HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2000 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 104-109
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2000.104.109
Movement, Persistence and Uptake by Plants of 14C-labelled Cyfluthrin
A. Lodhi, N.N. Malik and F. Azam

Abstract: A field lysimeter experiment was conducted to study the uptake by plants, dissipation and movement in soil of 14C-cyfluthrin (active ingredient of Baythroid, an insecticide produced by Bayer, Germany). Cotton and wheat plants were grown in succession to study the uptake of 14C. The chemical was worked well into the soil supporting the growth of a healthy cotton plant. The plant harvested at maturity contained 0.376 percent of the applied 14C; a major portion (ca 65 percent of the total) of the 14C being located in the stem portion. Wheat plants grown after cotton contained 0.11 percent of the initially applied 14C.
Dissipation of 14C from the soil-plant system was fairly rapid and after 9 weeks (during growth of cotton), ca 50 percent of the applied 14C was unaccounted. Subsequent losses were slower and during the remaining study period of 29 weeks, a further decrease of only 10 percent of the applied 14C occurred. Wheat growth and organic amendment caused a decrease in the loss of 14C from the soil-plant system. At all sampling intervals, a greater proportion of 14C was restricted to the top 0-10 cm layer and the amount consistently decreased with depth. In general, >80 percent of the 14C determined in soil at different sampling intervals was present in forms non-extractable with methanol.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
A. Lodhi, N.N. Malik and F. Azam, 2000. Movement, Persistence and Uptake by Plants of 14C-labelled Cyfluthrin. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3: 104-109.

Keywords: soil, wheat, Baythroid, 14C, cotton, cyfluthrin, insecticides and nitrapyrin

Introduction

In Pakistan, synthetic pyrethroids are used extensively against insect pests of cotton, Baythroid (having cyfluthrin as an active ingredient) being an example of such insecticides. Of the foliarly applied insecticides, a substantial portion may be washed to the soil (McDowell et al., 1987; Willis et al., 1986). According to Maqueda et al. (1989) a large proportion of the chemical goes directly to the soil during foliar applications. In soil, a part of the pesticide residues is amenable to uptake by the plants. However, the amount taken up is generally low because of rapid binding onto the soil colloidal complex and restricted mobility (Lee, 1985; Maitlen and Halfhill, 1985; Mikami et al., 1985; Amos and Leahey, 1986). Low permeability of cell membranes to pesticide residues may be another factor inhibiting the uptake by plants. However, the uptake of pesticide residues by plants is facilitated by complexation with humic compounds such as fulvic acid (Schnitzer and Khan, 1978).

A significant proportion of the chemical is adsorbed onto the soil colloidal complex and thus physically protected from further transformations and movement in the soil-plant system. Degradation of pesticides is generally slow in heavy-textured soils because of their adsorption onto the clay particles (Stevenson, 1976). Importance of clays in stabilizing organic compounds has been emphasized by different workers (Cheng et al., 1978; Sorenson, 1975). Similarly, soils rich in organic matter also give protection to these chemicals through adsorption and/or transformation into complex humic substances (Arienzo et al., 1994; Azam et al., 1988; Khan and Hamilton, 1980; Sundaram, 1996,1997). The fraction of the pesticide in excess of the soil's protecting ability is susceptible to movement and microbial transformations. Root growth and root-driven microbial activity may also have significant effect on the persistence, movement and transformations of pesticides in soil. However, because of soil's protective role, downward movement of pesticides is generally low (Lee, 1985).

Our objectives were to study the uptake, dissipation from and movement in soil and the distribution in bound and extractable forms of cyfluthrin-14C applied to soil under field conditions.

Materials and Methods

The experiment conducted on an undisturbed soil column in a cotton field. A squarish soil core measuring 0.6×0.6 m and bearing a 9-week old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.; var. NIAB-78) plant was dug by cutting the soil from around. A stainless steel rectangular cylinder (0.6×0.6×1.0 m) was then pushed onto the core using a polypropylene hammer to avoid excessive disturbance/compaction of the contained soil column. A part of the cylinder (4 in) was kept out of the soil to isolate the lysimeter soil from the rest of the field. This was necessary to prevent mixing of outside soil/water with the lysimeter soil during the experiment. The soil removed from around the newly established core was put back and excessive water applied to get it settled. Within a week, the lysimeter was well established.

Surface 10 cm of the lysimeter soil was then removed and treated with 10.8 mg 14C-labelled cyfluthrin (34130 KBq 14C). Structural formula and position of 14C labelling is shown in Fig. 1. The rate of cyfluthrin application was equivalent to 300 g ha–1 or ca 0.2 μg g–1 soil (considering 52 kg soil in the top 10 cm of the lysimeter). In order to achieve uniform mixing, solution of cyfluthrin in 3 ml methanol was mixed well with enough volume of water (9 litres) to wet the soil to 12 percent WHC. The solution thus prepared was sprayed onto the soil which was spread in a thin layer. The sprayed soil was thoroughly mixed to ensure good distribution of cyfluthrin and put back into the lysimeter followed by compaction and irrigation.

Fig. 1:Structural formula of cyfluthrin (thick line shows the position of 14C labelling)

During the growing period, triplicate soil cores (2 cm diameter) to a depth of 50 cm were obtained after 1, 3, 6, 9 weeks using a stainless steal auger. The soil cores obtained at different intervals were divided into layers measuring 0-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40 and 40-50 cm. Required quantities of the soil representative of each depth were freeze-dried and stored for further analysis. Rest of the soil was put back into the holes at respective depth. Cotton plant was harvested at physiological maturity 9 weeks after the application of cyfluthrin. During the growth period (May-November), a total 420 mm rain was received, while 5 irrigations of 74 mm each were given when required. The humidity varied from 40-80 percent; maximum being in the months of July and August and minimum in November. The harvested plant material was partitioned into leaves, stem, seed and root portions and oven-dried at 70°C.

After harvesting cotton, the lysimeter was divided into two by inserting a stainless steel plate in the middle. One half of the lysimeter was sown to wheat (Triticum aestivum L., var. Lu-26) and the other half was left fallow. Eight wheat plaits were raised, irrigated as required (5 irigations of 75 mm each; rainfall amounted to 70 mm during the period December to April; humidity ranged between 30-50 percent) and removed from the soil at maturity. The harvested plants were divided into root, straw and grain portions. All plant components were dried and finely powdered for further analysis. Soil core samples obtained after harvesting wheat as described above were freeze dried and stored for further analyses.

At wheat harvest, both planted and unplanted halves of the lysimeter were further sub-divided into two. One portion from both planted and unplanted halves was amended with 0.5 percent wheat straw, while the other portion was left unamended. For organic amendment, top 10 cm soil of the lysimeter portion to be amended was taken out and the powdered plant material worked well into it. The amended soil was put back into the respective portions. Same procedure was adopted for unamended portion. The soil in the lysimeter was kept moist and core samples taken after 9 weeks (the total time elapsed between initial application of cyfluthrin and final sampling would be 38 weeks). The soil samples were freeze dried and stored for further analysis.

For fractionation of 14C present in soil, aliquots (100 g) of soil samples were shaken for 1 h with 200 ml of methanol followed by centrifugation (5000 rpm, 4°C, 1 h). The supernatant (extractable fraction) was filtered and preserved for scintillation counting. The residue (containing bound residues) was dried, sieved and a portion extracted with 0.1 M NaOH + 0.1 M Na2P4O7, (1:5, soil:solution ratio, 12 h shaking followed by centrifugation for 1 h at 5000 rpm and 4°C). The residue containing humin fraction was dried, ground, sieved and combusted for the determination of 14C. Supernatant containing humic acid and fulvic acid fractions was filtered and a portion acidified with conc. H2SO4 to get the former precipitated. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 4°C, 30 min), dissolved in 0.5 M NaOH and preserved for scintillation counting of 14C. The supernatant containing fulvic acid was counted directly. Aliquots (0.5-1 mI) of the liquid samples were counted on a Packard Tricarb Scintillation Counter (Model 4530) using instagel (Packard, USA) scintillation cocktail.

Triplicate samples of soil and plant material were combusted in a Packard Oxidizer 306 (Hewlet Packard, USA). Weighed quantities of soil were mixed with powdered cellulose in a cellulosic combustion cup (Packard, USA) and after adding 1-2 drops of combust-aid, the sample was subjected to combustion. The CO2 trapped in carbosorb was received in a scintillation vial (28 ml) along with the permafluor scintillation cocktail (Packard, USA), The vials were stopperred and subjected to 14C counting as described above.

Results

Cotton plant contained 0.376 percent of the applied cyfluthrin-14C (Table 1). A major portion (0.34 percent) of the total plant 14C, was determined in the root and stalk portions and only a small proportion (0.035 percent) was translocated to the seed portion. Root portion, however, was the most heavily labelled with a specific activity (μCi 14C g–1 carbon) of 0.071, while the stem, leaves and seeds showed specific activity of 0.0261, 0.0065 and 0.0093, respectively.

Of the residual 14C (i.e., after removing cotton plant), 0.22 percent was found in wheat plants at maturity that was equivalent to only 0.011 percent of the originally applied 14C. Thus the availability to plants of cyfluthrin-14C decreased substantially with time i.e., 0.376 percent of the applied in cotton Vs 0.011 percent in wheat. A greater proportion of the total plant 14C (82%) in wheat was found in the vegetative parts and only ca 18 percent was translocated to the grain. Root portion was the most heavily labelled, with grain portion showing the lowest specific activity as also observed in cotton. In contrast to cotton, however, 14C was better distributed in the three plant components of wheat.

Table 1:Uptake of 14C by cotton and wheat and its distribution in different plant components
*Figures in a column (for either plant type) followed by a similar letter are not significantly different at 5% level of probability according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test

During 9 weeks of cotton growth, 49.6 percent of the applied 14C was lost from the soil plant system, the values representing a difference of applied and that recovered in soil upto a depth of 50 cm (Table 2). Considering an uptake of 0.38 percent by cotton plant, the remaining 49.2 percent was unaccounted. Of the total losses, over 80 percent occurred during the first 3 weeks after application. Recovery of applied 14C in both methanol-extractable and non-extractable (bound) forms decreased with the passage of time, essentially due to its loss from the soil plant system. A major portion (generally 80%) of the 14C found in soil was determined in bound forms, while upto 20 percent was still in extractable forms.

Fig. 2:Percent distribution of 14C in different soil layers during the growth of cotton

Figure 2 depicts percent distribution of applied 14C in different soil layers during nine weeks after application. A major portion of the total 14C was restricted to the top 0-10 cm which was understandable due to high organic matter content of the soil and a rapid adsorption of cyfluthrin on soil colloidal complex. One week after application, 84 percent of the 14C was determined in the top 0-10 cm and the rest in the remaining 10-50 cm soil layer. With the passage of time, the proportion of 14C in 0-10 cm soil layer decreased while that in 10-20 cm increased substantially.

Table 2:
Distribution (% of applied) of cyfluthrin-14C in extractable and bound forms and its loss from the soil - plant system during the growth of cotton
*Figures in a column (for either plant type) followed by a similar letter are not significantly different at 5% level of probability according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test

Relatively higher percentages of 14C were also determined in the deeper soil layers during extended residence time of cyfluthrin in soil. As the major proportion of 14C was restricted to the top 0-10 cm so was the case with extractable 14C; generally above 50 percent of the extractable 14C being determined in this soil layer. In the deeper soil layers less than 1 percent of the applied 14C was found in extractable forms. At all sampling intervals, the proportion of 14C in extractable forms generally increased while that in non-extractable forms it decreased with the depth of sampling, minimum being in 0-10 cm layer (data not tabulated). After 1 week, upto 49 percent of the soil 14C was in extractable forms at a depth of 40-50 cm as compared to 15 percent in the 0-10 cm layer.

Table 3:
Per cent Distribution of applied cyfluthrin-14C in extractable and bound forms and its loss from the soil-plant system as affected by wheat growth and organic amendment
*Figures in a column (for either plant type) followed by a similar letter are not significantly different at 5% level of probability according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test

Wheat growth caused somewhat higher losses of 14C from the soil-plant system i.e., 54.6 percent 14C was lost from planted vs 57.1 percent from unplanted portion of the lysimeter (Table 3). Losses of 14C were reduced substantially during the subsequent period of 9 weeks when both plant end unplanted portions were left with or without organic matter amendment. However, the differences in differently treated soil were not significant. A higher proportion (81-85 percent) of the soil 14C was found in non-extractable forms, while 15-19 percent was extractable with methanol in different treatments. Although small differences in the recovery of applied 14C in extractable and non-extractable forms were caused by wheat growth, percent distribution of the soil 14C was not affected. The differences due to organic amendment were not very clear and non-significant. The amount of total as well as extractable and bound 14C decreased with the depth of sampling as also observed for samples collected after cotton.

Fig. 3:Percent distribution of 14C in different soil layers as affected by plant growth and organic amendment

Data presented in Fig. 3 shows that a major proportion of the total 14C was restricted to the top 0-10 cm layer as was the case during growth of cotton (Fig. 2). In planted portion, relatively lower proportion of soil 14C was found in the 0-10 cm layer as compared to unplanted (fallow) portion, while it had more 14C in the 10-20 cm layer. This would suggest that plant growth may facilitate the movement of pesticide residues to greater soil depths. Organic amendment lead to a somewhat greater concentration of 14C in the top 0-10 cm layer in both planted and unplanted portions suggesting its protective role. Nevertheless, relatively higher concentrations of 14C were determined in deeper layers of amended as compared to the unamended soil.

Discussion

Results obtained in this study revealed a small uptake of 14C by cotton plants, the seed portion was the least labelled. These observations are in line with many other studies. For example, Mikami et al. (1985) found very little 14C in the shoot portion of bean plants grown to maturity in soils treated with 14C fenpropethrin at the rate of 1 ppm. Hascoet and Andre (1978) also found negligible amounts of Decamethrin in cotton seed. Lee (1985) sprayed 14C-labelled Fenvalerate on the soil surface and noted a meager uptake by plants. In the present study, 0.22 percent of the residual 14C after harvesting cotton was found in wheat plants at maturity that was equivalent to only 0.011 percent of the originally applied 14C. Thus the availability to plants of cyfluthrin-14C decreased substantially with time i.e., 0.376 percent of the applied in cotton vs 0.011 percent in wheat. Similar observations have been reported by Leahey and Carpenter (1980). Amos and Leahey (1986) detected very small quantities of 14C-tefluthrin residues in maize grains which were identified mainly as free and conjugated metabolites of tefluthrin itself.

In view of the very low net 14C content of plants in the present study, no effort was made to identify the 14C-labelled compounds. It can be argued, however, that a greater proportion of the 14C would be expected as cyfluthrin and one of the metabolites i.e., CONH2-cyfluthrin. This metabolite is produced by attack on the CN bond (Preiss et al., 1988). Some of our unpublished results suggest that even 5 weeks after spray application to cotton leaves, >60 percent of the extractable 14C was found as cyfluthrin, while 20 percent was determined as CONH2- cyfluthrin.

Losses of 14C were relatively higher from unplanted than planted (with wheat) soil but the difference was not significant (p=0.05). This difference could be attributed to the binding/transformation of the 14C-labelled material at the expense of rhizodeposition. Role of organic matter in protecting the xenobiotics from further degradation has already been emphasized. However, there was no significant effect of organic amendment on the loss of 14C whether the soil was previously sown to wheat or left fallow, although slightly more losses occurred from unamended soils. The absence of any effect of organic amendment on the loss of 14C could be due to relatively incalcitrant nature of the cyfluthrin residues after such a long period of presence in soil. In the incubation studies (Lodhi et al., 1996), losses of 14C as CO2 were relatively more from unamended soil and the difference was attributed to a higher stabilization and reduced degradability of the added cyfluthrin in amended soil.

A major portion of the total 14C applied to the lysimeter soils was restricted to the top 0-10 cm of the soil with higher organic matter content relative to the deeper soil layers and a rapid adsorption of cyfluthrin on soil colloidal complex. One week after application, >80 percent of the 14C was determined in the top 0-10 cm and the rest in the remaining 10-50 cm soil layer. Soil samples collected after cotton also showed higher concentration of 14C in the top 0-10 cm layer. Rapid binding and restricted movement of pesticides in soils rich in organic matter content has been reported (Arienzo et al., 1994; Mueller and Banks, 1991; Somasundaram et al., 1991; Sundaram, 1996, 1997). Smith et al. (1995) studied the effect of moisture, organic matter and redox potential on persistence of cyfluthrin and reported a protective role of organic matter. Lee (1985) also observed little downward movement of Fenvalerate insecticide. Degradation of organic chemicals depends upon their chemistry and to the physical protection resulting from adsorption of substrates to surfaces and from their location within soil aggregates at sites inaccessible to microbes (Paul and Van Veen, 1978; Van Veen et al., 1985). According to Van Veen et al. (1985) soils have characteristic capacities to protect or preserve microorganisms. Jenkinson (1977) and Sorenson (1975) have emphasized the importance of clays in stabilizing soil organic matter.

In soil, 14C in forms unextractable with methanol generally decreased with time and depth of sampling and accounted for >80 percent of the total soil 14C during the growth of cotton. Similar general trends in the distribution of 14C in extractable and bound forms were observed for soil samples collected after cotton albeit with some treatment (plant growth and organic amendment) effects which were not very consistent. This would suggest a rapid and persistent binding of the chemical in soil. Turco and Konopka (1990) found that as much as 95 percent of the applied ring-14C was non-extractable after 28 days. Gerstl and Helling (1985) observed that during 49 days, 54 percent of the ring 14C remained in soil of which 13 percent was extractable and 87 percent in bound forms. Similar observations were reported by Zhang et al. (1984) who studied the persistence, degradation and distribution of 14C-labelled Deltamethrin insecticide in organic soil under laboratory conditions.

Due to analytical limitations, identity of soil 14C could not be ascertained. However, a greater proportion of the methanol extractable 14C would be expected to occur as unaltered cyfluthrin and CONH2-cyfluthrin. Our unpublished work showed that even after 18 weeks of incubation under laboratory conditions, 67-79 percent of the methanol-extractable residual 14C was still present as cyfluthrin, while 17-27 percent was determined as CONH2-cyfluthrin. Using 14C-labelled pyrethroid, Lee (1985) demonstrated that a major portion (up to 50 percent) of the 14C recovered in soil after 12 months was in the form of unaltered parent compound. Azam et al. (1988) studied the fate of [carbonyl-14C]methabenzthiazuron in soil and observed more than 90 percent of the residual 14C as unaltered original compound. Khan et al. (1988) demonstrated a long-term persistence of parent compounds and different metabolites in an organic soil. They found 16 percent of the initially applied radioactivity in bound forms after 3 years and identified as original compound as well as metabolites.

Acknowledgments

14C-labelled cyfluthrin was provided by Bayer, Leverkusen through Prof. F. Fuhr, Institute of Radioagronomy, Research Center Julich, Germany. The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge this.

REFERENCES

  • Amos, R. and J.P. Leahey, 1986. Uptake and metabolism of tefluthrin by maize and sugar beet. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Pests and Diseases, November 17-20, 1986, England, pp: 821-828.


  • Arienzo, M., T. Crisanto, M.J. Sanchez-Martin and M. Sanchez-Camazano, 1994. Effect of soil characteristics on adsorption and mobility of (14C)diazinon. J. Agric. Food Chem., 42: 1803-1808.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Azam, F., F. Fuhr and W. Mittelstaedt, 1988. Fate of [carbonyl-14C]methabenzthiazuron in an arid region soil-effect of organic amendment, soil disturbance and fumigation. Plant Soil, 107: 149-158.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cheng, H.H., F. Fuehr, H.J. Jarczyk and W. Mittelstaedt, 1978. Degradation of methabenzthiazuron in the soil. J. Agric. Food Chem., 26: 595-599.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gerstl, Z. and C.S. Helling, 1985. Fate of bound methyl parathion residues in soils as affected by agronomic practices. Soil Biol. Biochem., 17: 667-673.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hascoet, M. and L. Andre, 1978. Detection of decamethrin residues present in treated plants and soils. Phytiatrie-Phytopharmacie, 27: 85-98.


  • Jenkinson, D.S., 1977. Studies on the decomposition of plant material in soil. V. The effects of plant cover and soil type on the loss of carbon from 14C labelled ryegrass decomposing under field conditions. J. Soil Sci., 28: 424-434.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Khan, S.U., R.M. Behki, R.I. Tapping and M.H. Akhtar, 1988. Deltamethrin residues in an organic soil under laboratory conditions and its degradation by a bacterial strain. J. Agric. Food Chem., 36: 636-638.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Khan, S.U. and H.A. Hamilton, 1980. Extractable and bound (nonextractable) residues of prometryn and its metabolites in an organic soil. J. Agric. Food Chem., 28: 126-132.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Leahey, J.P. and P.K. Carpenter, 1980. The uptake of metabolites of permethrin by plants grown in soil treated with [14C]permethrin. Pesticide Sci., 11: 279-289.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lee, P.W., 1985. Fate of fenvalerate (Pydrin insecticide) in the soil environment. J. Agric. Food Chem., 33: 993-998.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lodhi, A., S.H.M. Naqvi, F. Azam and F. Fuhr, 1996. Degradation of Clabelled cyfluthrin in soil and incorporation of C in to humus fractions as affected by wheat straw amendment and moisture conditions. Pak. J. Scient. Ind. Res., 39: 128-131.


  • Maitlen, J.C. and J.E. Halfhill, 1985. Residues of four pesticides in alfalfa seed and sprouted alfalfa seed following foliar applications. J. Agric. Food Chem., 33: 754-757.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Maqueda, C., E. Morillo and J.L.P. Rodriguez, 1989. Interaction in aqueous solution of certain pesticides with fulvic acids from a spodosol soil. Soil Sci., 148: 336-345.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • McDowell, L.L., G.H. Willis, L.M. Southwick and S. Smith Jr., 1987. Fenvalerate wash-off from cotton plants by rainfall. Pesticide Sci., 21: 83-92.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mikami, N., Y. Baba, T. Katagi and J. Miyamoto, 1985. Metabolism of the synthetic pyrethroid fenpropathrin in plants. J. Agric. Food Chem., 33: 980-987.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mueller, T.C. and P.A. Banks, 1991. Flurtamone adsorption and mobility in three Georgia soils. Weed Sci., 39: 275-279.


  • Paul, E.A. and J.A. van Veen, 1978. The use of tracers to determine the dynamic nature of organic matter. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Soil Science, June 19-27, 1978, Alberta, Canada, pp: 61-102.


  • Preiss, U., P.R. Wallnofer and G. Engelhardt, 1988. Partial purification and properties of an esterase from tomato cell suspension cultures hydrolysing the pyrethroid insecticide cyfluthrin. Pesticide Sci., 23: 13-24.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schnitzer, M. and S.U. Khan, 1978. Soil Organic Matter. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York


  • Smith, S., G.H. Willis and C.M. Cooper, 1995. Cyfluthrin persistence in soil as affected by moisture, organic matter and redox potential. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 55: 142-148.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Somasundaram, L., J.R. Coats, K.D. Racke and V.M. Shanbhag, 1991. Mobility of pesticides and their hydrolysis metabolites in soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 10: 185-194.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sorenson, L.H., 1975. The influence of clay on the rate of decay of amino acid metabolities synthesized in soil during decomposition of cellulose. Soil Biol. Biochem., 7: 171-177.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Stevenson, F.J., 1976. Organic Matter Reactions Involving Pesticides in Soil. In: Bound and Conjugated Pesticide Residues, Kaufman, D.D., G.G. Still, G. Paulson and S.K. Bandal (Eds.). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC., pp: 180-207


  • Sundaram, K.M.S., 1996. Leaching, mobility and persistence of tebufenozide in columns packed with forest litter and soil. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B: Pestic. Food Contamin. Agric. Wastes, 31: 1215-1239.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sundaram, K.M.S., 1997. Mobility and metabolic fate of mexacarbate in soil columns containing sandy and clay loam forest soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B: Pestic. Food Contamin. Agric. Wastes, 32: 147-175.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Turco, R.F. and A. Konopka, 1990. Biodegradation of carbofuran in enhanced and non-enhanced soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 22: 195-201.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Van Veen, J.A., J.N. Ladd and M. Amato, 1985. Turnover of carbon and nitrogen through the microbial biomass in a sandy loam and a clay soil incubated with [14C(U)] glucose and [N] (NH4)2SO4 under different moisture regimes. Soil Biol. Biochem., 17: 747-756.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Willis, G.H., L.L. McDowell, S. Smith and L.M. Southwick, 1986. Permethrin washoff from cotton plants by simulated rainfall. J. Environ. Qual., 15: 116-120.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhang, L., S.U. Khan, M.H. Akhtar and K.C. Ivarson, 1984. Persistence, degradation and distribution of deltamethrin in an organic soil under laboratory conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem., 32: 1207-1211.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved