HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Entomology

Year: 2014 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 330-337
DOI: 10.3923/je.2014.330.337
Planococcus citri (Risso, 1813) on Grapevine: Do Presence of the Male Influences Reproduction?
Raphael Reis da Silva, Jose Eudes de Morais Oliveira, Luciana Barboza Silva, Jocelia Goncalves da Silva, Ingride Dayane Souza and Andrea Costa Oliveira

Abstract: The reproductive biology of mealybugs is a topic of great discussion and contradiction with regard to the study of the bio-ecology of the pests. The main reason for controversy is the possibility that facultative parthenogenesis occurs, because it is reported as occurring and questioned by several authors. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive biology of females of Planococcus citri, coming from vineyards in the Lower Basin of the São Francisco Valley and the importance of male for progeny in this species. The experiment was conducted at the Laboratory of Entomology of Embrapa Semiarid (Petrolina-PE) in a controlled environment under the conditions of 25±1°C, 60±10% RH and a photoperiod of 12L:12D. Second instar nymphs were isolated individually in order to obtain virgin adult females. Individuals were kept in Petri dishes containing water-agar solution (2%) and a leaf disc of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivar Syrah, in the absence and presence of adult males. The studied population of P. citri reproduces only sexually, therefore, the presence of the male plays a key role in the reproduction of this species. In counterpart, non-copulated females preserve their morphological characteristics, such as waxy covering of the body, greater longevity and building of ovisacs.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Raphael Reis da Silva, Jose Eudes de Morais Oliveira, Luciana Barboza Silva, Jocelia Goncalves da Silva, Ingride Dayane Souza and Andrea Costa Oliveira, 2014. Planococcus citri (Risso, 1813) on Grapevine: Do Presence of the Male Influences Reproduction?. Journal of Entomology, 11: 330-337.

Keywords: fertility, Mealybug, fecundity and Vitis vinifera

INTRODUCTION

Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) comprise an important group of insect pests with a wide geographic distribution. Plants of economic importance such as cotton, coffee, citrus, mango, soy, grapevine and ornamentals are attacked by these pseudococcids (Santa-Cecilia et al., 2007; Morandi Filho, 2008). Specifically in relation to grapevine, the damages caused by direct and indirect action have increased costs aimed at their control, so, the mealybugs have become an increasingly important group of pests for the crop (Daane et al., 2008).

These pseudococcids are small insects, with a soft body and they feed on the sap produced in the phloem tissue of plants. Mealybugs are described as floury because their body is covered by a white waxy material (Culik and Gullan, 2005; Santa-Cecilia et al., 2007).

The mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso, 1813) is a polyphagous and cosmopolitan species of great agronomic importance. Due to its occurrence and damages, the scientific community has conducted diverse studies aimed primarily at different temperatures and host plants, to elucidate its bioecology (Correa et al., 2008; Morandi Filho, 2008; Ahmed and Abd-Rabou, 2010; Cid et al., 2010). However, despite the work and ongoing discussions on this topic, there are several key points that are controversial, such as the form and the mechanisms of reproduction that occur in the species, since, there is great divergence among the information (Chong et al., 2008; Zaviezo et al., 2010; Correa et al., 2011). The possibility that facultative parthenogenesis occurs is the main source of controversy in this area (Da Silva et al., 2010; Waterworth et al., 2011).

In the group of the Coccoidea, for example while some species such as Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley, 1898) and Dysmycoccus brevipes (Cockerell, 1893) reproduce in the absence of the male (Vennila et al., 2010; Bertin, 2011) others such as Planococcus ficus (Signoret, 1875) and Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret, 1875) require mating to produce viable offspring (Waterworth et al., 2011).

In case parthenogenesis is optional in P. citri, as in other species of the genera Planococcus and Pseudococcus, the use of techniques and the viability of pheromones in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs may be adversely affected. Therefore, it is necessary to know the reproductive biology of these insects to integrate the use of pheromones into IPM. The reproduction (sexual or asexual), the fecundity of the female, the sex ratio of offspring, the mating ability and longevity of both sexes are among the main factors for the use of pheromones. Moreover, fecundity and female form of reproduction also have a close relationship with the injuries and damage levels caused by mealybugs, because these characteristics reflect the increase or decrease in the population of the insects (Walton et al., 2006; Waterworth et al., 2011; Waterworth and Millar, 2012).

Given the above, what are the main limitations and/or implications that may affect the reproduction of these insects? What is the importance of the presence of the male and of copulation in P. citri?

Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the reproductive biology of females of P. citri on grapevine and the importance of the male for the progeny of this species, occurring in the Lower Basin of the São Francisco Valley.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted at the Laboratory of Entomology of Embrapa Semiarid, Petrolina, PE, in the B.O.D. climatic chambers (25±1°C, 60±10% RH and photoperiod 12L:12D).

Second instar females were collected with the aid of fine tip brushes from pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata Duschesne) of the cultivar Jacarézinho and reared and and maintained individually in Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) on leaf discs (3 cm diameter) of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivar Syrah with the abaxial surface facing upward. To maintain the turgor of the leaves a water-agar solution (2%) was used. Afterwards, the plates were sealed with PVC film, labeled and taken to the B.O.D. Females were kept under these conditions to ensure that copulation was performed with virgin adult females, remaining under the same experimental conditions for the complete life cycle (Da Silva et al., 2010).

Adult males were collected with the aid of fine tip brushes and placed inside Petri dishes which contained a virgin adult female.

The leaf discs and agar-water mixture were renewed every seven days by replacing the Petri dishes and the PVC film. To avoid damage to the mouthparts and allow the natural movement of insects, a cut was made with a scalpel of the area around the insect and with the aid of tweezers it was moved to the new leaf disc (Santa-Cecilia et al., 2008; Correa et al., 2011).

The exchange of exuviae of females, the pre-oviposition period (duration between changes of the adult female and the first egg production), oviposition (duration between the start and end of egg production) and post-oviposition (duration of last production of eggs to death female), number of ovisacs per female, number of eggs per mass, viability and duration of incubation of eggs and longevity of females were assessed daily with the aid of stereoscopic microscopes.

The ovisac and eggs were removed with the aid of fine tip brushes moistened with distilled water, placed in Petri dishes on moistened filter paper and counted. Around the eggs a circle was made with a black pencil (No. 2) to facilitate locating them. Then, the plates were covered with PVC plastic wrap, labeled and placed in the B.O.D. under the same experimental conditions.

The experimental design was fully randomized with two treatments and twenty replicates. The first treatment consisted of virgin adult females in the absence of the male and the second, in the presence of an adult male, on average one day old. In the second treatment, each female received only one male placed always in the morning between 7:45 and 08:00, since, it was observed that at that time there were a large number of males in the maintenance breeding area. Adult females were on average 8 days of age. The male remained with the female for 1 day and was replaced the following day. During the experiment it was not observed if there is rejection of mating by either females or males.

The data of the evaluated parameters were subjected to analysis of survival and means were compared by log-rank test at 1% significance using BioEstat 5.0 (Ayres et al., 2007) statistical software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Description of the moment of copulation: The copulation of insects was visualized and observed only in the first 4 h on the first day of contact between females and males, hence, the description that follows refers to the first instances of copulation of the insects (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1:Copulation of Planococcus citri, Male is holding the female for copulation

As males were placed in the Petri dishes, it was noted that females seemed to notice the presence of the male, since, they lifted the edge of their abdomens in order to attract and/or allow the introduction of the male copulatory organ. However, females did not move during this time, probably because they are fixed to the leaf disc.

On perceiving this signal, immediately, the males went to the females. First, they roamed around the body of the female then positioned themselves at the back to perform copulation.

During the evaluations, it was also observed that females attract males even with the plate sealed or within the B.O.D., because when being evaluated, males were seen standing on the PVC film and seeming to search for a way to enter the plate to copulate with the female. In the morning a large number of males were noticed on the floor around the B.O.D. This behavior can be explained by the relationship between the production and perception of pheromones, in which the males, after perceiving the emission, fly towards the females to mate. According to Waterworth and Millar (2012) this behavior is common among these insects, because adult females, mated or not, produce pheromones constantly. The emission of pheromones can overcome certain barriers, because even confined according to the methodology. The pheromone was perceived by the males which in turn responded positively, flying toward the female.

Longevity differed between treatments (p<0.001) and was influenced by the presence of males. Note that copulated females lived for a shorter period, on average, 31 days. In this experiment we registered longevity of 17-45 days and 14-83 days for copulated and not copulated females, respectively. Studies conducted by Chong et al. (2008), Correa et al. (2011) and Francis et al. (2012) showed that adult virgin females, kept in isolation, of the species Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green, 1908), P. citri and P. minor, respectively, can live for up to 2 months.

On studying the reproductive biology of females of Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn, 1900), Grimes and Cone (1985) and Waterworth and Millar (2012) observed that females have shorter longevity when mated. Grimes and Cone (1985) explain that this decrease probably occurs because the metabolic expense to produce the ovisac and perform oviposition.

Another difference observed between treatments was with respect to morphology, as on reproducing and generating offspring copulated females became smaller and had less waxy material covering the body (Fig. 2a, b).

Fig. 2(a-b): Morphological differences between Planococcus citri females of the same age, (a) Non-copulated and (b) Copulated

Table 1: Longevity and reproductive parameters (Mean±SE) of females of Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the absence (T1) and the presence of the adult male (T2)
Means±SE followed of different letters vertically differ significantly by Log-rank test (p<0.001), *Females did not oviposit, Pre-ovi: Pre-oviposition, Post-ovi: Post-oviposition, Daily Fec: Daily Fecundity, Total Fec: Total fecundity, Laboratory conditions of 25±1°C, RH 60±10% and photoperiod 12L:12D

Based on the results obtained, it was possible to confirm that virgin females kept in isolation (no contact with the adult male) did not reproduce (Table 1) but even in the absence of copulation a small percentage of these (20%) built the ovisac. It was also observed that copulated females could not form the ovisac and perform oviposition for one or more days. The presence of males and mating are essential for reproductive success and progeny in this population and it appears the formation of the ovisac is a process independent of copulation, corroborating the observations of Chong et al. (2008), Da Silva et al. (2010), Zaviezo et al. (2010), Correa et al. (2011) and Francis et al. (2012), who reported similar behavior in other pseudococcids.

According to Da Silva et al. (2010) non-copulated females of P. viburni and P. calceolariae (Maskell, 1879) can produce ovisacs, however, only a small percentage of these perform oviposition (maximum 8) and the eggs are sterile. The authors also point out that non-copulated females of P. citri do not build an ovisac. However, they conclude that in P. viburni and P. calceolariae the formation of the ovisac and oviposition are independent of copulation while in P. citri this process depends on copulation.

The oviposition period showed the greatest duration and corresponded to about half of longevity, being followed by pre-oviposition. The post-reproductive period showed the shortest duration (Table 1). Francis et al. (2012) reported that in P. minor the duration of the pre-reproductive and reproductive periods were similar. However, the proximity or distance between the duration of pre-oviposition and oviposition may be related to the mode of reproduction (Bertin, 2011) which was sexual in this study.

The fecundity and egg viability were satisfactory (Table 1), when compared with other studies on the bio-ecology of P. citri and other pseudococcids such as D. brevipes and P. viburni, also conducted in grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera). We registered a range of 27-242 eggs per female, with viability to 86.90±1.54%. Compared to other studies involving the reproductive parameters mentioned above, the results observed in this study were average or greater in quantity than observed by Morandi Filho (2008), Zaviezo et al. (2010) and Bertin (2011).

It was also observed that with the passage of days females reduced the number of eggs produced, as evidenced by a negative correlation between reproduction days and the number of eggs (Fig. 3). The first to the third day of the reproductive period, females oviposit in larger quantities. It was noted that from the seventh day there was a decline in oviposition.

The period of incubation and egg viability were evaluated until the fourteenth day of oviposition, because from then on, the quantity of eggs produced was considerably reduced (Fig. 3). It was observed that the incubation time increases from the twelfth day and egg viability decreased from the ninth day (Fig. 4).

Reproductive parameters (Table 1) are essential for the maintenance of the offspring of P. citri, whether in controlled environments or not. Although, they were performed in the laboratory, the observations and data obtained are relevant to research on the behavior and reproductive biology of these insects, because there is little information about the topic, especially in Brazil.

Fig. 3: Quantity of eggs produced during oviposition period by copulated females of Planococcus citri

Fig. 4(a-b): Incubation period (days) and viability (%) of eggs (Mean±SE) of female Planococcus citri during the first two weeks of the mating period

Considering the socio-economic importance of the region and pest species mentioned, it noted that P. citri is a real threat, since it is part of a complex of insects responsible for the drop in yield and quality of grape and derivatives in many wine regions.

CONCLUSION

Reproduction in the population of Planococcus citri originating from vineyards of the Lower Basin of the São Francisco Valley is sexual, because non-copulated females do not produce eggs. The construction of the ovisac is a process independent of copulation, however, in its absence egg production does not occur. The absence of descendants is due solely to the absence of the male and copulation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank FACEPE (Foundation for Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco) for financing the study, Embrapa Semiarid for space to conduct this study, the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the master’s scholarship and the Graduate program in Plant Science, Federal University of Piauí, Professor Cinobelina Elvas Campus, for encouraging the study.

REFERENCES

  • Ahmed, N.H. and S.M. Abd-Rabou, 2010. Host plants, geographical distribution, natural enemies and biological studies of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci., 3: 39-47.
    Direct Link    


  • Ayres, M., M. Ayres Junior, D.L. Ayres and A.A.S. Santos, 2007. BioEstat: Statistical Applications in the Areas of Biomedical Sciences. 5th Edn., Civil Society Mamiraua, Belem, Pages: 324


  • Bertin, A., 2011. [Bioecology of Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell, 1893) and Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret, 1875) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidade) on grapes]. Dissertacao (Mestrado em Entomologia)-Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Piracicaba.


  • Chong, J.H., A.L. Roda and C.M. Mannion, 2008. Life history of the mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), at constant temperatures. Environ. Entomol., 37: 323-332.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cid, M., S. Pereira, C. Cabaleiro and A. Segura, 2010. Citrus mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) movement and population dynamics in an arbor-trained vineyard. J. Econ. Entomol., 103: 619-630.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Correa, L.R.B., B. Souza, L.V.C. Santa-Cecilia and E. Prado, 2011. [Biologic studies of mealybugs of the genus Planococcus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on different hosts]. Arquivos Instituto Biologico, 78: 233-240, (In Portuguese).
    Direct Link    


  • Correa, L.R.B., L.V.C. Santa-Cecilia, B. Souza and F.J. Cividanes, 2008. [Heat requirements of the white mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso, 1813) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on coffee plants]. Arquivos Instituto Biologico, 75: 53-58, (In Portuguese).
    Direct Link    


  • Culik, M.P. and P.J. Gullan, 2005. A new pest of tomato and other records of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from Espirito Santo, Brazil. Zootaxa, 964: 1-8.
    Direct Link    


  • Daane, K.M., M.L. Cooper, S.V. Triapitsyn, V.M. Walton and G.Y. Yokota et al., 2008. Vineyard managers and researchers seek sustainable solutions for mealybugs, a changing pest complex. California Agric., 62: 167-176.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Francis, A.W., M.T.K. Kairo and A.L. Roda, 2012. Developmental and reproductive biology of Planococcus minor (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) under constant temperatures. Florida Entomol., 95: 297-303.
    CrossRef    


  • Grimes, E.W. and W.W. Cone, 1985. Life history, sex attraction, mating and natural enemies of the grape mealybug, Pseudococcus maritimus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 4: 554-558.


  • Morandi Filho, W.J., 2008. [Mealybugs associated in the Serra Gaucha vineyards, bioecology and control Planococcus citri (Risso, 1813) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)]. Tese (Doutorado em Fitossanidade)-Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas.


  • Santa-Cecilia, L.V.C., E. Prado, C.M. Borges, L.R.B. Correa and B. Souza, 2008. Methodology foir biological studies of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Coffee Sci., 3: 152-155.


  • Santa-Cecilia, L.V.C., B. Souza, J.C. Souza, E. Prado, A. Moino Junior, M.J. Fornazier and G.A. Carvalho, 2007. Mealybugs in coffee: Bioecology, damage and control methods. Belo Horizonte: EPAMIG. (Boletim Tecnico, 79), pp: 48.


  • Da Silva, E.B., Z. Mendel and J.C. Franco, 2010. Can facultative parthenogenesis occur in biparental mealybug species? Phytoparasitica, 38: 19-21.
    CrossRef    


  • Vennila, S., A.J. Deshmukh, D. Pinjarkar, M. Agarwal and W. Ramamurthy et al., 2010. Biology of the mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis on cotton in the laboratory. J. Insect Sci., 10: 1-9.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Walton, V.W., K.M. Daane, W.J. Bentley, J.G. Millar, T.E. Larsen and R. Malakar-Kuenen, 2006. Pheromone-based mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. J. Econ. Entomol., 99: 1280-1290.
    CrossRef    


  • Waterworth, R.A. and J.G. Millar, 2012. Reproductive biology of Pseudococcus maritimus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 105: 949-956.
    CrossRef    


  • Waterworth, R.A., I.M. Wright and J.G. Millar, 2011. Reproductive biology of three cosmopolitan mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) species, Pseudococcus longispinus, Pseudococcus viburni and Planococcus ficus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 104: 249-260.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zaviezo, T., E. Cadena, M.F. Flores and J. Bergmann, 2010. Influence of different plants substrates on development and reproduction for laboratory rearing of Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Ciencia Investigacion Agraria, 37: 31-37.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved