HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2014 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 327-331
DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2014.327.331
Isolation and Characterization of Dental Pulp Stem Cells from Murine Incisors
M.R. Nur Akmal, Z.A. Intan Zarina, M.A.W. Rohaya, S. Sahidan, Z.A. Zaidah and Z.A. Shahrul Hisham

Abstract: Studies have proven that dental pulp contains cells with stem cell activity. Although mice are widely used as a model organism, murine dental pulp stem cells (mDPSCs) are still poorly characterized. In this study, we aim to provide a modified and cost-effective method for isolating mDPSCs and to characterize the isolated cells using molecular markers. Mice incisors’ dental pulps were digested in collagenase 1A and the cell suspensions cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal bovine serum and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin. The morphology of the cells was observed and passage 4 cells were subjected to molecular characterization using RT-PCR. We found that the freshly isolated dental pulp cells through enzymatic dissociation method showed a heterogeneous cell morphology which became more homogeneous following cell passage. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed analysis that the murine incisors’ DPSCs are Cd105+, Cd13+, Cd29+, Cd146+, Cd166+, Cd90low, Cd73low, Cd105¯ and Cd34¯. Based on these findings, we concluded that dental pulp stem cells from murine incisor could be easily isolated through the method described and the incisor’s dental pulp could be a source of mesenchymal stem cells. Further studies are required to explore the differentiation potential of the isolated mDPSC in vitro.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
M.R. Nur Akmal, Z.A. Intan Zarina, M.A.W. Rohaya, S. Sahidan, Z.A. Zaidah and Z.A. Shahrul Hisham, 2014. Isolation and Characterization of Dental Pulp Stem Cells from Murine Incisors. Journal of Biological Sciences, 14: 327-331.

Keywords: semi-quantitative RT-PCR, stem cell, dental pulp and Murine incisor

INTRODUCTION

The subject of stem cells has caught the interest of many researchers due to its promising future in regenerative medicine application. Since embryonic stem cells face huge bouts of ethical issues, attempts are made to look for better alternatives of stem cells. Stem cells of dental sources have been isolated from different part of the tooth such as dental papilla, dental follicle, periodontal ligament and apical papilla (Bakopoulou et al., 2011; Tziafas and Kodonas, 2010). Teeth are developed from the same lineage of cranial neural crest ectomesenchyme, yet the gene expression profiles and differentiation potency of stem cells of different tooth sources are not the same (Bakopoulou et al., 2011; Morsczeck et al., 2010; Tziafas and Kodonas, 2010; Volponi et al., 2010; Lee and Lee, 2010). Thus, the dental stem cells from different sources need to be characterized in an effort to search for cells with good proliferative ability and wide differentiation potential.

Murine incisors and rabbit molars are well known for its ability for continuous eruption throughout life. In such cases, stem cells inside the heterogeneous population of dental cells are thought to be involved in the process of continuous growth by differentiating into odontoblasts that produce dentin (Mao and Prockop, 2012). Other than that, Tecles et al. (2005) has shown that the stem cells are also involved in reparative mechanism in which the cells would be activated in response to pulpal injury.

Human DPSC are actively being characterized as scientists focused on the application of DPSC in cell therapy. A lot of research involving dental pulp also targets big-sized organisms (Snyder et al., 2011; Kaneko et al., 2013; Iohara et al., 2006). Thus, although mice is being used as a model organism for a lot of studies primarily due to its small size, low cost of maintenance and easy handling and short generation time-which is only about 10 weeks after being born, there are still lack of data on mice dental pulp stem cells. This might be primarily due to the limited amount of dental pulp tissues in small organisms like mice. Therefore, in this study, we aim to isolate and characterize the stem cells isolated from mice dental pulp. A more cost-effective method of characterizing the stem cells was also used by combining touchdown PCR and semi-quantitative RT-PCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects, isolation and culture of dental pulp stem cells: The mandibles were dissected from of 6-8 weeks ICR strain mice and the incisor was separated from the surrounding alveolar bone and tissues with the help of stereomicroscope (Leica EZ4, Germany). The dental pulp was gently removed from interior of the incisor and subjected to digestion with 0.8 mg mL-1 (928 CDU) collagenase 1A (Sigma, USA) in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) (Sigma, USA) at 37°C for 1 h with shaking. The digested tissues were then homogenized by repetitive pipetting to release the cells from the tissue clumps. The cells were washed with 1X PBS and cultured in complete media (α-Minimum Essential Medium (α-MEM) (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 20% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Biowest, South America) and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (Biowest, South America). The first medium change was done 24 h after culture, followed by every three days. The cells were passaged when it reaches ~80% confluence. The cells were detached by incubation with 0.25% (v/v) trypsin-EDTA (Biowest, South America) for five minutes and sub-cultivated at a ratio of 1:2.

Semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR: Total RNA was isolated from passage 4 dental pulp stem cells using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA). Two-step reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was executed in which 1 μg of total RNA was used to generate the first strand cDNAs using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (ThermoScientific, USA). Second strand synthesis was conducted by means of touchdown PCR (Korbie and Mattick, 2008) using 0.25 μL of oligo-dT primed cDNAs, 0.125 units GoTaq, 1X GoTaq reaction buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP and 1 μM of sense and antisense primers each. Amplification was performed in a total of 40 cycles in Mastercycler Gradient PCR machine (Eppendorf, USA). The first phase of the touchdown PCR was carried out in 17 cycles (denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at the highest Tm of the primer pairs+8°C with decrement of 0.5°C per cycle and elongation at 72°C for 40 sec). This was followed by 23 cycles of amplification at the Tm. The Tm was calculated according to nearest neighbour formula using OligoCalc (http:// www.basic.northwestern.edu/biotools/oligocalc. html).

Table 1: Gene-specific primer sequences used in touchdown PCR

The touchdown PCR program was started with initial denaturation step at 95°C for 2 min and terminated with 5 min final elongation step at 72 °C. The primers used for the characterization of dental pulp stem cells were as shown in Table 1. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.7% (w/v) agarose in 1XTAE buffer. The gel was stained using EtBr and the image visualized under UV transillumination (AlphaInnotech, USA). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ 1.46 (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation of dental pulp stem cells: Mice’s maxilla and mandible both consist of three pair of molars and one pair of incisor. The incisor of mice is deeply embedded inside the alveolar bone and the dental pulp is almost the same length as the incisor (Fig. 1a). Figure 1b shows an intact, freshly isolated dental pulp with large blood vessels in both the coronal and radicular pulp. Apical part of the pulp was removed to minimize the contamination with epithelial stem cells which are known to give rise to transient amplifying cells that propagate, migrate anteriorly and differentiate into ameloblasts that produce enamel matrix in mice incisors (Mao and Prockop, 2012).

Two methods usually used in Dental Pulp Stem Cell (DPSC) isolation were the outgrowth method and enzyme dissociation method (Yildirim, 2013). The outgrowth method involved submerging the explant inside complete growth medium and allowing the cells to migrate out of the tissues. Although this method might be able to prevent cell damage resulting from the action of enzyme, the time taken to obtain the cell are however, significantly longer (Huang et al., 2006). It had also been shown that the time taken for the cells to become confluence is shorter for the enzyme dissociation method which is one to two weeks as compared to three weeks for the outgrowth method (Huang et al., 2006).

Fig. 1(a-b): Dental pulp (a) Dissected murine’s mandible. a: Molars, b: Incisor, c: Location of dental pulp, (b) Extracted incisor’s dental pulp showing the highly vascularized structure

Fig. 2(a-c): Dental pulp cells (DPCs) (a) DPCs colony formation in 1 week culture (passage 0) (scale bar: 500 μm), (b) Subconfluent DPCs (passage 0) (scale bar: 200 μm) and (c) Confluent DPCs (passage 4) cell (scale bar: 500 μm)

In this study, the isolated dental pulp was digested with only collagenase as opposed to a combination of collagenase/dispase (Waddington et al., 2008) or collagenase/trypsin (Balic et al., 2010). Collagenase type I was chosen as the sole enzyme to be used since collagen type I is present predominantly in dental pulp and it is the major organic component which make out the pulp (Yildirim, 2013). Collagenase functions by hydrolysing the X-Gly bond in the sequence R-Pro-X-Gly-Pro which is present almost exclusively in collagen (Yahyouche et al., 2011). This makes collagenase an enzyme with a high specificity on collagen.

Cell clusters known as the colony-forming units could be observed following the Dental Pulp Cells (DPCs) isolated through enzyme dissociation method as previously described (Fig. 2a) (Souza et al., 2010). A heterogeneous cell shapes such as spindle-like, endothelial-like or epithelial-like cells could be seen in freshly isolated cultures as the enzymatic dissociation technique would digest the tissues and release all sort of cells (Fig. 2b). This cell shapes however, would become more homogenous following subculture as the cells were grown in mesenchymal cell selection media, showing only fibroblastic-like cells (Fig. 2c) (Huang et al., 2006).

Molecular characterization of dental pulp stem cells: Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to demonstrate the level of expression of mesenchymal stem cells surface markers in the isolated DPSCs at passage 4. The gene expression levels of each marker were represented by the intensity of the amplicons (Fig. 2a-c). In order to ensure accurate quantification of the expressed markers, the intensity density was normalized to an endogenously expressed reference gene Gapdh. The DPSCs were shown to express high levels of mesenchymal stem cell markers Cd29, Cd105, Cd146, Cd166 and significantly low levels of Cd73 and Cd90 (p<0.01) in relative to housekeeping gene Gapdh. The cells are also negative for the expression of Cd34 and Cd150, ruling out contamination with cells of hematopoietic origin (Fig. 3a, b).

Fig. 3(a-b):
Gene expression profiles for dental pulp stem cell from murine incisor using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. (a) Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR product for the different primers used. The intensity of the PCR product confers directly with the expression of the genes. The amplified genes are Gapdh (717 bp), Cd13 (311 bp), Cd29 (821 bp), Cd73 (765 bp), Cd105 (356 bp), Cd146 (479 bp), Cd166 (630 bp), Cd90 (620 bp), Cd34 (769 bp), Cd150 (658 bp), (b) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showing different levels of mRNA transcribed for mesenchymal stem cell markers in relative to housekeeping genes Gapdh as analysed by ImageJ. Values were expressed as Mean±SD (n = 3) and were normalized using Gapdh (* : significant (p<0.01) in relative to Gapdh)

These findings were in concordance with the DPSCs isolated from rat (Kaneko et al., 2013), swine (Sonoyama et al., 2006), human (Atari et al., 2011) and primate (Snyder et al., 2011).

CONCLUSION

Murine incisor dental pulp stem cells with fibroblastic-like characteristics have been successfully isolated from murine incisors through digestion with a single enzyme (Collagenase 1A). These cells are determined to be Cd13+, Cd29+, Cd105+, Cd146+, Cd166+, Cd73low, Cd90low, Cd34¯ and Cd150¯ through semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Further studies are required in order to explore the differentiation potential of the isolated dental pulp stem cells in vitro.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DPP-2013-024, DLP-2012-025, DLP-2012-001) and Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (ERGS/1/2012/SKK11/UKM/02/5, FRGS/1/2011 /SG/UKM/02/13).

REFERENCES

  • Atari, M., M. Barajas, F. Hernandez-Alfaro, C. Gil and M. Fabregat et al., 2011. Isolation of pluripotent stem cells from human third molar dental pulp. Histol. Histopathol., 26: 1057-1070.
    Direct Link    


  • Bakopoulou, A., G. Leyhausen, J. Volk, A. Tsiftsoglou, P. Garefis, P. Koidis and W. Geurtsen, 2011. Comparative analysis of in vitro osteo/odontogenic differentiation potential of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) and stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP). Arch. Oral Biol., 56: 709-721.
    CrossRef    


  • Balic, A., H.L. Aguila, M.J. Caimano, V.P. Francone and M. Mina, 2010. Characterization of stem and progenitor cells in the dental pulp of erupted and unerupted murine molars. Bone, 46: 1639-1651.
    CrossRef    


  • Huang, G.T.J., W. Sonoyama, J. Chen and S.H. Park, 2006. In vitro characterization of human dental pulp cells: Various isolation methods and culturing environments. Cell Tissue Res., 324: 225-236.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iohara, K., L. Zheng, M. Ito, A. Tomokiyo, K. Matsushita and M. Nakashima, 2006. Side population cells isolated from porcine dental pulp tissue with self-renewal and multipotency for dentinogenesis, chondrogenesis, adipogenesis and neurogenesis. Stem Cells, 24: 2493-2503.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kaneko, T., U. Arayatrakoollikit, Y. Yamanaka, T. Ito and T. Okiji, 2013. Immunohistochemical and gene expression analysis of stem-cell-associated markers in rat dental pulp. Cell Tissue Res., 351: 425-432.
    CrossRef    


  • Korbie, D.J. and J.S. Mattick, 2008. Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nat. Protocols, 3: 1452-1456.
    CrossRef    


  • Lee, J.K. and J.H. Lee, 2010. A study on differentiation potency of adult stem cells from pulp, periodontal ligament and dental follicle to osteoblast. J. Korean Assoc. Oral Maxillofacial Surg., 36: 7-15.
    CrossRef    


  • Mao, J.J. and D.J. Prockop, 2012. Stem cells in the face: Tooth regeneration and beyond. Cell Stem Cell, 11: 291-301.
    CrossRef    


  • Morsczeck, C., F. Vollner, M. Saugspier, C. Brandl, T.E. Reichert, O. Driemel and G. Schmalz, 2010. Comparison of human dental follicle cells (DFCs) and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) after neural differentiation in vitro. Clin. Oral Invest., 14: 433-440.
    CrossRef    


  • Snyder, B., P.H. Cheng, J. Yang, S.H. Yang, A. Huang and A. Chan, 2011. Characterization of dental pulp stem/stromal cells of Huntington monkey tooth germs. BMC Cell Biol., Vol. 12.
    CrossRef    


  • Sonoyama, W., Y. Liu, D. Fang, T. Yamaza and B.M. Seo et al., 2006. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated functional tooth regeneration in swine. PLoS One, Vol. 1.
    CrossRef    


  • Souza, L.M.D., J.D. Bittar, I.C.R.D. Silva, O.A.D. Toledo, M.D.M. Birigido and M.J. Pocas-Fonseca, 2010. Comparative isolation protocols and characterization of stem cells from human primary and permanent teeth pulp. Braz. J. Oral Sci., 9: 427-433.


  • Tecles, O., P. Laurent, S. Zygouritsas, A.S. Burger, J. Camps, J. Dejou and I. About, 2005. Activation of human dental pulp progenitor/stem cells in response to odontoblast injury. Arch. Oral Biol., 50: 103-108.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Tziafas, D. and K. Kodonas, 2010. Differentiation potential of dental papilla, dental pulp, and apical papilla progenitor cells. J. Endodont., 36: 781-789.
    CrossRef    


  • Volponi, A.A., Y. Pang and P.T. Sharpe, 2010. Stem cell-based biological tooth repair and regeneration. Trends Cell Biol., 20: 715-722.
    CrossRef    


  • Waddington, R.J., S.J. Youde, C.P. Lee and A.J. Sloan, 2008. Isolation of distinct progenitor stem cell populations from dental pulp. Cells Tissues Organs, 189: 268-274.
    CrossRef    


  • Yahyouche, A., X. Zhidao, J.T. Czernuszka and A.J.P. Clover, 2011. Macrophage-mediated degradation of crosslinked collagen scaffolds. Acta Biomater., 7: 278-286.
    CrossRef    


  • Yildirim, S., 2013. Dental Pulp is a Connective Tissue. In: Dental Pulp Stem Cells, Yildirim, S. (Ed.). Springer, New York, ISBN-13: 9781461456865, pp: 17-24

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved