HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Medical Sciences

Year: 2011 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 8 | Page No.: 296-301
DOI: 10.3923/jms.2011.296.301
Design and Manufacture of Short stemless Femoral Hip Implant based on CT Images
B.R. Rawal, Rahul Ribeiro , Rajesh Malhotra and Naresh Bhatnagar

Abstract: This study describes a methodology for designing a short femoral stem, based on CT scan data, for young patients requiring a hip replacement. One advantage of using a short femoral stem is that it reduces the amount of surgery, conserving the greater trochanter and the femoral neck ring. Precise digital data of the internal femoral anatomy are necessary to develop new prosthetic implants using computer-aided design (CAD) techniques. Image processing and CAD Softwares were used to obtain a 3D reconstruction of the cortical bone and canal geometry, implant design, fit evaluation and 2D drawings. A short femoral stem can then be manufactured from this CAD model using computer aided manufacturing (CAM) techniques. The design procedures and rationales are explained. The fit of the stem was tested before clinical application, using virtual stem implantation so that predictable implant-related problems could be rectified. It was concluded that the designed short femoral stem matched the femoral cavities very well. The results indicate that the investigated method of designing a short femoral stem is practicable and very desirable for young patients.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
B.R. Rawal, Rahul Ribeiro , Rajesh Malhotra and Naresh Bhatnagar , 2011. Design and Manufacture of Short stemless Femoral Hip Implant based on CT Images. Journal of Medical Sciences, 11: 296-301.

Keywords: CNC manufacturing, Femoral stem, proximal stem and CAD

INTRODUCTION

The concept of the short stemless hip implant design in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not new now a day, as its fitment based on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique (Morrey, 1989). If adequate stability and sufficient load transfer can be obtained with a proximal insert into the femur, the goals of a hip replacement can be achieved without a conventional stem. The benefits of MIS made short stemless hip implants easier to fit, as conventional hip stem cannot be easily inserted with minimally invasive technique. In recent studies, the preservation of bone stock has been another issue for the design of stemless hip implants (Santori et al., 2006; Lombardi et al., 2009). The first attempts to publish this new stemless design idea to reduce stress shielding effect of conventional THA were made by Munting and Verhelpen (1995). After that, many other researchers try to use similar design idea to make MIS more convenient to surgeons and beneficial to surgery results (Tai et al., 2003; Renkawitz et al., 2008).

A review of historical hip designs indicated that many researchers advocated neck-sparing features in early hip designs since the 1970’s. In retaining the femoral neck, both torsional and axial loads are reduced, along with bending moments on the femoral component (Harrison et al., 2010). Following are the advantage of neck retention:

Provides better blood flow vs. hip resurfacing
Provides better axial and torsional stability vs. conventional THA (thus a shorter stem)
Provides for more tissue sparring approaches (both hard and soft tissue)
Potential for less blood loss
Potential for quicker rehab

The influence of implant-sizing on mechanical stability was investigated for the new stem, in particular with relation to the bone quality (Westphal et al., 2006).

Although substantial progress has been made in the development of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in recent years, a number of limitations remain. To address such limitations, new indigenous low-cost high-quality THA implant designs with shorter stems have been developed within the Indian context.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Designing of prosthesis inculcates in itself knowledge and understanding of a number of fields and collaboration between specialists in medicine and manufacturing to come up with an efficient solution. Figure 1 shows work flow diagram for designing a hip prosthesis. This includes data collection from patients, development of prosthesis dimensions based on measured data, biomechanics studies for function and motions (since a natural joint’s bones are coupled by ligaments), prototyping to verify the functional aspects and material selection (biocompatible, high strength to weight ratio). Once a simple design of prosthesis is ready, implantability issues (design for ease of implantation) are verified by virtual implantation accompanied with surgeons’ feedback. Major design consideration must also be given to revision surgery, since the prosthetic joints may loosen or break inside the body. Manufacturing issues also needs to be considered. Based on the surgeons and manufacturing engineer’s comments, the final design will be made and used for testing.

Designed for proximal fit and fill and bone conservation: In spite of the clinical success of total hip replacement (THR), still THR surgeries produce strong limitations to the quality of life on operated individuals.

Fig. 1: Work flow diagram for designing Hip prosthesis

As people live and remains active longer than in the past, the needs of more appropriate techniques in the treatment of dysfunctional joints quickly increased in the last years and it is expected to increase further. Such need pushed the industry and the research in developing new methods for the treatment of dysfunctional hips with particular attention to young and active patients and femoral short stemless implant could be the solution. The short femoral stem implant has been specifically designed to be implanted using a mid-neck resection, facilitating a highly bone conserving procedure that retains the femoral neck and leaves the diaphysis intact. The implant is designed such that it follow the medial and lateral natural profile of the medial calcar, three point mechanical stability and rest fit concept as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2: Concept of designing short femoral stem

The geometry of the short femoral stem prosthesis is based on a detailed analysis of high resolution CT scans with the objective of offering a less invasive femoral stem that locates proximally, leaving the diaphysis intact and providing a bone conserving solution for the young patient.

Anthropometric measurements: Thirty CT scans obtained from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) were analyzed. The scans were from 10 female and 20 male subjects. The ages of the subjects ranged from 40 to 55 years with an average of 51.3 years. These images in DICOM format were imported into MIMICS® (Materialize, Inc., Leuven, Belgium) to get a 3D graphic model of each femur. A 3D model was developed by a thresholding and region growing technique, to extract the boundaries of the femur from CT data.

The dimensional measurements of the femurs were divided into 2 groups. In the first group we measured extramedullary parameters like femoral head offset (horizontal offset), head diameter, femoral head position (vertical offset), neck-shaft angle and anteversion angle. In the second group, we measured intramedullary parameters like mediolateral canal width (ML) and anterioposterior canal width (AP) at 3 levels ( D, E and F) as shown in Fig. 3a and b.

3D Modelling of short femeoral stem implant: The obtained intramedullary and extramedullary geometrical parameters of the femur make it possible to commence designing a short femoral stem. Based on design assumptions of a close intramedullary fit of stem, the cross-section and shape of the short femoral stem was standardized. One of the most important characteristics of short femoral stem prostheses is their degree of filling the medullary canal at the proximal region. That’s why the planner must shape the prosthesis stem such that it would fit the medullary canal as much as possible for best type of fitment.

Fig. 3(a-b): (a) Mediolateral measured dimensions and (b) anteroposterior measured dimensions. Where, D: Mediolateral canal width, 20 mm above the lesser trochanter, E: Mediolateral canal width, at the level of the lesser trochanter, F: Mediolateral canal width, 20 mm below the lesser trochanter, L: Anteroposterior Canal width, 20 mm above the lesser trochanter, M: Anteroposterior Canal width, at the level of the lesser trochanter, N: Anteroposterior Canal width, 20 mm below the lesser trochanter

Fig. 4(a-c): Solid models of short femoral stem. (b) Wedge shape with femoral curve (c) Straight wedge shape

The implant was designed so that appropriate cross-sectional geometries could be swept along the main trajectories and guided contours of the implant (Fig. 4a), also defining the characteristic angular orientation of the prosthesis neck and then the final stage, which is that of building a solid model of the standard prosthesis with femoral curve and without femoral curve (i.e. straight stem) by using ProE software, as shown in (Fig. 4a-c).

Virtual implantation: To check for a close intramedullary fit and impingement of the short hip femoral stem to the femur bone, virtual implantations were performed. The close intramedullary stem fit may decreases the stresses at the proximal implant-bone interface. This fit was tested before actual fabrication and clinical application, so that implant-related problems could be corrected.

Fig. 5: Virtual implantation of short femoral stem

Virtual implantations of the prototype stem were performed with all digitized femur specimens obtained from CT scans, based on the implantation protocol and the factors to assess the fit of the designed implant shape given by Adam et al. (2002) (Fig. 5).

Designed for physiological loading: Initial and long-term stability of the short femoral stem was achieved through the loading path of the stem. This was validated using FEA testing where a model of the short stem implant was analyzed using a CT-based femur model on Ansys version 11. Relevant material properties and boundary conditions were applied in order to replicate natural conditions. The FEA showed that the load travels along the path of maximum stiffness flowing through the three contact points of the medial calcar, lateral calcar and lateral cortex. Typical stresses found were well below the yield strength of bone 130 MPa as per Bennett and Goswami (2008), indicating no risk of fracture as shown in Fig. 6.

Manufacturing of a short femoral stem hip implant: The machining of the titanium alloy femoral stem generally performed on a 5 or more axis CNC machine but here we did machining of this short femoral stem on a 3 Axis CNC machine. The following is the stepwise process NC sequence of machining of implant, developed in Pro/ENGINEER.

Step (1) involves the profile milling of 3-axes, which cuts the outer profile of the implant
Step (2) Involves volume milling of 3-axes, which cuts the material on wedge
Step (3) Involves surface milling of 3-axes, which finishes wedge portion of Implant
Step (4) Involves trajectory milling of some portion, for ease of further machining
Step (5) Involves the finishing cut of 3-axes; finishing the final geometry of the Implant
Step (6) Turning taper turning) at the upper portion

Fig. 6: FEA on short femoral stem implanted into the femur bone. (a) Meshing and Boundary conditions and (b) Contour plots of Von-Mises stresses

The same procedures are applied after flipping the work piece and maintaining the mirror imaged reference (datum) co-ordinates on other side. The finished short femoral stem implant is shown in Fig. 7.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There are three key extrafemoral dimensions like leg length (or femoral head position), femoral head offset and anteversion angle which helps restore proper hip kinematics and helps improving overall patient satisfaction. Optimizing these parameters before actual implantation leads to correct leg length, range of motion and joint stability. The intramedullary parameters like mediolateral canal width (ML) and anterioposterior canal width (AP) are responsible for the proper fit and primary stability. These anthropometrically measured parameters are summarized as the mean and standard deviation in Table 1.

The obtained anthropometrically measured data were used to model the anatomical shape of the short femoral stem. It is essential that the stem fills the medullary canal as completely as possible.

Table 1: Mean and standard deviation (SD) values of anthropometrically measured parameters

This fit was tested before emoral stem closely fits and matches both medial and lateral profiles of the canal, as shown in Fig. 5.

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) showed that from the point of view of reducing the direct stresses in the stem, therefore increasing the life of hip implant, a significant contribution was made by reducing the stem length of the prosthesis that fits proximally based on the best fit concept. It also concluded that by preserving the femoral neck, the stresses were reduced along with bending moments on the bone-implant system. The use of material with a lower modulus, such as titanium, would be superior to that of stiffer materials such as Co-Cr-Mo. It was also shown typical stresses found were well below the yield strength of bone indicating no risk of fracture (Fig. 6b).

All the machining of titanium was undertaken on a 3 Axis CNC machine for the short femoral stem. First, the machining was done on one side followed by machining on the other side after flipping the work piece and maintaining the same reference (datum) co-ordinates.

Fig. 7(a-b): (a) Implant machining and (b) photographs of newly designed short femoral stem

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduces a method for designing a short femoral stem hip implant based on CT images. Using image processing software MIMICS, CAD/CAM software Pro/Engineering and FE analysis software ANSYS, the design cycle is shortened. The results of verification indicated that this method of designing a short femoral stem hip implant based on CT images is practicable. The cost of short femoral stem hip implants can be lowered so most patients can accept it, thus helping to improve the quality of life for many patients in India.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), NMITLI project for a generous grant to undertake this study on selected medical implants, RP01841.

REFERENCES

  • Morrey, B.F., 1989. Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 249: 169-175.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Santori, N., C.V. Albanese, I.D. Learmond and F.S. Santori, 2006. Bone preservation with a conservative metaphyseal loading implant. Hip Int., 16: 16-21.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Lombardi Jr., A.V., K.R. Berend and J.B. Adams, 2009. Short stem solution: Through small portals. Orthopedics, 32: 663-663.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Munting, E. and M. Verhelpen, 1995. Fixation and effect on bone strain pattern of a stemless hip prosthesis. J. Biomech., 28: 949-961.


  • Tai, C.L., C.H. Shih, W.P. Chen, S.S. Lee, Y.L. Liu, P.H. Hsieh and W.J. Chen, 2003. Finite element analysis of the cervico-trochanteric stemless femoral proshthesis. Clin. Biomech., 18: S53-S58.
    CrossRef    


  • Renkawitz, T., F.S. Santori, J. Grifka, C. Valverde, M.M. Morlock and I.D. Learmonth, 2008. A new short uncemented, proximally fixed anatomic femoral implant with a prominent lateral flare: Design rationals and study design of an international clinical trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 9.
    CrossRef    


  • Harrison, J., J. Keggi, K. Keggi, L. Keppler and R.T. Kennon et al., 2010. Design rationale MSATM total hip stem design (Muscle sparing approach). Joint Implant Surgery and Research Foundation, Chagrin Falls, Ohio, USA. http://www.jisrf.org/pdf_files/DesignRationaleMSA.pdf.


  • Westphal, F.M., N. Bishop, K. Puschel and M.M. Morlock, 2006. Biomechanics of a new short stemmed uncemented hip prosthesis: An in-vitro study in human bone. Hip Int., 16: 22-30.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Adam, F., D.S. Hammer, D. Pape and D. Kohn, 2002. Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants. Arch. Orthopaedic Trauma Surg., 122: 262-268.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bennett, D. and T. Goswami, 2008. Finite element analysis of hip stem designs. Mater. Des., 29: 45-60.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved