HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Microbiology

Year: 2015 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 9 | Page No.: 440-446
DOI: 10.17311/jm.2015.440.446
Microbiological Quality and Salmonella spp., /Listeria monocytogenes of Spices in Turkey
Recep Kara, Mukadderat Gokmen, Levent Akkaya and Veli Gok

Abstract: Spices contaminated with pathogens may contaminate the food to which they are added and therefore, they pose a great risk to public health. In this study, 250 spices samples (50 samples each of red sweet pepper, red chili pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper) were evaluated for Total Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria (TMAB), Staphylococcus/Micrococcus, Coagulase (+) Staphylococcus, Yeast/Mold, Enterobacteriaceae, Coliform Bacteria, E. coli, Enterococcus spp., B. cereus, Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes. The means of total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TMAB), Staphylococcus/Micrococcus, Coagulase (+) Staphylococcus, Yeast/Mold, Enterobacteriaceae, Coliform Bacteria, E. coli, Enterococcus spp. and B. cereus, counts were detected 5.50, 2.03, <log 2.00, 3.98, 3.57, 3.07, <log 2.00, 3.32 and 2.79 log CFU g–1, respectively. Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes were detected 2.8 and 1.2%. We also determined the antimicrobial resistance of detected Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. Salmonella spp. was resistant to Gentamicin/Ampicillin/Streptomycin, Nalidixic Acid and Tetracycline, while L. monocytogenes was resistant to Gentamicin/Amoxicillin and Ampicillin/Tetracycline/Penicillin. Based on these results, we recommend that spices be packaged with suitable packaging material, preserved in adequate conditions and that all HACCP regulations be strictly obeyed at every stage from production to consumption.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Recep Kara, Mukadderat Gokmen, Levent Akkaya and Veli Gok, 2015. Microbiological Quality and Salmonella spp., /Listeria monocytogenes of Spices in Turkey. Research Journal of Microbiology, 10: 440-446.

Keywords: Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Spices and antimicrobial resistance

INTRODUCTION

Spices are additives that are produced by drying the seed, bud, kernel, fruit, crust, root, stem, node, leaf, stalk and onion parts of plants. They can be used whole, crumbled and/or ground. Spices and herbs are very popular for their aroma and flavor and they often add desirable color to food, as well (TFC., 2013; Elmali and Yaman, 2005). The most commonly used spices in Turkey include red pepper, black pepper, cumin, pimento, cinnamon and ginger (Vural, 2004). Because, they are phytogenetic, spices may become contaminated, especially if they are produced under unhealthy conditions in wet/hot climates and if they are stored under inappropriate conditions (Schwab et al., 1982). Spices are exposed to a wide range of environmental microbial contamination during collection and processing and they are further exposed in retail markets by dust, wastewater and animal and even human excrement. The microbiological quality of Enterobacteriaceae is often used as an indicator of the hygienic situation of a region, where spices are produced and processed (De Boer et al., 1985). Contaminated spices may affect the microbiological quality of the end product and may cause infections and toxicity in humans upon consumption (Elmali and Yaman, 2005). In addition, contaminated spices also increase the microbial load of the food to which they are added, which may cause food spoilage. Spices containing pathogen bacteria may be a potential danger to public health (Coskun, 2010). When added during cooking, spices often undergo sufficient heating to eliminate vegetative pathogens, such as Salmonella. However, when spices are added to pre-cooked dishes as a final flavoring or decoration, they could create a potential health hazard (D'Aoust, 1994). In this study, we investigated the microbiological quality of some spices (red sweet pepper, red chili pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper) that are unpackaged in the Afyonkarahisar province.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection: A total of 250 dried spices (50 samples each of red sweet pepper, red chili pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper) were collected from 20 different herbalist markets between November, 2012 and April, 2013 in the Afyonkarahisar province of Turkey. The spices were collected aseptically in sterile bags (Inter science, 132025) and were analyzed the same day.

Enumeration of microorganisms: Ten grams (10 g) of each spice was homogenized in a sterile stomacher bag (Bag Mixer) with 90 mL of sterile Buffered Peptone Water (BPW). Serial dilutions up to 10–9 were prepared from the homogenized samples. Prepared dilutions were inoculated and incubated as shown in Table 1.

Detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes: Isolation and identification of Salmonella spp. was performed according to ISO (2002) protocol. Briefly, samples (25 g) were weighed into sterile stomacher bags, diluted and homogenized with 225 mL BPW and incubated at 37°C for 18±2 h. Following the incubation, 0.1 mL sample was taken from the culture, inoculated in 10 mL of Rappaport-Vassiliadis enrichment broth (Oxoid) and incubated at 42°C for 24 h. After incubation, one loop cultures were streaked onto XLD Agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Five suspected colonies per plate were lifted and re-streaked onto Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA, Oxoid, CM131) to purify the colonies. The isolated colonies were biochemically characterized with a Microbact TM 24E Gram-Negative Identification System (Oxoid, MB1074A) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Table 1: Methods of microbiological analysis

We detected L. monocytogenes, according to ISO (1996) protocol. Samples (25 g) were weighed into sterile stomacher bags, diluted and homogenized with 225 mL Half Fraser broth (Oxoid, SR142) and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. After the incubation, 1 mL sample was taken from the culture, inoculated in 10 mL of Fraser broth (Oxoid, SR143) and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. After incubation, one loop cultures were streaked onto Oxford Agar (Oxoid, CM 856) and incubated at 30°C for 48 h. The isolated colonies were biochemically characterized with a Microbact™ TM 12L Listeria identification system (Oxoid, MB1128) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests: Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated with a disk-diffusion test (Kirby-Bauer Method), which was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar from a bacterial suspension with turbidity equal to McFarland 0.5. The interpretation was made according to the criteria provided by the CLSI. (2012).

All Salmonella isolates and 3 L. monocytogenes isolates from the recovered spices were evaluated for their resistance to 12 antimicrobial agents by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates. The standard procedure of CLSI. (2012) (formerly NCCLS) was strictly followed throughout. We included the quality control strains S. typhimurium (ATCC-14028) and L. monocytogenes (ATCC 7644) in each run. The concentrations of antimicrobial agents on the disks (Oxoid, Australia) were as follows: Chloramphenicol (30 μg, Oxoid, CT0013B), Ampicillin (10 μg, Oxoid, CT0003B), Gentamicin (10 μg, Oxoid, CT0024B), Streptomycin (10 μg, Oxoid, CT0047B), Vancomycin (30 μg, Oxoid, CT0058B), Amoxicillin (10 μg, Oxoid, CT0161B), Erythromycin (5 μg, Oxoid, CT0066B), Trimethoprim (5 μg, Oxoid, CT0076B), Kanamycin (30 μg, Oxoid, CT0026B), Nalidixic Acid (30 μg, Oxoid, CT0031B), Tetracycline (30 μg, Oxoid, CT0054B) and Penicillin G (10 U, Oxoid, CT0043B). We determined the resistance of the isolates according to the zone diameter interpretative standards recommendations by CLSI (2012).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The microbiological qualities of the spices collected from the markets are presented in Table 2 and 3. The concentrations of Total Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria (TAMB), Staphylococcus/Micrococcus, Coagulase Positive Staphylococcus, Yeast/mold, Enterobacteriaceae, Coliform bacteria, E. coli, Enterococcus spp. and B. cereus were 5.50, 2.03, <log 2.00, 3.98, 3.57, 3.07, <log2.00, 3.32 and 2.79 log CFU g–1, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2: Microbiological quality of spices

Table 3:Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. in spices
*ND: Not detected

According to the Turkish Food Codex Regulation on Microbiological Criteria (TFC., 2013), the standard values for coagulase-positive Staphylococcus and B. cereus should be between 103-104 CFU–1 of spices and should be zero for Salmonella spp. in 25 g samples.

Contaminated spices may cause microbiological problems and may pose a risk to public health because they are often added to foods (Banerjee and Sarkar, 2003). In this study, the average values of TAMB were 5.35, 5.67, 5.38, 5.85 and 5.01 log CFU g–1 in red sweet pepper, red chili pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper, respectively. Vural (2004) detected TAMB levels of 6.81, 6.68, 7.00, 6.92 and 6.59 log CFU g–1 in black pepper, cumin, chili pepper, red pepper flakes and black pepper flakes, respectively. Elmali and Yaman (2005) reported average TAMB levels of 7.23, 6.43, 7.20 and 5.61 log CFU g–1 in black pepper, powdered red pepper, granulated red pepper and cumin, respectively. Shamsuddeen (2009) reported TAMB levels in spice mixture samples, which were produced in Kilishi, as 9.47 log CFU g–1. Therefore, TAMB levels in our study were lower than those previously reported.

Levels of Micrococcus and Staphylococcus (S. aureus) are indicative of personal hygiene used during the preparation of spices (Elmali and Yaman, 2005). In this study, the average levels of Micrococcus/Staphylococcus were 3.66, 2.73, 1.11 and 0.57 CFU g–1 in red pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper, respectively. Coagulase-Positive Staphylococcus were detected at average levels of 1.00 log CFU g–1 in all spices. According to the Turkish Food Codex, the maximum level of Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus in spices should be between 3-4 log CFU g–1 (TFC., 2013). In this study, 12 samples had levels between 3-4 log CFU g–1, including 4 red sweet pepper, 2 red chili pepper, 4 red pepper flakes, 1 cumin and 1 black pepper. Erol et al. (1999) reported levels of Micrococcus/Staphylococcus as 3.07, 3.42, 2.58 and 2.48 CFU g–1 in red pepper, red pepper flakes, black pepper and cumin, respectively, in Ankara. Similarly, Elmali and Yaman (2005) reported Micrococcus/Staphylococcus levels as 2.88, 2.95, 3.47 and 3.92 CFU g–1 in red pepper, granulated red pepper, cumin and black pepper, respectively. The Micrococcus/ Staphylococcus levels in the red pepper in our study were higher than those detected by Erol et al. (1999) and by Elmali and Yaman (2005). However, our results in the red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper were lower than those of the others (Erol et al., 1999; Elmali and Yaman, 2005).

Levels of yeast/mold were 3.96, 3.60, 4.43, 4.42 and 3.31 log CFU g–1 in red sweet pepper, red chili pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper, respectively. Vural et al. (2004) reported that there was a high amount of yeast contamination (2.00-5.00 log CFU g–1) in spice samples. Shamsuddeen (2009) found the fungal count of spice mixture samples to be 5.01 log CFU g–1. Abou Donia (2008) reported that these levels are 1.00-4.00 CFU g–1 in spices in Egypt. The levels of yeast/mold detected in our study are similar to those reported by Abou Donia (2008) but they are lower than those reported by Vural et al. (2004) and Shamsuddeen (2009).

Enterobacteriaceae is an important bacterial group used in the evaluation of the manufacturing processes and include bacteria such as; Coliform, E. coli and Enterococcus spp. (Erol et al., 1999). Enterobacteriaceae counts are generally used as indicators of hygienic quality and therefore, indicate the general microbiological quality of the product (Adams and Moss, 1995). The levels of Enterobacteriaceae in our study were 4.55, 4.55, 1.76, 4.16 and 2,63 log CFU g–1 in red sweet pepper, red chili pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper, respectively. Elmali and Yaman (2005) reported Enterobacteriaceae levels between 3.04-4.91 log CFU g–1 and Ulukanli et al. (2005) reported levels between 2.00-7.00 log CFU g–1. The levels of Enterobacteriaceae detected in our study were similar to those of these previously published studies (Elmali and Yaman, 2005; Ulukanli et al., 2005).

Coliform bacterial level was on average 3.07 log CFU g–1 for all spices. E. coli was not found in the red pepper flakes, cumin, or black pepper, although it was detected in seven red sweet pepper samples (3.30-5.12 log CFU g–1) and eight red chili pepper samples (2.53-5.11 log CFU g–1). Enterococcus spp. levels were on average 3.32 log CFU g–1 in all spices and were highest in the red chili pepper (4.09 log CFU g–1). Ulukanli et al. (2005) reported that coliform levels were between 2.00-7.00 log CFU g–1 in all spices. Abou Donia (2008) reported Coliform and E. coli levels of 1.17-3.04 and 1.17-2.66 log CFU g–1, respectively. Shamsuddeen (2009) reported the detection of E. coli in only one spice sample.

Bacillus cereus levels were 2.56, 2.77, 2.94, 2.52 and 3.04 log CFU g–1 in red sweet pepper, red chili pepper, red pepper flakes, cumin and black pepper, respectively. According to the Turkish Food Codec in spices (TFC., 2013), the maximum level of Bacillus cereus should be between 3-4 log CFU g–1. In this study, 48 samples had levels between 3-4 log CFU g–1, including 8 red sweet pepper, 9 red chili pepper, 11 red pepper flakes, 5 cumin and 15 black pepper. Previously reported levels of B. cereus were ≥5 log CFU g–1 (Little et al., 2003), 2.08-2.85 log CFU g–1 (Erol et al., 1999) and 1.09-3.00 log CFU g–1 (Elmali and Yaman, 2005).

In this study, we detected Salmonella spp. in 2.8% and L. monocytogenes in 1.2% of the spice samples. Salmonella spp., was detected in red chili pepper, cumin and black pepper at 2, 6 and 6%, respectively. Listeria monocytogenes was detected in red chili pepper (2%) and cumin (4%) (Table 3). Salmonella spp., was detected in spices by Shamsuddeen (2009), Little et al. (2003) and Banerjee and Sarkar (2003), but was not detected by Ulukanli et al. (2005) and Abou Donia (2008). Contamination of spices with Salmonella spp. was identified as the cause of 95% of U.S. food recalls associated with spices between 1980-2000 (Vij et al., 2006). Contamination of retail spices is considered an indication of environmental or fecal contamination due to unhygienic practices during their production. Use of spices with high microbial content could increase the chance of food spoilage and transmission of food borne pathogens (Koohy-Kamaly-Dehkordy et al., 2013).

Seven Salmonella spp. and 3 L. monocytogenes isolates recovered from spice samples were tested for antimicrobial resistance against 12 antibiotics. Resistance to Gentamicin/Ampicillin/ Streptomycin, Nalidixic Acid and Tetracycline was found in 14, 42.86 and 57.14% of the Salmonella spp. isolates, respectively. All of the Salmonella spp. isolates were resistant to Vancomycin, Erythromycin and Penicillin G. On the other hand, L. monocytogenes isolates were resistant to Gentamicin/Amoxicillin and Ampicillin/Tetracycline/Penicillin in 33.33 and 66.67% of the samples, respectively. In addition, all of the L. monocytogenes isolates were resistant to Nalidixic Acid.

According to the results of various studies, spices may contain bacteria as a result of mistakes during harvest, inadequate storage conditions, lack of attention to staff hygiene and unrestrained sales without proper packaging.

CONCLUSION

Spices are traditionally used in the production and consumption of foods. In this study, we found that spices sold without proper packaging may contain indicator microorganisms and pathogens. Cross-contamination may occur, if contaminated spices are used for the production of food and this may pose a risk for public health. Additionally, in antibiograms, it was confirmed that obtained Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes strains are resistant to some antibiotics. Therefore, it is essential to apply all HACCP regulations during the harvest of spices and their processing and during all processes leading to consumption. Moreover, it is recommended that spices be packaged with suitable packaging material and regular inspections must be performed for bacteriological control, remnants and contaminants.

REFERENCES

  • Abou Donia, M.A., 2008. Microbiological quality and aflatoxinogenesis of Egyptian spices and medicinal plants. Global Vetrinaria, 2: 175-181.
    Direct Link    


  • Adams, M.R. and M.O. Moss, 1995. Food Microbiology. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK


  • Banerjee, M. and P.K. Sarkar, 2003. Microbiological quality of some retail spices in India. Food Res. Int., 36: 469-474.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • CLSI., 2012. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing standards. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Wayne, PA., USA.


  • Coskun, F., 2010. Microbiological characteristics of some spices sold in Tekirdag markets. J. Tekirdag Agric. Fac., 7: 85-93.
    Direct Link    


  • D'Aoust, J.Y., 1994. Salmonella and the international food trade. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 24: 11-31.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • De Boer, E., W.M. Spiegelenberg and F.W. Janssen, 1985. Microbiology of spices and herbs. Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 51: 435-438.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Domig, K.J., H.K. Mayer and W. Kneifel, 2003. Methods used for the isolation, enumeration, characterisation and identification of Enterococcus spp.: 2. Pheno- and genotypic criteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 88: 165-188.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Elmali, M. and H. Yaman, 2005. Microbiological quality of some spices sold in the markets of Bitlis district. J. Faculty Vet. Med. Univ. Erciyes, 2: 9-14.


  • Erol, I., O. Kuplulu and S. Karagoz, 1999. Microbiological quality of some spices consumed in Ankara. Vet. J. Ankara Univ., 46: 115-126.


  • Koohy-Kamaly-Dehkordy, P., H. Nikoopour, F. Siavoshi, M. Koushki and A. Abadi, 2013. Microbiological quality of retail spices in Tehran, Iran. J. Food Protect., 76: 843-848.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Little, C.L., R. Omotoye and R.T. Mitchell, 2003. The microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods with added spices. Int. J. Environ. Health Res., 13: 31-42.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schwab, A.H., A.D. Harpestad, A. Swartzentruber, J.M. Lanier and B.A. Wentz et al., 1982. Microbiological quality of some spices and herbs in retail markets. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 44: 627-630.
    Direct Link    


  • Shamsuddeen, U., 2009. Microbiological quality of spice used in the production of Kilishi a traditionally dried and grilled meat product. Bayero J. Pure Applied Sci., 2: 66-69.
    Direct Link    


  • TFC., 2013. Microbiological criteria directive. Turkish Food Codex (TFC), Turkey, Ankara.


  • Ulukanli, Z., E. Karadag, M. Elmali and A. Gurbuz, 2005. Microbiological quality of some ground spices sold openly in the retail shops of lgdir. J. Vet. Sci., 21: 31-37.
    Direct Link    


  • Vij, V., E. Ailes, C. Wolyniak, F.J. Angulo and K.C. Klontz, 2006. Recalls of spices due to bacterial contamination monitored by the U.S. Food and drug administration: The predominance of salmonellae. J. Food Protect., 69: 233-237.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Vural, A., 2004. Investigation on the microbiological quality of consumed some spices in Diyarbakir province. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Dergisi, 10: 13-18.
    Direct Link    


  • Vural, A., N.B. Arserim-Kaya and M. Mete, 2004. Investigation of the yeast and mould floras in some ground spices. Dicle Med. J., 31: 15-19.
    Direct Link    


  • Tournas, V., M.E. Stack, P.B. Mislivec, H.A. Koch and R. Bandler, 2001. Chapter 18: Yeasts, molds and mycotoxins. In: Bacteriological Analytical Manual, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition, USA., April 2001.


  • Rhodehamel, E.J. and S.M. Harmon, 2012. Chapter 14: Bacillus cereus. In: Bacteriological Analytical Manual, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition, USA., February 2012.


  • ISO., 1996. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes-Part 1: Detection method. ISO 11290-1, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.


  • ISO., 2002. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. ISO 6579, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.


  • ISO., 2001. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-horizontal method for the enumeration of β-glucuronidase-positive Escherichia coli-Part 2: Colony-count technique a 44°C using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-β-D-glucuronide. ISO 16649-2, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.


  • ISO., 1991. Microbiology-general guidance for the enumeration of coliforms-colony count technique. ISO 4832, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.


  • ISO., 1993. Microbiology-general guidance for the enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae without resuscitation-MPN technique and colony-count technique. ISO 7402, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.


  • ISO., 1999. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species)-Part 1: Technique using Baird-Parker agar medium. ISO 6888-1, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.


  • ISO., 2003. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms-colony-count technique at 30°C. ISO 4833, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved