HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Microbiology

Year: 2020 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-8
DOI: 10.17311/jm.2020.1.8
Determination of Probiotic Bacteria from Intestine of Sparisoma viride and Bioencapsulation of Artemia salina with Probionts
N. Yogananth , M. Akila, M. Syed Ali , M. Jayaprakashvel and R. Muthezhilan

Abstract: Background and Objective: Now a days, the need for remarkable disease resistance, growth of aquatic organisms and feed competence has brought about the employ of probiotics in aquaculture field. The objective of the present study was to isolate probiotic bacterial strains from fish intestines and screen them by in vitro testing of their antagonism to pathogens and bioencapsulation efficacy. Materials and Methods: Six bacteria were isolated from marine fish gut and identified by biochemical test. All six isolates were assessed in vitro for its inhibitory activity against common fish pathogens of Aeromonas hydrophila and Vibrio harvey by well diffusion assay. Based on the antimicrobial activity, the Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Bacillus were selected for assaying probiotic properties of acid tolerance, bile salt concentration and auto aggregation assay. The 24 h old Artemia salina nauplii were selected for probiont encapsulation study. Results: The isolates Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Bacillus were confirmed as probionts by above mentioned three methods. The research of encapsulation studies exposed that the gut loading and evacuation time of Artemia nauplii differed according to the oils and probiotics used for the trials. Probiotics take less time for gut loading and retention when compared to oils. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated that the indigenous fish gut bacteria provided benefit to the culture fishes in terms of pathogen protection and increasing growth potential and thus fulfilled the major requirements of being effective probiotics

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
N. Yogananth, M. Akila, M. Syed Ali, M. Jayaprakashvel and R. Muthezhilan, 2020. Determination of Probiotic Bacteria from Intestine of Sparisoma viride and Bioencapsulation of Artemia salina with Probionts. Research Journal of Microbiology, 15: 1-8.

Keywords: gut bacteria, Sparisoma viride, antagonistic activity, probiotics, Aquaculture, bioencapsulation and Artemia salina

INTRODUCTION

Shrimp and fish culture is grown as a million dollar industry and rearing of shrimps and fish in culture system becomes popularized throughout the world especially in Southeast Asia. Worldwide, major economic losses in cultured shrimp and fish result from a relatively small number of opportunistic pathogenic bacteria1. Vibrio and Aeromonas are most important pathogen recognized in larval cultures, causing haemorrhagic septicaemia, ulcerative conditions, abdominal distensions, fin/tail rot and exophthalmia in freshwater fish species2,3.

Many pathogenic bacteria become resistant to antibiotics and hence farmers resort to dump more antibiotics4. At the same time, use of prophylactic antibiotics is detrimental to aquatic and terrestrial environments, animal and human health5,6. Hence, the scientific communities have proposed friendly alternatives such as vaccines7, antibiotic substitutes8 or use of probiotics9.

During, last few decades probiotics have been used in a number of trials to improve human health and to reduce pathogenic problems in intestinal tracts10,11. Most of the results are promising and gave confidence about the use of probiotics for improving human health. The research on probiotics for aquatic animals is thus increasing with the demand for environment-friendly aquaculture and it is expected that it can assure the nutritional security in the next millennium12,13. The beneficial effect of probiotics have been attributed to their ability to promote the immunological and non- immunological defense barriers in the gut, normalization of increase in intestinal permeability, exogenous production of digestive enzymes and altered gut microflora. They have also been shown to enhance humoral response and consequently to promote intestine’s barriers. Probiotics have also been shown to stimulate non-specific host resistance to microbial pathogen and thereby, aid in immune elimination of pathogen14.

Different kinds of live prey have been used to feed larvae of diverse marine organisms. These include copepods, nematodes, rotifers and Artemia nauplii. Until now, brine shrimp nauplii was considered the best diet for feeding zoophagous organisms and was provided as a live food to over 85% of the aquaculture species15.

Even though enrichment of Artemia is widely used in aquaculture, it has to date been unclear as to what proportion of the enrichment is incorporated into body tissue and how much remains resident in the gut. The gut loading and evacuation trial demonstrated that the gut loading and retention time of Artemia nauplii (2 day old) bioencapsulated with vegetable oils and probiotics. Information regarding the gut loading and unloading time of A. parthenogenetica nauplii is scarce. Immanuel et al.16 conferred a study on delivery of highly unsaturated fatty acid, probionts and biomedicine through bioencapsulated Artemia and further its application was done on Penaeus monodon as growth and survival. They had reported that in products tested with probiont Lactobacillus, the Artemia reached full gut condition in 38±1 min.

The present study was undertaken to isolate probiotic bacterial strains from fish intestines and screen them by in vitro testing of their antagonism to pathogens and bioencapsulation efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection and processing of sample: A total of 10 healthy parrot fishes (Sparisoma viride) with average weight of 50-75 g and average length of 10-13 cm were collected in year of December, 2018, from fish farm in Besant Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu and transferred to the PG laboratory, PG and Research Department of Biotechnology, Mohammed Sathak College of Arts and Science, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

The surface of the fish is sterilized using 70% ethanol and sterile water. By using the surgical knife, cut the skin from the anal fin along the belly of the fish to the operculum and the fish gut was dissected out under the sterile condition.

The gut was removed by aseptic dissection box and homogenized in a mortar and pestle by using 5 mL sterile 0.9% NaCl solution for 24 h at 30°C followed by incubation at 45°C for 10 min in a convection oven to activate the sporulation process. Ethanol (50% v/v) was added to a volume of 20 mL to each of the flasks which were incubated at 20°C for 1 h. The contents were centrifuged at 10,000 g the supernatants decanted and the resultant pellets incubated at 105°C in a convection oven for 5 min. The dry pellets were reconstituted into 20 mL of sterile physiological saline and serially diluted to 104 in 101 increments. The 0.1 mL of the diluted sample were taken from 103 and 104 dilutions and spreaded in nutrient agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 12 h. After incubation, the each colony appeared on the plates were streak individually in fresh plate for further biochemical and antimicrobial characterization

Antagonistic activity: Nearly 6 strains were isolated at first phase which were designated as B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 and B6 undergoes agar well-diffusion method to detect the anti-microbial activity against the fish pathogens like Aeromonos hydrophilia and Vibrio harveii.

Screening for probiotics properties
Acid tolerance test: The B1, B2, B5, isolates were grown overnight 37°C for 12 h and were centrifuge at 7000 rpm for 10 min. The cell pellet were washed with twice with PBS (phosphate buffer saline) of pH 7.3 and resuspend in PBS and final volume 1 mL the strains were diluted in PBS 1:100 dilution at pH 1, 2, 3 and 4. The mixture of each strain was then incubated at 37°C for 12 h. the viability of bacterial cell were determined by plating the cells in nutrient agar plates at different time interval 0, 60, 180 min growth of the bacteria were expressed in colony forming units/mL (log10 CFU mL1) and the survival percentage of the 6 isolates to different pH values were calculated.

Bile salt concentration: The probiotics cultures were grown at 37°C for 12 h in nutrient broth without bile. Then 1 mL of the culture broth was poured onto the nutrient broth with varying bile salt concentration 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0%. The ability of the isolates was measured by absorbance at 595 nm using ELISA reader after different periods of incubation (0, 2, 4 and 6 h).

Auto aggregation assay: The probiotic culture was centrifuge and discard the supernatant in the pellet add twice the amount of PBS and dissolve the pellet in the PBS. The OD value was taken at various time intervals 0 min, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h.

Bioencapsulation potential of probiotics
Collection site: The cysts of Artemia salina were obtained from the Department of marine Biotechnology, Amet University, Kanathur, Chennai and were purified and stored according to Krishnakumar17.

Selection of experimental sources: The vegetable oil such as coconut oil, sunflower oil, cod liver oil and Gingelly oil were purchased commercially. In the present study probiotics such as B1, B2 and B5 strains were cultured in the nutrient agar slant.

Culturing of probiotic bacteria: The slant culture of the probiotic bacteria is transferred to the broth culture under aseptic techniques. B1, B2 and B5 strains were cultured in nutrient broth. After 48 h at 37°C incubation, the both bacterium has sub cultured again in same medium composition (50 mL of broth culture were prepared). Pure culture of probiotics was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 30 min. After centrifugation, the pellets were washed twice with saline. After washing probiotics were aseptically enriched with 24 h old Artemia salina nauplii according to Divya et al.18.

Experimental setup: Purified cysts were hatched out in 35 ppt sea water. The brine shrimp Artemia salina nauplii were collected on a sieve from the stock, rinsed with filtered seawater and transferred to enrichment containers (2 L capacity) at a density of 100 individuals/mL of seawater (35 ppt) at room temperature (28±1°C). The enrichment diets were then standardized and added at a rate of 0.5 mL L1 (oil emulsions) and 6×1010 CFU mL1 (probiotics) to the respective containers. Completely randomized experimental design was followed with 3 replicates. Strong aeration was provided to the rearing containers to maintain an optimum oxygen level at 5 ppm and to increase the enrichment rate16. To ensure the encapsulation of the diets, the enriched Artemia nauplii were examined under the microscope for assessing the time taken for 100% gut loading and unloading. The enriched Artemia, were kept in water free from the enrichment particle, to calculate Artemia nauplii gut unloading time. As the nauplii were transparent, the presence of the emulsion could readily be assessed by the yellowish gut. The time required for filling the gut with emulsions in the nauplii was observed periodically under light microscope.

RESULTS

Total 6 different isolates from fish guts were obtained on nutrient agar plates for their morphological and biochemical characterization. Mixed cultures of organisms in the nutrient agar plates with smooth round colony and large dull white irregular colonies and small pin point colonies were screened as individual isolates and given no B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 and B6 and identified to their species level. The description of the organisms is given in the Table 1. The strains 3 (2 Gram+ve Cocci and 1 Gram-ve rod) out of 6 were selected on the basis of specific morphological and antagonistic properties for further studies.

All 6 isolates from the gastrointestinal tract of S. viride was assessed in vitro for its inhibitory activity against common fish pathogen A. hydrophila and V. harvey by well diffusion assay. Out of the 6 strains, the B1, B2 and B5 strains registered the antagonistic activity and remaining 3 strains gave no zone of inhibition against the 2 fish pathogenic bacteria. The size of zone of inhibition was measured using centimeter scale and found between 2-5 mm (Table 2).

Screening for probiotics properties
Resistance to low pH: The selected isolates, Enterococcus sp., Streptococcus sp. and Bacillus sp. recorded maximum tolerance to pH 3 even after an exposure of 24 h. However, with pH 4, the viability was constant in all isolates even after 24 h. Table 3, 4 and 5 show the pH resistance.

Table 1:
Identification of bacterial isolates by morphological and cultural characteristics

Table 2:
Antagonistic activity of gut microflora

Table 3:
Low pH resistance of strain 1-Enterococcus sp.
TNTC: Too numerous to count

Table 4:
Low pH resistance of strain 2-Streptococcus sp.
TNTC: Too numerous to count

Table 5:
Low pH resistance of strain 5-Bacillus sp.
TNTC: Too numerous to count

Bile salt concentration: The results showed the bile salts at 0.15, 0.25 and 0.50% concentrations did not affect the viability of Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Bacillus in MRS medium (above 50% of survival). The results are given in Fig. 1a-c.

Auto aggregation: The cellular autoaggregation of probiotic strains were evaluated and compared with other standard probiotic cultures (Fig. 2). The highest percentage of autoaggregation was noted in the B1 strain (86%) when compared to B2 (74%) and B5 (46%) after 6 h incubation.

Bioencapsulation potential of probiotics
Gut loading time of Artemia salina nauplii: Results showed that the time required for loading coconut oil, sunflower oil, cod liver oil and gingelly oil) and probiotics (Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Bacillus) varied significantly among themselves. Of the diets tested, the probiotics enriched Artemia nauplii reached a full gut condition between 30-40 min, vegetable oil emulsions enriched Artemia nauplii reached a 100% gut full condition ranged between 55 and 80 min (Table 6).

Fig. 1a-c:
Bile salt tolerance of (a) Enterococcus B1, (b) Streptococcus B2 and (c) Bacillus B5

Streptococcus strain enriched Artemia nauplii reached a full gut condition at 30 min followed by Enterococcus enriched Artemia nauplii (35 min).

Evacuation time of Artemia salina nauplii: The gut evacuation for enriched A. salina with probiotics time ranged between 12-20 min, while for fish oil emulsion, it ranged between 35 and 78 min and for vegetable oil emulsion enriched Artemia nauplii (Table 7).

Fig. 2:
Autoaggregation potential of strain B1, B2 and B5

Table 6:
Gut loading time of Artemia salina nauplii

Table 7:
Evacuation time of Artemia salina nauplii

The gut retention time in the A. salina nauplii revealed that the time required for evacuation with loaded vegetable oils and probiotics varied significantly.

DISCUSSION

The parrot fish is a famous fish for export in Chennai, India, so improvement of its growth and immune system is very important. It was shown that probiotics can improve the growth parameters and immune system of various fish species in aquaculture. Therefore, the present study was aimed to use some isolated probiotics from digestive tract of parrot fish to improve its culture condition.

In the present study, out of the 6 bacterial isolates screened for use as probionts, only 3 strains (50% of the total) viz., B1, B2 and B5 showed antagonism against A. hydrophila and V. harvey.

The fish intestine is a favorable ecological niche for microorganisms, which reach much higher numbers than in the surrounding water19. There are several studies have been reported for the isolation of bacterial strains with probiotic potential from different sources. Jahangiri et al.20 reported the 6 probiotic bacteria were isolated from digestive tract of Guppy fish and these isolates demonstrated inhibition zones in the range of approximately 14-20 mm against the indicator strain. Also, a similar frequency of inhibitory bacteria was observed for isolates from halibut larvae21, rainbow trout22, turbot23 and shrimp24. The reduction of pathogen growth and cell density indicate that extracellular bacteriolytic products produced by probiotic bacteria were responsible for this inhibition13.

The present study, the selected bacteria with probiotic potential is resistance to acid and bile salts because they should tolerate low pH and bile acids. Being resistant to low pH and bile salt are the major selection criteria for probiotic strains. Since, to reach the small intestine they have to pass through from the stressful conditions of stomach25. Although in the stomach, pH can be as low as 1.0 in most in vitro assays pH 3.0 has been preferred. Due to the fact that a significant decrease in the viability of strains is often observed at pH 2.0 and below26. Although the bile concentration of the human gastro intestinal tract varies, the mean intestinal bile concentration is believed to be 0.3% w/v and the staying time is suggested to be 4 h26.

Presently, the cellular autoaggregation of probiotic strains were evaluated and compared with other standard probiotic cultures. The ability of probiotic bacteria to form cellular aggregates is considered a desirable characteristic as they can potentially inhibit adherence of pathogenic bacteria to intestinal mucosa either by forming a barrier via self-aggregation or coaggregation with commensal organisms on the intestinal mucosa or by direct coaggregation with the pathogens to facilitate clearance27,28.

For the gut loading time, of the 7 different diets tested, the probiotics enriched Artemia nauplii reached a full gut condition between 30-40 min than other diets tested. Similarly, Citarasu et al.29 depicted the effect of feeding Artemia enriched with stresstol and cod liver oil on the growth and stress resistance of the Penaeus indicus post larvae. Full gut loading time of Artemia with emulsified fish oil, stresstol and oil mixed with stresstol was 127, 95 and 110 min, respectively. The results obtained in the present study were more or less similar with the above results. Smith et al.30 described a method whereby the food in the gut is evacuated and replaced by inert plastic beads. The materials used for enrichment of Artemia nauplii are differed from the above study. So the time variations recorded for oils and probiotics are totally different from the above results.

The enrichment process in Artemia is generally regarded as a “bioencapsulation” process whereby the Artemia ingests enrichment particles until the gut is full. Feeding on large nauplii with higher energy content is advised since the target species will spend less energy capturing a smaller number of prey to fulfill its energetic requirements, unless that interferes with the feeding processes of the target species31. The result revealed that the gut loading and evacuation time of Artemia nauplii varied according to the oils and probiotics used for the experiments. Probiotics take less time for gut loading and retention when compared to oils.

CONCLUSION

It could be concluded that the indigenous fish gut bacteria provided benefit to the culture fishes in terms of pathogen protection and increasing growth potential and thus fulfilled the major requirements of being effective probiotics. Results of this experiment indicated that adult Artemia salina had high ability in enrichment with the probiotic bacteria viz., Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Bacillus and enrichment time had a positive ratio with attached bacteria to Artemia nauplii. However the principles behind their uses remain sound and their full potential needs to be explored further more and works are needed to assess the probiotic effects on growth and immune responses in fishes, including Indian major carps and other ornamental fishes.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study discover the antagonistic effect of probiotic against fish pathogens and their bioencapsulation potential that can be beneficial for Aquaculture. This study will help the researcher to uncover the critical areas of bioencapsulation potential by Artimia nauplii that many researchers were not able to explore. Thus a new theory on these gut loading and gut evacuation time of probiotics may support of growth and immune responses of fish community may be arrived at.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are thankful to the authorities of Mohamed Sathak College of Arts and Science, Sholinganallur, Chennai, India for providing necessary facilities.

REFERENCES

  • Toranzo, A.E., B. Magarinos and J.L. Romalde, 2005. A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture, 246: 37-61.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Austin, B. and X.H. Zhang, 2006. Vibrio harveyi: A significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Lett. Applied Microbiol., 43: 119-124.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Paillard, C., F. Le Roux and J.J. Borrego, 2004. Bacterial disease in marine bivalves, a review of recent studies: Trends and evolution. Aquat. Living Resour., 17: 477-498.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Aoki, T., 1975. Effects of chemotherapeutics on bacterial ecology in the water of ponds and the intestinal tracts of cultured fish, ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis). Jpn. J. Microbiol., 19: 7-12.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cabello, F.C., 2006. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: A growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol., 8: 1137-1144.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhou, Q., K. Li, X. Jun and L. Bo, 2009. Role and functions of beneficial microorganisms in sustainable aquaculture. Bioresour. Technol., 100: 3780-3786.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kurath, G., 2008. Biotechnology and DNA vaccines for aquatic animals. Revue Scientifique Technique, 27: 175-196.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dorrington, T. and M. Gomez-Chiarri, 2008. Antimicrobial peptides for use in oyster aquaculture: Effect on pathogens, commensals and eukaryotic expression systems. J. Shellfish Res., 27: 365-374.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kesarcodi-Watson, A., H. Kaspar, M.J. Lategan and L. Gibson, 2008. Probiotics in aquaculture: The need, principles and mechanisms of action and screening processes. Aquaculture, 274: 1-14.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Guarner, F. and J.R. Malagelada, 2003. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet, 361: 512-519.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Balcazar, J.L., I. de Blas, I. Ruiz-Zarzuela, D. Cunningham, D. Vendrell and J.L. Muzquiz, 2006. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet. Microbiol., 114: 173-186.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Patra, B.C. and P. Bandyopadhyay, 2002. Probiotics can Assure Nutritional Security in Aquaculture: An Overview. In: Ecology and Ethology of Aquatic Biota, Kumar, A. (Ed.). Vol. 2, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, India, pp: 220-225


  • Al-Faragi, J.K.H. and S.A.A. Alsaphar, 2012. Isolation and identification of Bacillus subtilus as probiotic from intestinal microflora of common carp Cyprinus carpio L. Iraqi J. Vet. Med., 36: 355-361.
    Direct Link    


  • Perdigon, G., S. Alvarez, M. Rachid, G. Aguero and N. Gobbato, 1995. Immune system stimulation by probiotics. J. Dairy Sci., 78: 1597-1606.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bhat, B.V., 1992. Potentials and prospects for an Artemia aquabusiness in India. Seafood Export J., 24: 27-31.


  • Immanuel, G., A. Palavesam and M. Petermarian, 2001. Effects of feeding lipid enriched Artemia nauplii on survival, growth, fatty acids and stress resistance of postlarvae Penaeus indicus. Asian Fish. Sci., 14: 377-388.
    Direct Link    


  • Krishnakumar, V., 2012. A studies on the outdoor culture of the brine shrimp, Artemia sp. in solar salt fields off Kelambakkam, South India and impact of the biotic community on salt quality. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Madras, India.


  • Divya, K.R., A. Isamma, V. Ramasubramanian, S. Sureshkumar and T.S. Arunjith, 2012. Colonization of probiotic bacteria and its impact on ornamental fish Puntius conchonius. J. Environ. Biol., 33: 551-555.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Austin, B. and D.A. Austin, 1987. Bacterial Fish Pathogens: Disease in Farmed and Wild Fish. Ellis Horwood Ltd., West Sussex, UK., ISBN-13: 9780853128441, pp: 13-350


  • Jahangiri, L., M. Sudagar, O. Ashayerizadeh, H. Kolangi and A. Tabarraei, 2018. Isolation of probiotic bacteria from guppy Poecilia reticulata (Cyprinodontiformes: Poecilidae). Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 18: 809-815.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bergh, O., 1995. Bacteria associated with early life stages of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus L., inhibit growth of a pathogenic Vibrio sp. J. Fish Dis., 18: 31-40.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Brunt, J. and B. Austin, 2005. Use of a probiotic to control lactococcosis and streptococcosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish. Dis., 28: 693-701.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hjelm, M., A. Riaza, F. Formoso, J. Melchiorsen and L. Gram, 2004. Seasonal incidence of autochthonous antagonistic Roseobacter spp. and Vibrionaceae strains in a turbot larva (Scophthalmus maximus) rearing system. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 70: 7288-7294.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rengpipat, S., W. Phianphak, S. Piyatiratitivorakul and P. Menasveta, 1998. Effects of a probiotic bacterium on black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon survival and growth. Aquaculture, 167: 301-313.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cakir, I., 2003. Determination of some probiotic properties on Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium. Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University, Turkey.


  • Prasad, J., H. Gill, J. Smart and P.K. Gopal, 1998. Selection and characterisation of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains for use as probiotics. Int. Dairy J., 8: 993-1002.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bujnakova, D. and V. Kmet, 2002. Aggregation of animal lactobacilli with O157 enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B, 49: 152-154.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schachtsiek, M., W.P. Hammes and C. Hertel, 2004. Characterization of Lactobacillus coryniformis DSM 20001T surface protein Cpf mediating coaggregation with and aggregation among pathogens. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 70: 7078-7085.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Citarasu, T., G. Immanuel and M.P. Marian, 1998. Effect of feeding Artemia enriched with stresstol and cod liver oil on growth and stress resistance in the Indian white shrimp Penaeus indicus post larvae. Asian Fish. Sci., 12: 65-75.
    Direct Link    


  • Smith, G.G., A.J. Ritar, C.F. Phleger, M.M. Nelson, B. Mooney, P.D. Nichols and P.R. Hart, 2002. Changes in gut content and composition of juvenile Artemia after oil enrichment and during starvation. Aquaculture, 208: 137-158.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Narciso, L., 2000. Biology and cultivation of Artemia sp. (Crustacea, Branchiopoda): Its use in aquaculture. King D. Carlos Sea Prize 1998, Cascais Town Hall, Cascais, Portugal, pp: 94.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved