HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Microbiology

Year: 2014 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 265-277
DOI: 10.17311/jm.2014.265.277
Partial Purification of Bacterial Chitinase as Biocontrol of Leaf Blight Disease on Oil Palm
Muhammad Asril, Nisa Rachmania Mubarik and Aris Tri Wahyudi

Abstract: Chitin is a major component of fungi cell wall, mycelia, stalks and spore which can be hydrolyzed by chitinase. This study was conducted to measure the ability of chitinase producing bacteria in degrading chitin of fungal pathogens such as Curvularia affinis and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. These pathogens caused antrachnose, leaf blight and rotting on oil palm leaves. Chitinase producing bacteria, Bacillus thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 isolate were used in this study. SAHA 12.08 showed maximum chitinase with specific activity (7.896 U mg-1 protein) at 60 h incubation. Maximum temperature and pH of chitinase activity were 35°C and 7.0, respectively. Chitinase was partially purified by 30% ammonium sulphate precipitation could increase 2.35 fold than the specific activity. The activity of partially purified chitinase was optimal at 45°C and 7.0, respectively. This chitinase was stable at optimum temperature for 180 min incubation. On SDS-PAGE analysis, the enzyme had molecular weight of 107, 102, 82, 63, 55, 46 and 44 kDa from zymogram analysis only 82 kDa protein band showed chitinase activity. In vitro and detached leaf bioassay showed that chitinase of SAHA 12.08 had antagonist activity and biocontrol efficacy to C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides in oil palm leaves.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Muhammad Asril, Nisa Rachmania Mubarik and Aris Tri Wahyudi, 2014. Partial Purification of Bacterial Chitinase as Biocontrol of Leaf Blight Disease on Oil Palm. Research Journal of Microbiology, 9: 265-277.

Keywords: Curvularia affinis, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Antagonistic activity, biocontrol efficacy and biocontrol efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Chitin is a polysaccharide consisting of β-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues that are highly cross-linked by hydrogen bonds. Chitin is one of the most abundant renewable natural resource after cellulose. Chitin is widely distributed in nature as it is found in the cuticles of insects, shells of crustaceans, nematodes and cell walls of most fungi (Gohel et al., 2006; Bhattacharya et al., 2007; Aranaz et al., 2009).

Curvularia affinis and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides are fungi causing leaf blight and leaf spots disease on oil palm nursery which decrease its economic value. In Indonesia the disease was still categorized as secondary diseases but in Thailand it seems to be serious disease in plant where 61.01% caused by Curvularia sp. and 22% caused by Colletotrichum sp. (Kittimorakul et al., 2013) thus, the study about early prevention of this disease is required. Chitin contained in the cell walls, mycelium, stalks and spores of pathogenic fungi are able to degrade by chitinase (Peter, 2005).

Chitinase is a group of enzymes that can degrade chitin polymer with 2 stages. Endochitinase (EC 3.2.1.14) degrade the polymer into oligomers then degraded to monomers by exochitinase (β-N-acetylhexosaminidase (EC 3.2.1.52). Enzyme is found in a wide variety of organisms such as bacteria (Liu et al., 2010), actinomycetes (Gherbawy et al., 2012), fungi (Lee et al., 2009), insects (Bansode and Bajekal, 2006) and plants (Matsushima et al., 2006). The use of chitinase some this decades is increasing along with the wide range application of this enzyme. One of them is used as a biocontrol against various types of fungal pathogens (De la Vega et al., 2006) which is expected to reduce the use of synthetic fungicides. Those efforts are continued throughout the world wide to increase the production of chitinase from various bacterial isolates. The most species is often used as biocontrol agent from group Bacillus. Various chitinase producing Bacillus species have been reported among B. cereus (Huang et al., 2005), B. thuringiensis (De la Vega et al., 2006) and B. licheniformis (Kamil et al., 2007). Some of the latest characteristics of bacterial chitinase has been widely reported (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). However, there were still no reports about the purification and characterization of indigenous bacterial chitinase which used as a biocontrol agent of C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides. The objectives of the study were to evaluate partial purified and characterize extracellular chitinase of Bacillus thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 and determine its potency as biocontrol of C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Microorganism strain and growth conditions: Bacillus thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 was previously isolated from soil in Jambi, Indonesia (Haryanto, 2013). Culture was grown and maintained on solid medium chitin agar at 37°C. The fungal pathogens C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides are isolated from infected oil palm leaves (Haryanto, 2013; Purnamasari, 2013). The isolated fungi were grown on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates and incubated at 28°C for 4-6 days. The both of isolate are collected at IPB Culture Collection, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia.

Modelling bacterial growth curve from isolates and chitinase production: Inoculation of 2-4 loopful of selected isolates into 50 mL nutrient broth (NB) supplemented with 0.3% chitin colloidal and incubated at 37°C for 15 h. In amount of 1% culture (108 cells mL-1) was inoculated into 100 mL NB with colloidal chitin which used enzyme production medium. Each culture was incubated at 37°C, 120 rpm and collected every 6 until 72 h and their optical density were measured spectrophotometrically at 600 nm. The cultures were then centrifuged at 6000 rpm (centrifuge Hermle with rotor 220.97) for 20 min to obtain the crude extract of extracellular chitinase enzyme.

Measurement of chitinase activity and protein concentration: Chitinase activity was measured by Spindler (1997). The crude extract of extracellular enzyme was added to 0.3% colloidal chitin and 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 37°C, pH 7.0 and agitated at 120 rpm. The mixture was incubated at 30°C for 30 min. After centrifugation at 8400 g for 5 min, the filtrate was added to 750 μL distillated water and 1500 μL Schales reagent (K-Ferrisianida and 0.5 M Na2CO3) and the mixture was boiled at 100°C for 10 min. Enzyme activity was determined by measuring absorbance at 420 nm and using Glc-NaCl as a standard. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford (1976) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Partial purification of chitinase: Partial purification was performed using ammonium sulphate. Crude enzyme obtained was precipitated with ammonium sulphate concentration 0-10% up to 60-70% (Scopes, 1994). Precipitates are stored at 4°C for 24 h and centrifuged at 6000 rpm (centrifuge Hermle with rotor 220.97) for 30 min at 4°C. The protein pellet was added to phosphate buffer (0.1 M) at pH 7. Suspension of the protein was stored at -10°C for further testing.

Electrophoresis and zymogram: The protein pellet was added by phosphate buffer (0.1 M) pH 7. Electrophoresis was carried out under denatured proteins (SDS-PAGE) and zymogram. Chitinase solution from crude enzyme and ammonium sulphate precipitation was viewed using Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Laemmli, 1970) with 4% acrylamide concentration in the stacking gel and 10% acrylamide in the separation gel. After electrophoresis, gels were stained with coomassie brilliant blue G-250. The chitinase activities were also detected on gels by using SDS-PAGE and zymogram supplemented with 0.3% colloidal chitin.

Characterization of chitinase activity: The crude extract and partially purification was characterized at its optimum pH and temperature with its stability was determind at optimum pH and temperature. The optimum pH for chitinase activity was determined by measurements at different pH values (4.0-10.0) using colloidal chitin as a substrate under standard assay conditions. The buffers used were as follows: 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 4.0-6.0), 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0-8.0) and 0.1 M glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 9.0-10.0). The optimum temperature was determined by incubating the reaction mixtures at different range of temperature from 25-60°C with 5°C interval from the optimum pH, obtained from the previous experiment. The stability of chitinase was investigated by incubating the enzyme with optimum pH and optimum temperature for 180 min.

Effect of chitinase on fungal pathogens by in vitro test: The effect of isolate SAHA 12.08 was tested against C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides on PDA. Antagonistic activity was tested by using cell culture, crude chitinase and partial purification enzyme of the strain with agar well diffusion method. Well containing 200 μL culture or crude chitinase was at distance of 3 cm from margin of PDA plate. Opposite the well, at a distance of at least 3 cm, suspected pathogenic fungi were placed. After incubation for 6 days at 27°C, inhibition of the pathogen’s development was assessed with parameter. The percentage of inhibition of radial growth can be estimated by following equation:

where, r1 is length of radial growth towards plate margin (3 cm) and r2 is length of radial growth towards antagonistic (Fokkema, 1973).

Biocontrol assay by detached leaf test: The 60 h cell culture, crude chitinase and partial purification chitinase were tested to biocontrol effectiveness (He et al., 2003). Oil palm leaf was washed using sterile aquadest. Treatment consists of 60 h cell culture, crude enzymes and partial purification enzyme. For negative control oil palm leaves were inoculated with fungi pathogens only, using C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides. The whole treatments were conducted four times. Each leaf was treated, cut up to size of 4x3 cm. Thereafter the leaf was dipped into treatments for 30 min then air dried. The leaves put and placed into a petri dish containing a wet filter paper to maintain the humidity. After 1-2 h, 50 μL of fungal pathogens at a concentration of 4x105 spores mL-1 to the one end of the surface of the leaves and then incubated for 7 days in the dark conditions at room temperature. Percentage of biocontrol efficacy of treatment (BC) and Disease Incidence (DI) calculated using the equation of Chanchaichaovivat et al. (2007):

and:

Where:

BC = Biocontrol efficacy
T = No. of infected spots inoculated with pathogens only
A = No. of infected spots inoculated with antagonist and pathogens
DI = Disease incidence

Statictical analysis: Data was analysed using MS.Excel Software.

RESULTS

Growth curve and chitinase activity of isolate: The isolates were grown in NB was enriched by colloidal chitin (pH 7.0) at 37°C. The growth rate of SAHA 12.08 isolate was ascended from 0-24 h of incubation and then growth was relatively stable up to 60 h incubation and descended after 72 h incubation (Fig. 1). The chitinase was produced from 30 h incubation and relatively increased until 60 h incubation. The highest chitinase activity was found at the 60 h incubation, after 66 h of incubation the activity was not found (Fig. 1).

Partial purification of chitinase: The partial purification procedures of the chitinase secreted by the SAHA 12.08 isolate are summarized in Table 1. The results of precipitation using ammonium sulphate 0-10% up to 60-70% (w/v) showed that at concentration of 30% it was able to produce a maximum chitinase specific activity 17.061 U mg-1 (Fig. 2) and increase the purity upto 2.35 fold.

Table 1:Summary of chitinase partially purification produced by B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08

Fig. 1:Growth and chitinase activity of the B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 isolate on production media enriched with colloidal chitin

Furthermore, ammonium sulphate at 30% (w/v) was used for precipitation of protein in crude enzyme.

Chitinase from precipitation method was analyzed by SDS-PAGE to obtain the number of protein bands and molecular weight. Zymogram was analyzed using 0.3% colloidal chitin as a substrate (Fig. 3). The result of SDS-PAGE using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (CBB G-250) showed at least seven bands (molecular) of SAHA 12.08 chitinase protein fraction of 30% ammonium sulphate with an estimated molecular weight viz 107, 102, 82, 63, 55, 46 and 44 kDa. Zymogram result using 0.1% Congo red showed one protein molecule which had chitinase activity with molecular weight of 82 kDa. It was calculated on the basis relative mobility of standard proteins.

Fig. 2:Effect of ammonium sulphate concentration on precipitation of B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 chitinase. Bars represent standard error

Fig. 3:
SDS-PAGE and zymogram of chitinase SAHA 12.08. M: Molecular weight standards, 1: SDS PAGE crude enzyme, 2: SDS PAGE of 30% (NH4)2SO4 precipitation, 3: Zymogram of 30% (NH4)2SO4 precipitation, 4: Zymogram of crude enzyme

Characterization of chitinase activity: Maximum pH of the crude enzyme and partially purification enzyme isolate, SAHA 12.08 was maximum at pH 7.0 with the activity 0.697 and 0.721 U mL-1, respectively (Fig. 4). Among the different temperature tested, the chitinase activity of crude enzyme was most active at 35°C being 0.722 U mL-1 but maximum activity of partially purification of enzyme was observed at 25, 45 and 60°C being 0.722, 0.723 and 0.719 U mL-1, respectively (Fig. 5). To determine its stability, the crude enzyme and partial purification enzyme was incubated at optimum temperature for a period of 3 h. Both chitinase were stable at maximum pH and temperature up to 180 min of incubation (Fig. 6).

Effect of chitinase on fungal pathogens by in vitro test: Inhibition of the growth of fungal pathogens i.e., C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides was observed in vitro by using 60 h cell culture, crude chitinase and partial purification chitinase on agar well-diffusion method (Fig. 7). Inhibition of those fungal pathogens by SAHA 12.08 isolate chitinase showed that it was able to inhibit C. affinis better than C. gloeosporioides after 5 days incubation.

Fig. 4:Effect of pH values on chitinase activity of crude enzyme and partially purified enzyme of B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08. The activity was measured at 37°C. Bars represent standard errors

Fig. 5:Effect of temperature on chitinase activity of crude enzyme and partially purified enzyme of B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08. The activity was measured at pH 7.0. Bars represent standard error

Fig. 6:Stability of crude chitinase and partially purified chitinase at optimum pH and temperature of B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08. Bars represent standard error

Fig. 7(a-h):
Effectiveness of antagonist B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 against C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides in antagonist assay after 7 days incubation on PDA medium. For C. Affinis (a) 60 h cell culture, (b) Crude enzyme, (c) Partial purification enzyme, (d) Control. For C. gloeosporioides (e) 60 h cell culture cell, (f) Crude enzyme, (g) Partial purification enzyme and (h) Control of after 7 day incubation

Partial purification chitinase could inhibit the growth of C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides better than crude chitinase and 60 h cell culture for about 39.89 and 35.80%, respectively after 5 days inoculation. Observations for 9 days showed that culture cell 60 h, capable to inhibit C. affinis up to 9 days while the crude extract has the highest inhibition of fungal pathogens at the early inoculation and the activity tend to decrease until 9 days. The same result was also showed by partial purification enzyme, the ability to inhibit was decreased. However, it was still higher than the other treatments (Fig. 8a). Whereas, the inhibition of C. gloeosporioides among those three treatments showed the similar patterns in which there was a declining of the activity along the incubation period (Fig. 8b).

Biocontrol assay by detached leaf test: Biocontrol efficacy test used two treatments, as cell culture 60 h and crude enzyme. However, partial purification of enzyme was not done because the enzyme can destruct the tested leaves.

Fig. 8(a-b): Growth reduction of (a) Cryptocoryne affinis and (b) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in the presence of B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 chitinases

Fig. 9(a-f):
Effectiveness of antagonist B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 against leaf blight disease caused by C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides in bioassay using oil palm leaves as for C. affins, (a) 60 h cell culture, (b) Crude enzyme, (c) Control and for C. gloeosporioides, (d) 60 h cell, (e) Crude enzyme and (f) Control

Effective test of the biocontrol from each treatments showed that the culture cell 60 h and the crude chitinase have the ability to inhibit the leaf blight caused by C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides (Fig. 9).

Fig. 10:
Effectiveness of the treatments B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 in reduction of disease incidence in C. affinis and C . gloeosporioides. 1: 60 h cell culture cell + C. affinis, 2: Crude enzyme + C. affinis, 3: 60-h cell culture + C. gloeosporioides, 4: Crude enzyme + C. gloeosporioides, 5: Control of C. affinis and 6: Control of C. gloeosporioides after 5 days incubation

The crude enzyme could reduce leaf blight caused by C. affinis better than the cell culture 60 h with the effectiveness value of biocontrol for about 86.45% or with disease incidence for about 13.5%. Whereas, the reduction of leaf blight caused by C. gloeosporioides showed by using 60 h cell culture was better than crude enzyme for about 83.6% or with disease incidence for about 16.36% (Fig. 10). The results indicated that there was correlation between the activity of in vitro antagonist and biocontrol efficacy by detached leaf assay test.

DISCUSSION

Isolate of B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 produced extracellular chitinase which are capable to hydrolyze substrates such as colloidal chitin. The specific activity of the enzyme began to find at the stationary phase when the number of cell tend to decrease. The highest specific activity of the enzyme occurred in the 60 h of incubation. The highest enzyme production was also previously reported by Narayana and Vijayalakshmi (2009), the maximum chitinase production of Streptomyces sp. ANU 6277 observed at 60 h of incubation and tended to decrease due to the increasing of incubation period. Almost all chitinase from bacteria has shown maximum activity at 30-96 h of incubation (Zhu et al., 2007; Faramarzi et al., 2009; Nurdebyandaru et al., 2010).

Crude extracts of enzyme obtained from the highest enzyme production could be precipitated with ammonium sulphate 30% (w/v) and capable to increase the purity of 2.35 fold. The percentage saturation of ammonium sulphate for each chitinase from different isolates was not the same. The percentage saturation of ammonium sulphate for each chitinase from different isolates was not same. The saturation level of precipitation are ranged from 30-85% (Zhang et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2003; Rabeeth et al., 2011). Previous studies reported that chitinase from B. circulans WL-12 was capable to precipitate with 40% ammonium sulphate (Watanabe et al., 1994). The molecular weight of the protein was found to be about 107, 102, 82, 63, 55, 46 and 44 kDa by 10% SDS PAGE and showed a single band 82 kDa on 10% zymogram analysis indicating the chitinase activity. The molecular weight of chitinase of Bacillus sp. i.e., B. thuringiensis was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, had more than one protein molecule in the range of 32-125 kDa (De la Vega et al., 2006; Barboza-Corona et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Kuzu et al., 2012).

The highest activity of both enzymes was at pH 7.0. Chitinase isolates, both crude enzyme and partial enzyme showed a wide range pH from 4-10. Wang and Chang (1997) suggested that the optimum chitinase of most bacteria are varieties from acidic pH to alkaline. The highest activity of both enzymes was at pH 7.0. The same results also reported that chitinase of B. thuringiensis (Gomaa, 2012) and Bacillus sp. (Mubarik et al., 2010) had the highest activity at pH 7.0. The enzyme activity was determined by the presence of donor protons and donor acceptors on the degree of ionization, obtained at pH optimum pH (Wilson and Walker, 2005). Proton donors and acceptors contained many degrees of ionization on the sites of catalytic enzyme to support optimum conditions, moreover, the pH also affects the solubility of the substrate. Extreme pH caused changes in the structure of the enzyme and then decrease the effectiveness and efficiency of enzyme activity (Farabee, 2001).

Crude enzyme showed the highest activity at 35°C. While the partial enzyme showed the highest range activity at a temperature of 25, 45 and 60°C. Most of the chitinase of bacteria have maximum activity at a wide temperature. Various reports indicated that the maximum activity was at 30-75°C (Frandberg and Schurer, 1994; Sakai et al., 1998; Barboza-Corona et al., 2008; Mubarik et al., 2010; Thiagarajan et al., 2011; Haggag and Abdallh, 2012; Margino et al., 2012). Both of crude chitinase and partial chitinase stable at optimum temperature for 180 min of incubation. Kuzu et al. (2012) also reported the same thing on B. thuringiensis ssp. kusrtaki HBK-51 which remains stable and active for 3 h at 30-120°C.

Chitinase enzyme is currently used in biological control of fungal pathogens because of its ability to degrade chitin in fungal cell walls (Ulhoa and Peberdy, 1991). This study was conducted to analyze the ability of 60 h cell culture, crude enzyme and partial enzyme of B. thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 isolate to inhibit the growth of leaf blight pathogens (C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides) by in vitro test. The three chitinase treatments were capable to inhibit the growth of both pathogenic fungi in vitro. Inhibition by partial chitinase was better than crude enzyme and 60 h cell culture against these fungal pathogens. Those results were probably caused by the length of time needed by the cell culture to produce chitinase while partial chitinase and crude enzyme were capable to hydrolyze chitin found in fungal cell walls directly. Differences among the ability of inhibition against fungal pathogens were caused by the concentration of hydrolytic enzyme or secondary metabolic compounds found in partial enzyme or crude enzyme (Prapagdee et al., 2008).

Effect of treatment of chitinase against leaves infected of fungal pathogens by detached leaf test has been conducted and the results are presented in Fig. 10. Crude enzyme has inhibitory against C. affinis, better than 60 h cell culture. However, different things are shown against C. gloeosporioides 60 h cell culture capable of inhibiting better than crude enzyme. The results indicated that there was correlation between the activity of in vitro antagonist and biocontrol efficacy by in vivo test. The results caused by the synergism of action of biocontrol mechanisms of cell culture such as antibiotic production and induction of plant resistance with genes activation such as chitinase, β 1, 3-glucanase, peroxydases and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (Chang et al., 2007). Although there are no reports on oil palm leaf blight biocontrol using chitinase from Bacillus sp. Several Bacillus species have been widely used as biocontrol agents pathogenic fungi both of cells, crude enzyme and partial chitinase including the germination of seeds protected with B. licheniformis and B. thuringiensis for seed infested with A. niger (Gomaa, 2012) and chitinase of B. thuringiensis ssp. aizawai able to protect of bean seeds infested with six phytopathogenic fungi (De la Vega et al., 2006).

CONCLUSION

Bacillus thuringiensis SAHA 12.08 produced chitinase at 60 h incubation. This chitinase was purified 2.35 fold with 30% ammonium sulphate. Crude chitinase and partially chitinase had maximum pH at 7.0, 35 and 45°C, respectively with molecular weight of 107, 102, 82, 63, 55, 46 and 44 kDa on SDS-PAGE analysis and 82 kDa on zymogram. The both of chitinase were stable at optimum temperature and pH for 180 min. This chitinase could better inhibit C. affinis than C. gloeosporioides in vitro and detached leaf assay and has potential application as biocontrol agents for C. affinis and C. gloeosporioides.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was funded by BOPTN scheme from Directorate General of Higher Education Republic of Indonesia in 2013 and ABS Funds from collaboration CRC IPB- University of Gottingen in 2014 to Nisa Rachmania Mubarik.

REFERENCES

  • Aranaz, I., M. Mengibar, R. Harris, I. Panos and B. Miralles et al., 2009. Functional characterization of chitin and chitosan. Curr. Chem. Biol., 3: 203-230.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bansode, V.B. and S.S. Bajekal, 2006. Characterization of chitinases from microorganisms isolated from Lonar Lake. Indian J. Biotechnol., 5: 357-363.
    Direct Link    


  • Barboza-Corona, J.E., D.M. Reyes-Rios, R. Salcedo-Hernandez and D.K. Bideshi, 2008. Molecular and biochemical characterization of an endochitinase (ChiA-HD73) from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-73. Mol. Biotechnol., 39: 29-37.
    CrossRef    


  • Bhattacharya, D., A. Nagpure and R.K. Gupta, 2007. Bacterial chitinases: Properties and potential. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 27: 21-28.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Chang, W.T., Y.C. Chen and C.L. Jao, 2007. Antifungal activity and enhancement of plant growth by Bacillus cereus grown on shellfish chitin wastes. Bioresour. Technol., 98: 1224-1230.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chanchaichaovivat, A., P. Ruenwongsa and B. Panijpan, 2007. Screening and identification of yeast strains from fruits and vegetables: Potential for biological control of postharvest chilli anthracnose (Colletotrichum capsici). Biol. Control, 42: 326-335.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • He, D., X.D. Zheng, Y.M. Yin, P. Sun and H.Y. Zhang, 2003. Yeast application for controlling apple postharvest diseases associated with Penicillium expansum. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 44: 211-216.
    Direct Link    


  • De la Vega, L.M., J.E. Barboza-Corona, M.G. Aguilar-Uscanga and M. Ramirez-Lepe, 2006. Purification and characterization of an exochitinase from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Aizawai and its action against phytopathogenic fungi. Can. J. Microbiol., 52: 651-657.
    CrossRef    


  • Kuzu, S.B., H.K. Guvenmez and A.A. Denizci, 2012. Production of a thermostable and alkaline chitinase by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki strain HBK-51. Biotechnol. Res. Int., Vol. 2012.
    CrossRef    


  • Laemmli, U.K., 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680-685.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Farabee, M.J., 2001. Enzyme: Organic Catalyst. W.H. Freeman and Co., USA


  • Faramarzi, M.A., M. Fazeli, M.T. Yazdi, S. Adrangi, K.J. Al Ahmadi, N. Tasharrofi and F.A. Mohseni, 2009. Optimization of cultural conditions for production of chitinase by a soil isolate of Massilia timonae. Biotechnology, 8: 93-99.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Frandberg, E. and J. Schurer, 1994. Chitinolytic properties of Bacillus pabuli K1. J. Applied Bacteriol., 76: 361-367.
    CrossRef    


  • Fokkema, N.J., 1973. The role of saprophytic fungi in antagonism against Drechslera sorokiniana (Helminthosporium sativum) on agar plates and on rye leaves with pollen. Physiol. Plant Pathol., 3: 195-205.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gherbawy, Y., H.M. Elhariry, A. Altalhi, B. El-Deeb and G. Khiralla, 2012. Molecular screening of Streptomyces isolates for antifungal activity and family 19 chitinase enzymes. J. Microbiol., 50: 459-468.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Gohel, V., A. Singh, M. Vimal, P. Ashwini and H.S. Chhatpar, 2006. Bioprospecting and antifungal potential of chitinolytic microorganisms. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 5: 54-72.
    Direct Link    


  • Gomaa, E.Z., 2012. Chitinase production by Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus licheniformis: Their potential in antifungal biocontrol. J. Microbiol., 50: 103-111.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Haggag, W.M. and E.G. Abdallh, 2012. Purification and characterization of chitinase produced by endophytic Streptomyceshygroscopicus against some phytopathogens. J. Microbiol. Res., 2: 145-151.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Haryanto, A., 2013. Isolation of chitinolytic bacteria used as biological control of suspected pathogenic fungi on oil palm seedlings. Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/67770/G13aha.pdf?sequence=1.


  • Huang, C.J., T.K. Wang, S.C. Chung and C.Y. Chen, 2005. Identification of an antifungal chitinase from a potential biocontrol agent, Bacillus cereus 28-29. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 38: 82-88.
    PubMed    


  • Kamil, Z., M. Rizk, M. Saleh and S. Moustafa, 2007. Isolation and identification of rhizosphere soil chitinolytic bacteria and their potential in antifungal biocontrol. Global J. Mol. Sci., 2: 57-66.
    Direct Link    


  • Kim, K.J., Y.J. Yang and J.G. Kim, 2003. Purification and characterization of chitinase from Streptomyces sp. M-20. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 36: 185-189.
    PubMed    


  • Kittimorakul, J., C. Pornsuriya, A. Sunpapao and V. Petcharat, 2013. Survey and incidence of leaf blight and leaf spot diseases of oil palm seedlings in southern Thailand. Plant Pathol. J., 12: 149-153.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lee, Y.G., K.C. Chung, S.G. Wi, J.C. Lee and H.J. Bae, 2009. Purification and properties of a chitinase from Penicillium sp. LYG 0704. Protein Expression Purif., 65: 244-250.
    CrossRef    


  • Liu, D., J. Cai, C.C. Xie, C. Liu and Y.H. Chen, 2010. Purification and partial characterization of a 36-kDa chitinase from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. colmeri and its biocontrol potential. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 46: 252-256.
    CrossRef    


  • Margino, S., C. Behar and W. Asmara, 2012. Isolation and purification of Chitinase Bacillus sp. D2 isolated from potato rhizosfer. Indonesian J. Biotechnol., 17: 69-78.


  • Matsushima, R., R. Ozawa, M. Uefune, T. Gotoh and J. Takabayashi, 2006. Intraspecies variation in the Kanzawa spider mite differentially affects induced defensive response in lima bean plants. J. Chem. Ecol., 32: 2501-2512.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Mubarik, N.R., I. Mahagiani, A. Anindyaputri, S. Santoso and I. Rusmana, 2010. Chitinolytic bacteria isolated from chili rhizosphere: Chitinase characterization and its application as biocontrol for whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.). Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 430-435.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Narayana, K.J.P. and M. Vijayalakshmi, 2009. Chitinase production by Streptomyces sp. ANU 6277. Braz. J. Microbiol., 40: 725-733.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nurdebyandaru, N., N.R. Mubarik and T.S. Prawasti, 2010. Chitinolytic bacteria isolated from Chili rhizosphere: Chitinase characterization and application as biocontrol for Aphis gossypii. Microbiol. Indonesia, 4: 103-107.
    Direct Link    


  • Peter, M.G., 2005. Chitin and chitosan in fungi. Biopolymers Online,
    CrossRef    


  • Prapagdee, B., C. Kuekulvong and S. Mongkolsuk, 2008. Antifungal potential of extracellular metabolites produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus against phytopathogenic fungi. Int. J. Biol. Sci., 4: 330-337.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Purnamasari, D., 2013. [Isolation and screening of cellulolytic bacteria inhibit fungal growth on oil palm tree]. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/67780.


  • Rabeeth, M., A. Anitha and G. Srikanth, 2011. Purification of an antifungal endochitinase from a potential biocontrol Agent Streptomyces griseus. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 14: 788-797.
    PubMed    


  • Spindler, K.D., 1997. Chitinase and Chitosanase Assays. In: Chitin Handbook, Muzarelli, R.A.A. and M.G. Peter (Eds.). Alda Tecnografica, Grottamare, Italy, pp: 229-235


  • Sakai, K., A. Yokota, H. Kurokawa, M. Wakayama and M. Moriguchi, 1998. Purification and characterization of three thermostable endochitinases of a noble Bacillus strain, MH-1, isolated from chitin-containing compost. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 64: 3397-3402.
    Direct Link    


  • Scopes, R.K., 1994. Protein Purification: Principles and Practice. 3rd Edn., Springer-Verlag, New York, ISBN-13: 978-0387940724, Pages: 380


  • Thiagarajan, V., R. Revathi, K. Aparanjini, P. Sivamani, M. Girilal, C.S. Priya and P.T. Kalaichelvan, 2011. Extra cellular chitinase production by Streptomyces sp. PTK19 in submerged fermentation and its lytic activity on Fusarium oxysporum PTK2 cell wall. Int. J. Curr. Sci., 1: 30-44.
    Direct Link    


  • Ulhoa, C.J. and J.F. Peberdy, 1991. Regulation of chitinase synthesis in Trichoderma harzianum. J. Gen. Microbiol., 137: 2163-2169.
    PubMed    


  • Wang, S.L. and W.T. Chang, 1997. Purification and characterization of two bifunctional chitinases/lysozymes extracellularly produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa K-187 in a shrimp and crab shell powder medium. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 63: 380-386.
    Direct Link    


  • Watanabe, T., Y. Ito, T. Yamada, M. Hashimoto, S. Sekine and H. Tanaka, 1994. The roles of the C-terminal domain and type III domains of chitinase A1 from Bacillus circulans WL-12 in chitin degradation. J. Bacteriol., 176: 4465-4472.
    Direct Link    


  • Wilson, K. and J. Walker, 2005. Practical Biochemistry: Principles and Techniques. 5th Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK., ISBN-13: 978-0521651042, Pages: 802


  • Zhang, Z., G.Y. Yuen, G. Sarath and A.R. Penheiter, 2001. Chitinases from the plant disease biocontrol agent, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia C3. Phytopathology, 91: 204-211.
    CrossRef    


  • Zhu, X.F., Y. Zhou and J.L. Feng, 2007. Analysis of both chitinase and chitosanase produced by Sphingomonas sp. CJ-5. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B, 8: 831-838.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved