HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2013 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 11 | Page No.: 2082-2086
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.2082.2086
Comparison of PCA and Model Optimization Algorithms for System Identification Using Limited Data
He Qinshu, Liu Xinen and Xiao Shifu

Abstract: Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a novel modeling method that is valuable in regression and classification. Kernel parameters setting in the SVM training process, along with the feature selection, significantly affects system identification accuracy. The objective of this study is to obtain the better algorithms for better prediction accuracy. This study develops Principle Component Analysis (PCA) for feature selection and a grid searching and k-fold cross validation (GSCV) approach for parameter optimization in the SVM. Numerical and engineering results indicate that SVM based on PCA can be used for identification of nonlinear functions with related input variables, while the SVM based on GSCV is useful for complex system identification with limited number with kinds of uncertainties.

Fulltext PDF

How to cite this article
He Qinshu, Liu Xinen and Xiao Shifu, 2013. Comparison of PCA and Model Optimization Algorithms for System Identification Using Limited Data. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13: 2082-2086.

Keywords: Support vector machine, principle component analysis, cross validation and system identification

REFERENCES

  • Ayat, N.E., M. Cheriet and C.Y. Suen, 2005. Automatic model selection for the optimization of SVM kernels. Pattern Recognit., 38: 1733-1745.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cao, L.J. K.S. Chua, W.K. Chong, H.P. Lee and Q.M. Gu, 2003. A comparison of PCA, KPCA and ICA for dimensionality reduction in support vector machine. Neurocomputing, 55: 321-336.
    CrossRef    


  • Chapelle, O., V. Vapnik, O. Bousquet and S. Mukherjee, 2002. Choosing multiple parameters for support vector machines. Mach. Learn., 46: 131-159.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hsu, C.W., C.C. Chang and C.J. Lin, 2003. A practical guide to support vector classification. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei.


  • Lee, K. and V. Estivill-Castro, 2007. Feature extraction and gating techniques for ultrasonic shaft signal classification. Applied Soft Comput., 7: 156-165.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liu, H. and H. Motoda, 1998. Feature Selection for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA., USA., ISBN-13: 9780792381983, Pages: 214


  • Rocco, C.M. and J.A. Moreno, 2002. Fast monte carlo reliability evaluation using support vector machine. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 76: 237-243.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vapnik, V.N., 2000. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. 2nd Edn., Springer, New York, USA., ISBN: 9780387987804, Pages: 314


  • Wang, J., X.D. Wu and C.Q. Zhang, 2005. Support vector machines based on k-means clustering for real-time business intelligence systems. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min., 1: 54-64.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Xiao, S.F. and B. Chen, 2005. Dynamic modeling of beams with flexible support. Mech. Eng., 27: 21-25.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved