982), whereas, potassium and sodium were estimated by flame emission spectrophotometer (Ghosh et al., 1983). Sulphate was determined turbidimetrically (Wolf, 1982). Carbonate and bicarbonate were determined by titration method (Ghosh et al., 1983). Chloride was estimated by argentometric titration (Clesceri et al., 1981). Phosphorus, nitrate and boron were determined calorimetrically. Iron was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Clesceri et al., 1981). Waters under test were classified as per results obtained from chemical analyses. SAR, SSP and RSC were calculated on the basis of few standard equations as outlined by Richards (1968), Todd (1980) and Wolf (1982). These equations are as follows:

Correlation analyses between the different combination of quality indicators, such as SAR versus SSP, SSP versus RSC etc. were done to establish relationship between them.

Results and Discussion

The chemical compositions of the collected groundwater samples are presented in Table 1. Major cations and anions are expressed in milliequivalent per litre (meq L–1), the nitrate-nitrogen content, phosphorus, boron and iron concentrations are in milligram per litre (mg L–1). The unit used for measuring EC is micro-siemens percentimeter (μScm–1). The results have mainly been discussed in the light of irrigation use, in addition to drinking and industrial usage. The high pH value of samples (8.1-8.3) indicated the alkalinity of water, possibly due to the presence of appreciable amounts of sodium, calcium, magnesium, carbonate and bicarbonate ions (Rao et al., 1982). These water could safely be used for irrigation but might not be suitable for brewing, laundering and tanning where the recommended pH are 6.5-7.0, 6.0-6.8 and 6.0-6.9, respectively (Anonymous, 1971). The estimated amounts of TDS ranged from 115 to 247 mg L–1. Waters containing TDS less than 1000 mg L–1 could be considered to be 'fresh water' for irrigation uses and would not affect the osmotic pressure of soil solution. But as per the detected values none of these waters were not found suitable for confectionery, rayon and pulp production where recommended limit of TDS is 50-100 mg L–1 (Todd, 1980). The range of electrical conductivity was 180-380 μS cm–1. This is an agreement with the findings of Ahmed et al. (1993) who reported EC values ranging 150-480 μS cm–1 for Muktagacha thana in Mymensingh district. According to Wilcox (1955) the water samples were classified into 'excellent' to 'good'. Out of 14 groundwater samples, three were in 'excellent' and the rest 11 were in 'good' class. The SAR values were between 0.22 and 0.80, all of which are under 'excellent' class (Richards, 1968). The similar SAR value was reported by Ahmed et al. (1993) for Muktagacha thane. EC and SAR based combined classification from the U.S. Salinity Laboratory (Richards, 1968) showed that three samples were categorized into low salinity-low alkali hazard' or 'C1-S1' class. The rest 11 samples fell under 'C2-S1' class indicating medium salinity-low alkali hazard (Table 2). All these waters could be safely used for irrigation purposes. The SSP values were found from 6.99 to 23.31. Khan et al. (1989) found 14.50-37.55 SSP for the North-West region of Bangladesh. Based on the classification after Wilcox (1955) for SSP, 12 groundwater samples fell under 'excellent' class and only two under 'good' class.

The concentrations of Ca++, Mg++, Na+ and K+ in water samples varied in the ranges of 1,40-2.65, 0.05-1.08, 0.23-1.00 and 0.04- 0.10 meq L–1, respectively (Table 1). Recommended maximum concentrations of Ca++, Mg+ Na+ and K+ for long-term irrigation use on all soils are 20, 5, 40 and 2 meq L–1, respectively (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). Therefore, all the waters in the study area can be used, for long-term irrigation. The concentration of soluble iron was found to vary within a wide range of 0.40 to 1.90 mg L–1 with and average of 0.80 mg L–1 and the computed CV was 47 percent. These waters would not be problematic for irrigation but most of them would be unsuitable for drinking, baking, brewing, confectionery, dairy, carbonated beverages, food processing laundering, paper and pulp industries, where the recommended maximum limit is 0.3 mg L–1 (Todd, 1980).

The upper limit of NO3-N was 0.49, phosphorus 0.10 and boron 0.43 mg L–1 in the waters. These values are comparatively low and 1 might not be problematic for irrigation and industrial uses. Out of the samples, nine were 'excellent' and five 'good' with respect to boron based classification of Wilcox (1955). The CI– content of groundwater samples varied from 0.14 to 0.42 meq L–1. Most tree, crops under sprinkler irrigation are sensitive to chloride having values more than 4 meq L–1 (Mridha et al., 1996). This indicate that there was no chloride toxicity problem in the area. The S04– concentration (0.03-0.15 meq L–1) in the samples were negligible Carbonate and bicarbonate concentrations in all the samples were, relatively high and were found in the ranges of 0.16-0.54 and 1.784-3.14 meq L–1, respectively. Irrigation water containing CO3– higher than 0.1 meq L–1 and bicarbonate more than 10 meq L–1 are not generally recommended (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). The highest value of RSC was 0.36 meq L–1. Based on RSC criteria after Eaton, (1950) all groundwater samples were found in 'suitable' class. 0ut of 14 samples, three showed negative values which indicated the dissolved Ca++ and Mg++ contents were higher than CO3– and HCO3– contents for these three samples.

While checking the correctness of chemical analyses of theee waters, the differences between sum total of cations and anion were within the acceptable limit (3.0-5.0%) showed in Table 3. According to Clesceri et al. (1981) this difference should be ≤5 percent.

Table 1: Chemical compositions of deep tubewell waters


Table 2: Qualit classification of deep tubewell waters based on different criteria for irrigation
Note: FW = Fresh water, Exi. = Excellent, Suit. = Suitable

Table 3: Checking the correctness of analyses for irrigation waters

Table 4: Correlation coefficient (r) for relationship between different combination of water quality determining factors

Fig. 1:Relationship between soluble sodium percentage (SSP) and sodium adsor-ption ratio (SAR)

Table 4 showed the interrelationship between pH, EC, SAR, SSP, RSC and boron in terms of correlation coefficient. The relationship between any two variables was assumed to be good with correlation coefficient higher than 0.80. From this analysis, it can be observed that only SSP was found to be dependent on SAR. All other quality determining indicators produced correlation coefficient less than 0.80. The correlation coefficient between SAR and SSP was 0.97. A linear relationship between SAR and SSP was found with r2= 0.95 (Fig. 1).

There was neither salinity nor toxicity problem of irrigation water. In respect of all evaluating criteria groundwater of the area can safely be used for long-term irrigation. But some of those may not be suitable for drinking and industrial uses in consideration of Fe concentration. TDS and pH values. Among the quality determining factors, a linear relationship between SSP and SAR was observed.

REFERENCES

  • Ahmed, M., M.S.U. Talukder and M.A. Mojid, 1993. Quality of groundwater for irrigation in Muktagacha area. J. Inst. Eng. Bangladesh, 21: 91-98.


  • Anonymous, 1971. Water Quality and Treatment. McGraw-Hill, New York, Pages: 654


  • Ayers, R.S. and D.W. Westcot, 1985. Water Quality for Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome


  • Chopra, S.L. and J.S. Kanwar, 1980. Analytical Agricultun Chemistry. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, New Delhi, pp: 306-307


  • Clesceri, L.S., A.E. Greenberg and R.R. Trussell, 1981. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wasp Water. 17th Edn., American Public Health Association, Washington DC., pp: 1-175


  • Eaton, F.M., 1950. Significance of carbonates in irrigation waters. Soil Sci., 69: 123-134.
    Direct Link    


  • Khan, L.R., S.C. Dutta and M.R. Biswas, 1989. Quality of groundwater for irrigation in the North-Western region of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res., 14: 45-54.


  • Mridha, M.A.K., M.H. Rashid and K.H. Talukder, 1996. Quality of groundwater for irrigation in Natore district. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res., 21: 15-30.


  • Rao, D.K., S. Panchaksharjah, B.N. Pati, A. Narayana and D.L.S. Raiker, 1982. Chemical composition of irrigation waters from selected parts of Bijapur district, Karnataka, Mysore. J. Agric. Sci., 16: 426-432.


  • Richards, L.A., 1968. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA and IBH Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp: 98-99


  • Todd, D.K., 1980. Groundwater Hydrology. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., pp: 267-315


  • Wilcox, L.V., 1955. Classification and Uses of Irrigation Water. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC., USA


  • Wolf, B., 1982. A comprehensive system of leaf analyses and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 13: 1035-1059.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ghosh, A.B., J.C. Bajaj, R. Hasan and D. Singh, 1983. Soil and Water Testing Methods: A Laboratory Manual, Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry. IARA., New Delhi, India, pp: 1-45


  • Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney, 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edn., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin USA., pp: 252-255

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved