HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Parasitology

Year: 2019 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-6
DOI: 10.17311/jp.2019.1.6
Sero-prevalence of Lymphatic Filariasis in Six Communities of Talata Mafara Local Government Area, Zamfara State, Nigeria
Mu`awiyya Umar Ladan , Tukur Adamu, Aminu Yabo Bala and Muhtari Jangebe Ladan

Abstract: Background and Objective: Lymphatic filariasis is a tropical disease caused by the parasitic filaroid nematode worms that are transmitted to humans by infected mosquitoes. It is the 4th leading cause of long-term and permanent disability. This study was conducted from May, 2017 to December, 2018 in order to determine the sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis in six communities of Talata Mafara Local Government Area, Zamfara state, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: Blood samples were sero-diagnosed to detect bancroftian infection using Rapid Diagnostic test. The participant’s sterilized finger was punctured using lancet to collect blood (about 40-50 μL) in a capillary tube and then transferred to the sample well of the test cassette. Then immediately 1-2 drops (about 35-50 μL) of sample diluent was added to the sample well and the time was noticed. The result was read within 15 min. Results: An overall sero-prevalence of 37.8% was recorded. Shiyar Galadima had the highest sero-prevalence (43.1%) of infection among the communities. An analysis of the results using chi-square indicated that males (38.9%) aged between 51-60 years (63.6%) are significantly at higher risk of infection. The highest prevalence of 43.3% was occurred in farmers than those in the other occupational groups. Conclusion: The study area is endemic with lymphatic filariasis and therefore, sanitation, public enlightenment and mass drug administration are urgently needed in the study area, if the elimination of lymphatic filariasis is to be achieved by the year 2020.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Mu`awiyya Umar Ladan, Tukur Adamu, Aminu Yabo Bala and Muhtari Jangebe Ladan, 2019. Sero-prevalence of Lymphatic Filariasis in Six Communities of Talata Mafara Local Government Area, Zamfara State, Nigeria. Research Journal of Parasitology, 14: 1-6.

Keywords: Sero-prevalence, filariasis, Wuchereria bancrofti, Mafara, Zamfara and Nigeria

INTRODUCTION

Lymphatic filariasis is a parasitic disease caused by microscopic thread-like worms that belongs to the Nematode superfamily Filarioidea which inhabit the lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes of a human host1,2. The parasites (Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi and Brugia timori) are transmitted by different species of mosquitoes3. The larvae of the parasites enter the human body at the time of the mosquito bite. They then travel to the lymphatic system, where they mature into adult worms. The adult worms can live for several years in the lymphatic system, where they mate and produce millions of live immature forms known as microfilariae that circulate in the blood4. The presence of these worms in the lymphatic system causes damage and blockage of the lymph channels thereby preventing the return of lymphatic fluid to the circulatory system. Such blockage results in the fluid accumulation in the tissues especially the legs and genitalia5. Symptoms of the infection in subcutaneous form include itching, urticarial, skin rashes, headache, muscle aches or pains, abdominal pain, high fever, nausea with or without vomiting and joint involvement or arthritis that may results to edema, the most common symptoms of filariasis that can lead to elephantiasis4. Elephantiasis is characterized by hardening and thickening of the skin and massive swelling of legs, arms, breasts or genitals2.

Lymphatic filariasis is among the neglected tropical diseases being the second most common vector-borne parasitic disease after malaria, lymphatic filariasis was also ranked, the second leading cause of long-term and permanent disability after mental illness worldwide6,7. An estimated 25 million men suffer with genital disease and over 15 million people are afflicted with lymphoedema8. In year 2000, more than 120 million people of all ages and sexes were infected with one or more of the lymphatic filariae worldwide3. Approximately, 80% of the infected individuals are living in the following ten (10) countries: Angola, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Indonesia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nigeria and the United Republic of Tanzania. About 947 million people in 54 countries worldwide are at risk of being infected with lymphatic filariasis. Enhanced strategies are now required in about 29 countries to achieve elimination targets and stop treatment3,9 by the year 2020.

Nigeria was rated as the third most endemic country with lymphatic filariasis in the world after India and Indonesia. It was reported that 22.1% of the Nigerian population is thought to be infected, with 66% people at risk of being infected. The significant burden of lymphatic filariasis in Nigeria is caused by the Wuchereria bancrofti 10,11. The Cater Center12 reported that, in Nigeria, lymphatic filariasis is transmitted by the same mosquito that transmits malaria. As Nigeria prepares to implement the Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Programme (LFEP) there is need to have the necessary base line information on the distribution and nature of disease, but unfortunately readily available information of some areas that could be endemic is lacking and until data on the distribution of the disease is available that the elimination of the disease will be achieved in the country. It is in this light coupled with the absence of a comprehensive report on lymphatic filariasis in Zamfara state, that this study was conducted in order to determine its prevalence in Talata Mafara Local Government Area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: The study was conducted at Talata Mafara Local Government Area of Zamfara state. Talata Mafara is located between latitude 12°21 00"-12°34 00"N and longitude 6°04 00"-6°04 00"E with an area of 1,430 km2 and has estimated population13,14 of 306,606. The area is mainly populated by Hausa and Fulani tribes farming is their major occupation and they practice the same culture and religion15,16. The mean annual rainfall in the area17 is 798 mm.

Ethical clearance: Before commencement of the study, an approval from State Health Research Ethics Committee and permission from the Ministry of Health were obtained, so as to have a better access to the community members and to ensure consent of their leaders and confidentiality of the participants for the study.

Determination of circulating filarial antigen: This study was conducted from May, 2017 to December, 2018 to determine the sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis in six communities of Talata Mafara Local Government Area, Zamfara state, Nigeria. Blood samples from 307 volunteers were sero-diagnosed for determination of circulating filarial antigen using Aria filariasis IgG/IgM Combo Rapid test for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of IgG and IgM anti-lymphatic filarial parasites (W. bancrofti and B. malayi ) in human serum, plasma or whole blood, following the manufacturer’s instructions18. The test cassette was labelled with the participant’s ID number and then placed on a clean flat surface. The participant’s left finger was sterilized with methylated spirit and then punctured using a sterile lancet to collect blood (about 40-50 μL) in a capillary tube and then transferred to the sample well of the test cassette by making sure that, there are no air bubbles. Then, immediately 1 drop (about 35-50 μL) of sample diluent was added to the sample well. The result of each cassette was read within 15 min. The test result whether positive or negative was recorded on the questionnaire that corresponds to the participant’s ID number.

Questionnaire administration: Questionnaires containing volunteer’s socioeconomic data and test result (whether positive or negative) were used to obtain some descriptive information about the volunteers as described by Boynton19. The questionnaires were labelled to correspond to the volunteer’s test cassette ID number and then administered to each volunteer that provided the blood for the test.

Statistical analysis: Prevalence of infection was calculated using the equation:

Association between parasitism and wards, gender, age and occupation were screened by Chi-squire test of goodness of it. The p-value less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to wards: The overall sero-prevalence of 37.8% was found in the study area. However, the prevalence of infection varied among the wards. Shiyar Galadima ward was found to have the highest sero-prevalence 22 (43.1%), while the least prevalence 13 (25.5%) was occurred in Ruwan-bore ward. The occurrence of the infection is not significantly associated (p>0.05) with the settlement of the communities (Table 1).

Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to gender: The results obtained with respect to gender of the people indicated that, males were found to be significantly (p<0.05) more infected 72 (38.9%) than their female counterparts with 44 (36.1%) (Table 2).

Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to age group: In age-related sero-prevalence of infection, people at age group of 51-60 were recorded with the highest prevalence 7 (63.6%) of infection than their counterparts at other age groups, the least prevalence 13 (27.7%) was found at age group of 21-30. Chi-square analysis revealed significant association (p<0.05) between infection and different age groups (Table 3).

Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to occupation: The sero-prevalence of infection is statistically significantly (p<0.05) associated with the occupation of the people in the study area. The highest sero-prevalence 26 (43.3%) and 38 (43.2%) of infection was occurred in students and farmers, respectively than in other occupational groups, however, the least prevalence 9 (23.7%) was recorded in those participating in civil service (Table 4).

Table 1: Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to wards
NS: Not significant, x2: 2.759, df: 5, p = 0.737NS

Table 2:Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to gender
*Significant value, x2: 6.759, df: 1, p = 0.009*

Table 3: Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to age group
*Significant value, x2: 34.000, df: 6, p = 0.000*

Table 4:Sero-prevalence of lymphatic filariasis with respect to occupation
*Significant value, x2: 24.948, df: 4, p = 0.000*

DISCUSSION

The results of this study revealed the overall sero-prevalence of 37.8% in infection with bancroftian filariasis in Talata Mafara Local Government Area indicating that the study area is endemic and also the active transmission is still occurring. The overall prevalence of infection obtained in the presence study was lower compared to that of Obi et al.20, who reported an overall prevalence of 73.0% in their study titled, Endemicity of lymphatic filariasis in three LGA of Imo state, Nigeria. The presence of infection in Talata Mafara communities could be attributed to the fact that majority of them are farmers that are living in rural areas where they are in close proximity to the water bodies that favour their farming activities. Conversely, these water bodies provide suitable mosquito breeding sites. Another contributing factor may be the presence of microfilariemic individuals in addition to poor environmental and hygienic conditions within the communities that permit close proximity to various mosquitoes breeding sites (e.g., abundant tires, unused plastic and glass containers, broken mud pots, dirty and contaminated gutters etc.), thus, exposing the inhabitants to the mosquito vectors. These observations agreed with that of Obadiah et al.10 and Badaki et al.21.

The highest sero-prevalence of infection recorded in the community of Shiyar Galadima ward could be attributed to the lifestyle of the inhabitants and environmental factors that influence the population of mosquitoes due to the fact that Shiyar Galadima ward is more rural than the other five wards. This is in addition to being them in close proximity to the pond that retains stagnant waters which provide breeding sites for the mosquitoes. Similar observations were made by Obadiah et al.10 and Eneanya et al.22 in their studies conducted elsewhere. Gender-related sero-prevalence of infection indicated that males had the highest prevalence of 38.9% in infection with lymphatic filariasis than their female counterparts. This finding is in line with that of Obi et al.20 and Parija and Garg 23. The significantly higher prevalence rate in males may be due to the fact that they are more exposed to the mosquitoes during their various outdoor activities. In the communities where this study was conducted, females are strongly restricted in the houses according to their culture and religion, they usually wear clothes (hijab) that do not expose their bodies, they are not allowed to play, swim and rest or do other work outside homes, this minimizes their exposure to mosquito bites. Dogara et al.24 and Badaki et al.21 made similar observations in their studies. The significantly highest sero-infection rate of 63.6% obtained in age bracket 50–61 years is in conformity with the findings of Obadiah et al.10. The fluctuation of the prevalence rate of infection observed among the age groups is inexplicable, but could be depend on the type of activities that exposes each group vulnerable to the mosquito bites. For example, subjects within the age of 1-20 years are considered school age children who expose themselves to different play grounds from where they may be biting by mosquitoes. The other age groups (21-above years) within these communities considered themselves as responsible adults who are expected to engage in different occupational activities especially farming. Therefore, the exposure to mosquitoes by these age groups is largely depends on the social and cultural activities of the communities. These observations corresponded to that of FMoH11 and Okorie et al.25. In the occupation related prevalence, the highest sero-prevalence of infection obtained in students mostly known as Almajirai and farmers than other occupational groups in the study area is not surprising, because (students) Almajirai within these communities are the most vulnerable group to mosquito bites, by the fact that majority of the Almajirai schools are poorly constructed, students are sleeping in open rooms without doors and windows. This maximizes the mosquito chances to access students (Almajirai) during the day and night. On the other hand, farmers are engaged in farming activities that prone them to the frequent mosquito bites more than any other occupational groups in the study area. These observations are supported by LeAnne and Christopher26, who reported that occupation and socioeconomic status are important risk factors as filariasis affects primarily persons of the lowest socioeconomic level.

CONCLUSION

It is evident from the results of this study that Talata Mafara Local Government Area is endemic with bancroftian filariasis. It is further indicated that, males, students and farmers were at higher risk of the infection. Therefore, sanitation, public enlightenment and mass drug administration are urgently needed in the study area, if the elimination of the infection by National Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Programme (NLFEP) is to be achieved by the year 2020.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study discovered that Talata Mafara Local Government Area of Zamfara state is endemic with lymphatic filariasis and active transmission is still going on, it further identified the categories (males, students and farmers) that are at significant risk of infection with W. bancrofti. These results could be beneficial to National Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Programme (NLFEP) and relevant authorities for effective elimination of the disease in the area, since to my knowledge no similar study was conducted in the present study area. Other researches are encouraged to identify the major vectors (mosquitoes) responsible for the disease transmission and more areas that need intervention.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We appreciated the efforts made by Zamfara State Ministry of Health for providing us with research ethical clearance letter of approval and connecting us to the Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) coordinators and their focal persons that helped us in accessing the communities. We remain thankful to the village heads and their community members who have participated voluntarily in the study. The technical support provided by Mal. Nasiru Sani Mada, Mal. Shuaibu Idris, Mal. Murtala Muhammad, Mal. Muhammad Umar, Mal. Nafi’u Umar and Mal. Abdullahi Garba must not be forgotten. The study (M. Phil/Ph.D) sponsorship funding support provided by TETFUND through the Federal University Gusau is highly appreciated.

REFERENCES

  • MedicineNet, 2016. Medical definition of lymphatic filariasis. http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=14970.


  • Mandal, A., 2016. What is filariasis? News-Medical Life Science. https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-Filariasis.aspx.


  • WHO., 2016. Lymphatic filariasis. Fact Sheets No. 102. http//www.who.int/mediacenter/factsheets/fs102/en/.


  • Lloyd III, W.C. and M.D. Facs, 2013. Lymphatic filariasis. Healthgrades. http://www.healthgrades.com/conditions/lymphatic-filariasis.


  • Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2014. Nigeria launches Africa’s first nationwide malaria and lymphatic filariasis (Elephantiasis) elimination co-implementation plan. http://www.ntd-ngdonetwork.org/news-events/news/nigeria-launches-africa%E2%80%99s-first-nationwide-malaria-and-lymphatic-filariasis.


  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016. Hygiene-related diseases: Lymphatic filariasis. In Water, Sanitation and Environmentally Related Hygiene. https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/hygiene/disease/lymphatic_filariasis.html.


  • Wynd, S., W.D. Melrose, D.N. Durrheim, J. Carron and M. Gyapong, 2007. Understanding the community impact of lymphatic filariasis: A review of the sociocultural literature. Bull. World Health Organiz., 85: 493-498.
    Direct Link    


  • McNulty, S.N., M. Mitreva, G.J. Weil and P.U. Fischer, 2013. Inter and intra-specific diversity of parasites that cause lymphatic filariasis. Infect. Genet. Evol., 14: 137-146.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • USAIDS., 2014. Lymphatic filariasis. USAIDS NTD’s Program Neglected Tropical Diseases. http://www.neglecteddiseases.gov/targetdiseases/lymphaticfilariasis/index.html.


  • Obadiah, E.S., E.D. Sambo, M.A. Alhaji, A.D. Elisha, K. Santaya, A. Greg and S. Adamu, 2018. Rapid epidemiological assessment of lymphatic filariasis in Northern Taraba Focus, Nigeria. Int. J. Infect. Dis. Ther., 3: 6-12.
    Direct Link    


  • Federal Ministry of Health, 2013. Guidelines for Malaria-lymphatic filariasis Co-implementation in Nigeria. Department of Public Health. https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/health_publications/malaria/guidelines-malaria-lf-co-implementation-nigeria-9-13.pdf.


  • The Cater Center, 2016. Fighting disease: Nigeria. Eliminating Lymphatic Filariasis. Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. http://www.carter.org/countries/nigeria-health-lymphatic-filariasis.html.


  • Nysczamfaranews, 2016. Local governments in Zamfara state. Zamfara State NYSC News. http://nysczamfaranews.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_24.html#!/p/blog-page_24.html.


  • National Population Commission of Nigeria, 2017. The population development in Zamfara. Subdivision. Zamfara (State in Nigeria). http://www.citypopulation.de/php/nigeria-admin.php?adm1id=NGA037.


  • Facts, 2016. Zamfara. Facts.ng Discover Nigeria. https://www.facts.ng/nigerian-states/zamfara/.


  • Logbaby, 2017. Zamfara state, Nigeria (Overview, history and summary information). http://www.logbaby.com/encyclopedia/history-of-zamfara-state_9957.html.


  • Onlinenigeria, 2003. Zamfara state. Online Nigeria. http://www.onlinenigeria.com/zamfara-state/?blurb=398.


  • CTK-Biotech, 2017. Aria filariasis IgG/IgM combo rapid test- (Serum/Plasma/Whole Blood). Leaflet. CTK Biotech Inc., San Diego, CA. USA., pp: 1-2. https://ctkbiotech.com/reagents/.


  • Boynton, P.M., 2004. Administering, analysing and reporting your questionnaire. Br. Med. J., 328: 1372-1375.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Obi, R.K., W.A. Oyibo, C.C. Okangba, F.C. Nwanebu, E.T. Oparaocha, N.M. Orji and U.U. Ndubuisi, 2010. Concurrent parasitosis in an onchocerciasis endemic community. Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci., 1: 263-270.


  • Badaki, J.A., O.B. Akogun, N.B. Molta and G. Imandeh, 2013. Bancroftiasis among the mumuye of Northeastern Nigeria: Parasitological and clinical studies in Northern Taraba state. Health, 5: 138-142.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Eneanya, O.A., J. Cano, I. Dorigatti, I. Anagbogu, C. Okoronkwo, T. Garske and C.A. Donnelly, 2018. Environmental suitability for lymphatic filariasis in Nigeria. Parasites Vectors, Vol. 11, No. 1.
    CrossRef    


  • Parija, S.C. and A. Garg, 2010. Seroprevalence of lymphatic filariasis at Puducherry. J. Parasitic Dis., 34: 20-23.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dogara, M.M., H.I. Nock, R.I.S. Agbede, S.I. Ndams and K.K. Joseph, 2012. Prevalence of lymphatic filariasis in three villages in Kano state, Nigeria. Internet J. Trop. Med., Vol. 8, No. 1.


  • Okorie, P.N., D. Emmanuel, O.O. Olushola, O. Olusola, Y. Saka, B. Okoeguale and I.B. Ekanem, 2015. Lymphatic filariasis baseline survey in two sentinel sites of Ogun state, Nigeria. Pan Afr. Med. J., Vol. 20.
    CrossRef    


  • LeAnne, M.F. and L.K. Christopher, 2013. Lymphatic Filariasis. In: Hunter's Tropical Medicine and Emerging Infectious Disease (Ninth Edition), Magill, A.J., D.R. Hill and E.T. Ryan (Eds.)., Saunders, USA., pp: 815-822

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved