HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2008 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 19 | Page No.: 3423-3430
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.3423.3430
Fuzzy Assessment of Causes of Time Overrun (Delays) in Iran`s Dam Construction Projects
P. Ghoddosi, M. P. Jalal and M. Hosseinalipour

Abstract: On-time completion and conformity with assigned costs of every project or plan is one of the most important factors in success of that project or plan. No completion or overrun cost leads to not meeting the employer`s requirements need or goals of the plan or the project. This issue is of greater importance in large and national projects in which the period of execution is long even in normal conditions and takes more than 6 years averagely. Dam construction projects are of especial importance regarding on-time completion and assigned funds because of their importance in operation size, great investment, complicated nature and many uncertainties in them like underground conditions, natural disasters and high cost of construction. So, inspection, identification and evaluation of causes of cost and time overrun and representations of solutions for obviating them have great benefits for economy of the country. Besides in most cases precise and sufficient information is not available for this purpose and opinions of experts and professionals in this project (in fuzzy theory framework) should be used. In this study, in addition to brief review of studies related to the issue of delays, fuzzy theory and method of using it is explained and real value of cost and time overrun in some dams of Iran is calculated and subsequently, fuzzy identification and evaluation of causes and cost and time overrun in these projects are dealt with.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
P. Ghoddosi, M. P. Jalal and M. Hosseinalipour, 2008. Fuzzy Assessment of Causes of Time Overrun (Delays) in Iran`s Dam Construction Projects. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8: 3423-3430.

Keywords: fuzzy assessment, Time overrun, dam construction projects and delays

INTRODUCTION

Although nowadays there are great efforts for accomplishing projects on-time by people in charge, projects are accomplished with delays and costs that are higher than estimated. Cost and time overrun is sometimes higher than the value of contract more than 100% (Peter and Hough, 1987; Morris, 1990; Flyvbjerg et al., 1995; Office of Government Commerce, 1995; Pillai and Kannan, 2001; Said, 2005). Considerable studies are performed about the delays in projects and the causes which can be classified in two categories. In first part delays and methods represented to analyze it. Delay is an action or event which prolongs the time schedule of the contract, in other words, delays is the time between preplanned time and actual time of project activities (Arditi and Robinson, 1995).

Project delays can be divided into categories on the basis of one of the criteria of project main parts (Owner-Caused Delays (OCD), Contractor or Consulting-Caused Delays (CCD) and Third party-Caused Delays (TPCD), occurrence time state (independent delays, serial delays and concurrent delays) and compensability (impermissible delays and permissible) (Kartam, 1999; Stumpf, 2000). For identifying complete procedure of events in project and calculating quantity of delays and specifying location of occurring delays, base time schedule, base time schedule with delays in one of the elements of the project, actual time and anticipated time schedule can be used (Arditi and Patel, 1989; Abdulaziz and Cunningham, 1998; Michael, 1999; Terry, 2003). Methods for analyzing delays included, methods of comparing planned time schedule and actual time, increase in base time schedule and analyzing time intervals delay (Cher, 1995; Michael, 1999; Stumpf, 2000). Part 2 presents the precedent studies about causes of delay. Major Project Association researching for analyzing super projects classifies time and cost overrun into 2 categories: strategic decisions which are made by high-rank manager of organization (e.g., selecting the project delivery system, the way of selecting involving people, etc.) before concluding the contract and operational causes which are produced during the execution of the project (e.g., lack of material, incompetence of the contractor, etc.) (Peter and Hough, 1987).

World Commission on Dams (WCD), through a complete research about 99 projects, represents that only half of the projects are accomplished on-time and 30% of the project with 1 to 2 years of delay and 4 projects with more than 10 years of delay. The main causes of these delays in projects are financial problems, incompetence of contractor and construction management, unreal time schedule, dissatisfaction of workforce, legal and constitutional objects and challenges (WCD, 2000).

Also, some other studies are done about the causes of project delays, some of which is as follows:

Causes of delay in large building construction projects (Sadi et al., 1995), delay in public utility projects in Saudi Arabia (Al-Khalil et al., 1999), construction delay: a quantitative analysis (Al-Moumani, 2000), causes of construction delay: traditional contracts (Abdalla and Battaineh, 2002), delays in construction: a brief study of the Florida construction industry (Ahmed et al., 2003), significant factors causing delay and cost overruns in construction of groundwater projects in Ghana (Frimpong et al., 2003) and factors affecting construction speed of industrialized building systems in Malaysia (Alaghbari, 2005).

Dam construction projects are of especial importance because of their operation size, great investment, complicated nature and many uncertainties in them like underground conditions, natural disasters and high cost of construction. Although nowadays there are great efforts for accomplishing Iran dams projects on-time by people in charge, but projects are accomplished with delays and costs that are higher than estimated. So in this study real value of cost and time overrun in some dams of Iran is calculated and subsequently, fuzzy identification and evaluation of causes and cost and time overrun in these projects are dealt with.

FUZZY SETS AND FUZZY NUMBERS

A fuzzy set approach, pioneered by Zadeh (1965), is useful for uncertainty analysis where a probabilistic data base is not available and/or when (interval) values of input variables are uncertain. The fuzzy set approach has been widely applied to represent the uncertainties of real-life situations (Bogardi and Bardossy, 1983; Anandalingam and Westfall, 1988).

Fuzziness or uncertainty represents situations where membership in sets cannot be defined on a yes/no basis because the boundaries of the sets are vague. The central concept of fuzzy set theory is the membership function, which represents numerically the degree to which an element belongs to a set. In a classical set, a sharp or unambiguous distinction exists between the members and nonmembers of the set. In other words, the value of the membership function of each element in the classical set is either 1 for members (those that certainly belong to the set) or 0 for nonmembers (those that certainly do not). However, it is sometimes difficult to make a sharp or precise distinction between the members and nonmembers of a set. For example, the boundaries of the sets of very risky words, nice houses or numbers much greater than 1.0 are fuzzy. Since the transition from member to nonmember appears gradual rather than abrupt, the fuzzy set introduces vagueness (with the aim of reducing complexity) by eliminating the sharp boundary dividing members of the set from nonmembers (Klir and Folger, 1988). Thus, if an element is a member of a fuzzy set to some degree, the value of its membership function can be between 0 and 1. When the membership function of an element can only have values 0 or 1, the fuzzy set theory reverts to the classical set theory.

A special class of fuzzy sets is described by fuzzy members, which are values that belong to a given set with a certain degree of membership only. As an example of fuzzy members, let Q be a fuzzy number and its membership function be denoted by (Fig. 1):

(1a)

(1b)

(1c)
Where:
q = The center value of the fuzzy number Q and δ (δ>0) and γ (γ>0) represent the left and right fuzziness from the center value q. When the values of δ and γ are equal to zero
Q = A nonfuzzy number by convention. As the values of δ and γ increase, Q becomes fuzzier and fuzzier

Among the common membership functions in studies, we can mention triangle (Fig. 1) and trapezoid (Fig. 2) shapes.

In this study, 39 reasons, which are categorized in 5 groups, are identified as causes of time and cost overrun in Iran dam construction projects and the value of effectiveness of each reason and each group is calculated and presented by using fuzzy logic and triangular and trapezoidal membership functions on the basis of opinions of experts.

Fig. 1: Membership function of fuzzy number Q

For calculating and representing value of effectiveness of each reason triangular membership function and for each group trapezoidal is used. Also in evaluation of cost and time overrun in 9 dam construction projects, trapezoidal membership function is used.

Trapezoidal membership functions and related calculations: As mentioned in fuzzy evaluation, the value of effectiveness of each group of causes (Table 4), with consideration of abundance of opinions in especial zone (the most likely zone) and iteration of them in this zone trapezoidal membership functions are used as shown in Fig. 2.

In the Fig. 2, the distance between A and B is the largest zone of experts` opinions which are located in the vicinity of A and B have the lowest level of membership to this set and the opinions located in the most likely zone have the highest level of membership.

In this case, the fuzzy number Z should be transferred into a crisp value that represents the fuzzy number Z. In this study, a ranking method is used to transfer the fuzzy number Z into the crisp value RC, making the ranking value of the fuzzy number Z equal to that of the crisp value RC. Using the ranking method developed by Chen (1985), the crisp value RC can be expressed as:

(2)

Where:

(2a)

(2b)

(2c)

(2d)

Fig. 2: Membership function of the value of effectiveness of each group of causes

In formulas RC is the crisp value and other letters are the largest number, larger than medium number, less than medium and the lowest number, respectively.

Triangular membership function: In this study, in order to show the opinions of experts (interviewees) about the value of each cause, triangular membership functions are used. For example experts` opinion (interviewees) about the effectiveness of causes No. 32 in accordance with Fig. 3. According to the Fig. 3, the minimum value among participants (interviewees) is parameter 1, the medium value is 6.1 and the maximum is 15. Minimum, maximum and medium of opinions for each parameter is calculated and presented in Table 3, from the perspective of involved people in the project and the opinion of all experts.

IDENTIFICATION AND FUZZY EVALUATION OF TIME AND COST OVERRUN CAUSES IN IRAN DAM CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

Underway studies of project and time and cost overrun in them: In order to analyze the rate of occurrence of time and cost overrun in dam construction industry and analyze the causes, 9 large and medium projects of dam construction which have been accomplished were selected and scrutinized and been accomplished.

The basis for calculating cost and time overrun in these projects is the information included in agreement of preliminary contract, final statement and time of taking over of the works. Results of these calculations are represented in Table 1 and Fig. 3 in simple form and also in fuzzy form with trapezoidal membership function.

With consideration of results of Table 1, the value of the diagram of trapezoidal membership function, delay in dam construction projects is in accordance with Fig. 4. Actually Fig. 4 shows that dams of country trace the following function during construction from the perspective of delays, in a way that a project undergoes less than 40% or more than 311% of delay is equal to zero.

Table 1: The rate of time and cost overrun in 9 dam project and fuzzy evaluation
Fig. 3: Value of effectiveness of cause No. 32 on time overrun

Fig. 4: The rate of time overrun in 9 dams project

And the most likely delay is between 122 and 199% (most likely). And if it is supposed to represent one Number as the value of delays in dam construction industry of country, the number resulted from converting the following membership function to crisp number is equal to 166.6%. This number is larger than the Average number (130) calculated in the Table 1.

Identification and fuzzy evaluation of time and cost overrun causes: In this study, identification of causes of cost and time overrun in country`s dam construction projects and the value of effectiveness of each element from the viewpoint of experts have been done in two stages:

Stage 1: Performing preliminary studies and designing questionnaire: In this stage, for the purpose of designing the appropriate questionnaire, in addition to the aforementioned projects, some of the underway or about-to-end projects which have undergone cost and time overrun are selected and studied completely in these projects which had increase in cost were fundamentally identified and scrutinized.

Table 2: The results of statistical society

Reports about time overrun of these projects were studied and inspected and superficial causes of cost and time overrun in theses projects are identified. With reference to involved managers and experts in these projects, a preliminary and comprehensive list (about 100 items) of causes of time and cost overrun is identified and collected.

With further study, it was understood that some of the causes have something in common and can be deleted and also some of them can be incorporated with each other. Thus, with final concluding of 39 items (items included in Table 5) as causes of cost and time overrun in dam construction projects are selected for starting consulting and a questionnaire is designed for taking opinions.

Stage 2: Collecting opinions of people in projects: In this stage, managers and some informed and experts who are involved in these projects in various parts (employer, consultant and contractor) were selected and questionnaire was sent to them and in some cases the form delivered to them in person while explaining and discussing about selected items. In this stage, the number of statistical society was in accordance with Table 2 and 90 questionnaires were delivered to the statistical society. After follow-ups, about 50% of questionnaires were collected and analyzed as in Table 2.

Collected results have been analyzed in two ways Fuzzy effect of each cause: First, calculations related to value effect of each cause have been done with consideration of expert`s opinions and the results are shown in Table 3, for the purpose of being presented as triangular membership function with containing 3 of minimum, maximum and medium.

Table 3: Fuzzy effect of each cause on cost and time overrun in dam construction project

Table 4: Fuzzy effect of each group on cost and time overrun in dam construction

With having these 3 afore mentioned numbers for each cause of triangular membership function. The value of effect of that cause in cost and time overrun in dam construction projects (Fig. 3) can be drawn.

In Table 3, the value of 3 numbers of minimum, maximum and medium is calculated and represented separately and by using the opinions of involved people (employer, consultant and contractor) and also with consideration of total opinions of 49 answer sheet.

Table 5: Affect of each causes on cost and time overrun in dam construction
*These number are in the order of list of causes in questionnaires

Referring to Table 3 and analyzing the results related to medium column, it is understood that the cause included in row 32" giving priority to taking the project rather than execution and as a result bidding lower price in tender" has the greatest effect in cost and time overrun in projects in opinion of involved people.

Fig. 5: The rate of cause related to consultant from the viewpoint of the whole interviewees

Triangular membership function of this parameter with consideration of total opinion of interviewees is represented in Fig. 3.

Fuzzy effect of each group: At first, total effect of causes of each group is calculated with consideration of each expert`s opinion and the values (minimum, maximum, Average, less and greater than Average numbers) are calculated and represented in Table 4, for calculation of trapezoidal membership function of each group of causes with regard to opinions of involved people (employer, consultant and contactor) as well as opinions of the whole interviewees. In Table 4 by using the formula in part 2, crisp numbers (RC) are calculated for each group of causes of cost and time overrun.

From the viewpoint of employer and contractor, the highest effect is related to the group of causes which is related to consultant .from the viewpoint of consultant the highest effect is related to causes which are related to employer and contactor respectively and from the viewpoint of whole interviewees, the highest effect is related to the group of causes which are related to consultant, employer and contractor respectively. The trapezoidal membership function of the cause related to consultant in cost and time overrun in dam construction project from the viewpoint of the whole interviewees is shown in Fig. 5.

In the Fig. 5 the largest zone is located between 4 and 60% which means that some interviewees consider the minimum value (4%) and some consider the greatest value (60%) of cause of cost and time overrun related to the consultant.

Also membership of these numbers to the above diagram is very low and about 0, there are few of them among the opinions experts (interviewees) and the zone between 27 and 30 is the most likely zone and the membership value to the diagram is 1.

CONCLUSION

In this study real value of cost and time overrun in some dams of Iran is calculated and subsequently, fuzzy identification and evaluation of causes and cost and time overrun in these projects are dealt with. After overall examination of value of causes from the viewpoint of main agents of dam construction projects in clause 3, in this clause, on the basis of PARATO law, parameters that have 80% of impact on cost and time overrun in dam construction projects are represented in order of the effect of each cause in rows 1 to 26 of Table 5.

Based on PARATO laws 20% of causes have the 80% of effect. Although in this problem PARATO law in not fully valid, about 70% of causes of cost and time overrun in dam construction projects are due to 20 causes and more than 50% of them are due to only 12 causes. So, Table 5 can be used in order to perform studies and represent solution to obviate or decrease the causes of cost and time overrun in Iran dam construction projects.

REFERENCES

  • Anandalingam, G. and M. Westfall, 1988. Selection of hazardous waste disposal alternative using multi-attribute utility theory and fuzzy set analysis. J. Environ. Syst., 18: 69-85.


  • Al-Moumani, H.A., 2000. Construction delay: A quantitative analysis. Int. J. Project Manage., 18: 51-59.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Arditi, D. and M.A. Robinson, 1995. Concurrent delays in construction litigation. J. Cost Eng., 37: 20-28.
    Direct Link    


  • Arditi, D. and B.K. Patel, 1989. Impact analysis of owner-directed acceleration. J. Construct. Eng. Manage., 115: 144-157.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abdulaziz, A.B. and M.J. Cunningham, 1998. Comparison of delay analysis methodologies. J. Constr. Eng. Mgmt., 124: 245-341.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Odeh, A.M. and H.T. Battaineh, 2002. Causes of construction delay: Traditional contracts. Int. J. Project Manage., 20: 67-73.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ahmed, S.M., S. Azhar, P. Kappagntula and D. Gollapudil, 2003. Delays in construction: A brief study of the Florida construction industry. Proceedings of the 39th Annual ASC Conference, April 10-12, 2003, Clemson University, Clemson, SC., pp: 257-266.


  • Alaghbari, W.A.M., 2005. Factors affecting construction speed of industrialized building systems in Malaysia. Master's Thesis, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang


  • Al-Khalil, M.I. and M.A. Al-Ghafly, 1999. Delay in public utility projects in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Project Manage., 17: 101-106.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Flyvbjerg, B., M.K.S. Holm and S.L. Buhl 1995. How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects. Transport Rev., 23: 71-88.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bogardi, I. and A. Bardossy, 1983. Regional management of an aquifer for mining under fuzzy environmental objectives. Water Resourc. Res., 19: 1394-1402.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chen, S.H., 1985. Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 17: 113-129.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Frimpong, Y., J. Oluwoye and L. Crawford, 2003. Causes of delay and cost overruns in construction of groundwater projects in a developing countries; Ghana as a case study. Int. J. Project Manage., 21: 321-326.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Klir, G.J. and T.A. Folger, 1988. Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty and Information. 1st Edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, ISBN-10: 0133459845


  • Michael, R.F., 1999. Window analyses of compensable delays. J. Construct. Eng. Manage., 125: 96-100.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Office of Government Commerce, 1995. Cost and time overruns in public sector construction projects. Econ. Political Weekly, 25: M-154-M-168


  • Pillai, N.V. and K.P. Kannan, 2001. Time and cost overruns of the power projects in Kerala. Centre for Development Studies Thiruvananthapuram. http://www.cds.edu/download_files/wp320.pdf


  • Peter, W.G.M. and G.H. Hough, 1987. The Anatomy of Major Projects. 1st Edn. Wiley, New York, ISBN-10: 0471915513


  • Kartam, S., 1999. Generic methodology for analyzing delay claims. J. Construct. Eng. Manage., 125: 409-419.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Stumpf, 2000. Schedule delay analysis. Cost Eng., 42: 32-43.


  • Schumacher, L., 1995. Quantifying and apportioning delay on construction project. Cost Eng., 37: 11-13.
    Direct Link    


  • Sadi, A.A., M. Al-Khalil and M. Al-Hazmi, 1995. Causes of delay in large building construction projects. J. Manage. Eng., 11: 45-50.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Morris, S., 1990. Cost and time overruns in public sector projects. Econ. Political Weekly, 25: M154-M168.
    Direct Link    


  • Terry, W., 2003. Assessing extension of time delays on major projects. Int. J. Project Manage., 21: 19-26.
    CrossRef    


  • The Report of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), 2000. Dams and Development. Earthscan publications L+d, London and sterling, http://www.dams.org/report/contents.htm.


  • Wang, L.X., 1997. A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control. 1st Edn., Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ., USA., ISBN: 0135408822, Pages: 424


  • Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control, 8: 338-353.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Said, B., 2005. A new approach of project cost overrun and contingency management. Proceedings of the OCRI Partnership Conferences Series Process and Project Management Ottawa, March 22, 2005. University of Quebec en Outaouais, pp: 1-32.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved