HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Medical Sciences

Year: 2009 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 98-102
DOI: 10.3923/jms.2009.98.102
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, the Egyptian Experience
S. Salah, A. Hamshary, H. Lotfy and H. Abdel Rahman

Abstract: To study the characteristics of Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis (JRA) in the Egyptian population, comparing it to other populations. We retrospectively studied the charts of 196 Egyptian children with Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis (JRA), who fulfilled the ILAR (International League Association for Rheumatology) classification of JIA and were followed up between 1990 and 2006 in the Children’s Hospital, Cairo University. Their clinical features and laboratory data were collected and statistically analyzed. The male to female ratio was 1:1.09 and the mean age of disease onset was 6.257 ±3.41 years. The mode of onset was oligoarticular in 41.3%, polyarticular in 34.7% and systemic in 24%. Chronic uveitis was found in 5.6% of the children. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) status was determined in all patients and was positive in 21.7%. Amyloidosis was present in 1.76% of patients. The spectrum of clinical presentation of the disease in Egyptian children shows both some similarities and some differences from other populations, with oligo and polyarticular onset subtypes being commonest. The cause of these differences may be due, in part, to ethnic and environmental factors. Referral bias may be another cause.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
S. Salah, A. Hamshary, H. Lotfy and H. Abdel Rahman, 2009. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, the Egyptian Experience. Journal of Medical Sciences, 9: 98-102.

Keywords: Childhood arthritis and rheumatoid epidemiology

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a term referring to a group of disorders characterized by chronic arthritis manifesting by synovitis with or without systemic features (Sircar et al., 2006). It is the most common chronic rheumatic illness in children and is a significant cause of short and long term disability (Weiss and IIowite, 2005) According to the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification, JIR includes several subgroups, including systemic arthritis, oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and others, all of which are distinguished by clinical and laboratory features (Weiss et al., 2005). However, in spite of being a common disease, it is still one of the most enigmatic problems in rheumatology (Borchers et al., 2006). The clinical presentation of the disease differs in different populations, reflecting the effect of genetic and environmental factors (Bahabri et al., 1997). The disease has been studied extensively in Western countries. Studies have shown the following characteristics: a predominance of the pauciarticular onset type, lower incidence of systemic onset disease and a higher risk of secondary amyloidosis (Bahabri et al., 1997). Reports from Arab countries are insufficient (Bahabri et al., 1997). The management of JIA combines anti inflammatory and immuno-modulatory medications with physical and occupational therapy, psychosocial and educational partnership with patients and their parents in addition to the occasional need for surgery and nutritional support for these children (Hashkes et al., 2005).

During the past few years, remarkable advances in the treatment of JIA have been made with the advent of new disease-modifying antirheumatic agents (DMARDS) and biologic therapy (Martini et al., 2006).

The objective of this retrospective study was to describe the demographic, clinical and laboratory features of JIA among Egyptian children, comparing them to those of other populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 196 Egyptian children with JIA followed up from January 1990 until December 2006 at the Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic of the Children’s Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt. One hundred and two female and 94 male patients who fulfilled the ILAR (International league association for Rheumatology) criteria for classification of JIA (Weiss et al., 2005) were enrolled in the study. All patients had been followed up for at least 18 months. We recorded the age of disease onset, main presenting features and also clinical and laboratory manifestations of the disease. We performed a urine examination for these children every 3 months in order to search for proteinuria. A chest x ray was carried out for all patients, in addition to an echocardiography when cardiac affection was suspected. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening was carried out by indirect immunoflourescence (IF) using Hep-2 cells. Slit lamp examination was used for screening of uveitis. The disease course was considered remittent if the disease activity lasted less than 2 years from the onset and terminated in remission without recurrence. Progressive or unremitting disease course was characterized by active disease for more than two years (Bahabri et al., 1997). We summarized our results using simple descriptive statistics, such as the mean, median and range. The t-test was used to compare numerical data. The Chi-square test was used to compare nominal data. Overall, p<0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

We included in present study 196 Egyptian JRA patients (94 males and 102 females, male- to-female ratio of 1:1.09) with a mean age of 11.93 ± 4.423 years (range 3-25 years). Their ages at disease diagnosis ranged from 6 months-12 years with a mean of 6.257 ± 3.41 years. Six (3.06%) patients were below 5 years of age while the highest percentage of patients (43.88%) was in the age range of 10-15 years. Patients were almost evenly distributed between urban (50.51%) and rural areas (49.48%). Eleven patients (5.6%) had a positive family history for rheumatoid arthritis. While 27 cases (13.8%) showed a positive family history of other autoimmune rheumatologic diseases (e.g., SLE).

The mode of onset was oligoarticular in 81 (41.3%), polyarticular in 68 (34.7%) and systemic in 47 patients (24%).

Table 1 shows the frequency of the clinical characteristics according to the type of onset.

In oligoarticular onset JRA, 2 subtypes were detected, persistent oligoarticular arthritis, which was present in 77.8% (n = 63) and extended oligoarticular arthritis which was present in 22.2% (n = 18).

The distribution of joint affection in different onset types is shown in Table 2.

The laboratory parameters of different types are shown in Table 3.

Albuminuria was detected in 6 (1.75%) of the patients, one in the oligoarticular onset subtype, two in the polyarticular onset subtype and three in the systemic onset subtype.

Table 1: Clinical characteristics of children with juvenile arthritis, according to the onset type
The percent sign represents the percentage of patients in that particular subtype of JRA manifesting the clinical characteristic

Table 2: Distribution of joint affection in different modes of onset in the study group
PIPs: Proximal interphalangeal; MCPs: Metacarpophalangeal; MTPs: Metatarsophalyngeal. The percent sign represents the percentage of patients in that particular subtype of JRA manifesting the clinical characteristic

Table 3: Laboratory parameters in different JIA subtypes
The percent sign represents the percentage of patients in that particular subtype of JRA manifesting the clinical characteristic

Table 4: Results of ANA in the present study group

Table 5: The prognosis and fate of present study group

ANA was positive (1:80-1:60), in 37 (18.9%) of the patients and the distribution in different subtypes is shown in Table 4.

Slit lamp examination showed positive findings suggesting chronic uveitis in 5.6% of patients (n = 11).

The prognosis and fate of present study group were also studied and shown in Table 5.

DISCUSSION

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common rheumatic diseases in childhood (Niehues and Lankisch, 2006). We studied by retrospective analysis 196 Egyptian children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis who were following up in the Children’s Hospital of Cairo University which is a tertiary referral center. The results of this retrospective analysis showed some differences and some similarities in the clinical profiles of our patients with JRA, when compared to other populations. The mean age of disease onset was 6.257 ±3.41 years, which was close to that seen in Saudi Arabia (6 years) and Spain (5.6 years) (Bahabri et al., 1997; Mengual et al., 2007). Disease prevalence was almost equal in patients form both urban and rural areas. This was contrary to other studies (Kurahara et al., 2007) where rural areas showed a higher prevalence. Perhaps this was due to the fact that present study was conducted in a public hospital, where most of the patients come from the low or middle socioeconomic classes.

In contrast to some countries such as Saudi Arabia were systemic onset is the commonest type (Khuffash and Majeed, 1988), the oligoarticular onset disease was the most frequently observed type found in the patients followed by the polyarticular JRA. Other countries, such as France and Spain, described similar presentations to ours, whereby the oligoarticular onset was the commonest (41.7%) (Quartier and Prieor, 2007; Mengual et al., 2007).

This variability in the relative frequency of the subtypes of arthritis may be due to differences in environmental and genetic factors, with possible exposure to different types of infections (Chantler et al., 1985). All throughout the course of the disease morning stiffness was the commonest manifestation in 65.3% (similar to studies by Grassi et al., 1998), while spiky fever was the next commonest (19.4% of all patients and 80.9% of patients of the systemic onset type. Work done in Lithuania revealed the presence of spiky fever in 73% of patients with systemic onset type (Baksiene et al., 2003), but other studies (Chandrasekaran et al., 1996) described spiky fever in all patients with systemic onset type.

Table 6: Comparative epidemiological data of JRA in 5 countries
NA: Not applicable

Families of 5.6% of our patients had a history of JRA, while 13.8% of the families had a history of some other rheumatological disease, which is higher than the 4% incidence in the Saudi study (Niehues and Lankisch, 2006), but close to that in other studies (Zeft et al., 2008). ANA was positive in 18.9% of cases, which is close to the results of Gare and Fasth (1995). This might reflect a higher incidence of infections inducing the illness, or more likely the use of more sensitive techniques (Grassi et al., 1998) in detecting ANA (Schaller, 1977). In different studies, the reported incidence of uveitis in JIA patients in Western countries ranged between 10 and 20% (Khuffash and Majeed, 1988; Steinbrocker et al., 1949) and can reach up to 50% in younger patients with PaO-JRA and positive ANA (Ozdogan et al., 1991) which is higher than the prevalence of uveitis (5.6%) observed in this study, but the results of this study are close to that in other studies (Schaller et al., 1976) and even higher than the 1.7% reported by in the Saudi study (Niehues et al., 2006) which my be attributed to genetic susceptibility influencing the disease expression and the larger number of cases in this study that decreases the referral bias.

Secondary amyloidosis is a known complication of JRA, especially of SO-JRA. The highest frequency (up to 10%) of this complication was reported by various European series (Svantesson et al., 1983). Amyloidosis was diagnosed in only 3 c ases (1.76%) in present study group, but the lower incidence in this series may be due to the younger age of the patients, as amyloidosis is more common in adults with JRA. Another influencing factor might be the effect of ethnicity on disease expression.

Table 6 show comparative epidemiological data between several studies including the present study.

In conclusion, this is one of the largest series of patients with JRA recorded in an Arab country. Epidemiological data is comparable to earlier reports. Onset types show increased frequency of Oligoarticular-JRA and PaO-JRA compared to SO-JRA and a lower incidence of amyloidosis. Whether this represents referral bias to tertiary care centers or due to the effect of genetic and environmental factors, has to be proved by further studies in other centers.

REFERENCES

  • Bahabri, S., W. Al-Sewairi, A. Al-Mazyad, A. Karrar, S. Al-Ballaa, K. El-Ramahai and A. Al-Dalaan, 1997. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: The Saudi experience. Ann. Saudi Med., 4: 413-418.
    PubMed    


  • Baksiene, D., J. Kasparaviciene, M. Zebiene and B. Puteliene, 2003. Juvenile idiopathic systemic arthritis. Medicina (Kaunas), 39: 751-755.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Borchers, A.T., C. Selmi, G. Cheema, C.L. Keen, Y. Shoenfeld and M.E. Gershwin, 2006. juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Autoimmun. Rev., 5: 279-298.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Chandrasekaran, A.N., C.P. Rajendran and R. Madhavan, 1996. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-Madras experience. Indian J. Pediatr., 4: 501-510.
    PubMed    


  • Chantler, J.K., A.J. Tingle and R.E. Petty, 1985. Persistent rubella virus infection associated with chronic arthritis in children. N Engl. J. Med., 313: 1117-1123.
    PubMed    


  • Gare, B.A. and A. Fasth, 1995. The natural history of juvenile chronic arthritis: A population based cohort study. I. Onset and disease process. J. Rheumatol., 22: 295-306.
    PubMed    


  • Grassi, W., R. De Angelis and G. Lamanna, 1998. The clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur. J. Radiol., 27: 18-24.
    PubMed    


  • Khuffash, F.A. and H.A. Majeed, 1988. juvenile rheumatoid arthritis among Arab children. Scand J. Rheumatol., 17: 393-395.
    PubMed    


  • Kurahara, D.K., A. Grandinetti, L.L. Fujii, A.A. Tokuda and J.A. Galario et al., 2007. Visiting consultant clinics to study prevalence rates of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and childhood systemic lupus erythematosus across dispersed geographic areas. J. Rheumatol., 34: 425-429.
    PubMed    


  • Mengual L.M., J.M. Fernandez Menenclez, G.S. Sanchez, M.F. Diaz, N.F. Gonzalez and S.M. Guerrero, 2007. Epidemiological study of juvenile arthritis in the last sixteen years in Asturias. Anal. Pediatr., 66: 24-30.
    PubMed    


  • Niehues, T. and P. Lankisch, 2006. Recommendations for the use of methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Paediatr. Drugs, 8: 347-356.
    PubMed    


  • Ozdogan, H., O. Kasapcopur, H. Dede, N. Arisoy, T. Beceren, S. Yurdakul and H. Yazici, 1991. Juvenile chronic arthritis in a Turkish population. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol., 9: 431-435.
    PubMed    


  • Quartier, P. and A.M. Prieur, 2007. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. (I) Clinical aspects. Rev. Prat., 57: 1171-1178.
    PubMed    


  • Schaller, J.G., H.D. Ochs and E.D. Thomas, 1976. Histocompatibility antigens in childhood-onset arthritis. J. Pediatr., 88: 926-930.
    PubMed    


  • Steinbrocker, O., C.H. Traeger and R.C. Batterman, 1949. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 140: 659-662.
    PubMed    


  • Svantesson, H., A. Akesson and K. Eberhardt, 1983. Prognosis in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis with systemic onset. A follow-up study. Scand J. Rheumatol., 12: 139-144.
    PubMed    


  • Weiss, J.E. and N.T. Ilowite, 2005. juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr. Clin. North Am., 52: 413-442.
    PubMed    


  • Zeft, A., E.S. Shear, S.D. Thompson, N. Glass David and S. Prahalad, 2008. Familial autoimmunity: maternal parent-of-origin effect in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol., 27: 241-244.
    PubMed    


  • Sircar, D., B. Ghosh, A. Ghosh and S. Haldar, 2006. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Indian Pediatr., 43: 429-433.
    PubMed    


  • Hashkes, P.J. and R.M. Laxer, 2005. Medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. JAMA., 294: 1671-1684.
    PubMed    


  • Martini, G. and F. Zulian, 2006. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Current and future treatment options. Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 7: 387-399.
    PubMed    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved