HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2013 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 22 | Page No.: 5434-5439
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.5434.5439
Study on Container Yard Pick-up Operations based on Distributed Decision-making
Yang Xiaoming, Zhao Ning, Chai Jiaqi, Liu Haiwei and Mi Chao

Abstract: In this study, a state-of-the-art strategy of distributed decision-making is proposed for pick-up operations in a container yard which secures an important position during the container handling process. According to the pick-up principles in the storage yard and corresponding practical experience, a distributed decision-making algorithm is formulated which is intended to assist yard operators to figure out the best solution, thus maximally raising operational efficiency in container yard and avoiding unnecessary traffic congestions of container trucks. Moreover, the workflow of yard cranes is efficiently optimized to reduce their movement frequency. In the entire decision-making process, numerous workloads are distributed to all yard cranes. The optimal scheme will be generated after individual computation for each yard crane. Numerical tests are carried out and their results show the effectiveness and feasibility of the algorithm. The application of the proposed theory provides a practical significance to improve operational efficiency when picking up containers.

Fulltext PDF

How to cite this article
Yang Xiaoming, Zhao Ning, Chai Jiaqi, Liu Haiwei and Mi Chao, 2013. Study on Container Yard Pick-up Operations based on Distributed Decision-making. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13: 5434-5439.

Keywords: Distributed decision-making, container yard, pick-up operation and operational efficiency

REFERENCES

  • Ngoc, A.D.D. and I.K. Moon, 2011. The storage capacity expansion and space leasing for container depots. Flexible Serv. Manuf. J., 23: 364-384.
    CrossRef    


  • Douma, A.M., P.C. Schuur and J.M.J. Schutten, 2011. Aligning barge and terminal operations using service-time profiles. Flexible Services Manuf. J., 23: 385-421.
    CrossRef    


  • Gao, P., C. Jin and Q.P. Han, 2008. A nested genetic algorithms to schedule the pick-up operation in container terminal. J. Syst. Manage., 17: 203-209.


  • Hao, J.M., Z.S. Ji and Y. Lin, 2000. Study of optimization of a bay of stacking. J. Dalian Univ. Technol., 40: 102-105.


  • Kim, K.H., Y.M. Park and K.R. Ryu, 2000. Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards. Eur. J. Operat. Res., 124: 89-101.
    CrossRef    


  • Kim, K.H., 1997. Evaluation of the number of rehandles in container yards. Comput. Ind. Eng., 32: 701-711.
    CrossRef    


  • Kozan, E. and P. Preston, 1999. Genetic algorithms to schedule container transfers at multimodal terminals. Int. Trans. Operat. Res., 6: 311-329.
    CrossRef    


  • Lee, C.Y. and M. Yu, 2012. Inbound container storage price competition between the container terminal and a remote container yard. Flexible Services Manuf. J., 24: 320-348.
    CrossRef    


  • Liu, L.Y., 2008. Optimization and simulation for the rehandling operation in container yard. Dalian Maritime University, pp: 5-50.


  • Preston, P. and E. Kozan, 2001. An approach to determine storage locations of containers at seaport terminals. Comput. Operat. Res., 28: 983-995.
    CrossRef    


  • Qing, W., 2007. The research on the container terminal allocation optimization based on genetic algorithm. Qing Dao University, pp: 8-42.


  • Wang, Z.M. and Y.Q. Fu, 2010. The research on the container yard allocation optimization based on genetic algorithm. Appl. Res. Comput., 27: 2939-2941.


  • Wang, X.T. and Y.F. Zhao, 2007. Application of six sigma to improve the empty container pick-up operation. Containerization, 18: 23-26.


  • Van Asperen, E., B. Borgman and R. Dekker, 2013. Evaluating impact of truck announcements on container stacking efficiency. Flexible Services Manuf. J., 25: 543-556.
    CrossRef    


  • Yu, M. and S.M. Wang, 2007. The research on the container terminal scheduling system based on the agent. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., 31: 494-497.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved