HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2019 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 624-628
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2019.624.628
Sources and Variations of Aliphatic Hydrocarbons in Petroleum Products Contaminated Soils
Ifenna Ilechukwu , Mark Obinna Onyema and Grace Imperial Tejano

Abstract: Background and Objective: Aliphatic hydrocarbons are carcinogenic at high concentrations and can be hazardous to biological system. This study aimed to examine the aliphatic hydrocarbon variations in soils from the vicinity of mechanic workshops. Materials and Methods: The aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHCs) in soil samples collected from auto-mechanic workshops in Nnewi, Anambra state, Nigeria, were analyzed with gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) to determine their sources and examine the variations in their composition. Petroleum products contribution to the hydrocarbons in the soil samples were estimated from composition of n-alkanes. Results: The GC-FID resolved aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHCs) in the samples were composed of C8, C10, C16-C35, C16, C25, C28, C30-C36, C16 - C18, C21-C36 n-alkanes with unresolved complex mixture (UCM) of hydrocarbons from C22-C36 in one of the samples. These n-alkanes carbon number ranges suggest gasoline, diesel, lube oil and grease as the source of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the samples. The kerosene range n-alkanes (C10-C15) were not detected in any of the samples. Conclusion: The chemical composition features showed grease as the dominant source of petroleum products in the soils with varying inputs from gasoline, diesel and lube oil. The presence of UCM of hydrocarbons in one of the samples indicated the aliphatic hydrocarbons in the soil had undergone degradation.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Ifenna Ilechukwu, Mark Obinna Onyema and Grace Imperial Tejano, 2019. Sources and Variations of Aliphatic Hydrocarbons in Petroleum Products Contaminated Soils. Journal of Applied Sciences, 19: 624-628.

Keywords: Mechanic workshop, lube oil, petroleum products, aliphatic hydrocarbons, n-alkanes, petroleum products, soil and contamination

INTRODUCTION

In the past few decades there has been increased concern about petroleum contamination of the environment1,2. The source and fate of petroleum products released into the environment, either intentionally or accidentally are frequently investigated3-5. For environmental impact assessment of petroleum contaminated sites, it is important to unambiguously characterize the chemical compositions of samples and identify the contamination source. This is mostly achieved by the use of chromatographic techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to obtain detailed petroleum hydrocarbon composition of the contaminated environment6. Petroleum hydrocarbon components frequently utilized in environmental studies include aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHCs), biomarkers (e.g., triterpanes and steranes) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 2-6 fused ring aromatic compounds7-10. The saturate AHC component constitutes the most abundant hydrocarbons in non-degraded crude oils and refined petroleum products. The AHC compositions and distribution are used for characterization, identification and correlation of oils especially between spilled oils and source oil11,12. Environmental geochemists appraise AHCs from quantitative chromatographic analyses by compiling histogram distribution and diagnostic ratios of source-specific compounds for visual and statistical comparisons of samples13-15.

The concentrations of aliphatic hydrocarbons analyzed by gas chromatography are used to evaluate petroleum contamination of the environment and identify their sources16,17. The comparison of AHC compositions of mixtures of 2 oil types was used by Ho et al.18 to evaluate weathering rate as well as estimate the mixing proportions of the oils. Aliphatic hydrocarbons are carcinogenic at high concentrations and can be hazardous to biological receptors due to formation of toxic metabolites during biodegradation. However, most studies focus on aromatic hydrocarbons19. Nnewi is the second largest city in Anambra state, south east Nigeria. The city falls within the tropical rain forest region of Nigeria and thus rich in agricultural produce. The city is also highly industrialized with majority of the residents dealing on motor and motorcycle spare parts. These spare parts are traded at Nkwo Nnewi market, the major import and wholesale point for auto spare parts in Nigeria and the largest in west Africa20. Mechanic workshops are widely distributed in Nnewi for the repair of these vehicles and their spare parts.

This study therefore, was aimed to investigate the aliphatic hydrocarbon variations in soils from the vicinity of mechanic workshops.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling: Oil contaminated soil samples were collected at 0-5 cm depth from 3 auto mechanic workshops in Nnewi, Anambra state, Nigeria. Samples were collected in March, 2017. The sampling locations of the auto mechanic workshops are Sample-1 6.0223° N and 6.9141° E, Sample-2 6.0214° N and 6.9154° E, Sample-3 6.0213° N and 6.9154° E. At each sampling location, soil samples were collected from 4 points and thoroughly mixed to form a composite sample. The samples were collected using a stainless steel scoop, packed in pre-cleaned glass jars, labelled appropriately and preserved at a temperature of 4°C prior to analysis.

Petroleum hydrocarbon extraction and clean up: About 5 g of each soil sample was separately weighed into glass bottles and 20 mL hexane was added for extraction. Glass bottles with contents were placed in an ultrasonic shaker for 1 h. The process was repeated twice after which the extracts were pooled and concentrated to 2 mL using a rotary evaporator. The concentrated extract was transferred to the top of a glass column (50×1 cm) packed with activated silica (mesh 100-200) and stuffed with glass wool at the base. About 10 mL of hexane was used to elute the saturate fraction, which contains aliphatic hydrocarbons. The eluent was evaporated to less than 2 mL under a gentle stream of nitrogen.

Gas chromatographic analysis: Analysis of AHCs was performed on a Hewlett Packard (HP) 6890 gas chromatography (GC) system fitted to a DB-5 silica capillary column (30×0.25 mm ID and 0.25 μm film thickness, J and W scientific Co., Ltd., USA) and equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). About 1 μL of the concentrated saturate fraction was injected into the GC column with the aid of an auto sampler using the splitless injection mode. Oven temperature was programmed from 40-320°C at 5°C min1 with a 5 min hold at 40°C and 20 min hold at 320°C. The AHCs were identified by their relative retention times in comparison with internal standard and quantification acquired by area integration of each identified compound peak, which was processed by HP Chemstation software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Distribution of aliphatic hydrocarbons: The GC-FID fingerprints from analysis of soil samples from the auto mechanic workshops showed the presence of aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHCs) in all the samples (Fig. 1a-c).

Fig. 1(a-c): Gas chromatogram of aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHCs) for sample (a) 1, (b) 2 and (c) 3

The GC-FID chromatogram provides a descriptive picture of hydrocarbons present in a sample as well as information used for characterization of spilled petroleum products11,13-15. The GC chromatograms showed AHCs which were resolved and composed mainly of n-alkanes (Fig. 1a-c).

Fig. 2:Composition (%) of n-alkanes in the oil-contaminated soil samples

Carbon number distribution of n-alkanes were C8, C10, C16-C35 and C16, C25, C28, C30-C36 for sample 1 and 2, respectively (Fig. 1a, b). The n-alkane carbon number distribution in sample 3 was from C16-C18 and C21-C36, with a noticeable hump (Fig. 1c). The hump, which represents unresolved complex mixture (UCM) of hydrocarbons was nearly symmetrical with carbon number distribution from C22-C36, maximizing at C33. Crude oil and its refined products are often identified by their GC profile carbon number distribution, especially during the early stages of an oil spill21,17. The n-alkane carbon number distributions of the samples were narrower than C8-C40 range of crude oil but within range of some refined petroleum products. The AHC distribution suggested gasoline, diesel, lube oil and grease sources for petroleum contamination of sample 1 soils, diesel and grease sources for contamination of sample 2 soils and diesel, lube oil and grease sources for contamination18 of sample 3. The kerosene carbon range C10-C15 n-alkanes was not detected in any of the samples. This is expected for auto mechanic workshops since kerosene plays no part as auto fuels in this region. The presence of UCM is attributed to degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons22.

Composition of n-alkanes: Percentage n-alkane compositions of the soil samples showed nearly identical distribution pattern for samples 1 and 2 particularly for n-alkanes greater than C26. But, sample-3 showed difference in n-alkane percentage [H1] composition distribution pattern (Fig. 2). Petroleum products contribution to the hydrocarbon mix in each soil sample was estimated from their compositions of n-alkane. The n-alkane composition features indicated the major contamination source for sample 1 soils was grease, with minor inputs from gasoline, diesel and lube oil, for sample 2 soils, major contaminant was also grease with [H2] minor input from diesel, while sample 3 soils were contaminated with lube oil and grease with minor input from diesel.

CONCLUSION

The GC analysis of soil samples from these auto mechanic workshops revealed presence of aliphatic hydrocarbons which were composed of n-alkanes. The n-alkane carbon number distributions were C8, C10 and C16-C35 for sample 1, C16, C25, C28 and C30-C36 for sample 2 and C16-C18 and C21-C36 for sample 3. These n-alkane compositions suggest grease as the dominant source of contamination contributing to the hydrocarbon mix in the soils with varying inputs from gasoline, diesel and lube oil. The kerosene range C10-C15 n-alkanes were not detected in any of the samples. This is typical for auto mechanic workshops. The presence of UCM in sample 3 soils from C22-C36 and maximizing at C33 indicated petroleum hydrocarbons had undergone degradation.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The study showed the sources of aliphatic hydrocarbons in soils from mechanic workshops. The GC-FID analysis and the fingerprinting procedures that were employed showed grease was the dominant source of aliphatic hydrocarbons in the studied samples.

REFERENCES

  • Sammarco, P.W., S.R. Kolian, R.A. Warby, J.L. Bouldin, W.A. Subra and S.A. Porter, 2013. Distribution and concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the BP/deepwater horizon oil spill, Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 73: 129-143.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wang, Z., S.A. Stout and M. Fingas, 2006. Forensic fingerprinting of biomarkers for oil spill characterization and source identification. Environ. Forensics, 7: 105-146.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liu, X., M. Guo, Y. Wang, X. Yu and J. Guo et al., 2016. Assessing pollution-related effects of oil spills from ships in the Chinese Bohai Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 110: 194-202.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yim, U.H., S.Y. Ha, J.G. An, J.H. Won and G.M. Han et al., 2011. Fingerprint and weathering characteristics of stranded oils after the Hebei Spirit oil spill. J. Hazard. Mater., 197: 60-69.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gao, X. and S. Chen, 2008. Petroleum pollution in surface sediments of Daya Bay, South China, revealed by chemical fingerprinting of aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 80: 95-102.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bayona, J.M., C. Dominguez and J. Albaiges, 2015. Analytical developments for oil spill fingerprinting. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem., 5: 26-34.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Stout, S.A., J.R. Payne, S.D. Emsbo-Mattingly and G. Baker, 2016. Weathering of field-collected floating and stranded Macondo oils during and shortly after the deepwater horizon oil spill. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 105: 7-22.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ioana, P., 2005. Fingerprinting in environmental forensics. Environ. Forensics, 6: 101-102.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mulabagal, V., F. Yin, G.F. John, J.S. Hayworth and T.P. Clement, 2013. Chemical fingerprinting of petroleum biomarkers in deepwater horizon oil spill samples collected from Alabama shoreline. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 70: 147-154.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Munoz, D., M. Guiliano, P. Doumenq, F. Jacquot, P. Scherrer and G. Mille, 1997. Long term evolution of petroleum biomarkers in mangrove soil (Guadeloupe). Mar. Pollut. Bull., 34: 868-874.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yang, C., Z. Wang, Z. Yang, B. Hollebone, C.E. Brown, M. Landriault and B. Fieldhouse, 2011. Chemical fingerprints of Alberta oil sands and related petroleum products. Environ. Forensics, 12: 173-188.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Alimi, H., T. Ertel and B. Schug, 2003. Fingerprinting of hydrocarbon fuel contaminants: Literature review. Environ. Forensics, 4: 25-38.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Onyema, M.O., L.C. Osuji and I. Ilechukwu, 2016. Petroleum hydrocarbon variations revealed by chemical fingerprinting of oil spill soils with similar contamination source. Researcher, 8: 11-18.


  • Sun, P., M. Bao, G. Li, X. Wang, Y. Zhao, Q. Zhou and L. Cao, 2009. Fingerprinting and source identification of an oil spill in China Bohai Sea by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with multi-statistical analyses. J. Chromatogr. A., 1216: 830-836.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Peters, K.E., C.C. Walters and J.M. Moldowan, 2005. The Biomarker Guide, Volume 2: Biomarkers and Isotopes in Petroleum Exploration and Earth History. 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, UK


  • Ilechukwu, I., L.C. Osuji, M.O. Onyema and G.I. Ndukwe, 2016. Occurrence and sources of aliphatic hydrocarbons in soils within the vicinity of hot mix asphalt plants in Obigbo and Igwuruta areas of rivers state, Nigeria. J. Applied Sci. Environ. Manage., 20: 1087-1094.
    Direct Link    


  • Zhang, J., J. Dai, H. Chen, X. Du, W. Wang and R. Wang, 2012. Petroleum contamination in groundwater/air and its effects on farmland soil in the outskirt of an industrial city in China. J. Geochem. Explor., 118: 19-29.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ho, S.J., C.Y. Wang and Y.M. Luo, 2015. GC-MS analysis of two types of mixed oils, a comparison of composition and weathering patterns. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 96: 271-278.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Stroud, J.L., G.I. Paton and K.T. Semple, 2007. Microbe-aliphatic hydrocarbon interactions in soil: Implications for biodegradation and bioremediation. J. Applied Microbiol., 102: 1239-1253.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Onwutalobi, A.C., 2015. Nnewi Industrialization overview-The official Nnewi city portal. http://www.nnewi.info/.


  • Wang, Z., 2009. Oil weathering and chemical fingerprinting of spilled or discharged petroleum in the environment. Proceedings of the IOC/WESTPAC Workshop, April 2009, Qingdao, China -.


  • Readman, J.W., G. Fillmann, I. Tolosa, J. Bartocci, J.P. Villeneuve, C. Catinni and L.D. Mee, 2002. Petroleum and PAH contamination of the Black Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 44: 48-62.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved