HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2009 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 17 | Page No.: 3180-3183
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2009.3180.3183
Optimisation of Arsenic Adsorption from Water by Carbon Nanofibres Grown on Powdered Activated Carbon Impregnated with Nickel
A.A. Mamun, F.R. Ma`an, A.K. Zahirah, M.A. Yehya, A.R.S. Mohammed, M.Z. Alam, S.A. Muyibi, I.A. Faris and I. Azni

Abstract: Contamination of water due to arsenic (As) is increasing in many parts of the world. The removal of As from aqueous solution by using impregnated carbon nanofibres (CNFs) as the adsorbent is reported in this paper. The effects of pH, CNFs dosage, contact time and initial concentration of arsenic were studied at room temperature (±25°C). The interactions among the parameters were also investigated. The data obtained from the adsorption experiment were analysed using statistical software in order to develop a regression equation to represent the optimum operating conditions. The interactions of each parameters were considered during this analysis and the result indicated that the highest removal (97.25%) of As can be attained at pH 6, initial concentration of arsenic of 0.08 mg L-1, contact time of 60 min and CNF dosage of 200 mg L-1. Comparison between impregnated CNF and Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC) were also done and it is determined that impregnated CNF has better removal compared to PAC alone. The final concentration of As after the treatment using CNFs was about 8 ~ 10 times less than that of using PAC. Therefore, it can be concluded that CNFs are highly potential for the adsorption of As from water.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
A.A. Mamun, F.R. Ma`an, A.K. Zahirah, M.A. Yehya, A.R.S. Mohammed, M.Z. Alam, S.A. Muyibi, I.A. Faris and I. Azni, 2009. Optimisation of Arsenic Adsorption from Water by Carbon Nanofibres Grown on Powdered Activated Carbon Impregnated with Nickel. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9: 3180-3183.

Keywords: Adsorption, optimum condition and impregnated powdered activated carbon, carbon nanofibres and arsenic

INTRODUCTION

Heavy metals are natural components of the Earth's crust and they could not be degraded or destroyed. To a small extent, they enter our bodies via food, drinking water and air. Heavy metals are dangerous because they tend to bioaccumulate, which means an increase in the concentration of a chemical in a biological organism over time, compared to the chemical's concentration in the environment. Heavy metals can enter a water supply by industrial and consumer waste, or even from acidic rain breaking down soils and releasing heavy metals into streams, lakes, rivers and groundwater.

Basically, arsenic is a semi-metal element in the periodic table. It is odorless and tasteless. It enters drinking water supplies from natural deposits in the earth or activities such as from agricultural and industrial practices (Mazumder, 2000). Arsenic is a poisonous element which could lead to health effects to human beings. The presence of arsenic in the drinking water can be considered dangerous because of the large quantity of water consumed by the human beings in long term. Therefore, an increasing awareness has been focused on the removal of arsenic from water due to its detrimental effects on human health.

There are different approaches to remove arsenic from aqueous solution, including chemical precipitation, ion exchange, coagulation, oxidation and adsorption. Adsorption method is reported to be the most common method used to remove arsenic from water and wastewater treatment due to its simplicity and cost effectiveness. Various adsorbents have been used to remove arsenic from aqueous solution such as activated carbon, iron oxides, granular titanium dioxide, natural iron ores and bead cellulose.

It was reported that CNFs have high adsorption capacity and can be used as an adsorbent for removal of arsenic from aqueous solution (Chatterjee and Deopura, 2002). Therefore, this study intended to examine the removal of arsenic from aqueous solution using CNFs grown on Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Powdered activated carbons (100-250 μm) were impregnated with Ni catalyst and CNFs were synthesized on the PACs using Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) method. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) was used to determine the morphology of the CNFs in terms of diameter, length and coverage on the PACs.

Experiments were conducted at room temperature (±25°C) to study the effect of pH, CNFs dosage, contact time and initial concentration of arsenic on the adsorption of As ions. Each experiment was conducted in 100 mL shake flask. The prepared arsenic stock solutions with adjusted pH value were placed into the 100 mL shake solution, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1: Experimental parameters and its variation

The shake flasks containing the mixtures at different pH were shaken at 150 rpm using a mechanical shaker. These mixtures were shaken according to the contact time (10, 30, 60, 90 and 110 min). The maximum limit of the initial concentrations of arsenic was selected based on the Department of Environment (DOE) Malaysia effluent discharge standard.

The adsorbents were removed from the solution by filtration using filter paper (110 mm). The solutions were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (Graphite Furnace) at wavelengths of 193.70 nm for arsenic. Finally, the final concentration of each study was tabulated in order to determine the percentage removal of As by CNFs.

Design-expert version 6.0.8 was used to conduct the experimental design for this test. Five parameters were used for the evaluation using central composite design, which results in 33 experiment runs. For this project, 2 replications with 5 levels were used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The 3D response surface and the 2D contour plots are the graphical representation of the regression equation in order to determine the optimum values of the variables within the ranges considered. Both plots are shown in Fig. 1-3. The main goal of response surface is to find the optimum values of the variables such that the response is maximized (Alam, 2005). The maximum predicted value is indicated by the surface confined in the smallest ellipse in the contour diagram.

Fig. 1: Response surface of the interaction of pH and contact time

Fig. 2: Response surface of the interaction of initial pH and adsorbent dosage

Fig. 3: Response surface of the interaction of contact time and adsorbent dosage

From Fig. 1, the response surface was elliptical in the entire region. The maximum removal of arsenic was obtained at the point of intersection of major and minor axes of the ellipse. The maximum removal of arsenic was predicted at given ranges of both pH and contact time. At pH 6 and contact time of 60 min showed the maximum removal of arsenic (i.e., minimum residual concentration of 0.0027 mg L-1).

Similar interaction was observed in the effect of pH and adsorbent dosage at their centre and onward values (Fig. 2). The highest removal of arsenic was observed with the interactions of pH and adsorbent dosage, 6 and 200 mg L-1, respectively.

The next observation was found in the effect of adsorbent dosage and contact time on maximum removal of arsenic at their centre and onward values (Fig. 3). The highest removal of arsenic (at the residual of about 0.0027 mg L-1) was observed with the interactions of adsorbent dosage and contact time, 200 mg L-1 and 60 min, respectively.

Fig. 4: Relationship between the experimental final concentration and predicted final concentration of arsenic

Fig. 5: The CNFs (a) before and (b) after the adsorption experiments

It is determined that the highest predictive percentage removal is 97.25%. The parameters that contribute to these optimal conditions are initial concentration of arsenic of 0.08 mg L-1, pH 6, contact time of 60 min, adsorbent dosage of 200 mg L-1 and agitation speed at 150 rpm. Based on these results, validation on removal of arsenic using optimum process conditions were done to compare and validate the results obtained.

Based on the results obtained, the experimental final concentration of arsenic and predicted final concentration of arsenic were plotted on the Fig. 4. It can be said that the experimental values and predicted values are very close to each other because as the R2 reaches the value of 0.947.

The images of the CNFs grown on PACs before and after the adsorption tests are shown in Fig. 5. It was observed that although the CNFs became smoother compared to the curly texture before the adsorption tests.

CONCLUSION

Carbon Nanofibres grown on PACs was found to be efficient for the adsorption of As in aqueous solution. The characterization of As ions uptake showed that the arsenic binding is dependent on the operational parameters such as pH, CNFs dosage, contact time and initial concentration of arsenic.

Based on the study of the parameters used on the removal of As, the best conditions from each factor was fitted into the regression analysis in order to develop an optimization equation. The optimization equation was used to predict the highest percent removal of As. From this analysis, the highest (predictive) percent removal of 97.25% can be obtained for initial concentration of arsenic of 0.08 mg L-1, pH 6, contact time of 60 min, CNFs dosage of 200 mg L-1 and agitation speed at 150 rpm.

REFERENCES

  • Alam, M.Z., 2005. Optimization of citric acid by empty fruit bunches. J. Biotechnol., 5: 145-196.


  • Chatterjee, A. and B.L. Deopura, 2002. Carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibre: An overview. J. Fibers Polymers, 3: 134-139.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mazumder, D.N., 2000. Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. Int. J. Epidemol., 29: 1047-1052.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved