HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2001 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 124-125
DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2001.124.125
Effect of Incubation Period on Phosphate Sorption from Two P Sources
Muhammad Akhtar and S. M. Alam

Abstract: The results showed that by increasing the time of incubation, P availability in soil gradually decreased for both organic (DCP) and inorganic (SSP) sources. Phosphorus sorption irrespective of source, however, increased with incubation time. SSP compared to DCP yielded more AB-DTPA extractable P up to day 7, P content of SSP after day 14 became equal to that of DCP, and there after declined. After day 56, as much as half of P from SSP was sorbed out compared to 1/4th of P from DCP. Thus a readily soluble P source (SSP) was more affected to sorption under an alkaline calcareous soil environment compared to slowly soluble P source (DCP) which maintained P availability in soil for a longer period of time.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Muhammad Akhtar and S. M. Alam, 2001. Effect of Incubation Period on Phosphate Sorption from Two P Sources. Journal of Biological Sciences, 1: 124-125.

Keywords: p-sorption, Phosphorus sources and calcareous soil

Introduction

The consistency in P availability to plant has remained a matter of great interest especially for arid/ semi arid region with alkaline calcareous soils having abundant Ca rich clay mineral and free lime. The constituent of soil fixes much of the applied P into form that remains difficultly soluble in soil system, commonly known as “ sorption” or “fixation”. Sorption of P is a process in which readily soluble phosphate is changed to less soluble forms by reacting with inorganic or organic compound of the soil so that P becomes immobilized and there is decrease in the quantity of P to plants (Kardos, 1964).

Transformation of available P into unavailable compound is the major cause responsible for insufficient utilization of P fertilizer (Sharpley, 1983). Chaudhry and Qureshi (1980) reported that P fixation increased with the increase in clay content. Biswas and Ghoshi (1988) found a decrease in the recovery of added P in alkaline alluvial soil with the increase in time and temperature of incubation. Tisdale et al. (1985) reported that the amount of P sorbed by soil depend on the saturation of sorption complex or the number of sites available for reaction with added P. Agbenin and Tiessen (1995) investigated the time dependent P sorption of five soils and found a rapid initial sorption followed by a slower phase. At 50 days, sorption reached a steady state in all soil. Chand et al. (1995) found that the steady state equilibrium in low P fixing alluvial soil is attained within two days. This study was conducted to evaluate the extent of P sorption of two P sources, differing in water solubility, on an alkaline clay loam soil as affected by time of incubation.

Materials and Methods

Surface (0-15 cm) soil sample was collected, air dried, ground and sieved through 2 mm sieve. The soil sample was analyzed for physico-chemical properties (Table 1). Soil saturated paste was prepared to measure water holding capacity and also to determine EC and pH (Adams, 1984). Soil texture was determined by hydrometer method and CaCO3 was analyzed as proposed by Richards (1954). Phosphorus was extracted by sodium bicarbonate (Olsen et al., 1954).

Two hundred gm soil was taken in plastic vessels and arranged in completely randomized design with three replicates and having treatments as Control (no P) or 75 mg P kg–1 soil each from an inorganic source (SSP) and an organic source (DCP), a low water soluble P source and a bye-product of industry. Composition of SSP and DCP are given in Table 2.

The soil was incubated at 20°C and was maintained at 70% water holding capacity by replenishing deficient water after weighing the vessels twice a week. Phosphorus was extracted by AB-DTPA (Soltanpour and Schwab, 1997) in moist samples collected from each treatment at 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, 90 and 120 days after the incubation of the soil and P was determined by ascorbic acid blue colour method (Olsen et al., 1954). A separate sample was used to estimate moisture content and results were expressed on an oven dry basis. Sorbed P was determined by subtracting the net applied P available in the soil from the total applied P.

Table 1: Some physico-chemical properties of soil

Table 2:Composition of dicalcium phosphate and single superphosphate

Results and Discussion

The amount of P available after the incubation period of 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, 90 and 120 days is presented in Fig. 1. Initially upto day 7, SSP yielded more AB-DPTA extractable P compared to that of DCP. It might be due to higher solubility index of SSP (Tisdale et al., 1985) compared to slower solubility organic complex (DCP). Later, higher P concentration of soil solution enhanced the P fixation rate for SSP compared to that of DCP. Therefore, after fourteen days period, P content of SSP became equal to that of DCP but there after decreased. However, the amount of P available from DCP remained significantly higher than that of SSP for the 120 days period studied. This indicates that superiority once achieved by a source continued for a longer period of time. The results are confirmatory to Biswas and Ghoshi (1988). They indicated a decrease in the recovery of added P in alkaline alluvial soil with the increase in time and temperature of incubation. The results of incubation experiment on 19 soils showed that in all soils and at all P rates, availability index decreased with time (Afif et al., 1993).

Fig. 1:
Effect of time of incubation on AB-DTPA extractable P (mg kg–1) from two sources

Fig. 2:
Sorption of P (%) from DCP and SSP as influenced by time of incubation.

The percent P sorbed to clay loam soil with respect to time of incubation is presented in Fig. 2. The results showed that by increasing the time of incubation, percent P sorption increased for both P sources. Sorption of P was minimum at day 0 and steadily increased with incubation time. Yaseen et al. (1999) also reported increased P sorption with increase in incubation time. However, % P sorption from DCP was comparatively slow upto 28 days and thereafter increased, whereas in case of SSP, there was a steady and consistent increase in P sorption upto day 90. The results indicated that steady state condition (maximum sorption) was attained at day 90. The increase in incubation time did not further affect P fixation of both DCP and SSP. However, the steady state condition was attained after 69.76% P sorption from DCP compared to 82.63% P sorption from SSP. The low P sorption value for DCP to develop saturation (maximum sorption) under the same environment is really interesting. It might be due to satisfaction of some fixation sites by the ions produced after the decomposition of organic complex (DCP). Fox and Comerford (1992) reported that organic matter decomposition produced low molecular weight organic acids in the soil. It has been suggested that organic acids produced in the rhizosphere enhance the availability of P both by supplying proton and by complexing Cation (Moghimi et al., 1978). Thus the results indicate that a readily soluble P source was more affected to sorption under an alkaline calcareous soil environment compared to slowly soluble organic P complex, that is less inclined to sorption and maintained P availability in soil for a longer period of time.

REFERENCES

  • Afif, E., A. Matar and J. Torrent, 1993. Availability of phosphate applied to calcareous soils of West Asia and North Africa. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57: 756-760.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Olsen, S.R., C.V. Cole, F.S. Watanabe and L.A. Dean, 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., Pages: 19
    Direct Link    


  • Richards, L.A., 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. United State Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 160
    Direct Link    


  • Sharpley, A.N., 1983. Effect of soil properties on the kinetics of phosphorus desorption. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47: 462-467.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Soltanpour, P.N. and A.P. Schwab, 1997. A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro and micro- nutrients in alkaline soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 8: 195-207.
    Direct Link    


  • Yaseen, M., N. Ahmad, A. Razzaq and N. Mahmood, 1999. Effect of incubation period on the phosphate adsorption in seven soil series of Pakistan. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 2: 357-359.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chand, M., S.R. Nirmal and A.G. Vig, 1995. Standardization of equilibration time for phosphorus adsorption studies in low P-fixing alluvial soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 43: 676-678.
    Direct Link    


  • Agbenin, J.O. and H. Tiessen, 1995. Phosphorus sorption at field capacity and soil ionic strength: Kinetics and transformation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59: 998-1005.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Biswas, P.P. and G. Ghoshi, 1988. Temperature effect on kinetics of P availability from partially water soluble and citrate soluble P fraction on nitrophosphate in alkaline alluvial soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 36: 48-52.


  • Chaudhry, T.M. and S.M. Qureshi, 1980. Agricultural chemistry section. Review of work 1926-80. Autism Research Institute (ARI), Tandoiarn, Government of Sindh, Pakistan.


  • Fox, T.R. and N.B. Comerford, 1992. Influence of oxalate loading on phosphorus and aluminum solubility in spodosols. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56: 290-294.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kardos, L.T., 1964. Soil Fixation of Plant Nutrients. In: Chemistry of the Soils, Bear, F.E. (Ed.). Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, pp: 369-394


  • Moghimi, A., D.G. Lewis and J.M. Oades, 1978. Release of phosphate from calcium phosphate by rhizosphere products. Soil Biol. Biochem., 10: 277-281.


  • Adams, F., 1984. Soil Acidity and Liming. Vol. 12, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI
    Direct Link    


  • Tisdale, S.L., W.L. Nelson and J.D. Beaton, 1985. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 4th Edn., Macmillian Publishing Co., New York

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved