HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2006 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 9 | Page No.: 2031-2035
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2006.2031.2035
The Effect of Vacuum Cooling of Some Products on the Ratio of Weight Loss
Esref Isik

Abstract: In this study, weight loss and the methods to reduce weight loss were determined as well as the parameters of pressure, temperature and time during the vacuum cooling of lettuce, cauliflower, cabbage and spinach at low evacuation rate using three different methods and these were compared with the studies made before. The weight loss for every 1°C ratios of products with high specific volume values during vacuum pre-cooling practices are also high, since they can release the water inside their structure more easily. However, they are more suitable to vacuum pre-cooling compared with the other products. Spraying water onto the products which could not release their water readily, during vacuum pre-cooling reduces the weight loss for every 1°C and also increases the cooling rate. In this connection one can say that spraying water onto the lettuce, cabbage, cauliflower, spinach and thereafter covering them with perforated PVC film before cooling in the vacuum cooling process is a factor significantly reducing the weight loss for every 1°C and total weight loss.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Esref Isik , 2006. The Effect of Vacuum Cooling of Some Products on the Ratio of Weight Loss. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6: 2031-2035.

Keywords: spinach, Vacuum cooling, lettuce, cauliflower, cabbage and weight loss

INTRODUCTION

Vacuum cooling has been used as a pre-cooling treatment for products such as lettuces (Ahoroni and Kalmanovitz, 1971; Hayakawa et al., 1983; Haas et al., 1986; Chen, 1986; Yanniotis and Schwartzberg, 1986; Thompson et al., 1987; Isenberg et al., 1986; Turk and Çelik, 1993; Martinez and Artez, 1999), mushrooms (Carol et al., 1987; Frost et al., 1989), broccoli (Perrin, 1982), asparagus (Ryall and Peizer, 1982), artichokes, cucumbers, carrots (Hayakawa et al., 1983), peppermints, dills, garden rockets (Hass and Gur, 1987), green onions (Shaw and Kou, 1987) and cut flowers (Wiersma, 1971; Sun and Brosnan, 1999; Brosnan and Sun, 2001, 2003) to remove field heat and thus extend shelf life and quality.

The major advantage of vacuum cooling over other techniques of cooling is the short time required to cool a suitable product to a given temperature (Mc Donald and Sun, 2000). However, the weight loss of vacuum cooled foods may be reduced by adding a suitable amount of water to the cooled foods (Wang and Sun, 2001). Studies towards decreasing the weight loss in different products on the basis of years were aimed at eliminating this disadvantage.

Ryall and Peizer (1982) reported the weight loss in asparagus as the result of lowering the temperature from 20 to 8°C within 25 min as 1.4% and the weight loss resulting from the wetting of product before cooling as 0.5%. The weight loss during vacuum cooling for every 10°C reduction in temperature was determined as 2.1, 2.8 and 3.4% for lettuce, artichoke and carrot, respectively (Hayakawa et al., 1983). The weight loss in mushrooms that were vacuum precooled 6 h after harvest was found as 1.9%, whereas the weight loss after air-pre-cooling was found as 0.7% (Frost et al., 1989). Martínez and Artéz (1999) determined the weight loss ratio in iceberg-type lettuces precooled without covering as 4.75%, while in lettuces covered with polyethylene film, this ratio was found as 0.93%. Sun and Brosnan (1999) determined that the weight loss which was between 2.5 and 3% under normal conditions could be lowered to 1.5% by wetting the products before vacuum cooling, in a study on vacuum cooling of cut narcissus flowers. Mc Donald and Sun (2000) reported that weight loss was an important problem associated with vacuum cooling, however, wetting the products before cooling had a reducing effect on weight loss and the weight loss in vegetables after vacuum cooling would be lettuce 1 and 5%. Brosnan and Sun (2003) determined in their study on the effect of evacuation rate on weight loss in cut lilies that the weight loss was 5.4% with 374 mbar min-1 evacuation rate and 3.7% with 8.5 mbar min-1 evacuation rate.

In this study, weight loss and the methods for reducing weight loss as well as the parameters of pressure, temperature and time were determined during vacuum cooling of lettuce, cauliflower, cabbage and spinach under low evacuation rates with three different methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trials were realized in Vacuum pre-cooling experimental system that was made by the University of Uludag, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture Machinery, Bursa, Turkey. The system consisted of vacuum chamber, vacuum pumps, condenser and measuring devices (Fig. 1) (Ryall and Pizer, 1982; Isenberg et al., 1986; Amirante and Renzo, 1989; Houceka et al., 1996; Sun and Brosnan, 1999; Mc Donald and Sun, 2000; Wang and Sun, 2001; Isik, 2002; Landfeld et al., 2002; Brosnan and Sun, 2003; Sun and Hu, 2003).

Vacuum pumps were two oil rotary vacuum pumps with speeds of 8.4 m3 h-1 and 12 m3 h-1. In addition, a compressor with an electrical motor power of 0.368 kW was used in the cooling system connected to the condenser in vacuum chamber. An analog-membrane vacuum meter with a range between 760 and 0 mmHg values was used for measuring the pressure in the system. Weightings were done using a BASTER-brand digital precision balance with 1 g sensitivity. Thermocouples with 0.2 mm diameter were used in temperature measurements (Sun and Brosnan, 1999). Temperature values were collected in data acquisition system and transferred to the computer.

The products used in the study were obtained from local farms of Bursa region and then were transported to Laboratory of Department of Agriculture Machinery on harvest temperatures.

Vacuum pre-cooling trials were realized in four different products with three different methods and low evacuation rate (0.343 kPa min-1). In the first method, the thermocouples were inserted into the center of the case for a sensitive measurement of the temperature in the center of the product after the weighted products were put into vacuum chamber (Mc Donald et al., 2001; Landfeld et al., 2002), while in the case of spinach, they were placed into the center of the bunch.

Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of the experimental vacuum cooler

The second thermocouple was hanged freely into the center of the chamber. External ambient temperature was measured by a third thermocouple placed around. The values of weight loss, temperature, time and pressure were recorded during trials.

In the 2nd method, approximately 5 mL of water was pulverized on each product directly in a uniform manner after the product was weighed (Chen, 1988; Sun and Brosnan, 1999; Brosnan and Sun, 2001), whereas in the 3rd method, the product was covered with perforated PVC stretch film fallowing water pulverization (Haas et al., 1986, 1987; Martinez and Artes, 1999). Other stages were realized as described in the 1st method.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Physical characteristics of the products used in the trials are given Table 1. The results of the trial carried out on lettuce are given in Fig. 2. The cooling period at the point at which the product temperature reached 4°C is 33 min, while the pressure at this point is 0.60 kPa. The trial was stopped at this point since lowering the pressure below 0.60 kPa and prolonging cooling period lead to freezing in the product and reduce its market value. At the end of the trial, a weight loss of 4.20% was recorded in lettuce (compared with 4.75% by Martínez and Artés, 1999; 1-5% by Mc Donald and Sun, 2000). A weight loss of 2.8% (2.1% by Ryall and Peizer, 1982) is in equation for every 10°C decline in temperature and 0.28% for every 1°C. The temperature of wetted lettuce was lowered to 3°C at the end of 33 min trial period. Weight loss was determined as 3.13%, being lower compared with natural lettuce trial.

Table 1: Physical characteristics of the products
* Bunched

Fig. 2: Experimental results of lettuce in vacuum cooling

Fig. 3: Experimental results of cauliflower in vacuum cooling

Fig. 4: Experimental results of cabbage in vacuum cooling

Fig. 5: Experimental results of spinach in vacuum cooling

The temperature of wetted and covered with perforated PVC stretch film was lowered to 2°C in the 33rd min of the trial period, with a temperature reduction of 18°C. The weight loss in lettuce at the end of the trial was found as 2.03%.

Fig. 6: Weight loss of products

Fig. 7: Weight loss for every 1°C of product temperatures

Results of cauliflower are given in Fig. 3. The product temperatures reached 3°C at the end of the 34th min, 3°C at the end of 33rd min and 1°C at the end 31st min, natural, wetted and wetted-covered, respectively.

The temperature of cabbages was lowered to 11°C at the end of the 33rd min (Fig. 4). The weight loss was found as 2.40%. The product temperature was lowered to 8°C from 20°C and to 4°C from 15°C, wetted and wetted-covered, respectively. Weight losses in wetted and wetted-covered cabbage were determined as 1.87 and 1.60%, respectively.

The initial temperature was 22°C in the spinach trial (Fig. 5). The product temperature reached 5°C in the 33rd min of trial with a reduction of 17°C. Cooling trials of wetted spinach were started with a product temperature of 22°C and the temperature was lowered to 4°C at the end of the 33rd min. Wetted plus covered spinach were started with a product temperature of 22°C and the temperature fell down to 3°C at the end of the 33rd min.

When Fig. 6 is examined, it can be seen that the highest weight losses were in spinach (4.96%), followed by lettuce (4.20%). These values were 3.51 and 2.40% in cauliflower and cabbage, respectively. Reduction was observed in weight loss when the products were subjected to cooling after being wetted. Weight loss ratios were determined as 2.50, 2.03, 1.90 and 1.60%, in spinach, lettuce, cauliflower and cabbage, respectively at the end of the trials realized on wetted plus perforated PVC stretch film covered products.

Considering these values, it may be said that spraying water onto the products followed by covering with PVC stretch film before cooling in vacuum pre-cooling method is a factor significantly reducing the weight loss.

Another important parameter that should be examined nearby total weight loss is the weight loss for every 1°C (Fig. 7). When the products at natural state are examined, the weight loss required for decreasing the temperature of 1 kg of product by 1°C was observed to be 0.028, 0.022, 0.027 and 0.029% in lettuce, cauliflower, cabbage and spinach, respectively.

When the Table 1 and Fig. 6 are examined, it can be seen that weight loss are at high rates in the natural spinach (4.96%) which has high specific volume (1.787 dm3 kg-1) than the others. Lettuce (4.20%), which was on the second order with respect to weight loss, was also the second with regard to specific volume (1.538 dm3 kg-1). These two products are followed by cauliflower (3.51%) and cabbage (2.40%), with regard to these two parameters.

The existence of a linear relation between the specific volume of the product and the weight loss resulting from vacuum pre-cooling is remarkable when the weight losses values are examined.

REFERENCES

  • Ahoroni, N. and D. Kalmanovitz, 1971. Vacuum pre chilling of lettuce for export. Hortic. Abst., 42: 3627-3627.


  • Amirante, P. and G.C. Renzo, 1989. The Influence of the Physical and Mechanical Characteristics of Produce on the Design of Vacuum Pre Coolers. Ashgate Pubhshing, Rotterdam, Netherlands, ISBN: 9061919800


  • Brosnan, T. and D.W. Sun, 2001. Compensation for water loss in vacuum pre cooled cut lily flowers. J. Food Eng., 79: 299-305.
    CrossRef    


  • Brosnan, T. and D.W. Sun, 2003. Influence of modulated vacuum cooling on the cooling rate mass loss and vase life of cut lily flowers. Biosyst. Eng., 86: 45-49.
    CrossRef    


  • Carol, E.F., S.B. Kerry and P.T. Atkay, 1987. A Fresh Look Cooling Mushrooms. AFRC Institute of Hortic, UK


  • Chen, Y.L., 1986. Vacuum cooling and its energy use analysis. J. Chinese Agric. Eng., 32: 43-50.


  • Chen, Y.L., 1988. Vacuum hydro and forced air cooling of farm produce and their energy consumption. Postharvest Handling Tropical Subtropical Fruit Crops, 37: 104-111.


  • Frost, C.E., K.S. Burton and P.T. Atkay, 1989. A fresh look at cooling mushrooms. Mushroom J., 193: 23-29.


  • Haas, E., G. Zoslaves, R. Regen and G. Gur, 1986. Design Data for Commercial Vacuum Coolers. Inst. of Agricultural Engineering, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel


  • Haas, E. and G. Gur, 1987. Factor effecting the cooling rate of lettuce in vacuum cooling installations. Intl. J. Refrigeration, 10: 82-86.


  • Hayakawa, A., S. Kawano, M. Iwamoto and T. Onodera, 1983. Vacuum cooling characteristics of fruit vegetables and root vegetables. Natl. Food Res. Inst. Jap., 43: 109-115.


  • Houska, M., S. Podloucky, R. Zitny, R. Gree, J. Sestak, M. Dostal and D. Burfoot, 1996. Mathematical model of the vacuum cooling of liquids. J. Food Eng., 26: 339-348.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Isik, E., 2002. Urun Isleme Makinalari. Uludag Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Ders Notu., Bursa, pp: 50-56


  • Isenberg, F.M.R., R.F. Kasmire and J.G. Parson, 1986. Vacuum Cooling Vegetables. A Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication, California, USA


  • Landfeld, A., M. Houoeka, K. Kyros and J. Qibin, 2002. Mass transfer experiments on vacuum cooling of selected pre cooked solid foods. J. Food Eng., 52: 207-210.
    Direct Link    


  • Martinez, J.A. and F. Artes, 1999. Effect of packaging treatments and vacuum cooling on quality of winter harvested iceberg lettuce. Food Res. Int., 32: 621-627.
    Direct Link    


  • McDonald, K., D.W. Sun and T. Kenny, 2000. Comparison of the quality of cooked beef products cooled by vacuum cooling and by conventional cooling. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 33: 21-29.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • McDonald, K. and D.W. Sun, 2000. Vacuum cooling technology for the food processing industry: A review. J. Food Eng., 45: 55-65.
    CrossRef    


  • Donald, K.M., S.D. Wen and T. Kenny, 2001. The effect of injection level on the quality of a rapid vacuum cooled cooked beef product. J. Food Eng., 47: 139-147.


  • Perrin, P.W., 1982. Cooling and Storage of Broccoli in British Colombia. Agriculture Canada Research Station, Canada


  • Ryall, A.L. and W.T. Peizer, 1982. Handling Transportation and Storage of Fruits and Vegetables. AVI. Publishing Co. Inc., Westport, USA


  • Shaw, J. and C. Kou, 1987. Vacuum Pre Cooling Green Onion and Celery. Hyatt Regescychi Chicago Illinois Center. America Social Agriculture Engineering, USA., pp: 87-5522


  • Sun, D.W. and T. Brosnan, 1999. Extension of the vase life of cut daffodil flowers by rapid vacuum cooling. Int. J. Refrig., 22: 472-478.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wen, S.D. and Z. Hu, 2003. CFD simulation of coupled heat and mass transfer through porous foods during vacuum cooling process. Intl. J. Refrigeration, 26: 19-27.
    Direct Link    


  • Thompson, J.F., Y.L. Chen and T.R. Rumsey, 1987. Energy use in vacuum coolers for fresh market vegetables. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 87: 0302-0302.


  • Turk, R. and E. Celik, 1993. The effects of vacuum pre cooling on the half cooling period and quality characteristic of iceberg lettuce. Acta Hortic., 343: 321-324.


  • Wang, L. and D.W. Sun, 2001. Rapid cooling of porous and moisture foods by using vacuum cooling technology. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 12: 174-184.
    Direct Link    


  • Wiersma, O., 1971. Vacuum cooling of cut flowers. Hort. Abst., 42: 6311-6311.


  • Yanniotis, S. and H. Schwartzberg, 1986. Evaporative cooling of foods in an absorption driver vacuum cooler trans. ASAE USA., 29: 164-1170.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved