HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2013 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 20 | Page No.: 4293-4299
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.4293.4299
Why Complex Organizations Cooperate with Competitors? An Systematic Perspective
Xing-Xiu Wang, Han-Min Liu and Chun-Xia Yang

Abstract: Existing theory and research on coopetition pays attention to its effect on organizational performance and innovation. However, the main reason why complex organizations cooperate with competitors is still in its infancy behind the hotspot. The purpose of this study is to scrutinize and analyze critical determinants from the point view of dynamic process. We propose that the coopetition relationship among complex organizations is a complex system with three subsystems. Present study shows that decision-makers in complex organizations should consider the degree of resource scarcity and market entry barriers they face, as well as the improvement of resource utilization and the expected market overlap in the selection subsystem, focus on communication skills of partners and their own managerial experience on coopetition in the organizational interaction subsystem and then take the new market appeal, the expected risk-sharing, the relative scope, strategic position to be some of most important factors to consider in the strategic interaction subsystem.

Fulltext PDF

How to cite this article
Xing-Xiu Wang, Han-Min Liu and Chun-Xia Yang, 2013. Why Complex Organizations Cooperate with Competitors? An Systematic Perspective. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13: 4293-4299.

Keywords: Coopetition strategy, complex system and complex organizations

REFERENCES

  • Barretta, A., 2008. The functioning of co-opetition in the health-care sector: An explorative analysis. Scandinavian J. Manage., 24: 209-220.
    CrossRef    


  • Brandenburger, A. M. and B. J. Nalebuff, 2011. Co-Opetition. Random House Digital, Inc., UK


  • Chin, K.S., B.L. Chan and P.K. Lam, 2008. Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 108: 437-454.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Garrette, B., X. Castaner and P. Dussauge, 2009. Horizontal alliances as an alternative to autonomous production: Product expansion mode choice in the worldwide aircraft industry 1945-2000. Strategic Manage. J., 30: 885-894.
    CrossRef    


  • Gulati, R. and M. Gargiulo, 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Am. J. Sociol., 104: 1439-1493.
    CrossRef    


  • Inkpen, A.C. and E.W.K. Tsang, 2005. Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Acad. Manage. Rev., 30: 146-165.
    CrossRef    


  • Khanna, T., R. Gulati and N. Nohria, 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation and relative scope. Strategic Manage. J., 19: 193-210.
    CrossRef    


  • Lado, A.A., N.G. Boyd and S.C. Hanlon, 1997. Competition, coperation and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Acad. Manage. Rev., 22: 110-141.
    Direct Link    


  • Luo, Y., 2005. Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. J. World Bus., 40: 71-90.
    CrossRef    


  • Oliver, A.L., 2004. On the duality of competition and collaboration: Network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry. Scandinavian J. Manage., 20: 151-171.
    Direct Link    


  • Giovanna, P. and D.G. Battista, 2007. Untangling the rise of coopetition: The intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. Int. Stud. Manage. Organiz., 37: 32-52.
    Direct Link    


  • Peng, T.J.A. and M. Bourne, 2009. The coexistence of competition and cooperation between networks: Implications from two Taiwanese healthcare networks. Br. J. Manage., 20: 377-400.
    CrossRef    


  • Quintana-Garcia, C. and C.A. Benavides-Velasco, 2004. Co-operation, competition and innovative capability: A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24: 927-938.
    CrossRef    


  • Ritala, P., 2012. Coopetition strategy-when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. Br. J. Manage., 23: 307-324.
    CrossRef    


  • Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. 1st Edn., Transaction Publishers, New York, USA., ISBN: 9780765809919, Pages: 192


  • Tsai, W., 2002. Social structure of competition within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organiz. Sci., 13: 179-190.
    CrossRef    


  • Christiansen, J., 2011. A dynamic network analysis of vision in complex organizations. Master's Thesis, Clemson University.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved