Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2005 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 9 | Page No.: 1602-1605
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2005.1602.1605

Interfaces Fluid-solid Modeling

M. Benyettou, S. Chouraqui and H. Alla

Abstract: This study was a contribution to the theoretical approach of the wettability notion; it showed that, under no slip boundary condition, the representation of wettability by contact angle was disputed. Two news parameters were proposed to characterize the wettability; a shem of simple experiments was discibed to measure these parameters.

Keywords: hysteresis phenomenon, Contact angle and curvature radius

INTRODUCTION

The law which governs the behaviour of a Fluid/Fluid (F⁽¹⁾/F⁽²⁾) interface is reletively well known; it is characterized by an « interfacial tension σ » which connectsthe mean H of the interface to the pressure jump accross this interface. Far from any solid wall, this law described by the LAPLACE law^[1]: p⁽¹⁾-p⁽²⁾ = 2σH (the heigher pressure being always locally on the same side that the center of curvature (Fig. 1).

If now we approach a solide wall S along the (F⁽¹⁾/F⁽²⁾) interface, in a plane perpendiculaire to the wall, we observe that the contact angle θ and (or) the curvature of the interface varies with the nature of the solid surface. To describe this interaction of the wall with the interface, two news surfaces tensions σ^αs (α = 1.2) are proosed as the necessary energy to increase of one unit the area of the common interface F^(α)/S and the only geometric parameter retained is 0; the equilibrium of the trple line (intersection of the three media ) implied then the young relation σ_2s-σ_1s = σ cos θ (the origine of θ being taken inside the fluid of higher pressure).

The influence of the solid wall introduces also some hystersis phenomenon that we may briefly recall as floow, from the description of the observers: If we modify the constraints on the two fluids, θ can vary between two limit vaules θ_A and θ_R (θ_R < θ_A) while the contact line is fixed-alternatively, the contact line can move in a directioneither with θ=θ_A fixed (advancing process).

It is clear that the Young formula cannot take into account the hysteresis phenomena if σ_2s, σ_1s and σ are constants numbers.

All the notions evocated above are really important for a lot of engeniering problems(spreading or adhesion of a fluid on asolid surface, assisted recoveryof oil in the soils, lubrications etc…) they are known as the properties of wettability of solid surface, but however, they are not clear anough from the point of the mathematic modeling.

Present objective was then to find out what were the characteristic parameters of a triplet F⁽¹⁾, F⁽²⁾, S such as:

To replyhtis question, we study here the simple problem of a symetrical drop posed (or hanged ) on an horizontal solid support.

Equation of a symetrical drop:

We may represent the boundary of the symetrical drop by Benyettou and Alla^[1,2]:

Where, r is the cylindrical radial coordinate and

and when x o, the non sliding conditions on the wall implies

but lim

from there we may conclude
if η(t) > o (Advancing process) then θ(t) =π
if η(t) < o (Receding process) then θ(t) =o
and the paradox of the moving triple line desapears.

[ρ⁽¹⁾-ρ⁽²⁾]g being the difference of the weight by unit of volume of the two fluids, the LAPLACE relation nad the hydrostatic equation^[3,4] lead us to the following differencial equation for

Where, (reduced mean curvature of the F⁽¹⁾/F⁽²⁾ interface at the contact with the wall), and λ or 0 are unknown pareameters (all relative to the contact) and the is although given

However:

(R_c being the reducted curvature radius of the drop’s profile at the wall ) and (5) gives:

From (5) and (6), can be eliminated and the foundamental relation (6) leads us to a new interpretation of the hysteresis phenomenon that we describe below as a conjecture.

A new interpretation of the hysteresis phenomenon conjecture^[1]

When the observers say:
dη = o or dη > o or dη < o, it is certaily true because clearly observable
when the observers say :
dθ = o during the advancing or receding process, we may think from (6) that the truth is probably :

Hence we porpose the following conjecture.

during the advancing process

during the receding process

C_A and C_R being two constant numbers. When V discreases just after « advancing »
η = constant numbers =η_A and then from (6)

When V̄ increases again just after « Receding ».
η = constant numbers = η_R and then from (6)

Which could contain all the information about the wettability; then:

Whatever, the intial volume may be

In a succession of volume increments from V_o,
we can
To measure η₀, η₁, …., η_p = η_m
To check that = constant number and in the affirmativ answer,named this number C_A;

Then, in a succession of volume decrements from V_m, we can
To check first, that for a while,

and then, from a certain volume Vq, that η begins to decrease in a such way that is a constant number and in the affirmative answer, named this number C_R.

In the end, in a last succession of volume increments from V_m

We can close the hysteresis cycle (Fig. 2), checking first that, for a while,

and then, from

η begins again to increase following the rule

We have also to check, that the advantage and the

Receding processes are irreversible while the processes where either are reversible.

ACTUAL STATE OF THE ART

Two short series of experiments seems to confort the conjecture:

OPEN QUESTIONS

REFERENCES