HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science

Year: 2012 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 422-430
DOI: 10.3923/jfas.2012.422.430
Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis Effect as Probiotic on Hematological Parameters of Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) Following Experimental Infection with Streptococcus iniae
Maryam Kamgar and Masood Ghane

Abstract: In this study, Bacillus subtilis is used for control of streptococcosis with the agent of Streptococcus iniae in rainbow trout. The experience was carried out in 2 groups (Control (c) and Treatment (T)) and 3 replicates. In control group, probiotic was not applied in diet but in treatment group, Bacillus subtilis was administered in feed at a concentration of 107 cells g-1. At 45th day, 0.1 mL intraperitoneally injection of S. iniae with 2x107 cells mL-1 dosage was given to both groups and were checked for the rest of the survey duration (2 weeks). At the end of the time which took about two months, blood samples were caught for hematological experiments for realizing the effect of B. subtilis feeding on resistance of fish against S. iniae infection. After injection of S. iniae, there was no significant difference among T and C groups considering parameters such as erythrocyte count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) and percent of monocyte (p>0.05). But significant difference was seen in the leucocyte count, percent of lymphocyte and neutrophile in both groups (p<0.05). The leucocyte count and percent of lymphocyte was higher in T group and neutrophile percent was lower in comparison with the control. The results of the present study indicate that B. subtilis can be used as an agent for the control of streptococcosis in rainbow trout hatchery and culture farms for decreasing economical disasters.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Maryam Kamgar and Masood Ghane, 2012. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis Effect as Probiotic on Hematological Parameters of Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) Following Experimental Infection with Streptococcus iniae. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 7: 422-430.

Keywords: streptococcosis, rainbow trout, Probiotic Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus iniae

INTRODUCTION

As the sole water-cool culturing species being available in the country, rainbow trout is of very much significance. In 2009, Iran, by producing almost 73000 tons of the rainbow trout, a located the first position of the world to itself regarding the production of the rainbow trout in the freshwater. One of the significant bacteria diseases in the rainbow trout is streptococcosis whose causal agents are the various species of the Streptococcus (Garedaghi et al., 2011; Haghighi et al., 2010; Yanong and Francis-Floyd, 2002). This disease was reported for the first time in the rainbow trout in Japan in 1958 (Hoshina et al., 1958). After that, the disease was reported in different fresh and saline water fishing, including striped bass, sturgeon, tilapia, sea trout, eel, pinfish, golden shiner, mullet and salmon (Inglis et al., 1993).

Streptococcus iniae is one of the most important species of cause streptococcosis which, for the first time, isolated in 1979 from the subcutaneous abscesses of a sample of the Amazon river's dolphin being afflicted by an infection under the topic of ''golf ball disease'' (Austin and Austin, 2007). Out of consideration for the severe damages losses and high mortality in the fish population, streptococcosis have converted in to the most significant bacteria disease of the farms for fish culture which is of a particular healthful important considering its transfer to human. Hence, its control is necessary affair and many measures have been taken in recent years in order to control and treat the infection origination from the Streptococcus iniae including it can refer to the usage of the antibiotics such as furazolidon, oxytetracycline, erythromycin and amoxicillin (Agnew and Barnes, 2007). After many years these drugs, by the selves, have created several problem, including the resistant-becoming (resistance) of the pathogenic factors bio environmental problems etc (WHO, 2006).

Therefore, application of the probiotics as a replacement for the former methods has been set raised which it seems that it can obviate many problems (Deeseenthum et al., 2007). Probiotics are supplemental microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and yeasts which increase the health of the host through balancing the microbial flora of the gastrointestinal tract (Vivas et al., 2004; Bagheri et al., 2008; Hung et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2009; Son et al., 2009; Agouz and Anwer, 2011). Usage of the probiotics, in fact, is considered as a new technology of the aquaculture being in sync with the bioenvironmental. Using these materials, both the production can be increased and the quality of the water can be corrected and they can be taken into consideration as a biological fight. The effect of the probiotics in the nutrition, resistance against the diseases and the other useful activities has been confirmed which out of the useful effects they have on the health, the effect is one the immune system and stimulation of the immune system (Abraham et al., 2008; Dalmo and Bogwald, 2008; Soundarapandian and Sankar, 2008; Vijayabaskar and Somasundaram, 2008). From amongst these Probiotics, the Bacillus species can be referred to, for example (Mohamed and Refat, 2011; Wang et al., 2008; Lakshmanan and Soundarapandian, 2008). The Bacillus species have been using as the probiotics for less than 50 years. Of the species that have been most extensively examined these are Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus clausii, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans and Bacillus licheniformis (Cutting, 2010; Bandyopadhyay and Mohapatra, 2009; Farzanfar et al., 2009).

As genus of Bacillus has not been reported as the pathogen in the water organisms, it is thus used widely in the aquaculture and the effect of the Bacillus subtilis on the hematological factors of the rainbow trout was studied in this research followed by the empirical infection with Streptococcus iniae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fish: This study was carried out in winter 2011 at rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) of 60 g average weight were obtained from a commercial fish farm in north of Iran for a period of 60 days. The fish, in groups of 60, were maintained in continuously aerated free-flowing dechlorinated freshwater at 14.5°C and fed with commercial pelleted diet (NRC, 1993) at 2.4% of body weight daily.

Experimental diets: The feed contained 107 cells g-1 (Newaj-Fyzul et al., 2007) and the fish were fed to satiation three times a day for 45 days before challenge with S. iniae. For this, Bacillus subtilis PTCC 1720 cultures were grown for 48 h at 25°C in blood agar. The culture was centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 min at 4°C, was washed three times in 0.9% (w/v) saline and was prepared a suspension in 0.9% (w/v) saline to achieve an absorbance of 0.132 at 600 nm (0.5 McFarland Standard) (MacFarland, 2000). The resultant suspension adjusted to 107 cells g-1. In control group, probiotic was not applied in diet but in treatment group, Bacillus subtilis was administered in feed at a concentration of 107 cells g-1.

Bacterial pathogen: Streptococcus iniae isolated from diseased rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) and identified by phenotyping tests. Bacterial isolates were grown for 48 h at 25°C in blood agar, The culture was grown for 48-75 h at 25°C in tryptic soy broth, harvested by centrifugation at 4000 g for 10 min at 4°C and was washed three times in 0.9% (w/v) saline and was prepared a suspension in 0.9% (w/v) saline to achieve an absorbance of 0.132 at 600 nm (0.5 McFarland Standard) (MacFarland, 2000). The resultant suspension adjusted to 2x107 cells mL-1.

Challenge test: Forty five days after the start of the feeding experiments, 60 fish were collected from each of the treated and control groups. Fishes were challenged intraperitoneally injection with 0.1 mL of fresh culture suspension containing 2x107 bacteria mL-1 Streptococcus iniae (Brunt et al., 2007).

Blood sampling: Fifteen fish were randomly collected from each groups. The fish were anesthetized by immersion in water containing 0.1 ppm tricaine methane sulfonate (MS-222). Whole blood was collected from the caudal vein (Abdelhamid et al., 2009) of each fish at day 60 using syringes 2 and 0.5 mL were rinsed in Eppendorf tubes with heparin (15 unit mL-1) (Larsen, 1964), to determine hematological factors include Red Blood Cells (RBC), White Blood Cells (WBC), Hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit (Hct), Mean Cell Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) and Differential Count Leucocyte (Diff).

Red blood cells count: The blood was used to determine the number of erythrocytes by means of a Neubauer hemocytometer slide at a magnification of x400. The blood was diluted to 1:50 in 0.9% (w/v) saline. Count the erythrocytes occurring in five small squares at the centre of the grid, a total area of 0.02 mm3 (1/50 of 1 mm3). The total area counted here (0.02 mm3, at a dilution of 1:50) should be sufficient for an accurate count to be obtained. The dilution is 1:50, therefore the number of cells occurring per mm3 may be calculated as follows (IMBC, 1998):

White blood cells count: The blood was used to determine the number of leucocyte by means of a Neubauer hemocytometer slide at a magnification of x400. The blood was diluted to 1:50 in Dacies fluid (IMBC, 1998; Abdelhamid et al., 2009). Count the leucocytes occurring in the four corner squares marked on the grid, a total area of 0.1 mm-3. The total area counted here (0.1 mm-3, at a dilution of 1:50), should be sufficient for an accurate count to be obtained. The dilution is 1:50, therefore, the number of cells occurring per mm3 may be calculated as follows (IMBC, 1998):

Hemoglobin level: Used a pipette add a sample of 20 μL of blood to 5 mL of Drabkin’s solution in a test tube and mix thoroughly. Place approximately 2 mL of the resulting solution into a cuvette and read the absorbance values in a spectrophotometer at 540 nm. The hemoglobin concentration of the blood sample can be calculated from a curve prepared from known standards (IMBC, 1998).

Hematocrit level: Hematocrit capillary tubes were two-third filled with the whole blood and centrifuged in a hematocrit centrifuge for 5 min at 13500 rpm and the percentage of the packed cell-volume was determined by the hematocrit tube reader (IMBC, 1998).

Red blood cell indices: Red blood cell indices are blood tests that provide information about the hemoglobin content and size of red blood cells (Benfey and Sutterlin, 1984).

Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) is the average size of a red blood cell and is calculated by dividing the hematocrit by the red blood cell count:

Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) is the average amount of hemoglobin (Hb) per red blood cell and is calculated by dividing the hemoglobin by the red blood cell count:

Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) is the average concentration of hemoglobin per red blood cell and is calculated by dividing the hemoglobin by the hematocrit:

Differential leucocyte counts: Blood films from duplicate samples were prepared on glass microscope slides with fixation for 5 min in 96% methanol. After air-drying for a few minutes at room temperature, staining was by Giemsa’s method (Thrall, 2004) and the preparations were examined at x1000 to determine the proportion of neutrophile, monocytes and lymphocytes (Benfey and Sutterlin, 1984). Triplicate groups of 100-200 cells were counted on each of the slides.

Statistical analysis: Significant differences among treatment groups were tested by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the comparison of any two mean values was made by Duncan’s multiple range tests. A significance level of p<0.05 was used. The statistical analysis was performed by using the software program SPSS (version 18).

RESULTS

Results showed that after feeding of B. subtilis treatment group for forty five days then injection of S. iniae to both of Control and Treatment groups, the death rates in C group was 54-60% and in T group was 25-31%.

Table 1: Effect of Bacillus subtilis on hematological factors of rainbow trout after challenge with Streptococcus iniae
The values are presented as Mean±SE, Means with the same letter for each parameter are not significantly different at p>0.05

After injection of S. iniae, there were no statistically significant differences among T and C groups considering parameters such as erythrocyte count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean cell volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and percent of monocyte (p>0.05). The erythrocyte counts for the probiotic treated and control fish were 0.56±0.06x09 mL-1 and 0.48±0.05x109 mL-1, respectively. The hemoglobin in Bacillus subtilis fed fish was 4.37±044 g dL-1 and in control fish was 4.10±0.41 g dL-1. The percent of hematocrit for the probiotic treated and control fish were 25.83±2.25 and 24.90±2.55, respectively. The mean cell volume in treatment group was 480.06±24.12 femtoliter and in control group was 539.16±30.99 femtoliter. The mean corpuscular hemoglobin for the probiotic treated and control fish were 79.51±3.75 and 89.75±5.91 picogram, respectively. The mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration in Bacillus subtilis -fed fish was 16.66±0.39 g dL-1 and in control fish was 16.61±0.34 g dL-1. The percent of monocyte in treatment group was 0.40±0.13 and in control group was 0.60±0.19 (Table 1). But significant difference was seen in the leucocyte count, percent of lymphocyte and neutrophil in both groups (p<0.05). Generally, there was stimulation of the immune system after administering Bacillus subtilis to rainbow trout. Specifically, the number of leucocytes increased from 16.367±2.10x106 mL-1 in the control group to 36.867±4.22x106 mL-1 in Bacillus subtilis fed fish. The percent of lymphocyte of Bacillus subtilis fed fish (95.53±0.98) was significantly higher than that of controls (91.93±1.28). In addition, the percent of neutrophil from Bacillus subtilis -fed fish (4.07±0.92) was significantly lower than that of controls (7.47±1.18) (Table 1).

DISCUSSION

With regard to the existence of the ideal condition in the Mazandaran province in order to culture the trout fish has been developed much quickly within recent years, new farms have been established and the rate of production has been increased noticeably. Nevertheless, varieties of the infectious diseases develop among the population of the fish which one of the most significant diseases is streptococcosis which can cause irreparable damages to the industry of the fish culture in case of the prevalence (Akhlaghi and Keshavarz, 2002). Considering this fact that generating agent of the disease exists in the aquatic environments all the year, it seems that the protection from the fish against the pathogenic agents is the most significant, easiest and the most inexpensive way in order to prevent from the damages, and losses resulting from the occurrence of the diseases in the cultures of the aquatics. As a results it was tried in this research that, trout the probiotic prescription together which the feeding ration, to make the fish resistant against the agent of the disease and to reach a minimum the damages and losses resulting from the mentioned infection the obtained results confirm this subject so that, after the edible prescription of Bacillus subtilis for 45 days and then, injection of the bacterium Streptococcus iniae to the fish of the test and control groups, it was observed that the rate of the losses, within 14 days, in the control group which had not received probiotic was 54-60%, while it was 25-31% in the treatment group. This result was in conformity with the results of other researchers, including Newaj-Fyzul et al. (2007), Raida et al. (2003), Brunt and Austin (2005), Kumar et al. (2006), Aly et al. (2008), Vendrell et al. (2008) and Abbass et al. (2010).

Furthermore, the above findings showed that the addition of the Bacillus subtilis in the nutrient ration of the rainbow trout had no effect on the rate of hematocrit, hemoglobin, number of the red blood cell, MCV, MCH and MCHC. Which the similar results were also obtained by Newaj-Fyzul et al. (2007), Raida et al. (2003), Brunt and Austin (2005) and De Carla Dias et al. (2010). Also, addition of the Bacillus subtilis in the nutrient ration of the rainbow trout was led to the increase of the white blood cells which, in harmony with these results, Brunt and Austin (2005), Newaj-Fyzul et al. (2007), Tavakoli and Akhlaghi (2009), Ali et al. (2010), Sihag and Sharma (2012). Also, showed that the usage of the probiotic in the nutrient ration was led to the increase of with blood cells.

The above mentioned results indicate that Bacillus subtilis leads to the increase of the percent of the lymphocyte while reducing the percent of the neutrophil and monocyte which is because of the effect of the probiotic on the immunity system and its stimulation so that they can cause to increase the B lymphocytes in the fish (Aly et al., 2008; Trachoo and Boudreaux, 2006). Also, lymphocytes are one of the most important protective factors of the fish against the microbial agents so that Th2 cell, while stimulating, secrete cytokines, including interleukin 4 which leads to the reinforcement of the growth of the precursor cells of the hematopoietic and more distinction of the cellular families of the myeloid and intensifies noticeably the activity of the fatality of the macrophages (Pangrahi et al., 2005; Hoseinifar and Pooramini, 2007). Increase of the percent of the lymphocyte trout racing the potential of the Immune system leads to the increase of the resistance against the pathogenic agents, the environmental stimulations and stresses which this affair can cause to improve to the growth, decrease the rate of the mortality and increase the survival (Sharifuzzaman and Austin, 2009).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study indicate that B. subtilis can be used as an agent for the control of streptococcosis in rainbow trout hatchery and culture farms for decreasing economical disasters and Immune system in fish can be stimulated with B. subtilis. It is also suggested that some more experiments may be conducted using some other doses of B. subtilis and finding the effect of B. subtilis in control of streptococcosis in different stages of fish life in order to establish the role of B. subtilis as an immuno-stimulator.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Reza Pourgholam head of Caspian Sea Ecology Research Center of Iran and Dr. Maryam Ghiasi for helping and research support.

REFERENCES

  • Abbass, A., S.M. Sharifuzzaman and B. Austin, 2010. Cellular components of probiotics control Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish Dis., 33: 31-37.
    CrossRef    


  • Abdelhamid, A.M., A.I. Mehrim, M.I. El-Barbary, S.M. Ibrahim and A.I. Abd El-Wahab, 2009. Evaluation of a New Egyptian probiotic by African catfish fingerlings. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2: 133-145.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abraham, T.J., S. Mondal and C.S. Babu, 2008. Effect of commercial aquaculture probiotic and fish gut antagonistic bacterial flora on the growth and disease resistance of ornamental fishes Carassius auratus and Xiphophorus helleri. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 25: 27-30.
    Direct Link    


  • Agnew, W. and A.C. Barnes, 2007. Streptococcus iniae: An aquatic pathogen of global veterinary significance and a challenging candidate for reliable vaccination. Vet. Microbiol., 122: 1-15.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Agouz, H.M. and W. Anwer, 2011. Effect of biogen® and Myco-ad® on the growth performance of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed a mycotoxin contaminated aquafeed. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 6: 334-345.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Akhlaghi, M. and M. Keshavarz, 2002. Occurence of streptococcosis in rainbow trout, farms of Fars province. Iran. J. Vet. Res., 3: 183-189.


  • Ali, H.M., A.A. Ghazalah, E.A. Gehad, Y.A. Hammouda and H.A. Abo-State, 2010. Practical aspects and immune response of probiotics preparations supplemented to Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets. Nat. Sci., 8: 39-45.
    Direct Link    


  • Aly, S.M., Y.A.G. Ahmed, A.A.A. Ghareeb and M.F. Mohamed, 2008. Studies on Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, as potential probiotics, on the immune response and resistance of tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 25: 128-136.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Austin, B. and D.A. Austin, 2007. Bacterial Fish Pathogens: Disease in Farmed and Wild Fish. 4th Edn., Springer, Chichester, UK., ISBN-13: 978-1402060687, pp: 56-63


  • Bagheri, T., S.A. Hedayati, V. Yavari, M. Alizade and A. Farzanfar, 2008. Growth, survival and gut microbial load of rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) fry given diet supplemented with probiotic during the two months of first feeding. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 8: 43-48.
    Direct Link    


  • Bandyopadhyay, P. and P.K.D. Mohapatra, 2009. Effect of a probiotic bacterium Bacillus circulans PB7 in the formulated diets: On growth, nutritional quality and immunity of Catla catla (Ham.). Fish Physiol. Biochem., 35: 467-478.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Benfey, T.J. and A.M. Sutterlin, 1984. The haematology of triploid landlocked atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J. Fish Biol., 24: 333-338.
    CrossRef    


  • Brunt, J. and B. Austin, 2005. Use of a probiotic to control lactococcosis and streptococcosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish. Dis., 28: 693-701.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Brunt, J., A. Newaj-Fyzul and B. Austin, 2007. The development of probiotics for the control of multiple bacterial diseases of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish Dis., 30: 573-579.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Dalmo, R.A. and J. Bogwald, 2008. β-glucans as conductors of immune symphonies. Fish Shellfish immunol., 25: 384-396.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • De Carla Dias, D., M.V. de Stefani, C.M. Ferreira, F.M. Franca, M.J.T. Ranzani-Paiva and A.A. Santos, 2010. Haematologic and immunologic parameters of bullfrogs, Lithobates catesbeianus, fed probiotics. Aquacul. Res., 41: 1064-1071.
    CrossRef    


  • Deeseenthum, S., V. Leelavatcharamas and J.D. Brooks, 2007. Effect of feeding Bacillus sp. as probiotic bacteria on growth of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii de Man). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 1481-1485.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Farzanfar, A., G. Lashtooaghaee, M. Alizadeh, M. Bayati and R. Ghorbani, 2009. Effect of using Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis as probiotic on growth parameters, survival and carcass quality in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) fry. Proceeding of the the First National Coldwater Fishes Conference, May 12-14, 2009, Tonekabon-Iran, pp: 154-.


  • Garedaghi, Y., M.H. Khayat Nouri, S. Kakekhani and M. Nazeri, 2011. Survey of experimental contamination to Ichthyophthirius multifiliis in cultural rainbow trout consequently vaccination with Aquavac garvetil. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 10: 1473-1476.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cutting, S.M., 2010. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol., 30: 1-7.


  • Haghighi, S.H., M. Soltani, G. Nikbakhat-Brojeni, M. Ghasemi and H.F. Skall, 2010. Molecular epidemiology of zoonotic streptococcosis/lactococcosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) aquaculture in Iran. Iran. J. Microbiol., 2: 198-209.
    Direct Link    


  • Hoseinifar, S.H. and M. Pooramini, 2007. Application of Probiotics and Prebiotic in Aquaculture. Green Wave Publication, Tehran, Iran


  • Hoshina, T., T. Sano and Y. Morimoto, 1958. A Streptococcus pathogenic to fish. J. Tokyo Univ. Fish., 44: 57-58.


  • Hung, A.T.Y., T.M. Su, C.W. Liao and J.J. Lu, 2008. Effect of probiotic combination fermented soybean meal on growth performance, lipid metabolism and immunological response of growing-finishing pigs. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 3: 431-436.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Inglis, V., R.J. Roberts and N.R. Bromage, 1993. Streptococcal Infections. In: Bacterial Diseases of Fish, Inglis, V., R.J. Roberts and N.R. Bromage (Eds.). Halsted Press, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA pp: 196-197


  • IMBC, 1998. Basic Techniques in Fish Haematology: A Guide to the Practical Skills in Collecting and Analysing Fish Blood Samples. Aqualex Multimedia Consortium, UK


  • Kumar, R., S.C. Mukherjee, K.P. Prasad and A.K. Pal, 2006. Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis as a probiotic to Indian major carp Labeo rohita (Ham.). Aquacult. Res., 37: 1215-1221.
    CrossRef    


  • Lakshmanan, R. and P. Soundarapandian, 2008. Effect of commercial probiotics on large scale culture of black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Fabricius). Res. J. Microbiol., 3: 198-203.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Larsen, H.N., 1964. Comparison of various methods of hemoglobin determination on catfish blood. Prog. Fish-Culturist, 26: 11-15.
    CrossRef    


  • MacFarland, J.F., 2000. Biochemical Testes for Identification of Medical Bacteria. Williams and Wilkins, USA., Pages: 912


  • Mohamed, M.H. and N.A.G.A. Refat, 2011. Pathological evaluation of probiotic, Bacillus subtilis, against Flavobacterium columnare in tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus) fish in sharkia governorate, Egypt. J. Am. Sci., 7: 244-256.
    Direct Link    


  • Newaj-Fyzul, A., A.A. Adesiyun, A. Mutani, A. Ramsubhag, J. Brunt and B. Austin, 2007. Bacillus subtilis AB1 controls aeromonas infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). J. Applied Microbiol., 103: 1699-1706.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • NRC., 1993. Nutrient Requirement of Fish. National Academy Press, Washington, DC., ISBN: 9780309048910, Pages: 114


  • Panigrahi, A., V. Kiron, J. Puangkaew, T. Kobayashi, S. Satoh and H. Sugita, 2005. The viability of probiotic bacteria as a factor influencing the immune response in Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture, 243: 241-254.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Raida, M.K., J.L. Larsen, M.E. Nielsen and K. Buchmann, 2003. Enhanced resistance of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), against Yersinia ruckeri challenge following oral administration of Bacillus subtilis and B. licheniformis (BioPlus2B). J. Fish Dis., 26: 495-498.
    CrossRef    


  • Sharifuzzaman, S.M. and B. Austin, 2009. Influence of probiotic feeding duration on disease resistance and immune parameters in rainbow trout. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 27: 440-445.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sihag, R.C. and P. Sharma, 2012. Probiotics: The new ecofriendly alternative measures of disease control for sustainable aquaculture. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 7: 72-103.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Son, V.M., C.C. Chang, M.C. Wu, Y.K. Guu, C.H. Chiu and W. Cheng, 2009. Dietary administration of probiotic, Lactobacllus plantarum, enhanced the growth, innate immune responses and disease resistance of grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish immunol., 26: 691-698.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Soundarapandian, P. and S. Sankar, 2008. Effect of probiotics on the survival and production of black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Fabricius). Int. J. Zool. Res., 4: 35-41.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tavakoli, H. and M. Akhlaghi, 2009. Study of lysozyme, immunoglobulin, blood cell and hematocrit changes following experimental infection with a pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila in rainbow trout. J. Vet. Res., 64: 157-162.


  • Thrall, M.A., 2004. Veterinary Hematology and Clinical Chemistry. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pages: 518


  • Trachoo, N. and C. Boudreaux, 2006. Therapeutic properties of probiotic bacteria. J. Biol. Sci., 6: 202-208.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vijayabaskar, P. and S.T. Somasundaram, 2008. Isolation of bacteriocin producing lactic acid bacteria from fish gut and probiotic activity against common fresh water fish pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Biotechnology, 7: 124-128.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vivas, J., J. Riano, B. Carracedo, B.E. Razquin, P. Lopez-Fierro and G. Naharro and A.J. Villena, 2004. The auxotrophic aroA mutant of Aeromonas hydrophila as a live attenuated vaccine against A. salmonicida infections in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol., 16: 193-206.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Vendrell, D., J.L. Balcazar, I. de Blas, I. Ruiz-Zarzuela, O. Girones and J.L. Muzquiz, 2008. Protection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from lactococcosis by probiotic bacteria. Comparative Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 31: 337-345.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Wang, Y.C., P.S. Chang and H.Y. Chen, 2008. Differential time-series expression of immune-related genes of pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in response to dietary inclusion of β-1,3-glucan. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 24: 113-121.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • WHO, 2006. Report of a joint FAO/OIE/WHO expert consultation on antimicrobial use in aquaculture and antimicrobial resistance. Seoul, Republic of Korea.


  • Yanong, R.P.E. and R. Francis-Floyd, 2002. Streptococcal infections of fish. Report from University of Florida. Series from the Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.


  • Zhou, Q., K. Li, X. Jun and L. Bo, 2009. Role and functions of beneficial microorganisms in sustainable aquaculture. Bioresour. Technol., 100: 3780-3786.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved