HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 1999 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 606-608
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.1999.606.608
Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes to NaCI Salinity Induced at Various Growth Stages of Crop
Aqueela Sharif, Ejaz Rasul , Abid Nisar and M.Sadiq

Abstract: Two maize inbreds (B-73 and MO-17) and their hybrid (YHS-202) were subjected to NaCI salinity induced at four growth stages in a pot experiment during 1998. It comprised of three salinity treatments viz. 10, 15 and 20 dSm–1 alongwith control having normal field soil (EC 2.5 dSm–1). A progressive decrease occurred in all parameters with increasing salinity levels. Grain yield was reduced by 22 percent at 20 dSm–1 as compared with control. Salinity affected all the genotypes but MO-17 proved comparatively better than other two. Deterioration was caused by salinity at all growth stages but it was more pronounced at earlier than later growth stages.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Aqueela Sharif, Ejaz Rasul , Abid Nisar and M.Sadiq , 1999. Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes to NaCI Salinity Induced at Various Growth Stages of Crop. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2: 606-608.

Keywords: growth and yield, growth stages, nacl stalintiy and Maize genotypes

Introduction

Salinity is a global problem that largely limits crop production especially on irrigated area of the world. In Pakistan, as well salinity is one of the major soil problems. The soil of Pakistan has a great productive potential but salinity has hampered its crop production in some areas and inhibited it completely in others. The rapid increase in unproductive salt affected land is adversely affecting the economy of Pakistan. Many curative and management practices have been adopted by soil scientists to overcome the problem, but they are highly expensive. One of the possible alternatives is development of cultivars tolerant to high salt concentrations. The biological approach has received considerable attention in the last few decades.

All the varieties of a crop are some times not equally sensitive to salinity (Ashraf et al., 1986; Ahsan and Wright, 1998). This differential response has been reported for maize as well (Jan et al., 1995). Plant growth is severely affected by salinity at all. stages of development but sensitivity varies from one growth stage to another.

New genotype combinations of maize are being tested and introduced continuously by the plant breeders and promising ones are released to the market. They need thorough threshing for various aspects including their capability to tolerate some adverse environmental and edaphic conditions. The present studies were planned to furnish the knowledge about growth and yield of two maize inbreds and their hybrid under saline conditions.

Materials and Methods

The experiment was conducted during spring 1998 at University of Agriculture Faisalabad, to study the effect of salinity on two maize inbred lines namely B-73 (G1) and MO-17 (G2) and their hybrid YHS 202 (G3) obtained from Maize and Millets Research Institute Yousafwala, Sahiwal. Plants were sown in polyethylene lined pots filled with well mixed sand and field soil in a 40:60 ratio respectively. Experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design under split plot arrangement. The experiment comprised of four treatments in which salinity was induced using NaCI at ECe levels of 10 (SL2), 15 (SL3) and 20 (SL4) dSm–1, while fourth treatment (control) comprised normal soil at ECe 2.5 dSm–1 (SL1). Salinity was applied as 6 percent NaCI solution in 3, 5 and 6 instalments for ECe 10, 15 and 20 dSm–1 respectively at four different stages of growth i.e., seedling stage (30 days after sowing), Vegetative stage (45 days after sowing), reproductive stage (60 days after sowing) and at physiological maturity (75 days after sowing) named as GS1, GS2, GS3 and GS4, respectively. Each time crop was harvested one month after imposition of salinity.

Data were recorded for various growth and yield parameters at each harvest and analysed statistically using analysis of variance technique. Treatment means were compared by applying LSD test (Steel and Torrie, 1980).

Results and Discussion

All plant growth parameters progressively decreased with increasing salinity levels (Table 1). Plant height, number of leaves per plant and fresh weight as well as dry weight of plant were significantly less than control at higher salinity levels. Like other growth parameters leaf area per plant also differed significantly across various salinity levels. Reduction in leaf area occurs either due to reduction in leaf number (Huang and Redmann, 1995) or leaf size (Zidan et al., 1992) and mostly as a result of reduction in both these parameters (Kayani and Rahman, 1988). Results inferred during this study resemble third category where a reduction in leaf area may be attributed to smaller and significantly lesser number of leaves. As compared with control a reduction upto 29 percent was noted in leaf area which might have affected the photosynthetic efficiency of the plants. Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) was the highest in control plants and the lowest in ECe 20 dSm–1 which resulted in accumulation of less dry mass by plants at higher salinity levels. Reduction in formation of dry mass is one of the generally observed effects of salinity (Izzo et al., 1993; Saqib and Qureshi, 1998). A reduction upto 50 per cent in dry matter of maize has been reported by Soliman (1988). This reduction can be attributed to decrease in various growth parameters under saline conditions.

Table 1: Mean values showing effect of NaCI induced salinity on various parameters of maize genotypes

Table 2: Response of maize genotypes to various salinity levels

Table 3: Effectiveness of various salinity levels at different growth stages of maize

Deterioration of vegetative parameters by salinity has been reported by numerous workers in different crops such as maize (Fortmeier and Schubert, 1995), wheat (Sharma, 1995) and rice (Aslam et al., 1995).

The yield components were also negatively affected by salinity. The size of cob got shortened with increasing salinity concentration. Number of kernels formed per row were less than control in saline soil and this difference from normal got widened to significant level in EC 20 dSm–1. Number of kernel rows also got reduced by salinity. The least affected yield component was 100-kernel weight and the plants in various salinity levels formed grains of almost similar size.

Decrease in yield components is reflected in the final produce. At EC 10 dSm–1 grain yield was at par with control. A significant decrease amounting to 16 and 22 percent in total kernel weight at EC 15 and 20 dSm–1 respectively was recorded as compared to grain yield under normal soil condition. These results corroborate the findings of Raghav and Pal (1994), Ashraf et al. (1998) and Saqib and Qureshi (1998) for decreased yield in various crops under saline conditions.

Cumulative means of three genotypes for growth and yield parameters (Table 1) revealed significant differences, among themselves for yield components such as cob length, number of kernel rows per cob and number of kernels, per row while non-significant difference existed for 100-kernel weight. For all the yield components MO-17 (G2) surpassed other two cultivars B-73 (C1) and YHS-202 (G3). Consequently, the total kernel yield was the highest in MO-17 and it depicted a significant difference of 13 and 14 percent from G1 and G3 respectively exhibiting better performance than its two counterparts. Genotypes G1 and G3 indicated non-significant difference in almost all the parameters and stood at par with each other in total kernel weight.

The interaction of three genotypes with various salinity levels presented non-significant differences for all the parameters (Table 2). All genotypes showed a gradual decrease in various parameters with corresponding increase in salinity levels. However, cumulative performance of G2 reflected better results and depicted higher kernel weight at all salinity levels than other genotypes. Differences in behaviour of various cultivars of a crop confirms numerous earlier reports (Jan et al., 1995; Ashraf et al., 1998).

Perusal of Table 3 indicates that salinity affected negatively at all growth stages. Vegetative parameters were affected more at the first three growth stages as compared with fourth stage (GS4), as the plants were in full bloom of their vegetative growth during the early periods. These facts are supported by the results of Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) which exhibited a linear decrease from growth stage 1 (GS1) to growth stage 4 (GS4), as well as reduced NAR was observed with increase in salinity levels from 2.5 dSm–1 to 20 dSm–1. These results agree with those reported by Dutt and Bel (1988) that increasing level of salinity reduced the Net Assimilation Rate.

REFERENCES

  • Ahsan, M. and D. Wright, 1998. Inter and intra-varietal variations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under saline conditions. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 339-341.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ashraf, M., T. Mc Neilly and A.D. Bradshow, 1986. The response of NaCl and ionic content of selected salt tolerant and normal lines of three legumes forage species in sand culture. New Phytol., 104: 403-471.
    Direct Link    


  • Ashraf, M.Y., Y. Ali and T.M. Qureshi, 1998. Effect of salinity on photosynthetic efficiency and yield of rice genotypes. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 72-74.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Aslam, M., I. Ahmed, I.A. Mahmood, J. Akhtar and S. Nawaz, 1995. Physiological basis of differential tolerance in rice to salinity. Pak. J. Soil Sci., 10: 38-41.


  • Dutt, S.K. and A.R. Bel, 1988. Effect of salinity on net assimilation and rice grain yield. Int. Rice Res. Newslett., 13: 17-17.


  • Fortmeier, R. and S. Schubert, 1995. Salt tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.): The role of sodium exclusion. Plant Cell Environ., 18: 1041-1047.


  • Huang, J. and R.E. Redmann, 1995. Responses of growth, morphology and anatomy to salinity and calcium supply in cultivated and wild barley. Can. J. Bot., 73: 1859-1866.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Izzo, R., A. Scagnozzi, A. Belligno and F. Navari-Izzo, 1993. Influence of NaCl Treatment on Ca, K and Na Interrelations in Maize Shoots. In: Optimization of Plant Nutrition, Fragoso, M.A.C., M.L. Van Beusichem, A. Houwers (Eds.). Springer, Netherlands, pp: 577-582


  • Jan, N., S.G. Khatak and J. Khattak, 1995. Effect of various levels of salinity on germination of different maize cultivars. Sarhad J. Agric., 11: 721-724.


  • Kayani, S.A. and M. Rahman, 1988. Effect of NaCl salinity on shoot growth, stomatal size and its distribution in Zea mays L. Pak. J. Bot., 20: 75-81.


  • Raghav, C.S. and B. Pal, 1994. Effect of saline water on growth, yield and yield contributory characters of various wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Ann. Agric. Res., 15: 351-356.


  • Saqib, M. and R.H. Qureshi, 1998. Combined effect of salinity and hypoxia on growth, ionic composition and yield of wheat line 234-1. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 167-169.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sharma, S.K., 1995. Studies on growth, water relation and distribution of Na+, K+ and other ions in wheat under short term exposure to salinity. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 38: 233-235.


  • Soliman, M.F., 1988. Effect of salinity on growth and micronutrient composition of corn plants. Agroclimica, 32: 337-348.


  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780070609266, Pages: 633
    Direct Link    


  • Zidan, I., A. Shauiv, I. Ravina and P.M. Neumann, 1992. Does salinity inhibit maize leaf growth by reducing tissue concentration of essential mineral nutrients. J. Plant Nutr., 15: 1407-1419.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved