HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Agronomy

Year: 2019 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 55-60
DOI: 10.3923/ja.2019.55.60
Effect of Harvest Time on Bioactive Compounds of Field-cultivated Centella asiatica (L) Urban
Noverita Sprinse Vinolina , Luthfi Siregar, Bilter Sirat, Nurhayati , Enny Adelina and Laila Nazirah

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Pegagan, Centella asiatica (L) Urban is an important traditional herb and its wild population is currently heavily exploited due to commercial cultivation shortage. This study evaluated the content of different bioactive compounds in the leaves and roots of Pegagan, Centella asiatica (L) Urban cultivated in field condition and harvested at different times. Materials and Methods: The contents of centellosides in the leaves and roots of field-cultivated Deli Serdang Pegagan Accession were determined by using ultra fast liquid chromatography system. The levels of bioactive compounds in relation to harvest time were compared with an additional discussion on the dry/wet weight relationship. Results: The result showed that asiaticoside and madecassoside increased while asiatic acid decreased over time in both the leaves and roots of Pegagan. However, the leaves were shown to have significantly higher amounts of all centellosides compared to the roots in all harvest time treatments. Conclusion: This study concluded that a late harvest of Pegagan is best to maximize the production of asiaticoside and madecassoside. Conversely, early harvest was best to the maximum amount of asiatic acid in Pegagan.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Noverita Sprinse Vinolina, Luthfi Siregar, Bilter Sirat, Nurhayati , Enny Adelina and Laila Nazirah, 2019. Effect of Harvest Time on Bioactive Compounds of Field-cultivated Centella asiatica (L) Urban. Journal of Agronomy, 18: 55-60.

Keywords: centellosides, chromatography system, Centella asiatica, bioactive compounds and asiaticoside

INTRODUCTION

Centella asiatica is widely known as Gotu Kola in the international market or ‘Pegagan’ in Indonesia1. It is known for its bioactive compounds and has been used as a medicinal ingredient to treat various illnesses and diseases2-4. Such benefits offered by this tropical plant have led to its commercial cultivation in some of the dominant producing countries such as China and India5,6. However, the commercial cultivation of Pegagan in Indonesia is lagged behind due to the inconsistent supply of quantity and quality due to environmental conditions, harvest and post-processing7. As a result, the increasing national and international demands of Pegagan is primarily supplied from the wild population8 resulting in overexploitation of the plant worldwide9.

Previous studies on the content of bioactive compounds in Pegagan such as asiaticoside, madecassoside and asiatic acid have been focusing on their complex and benefits of biochemical processes10, their concentration in different parts of the plant11-13 and general reviews of its growth under controlled conditions11,14. There was limited or non-existent literature or studies, particularly within Indonesian regions, that provide information regarding the effect of harvest time on the concentration of important bioactive compounds of Pegagan cultivated in field condition. Such discrepancy has been highlighted by Vinolina et al.7 and Ghulamahdi et al.15 where the field production of Pegagan varies in terms of quality and quantity throughout the year. Field location, seasonal climate condition as well as accession type contributed to these inconsistencies are needed to be studied further10,16. Hence this recent study determined the content of different bioactive compounds in different parts of field-cultivated Pegagan harvested at different times.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study location: The study was carried out for 9 months from January-September 2014. The experimental field was located at the University of Sisingamangaraja XII, Medan, north Sumatra situated at an altitude of 50 m above sea level.

Seed production and field preparation: This study used Gotu Kola seeds from the accession of Deli Serdang, north Sumatra, Indonesia due to its higher content of centellosides in a previous study by Vinolina et al.17. The mother plants were grown for two and a half months and used as the seeds. The seeds were planted in previously prepared 30 units of 30 cm raised-soil beds or plots sized 1×1 m. Each treatment (harvest time) used 10 plots where four seeds of Pegagan was planted in each plot at 40 cm distance. Randomized Block Design was used to arrange the treatments consisted of different harvest time of 56, 70 and 84 days after planting denoted as U1, U2 and U3, respectively. Each treatment had 10 replicates to determine the effect of harvest time on biomass production of and bioactive compound in Pegagan. Fertilization was conducted at 0 days after planting (DAP) and repeated at 20 and 40 DAP using superphosphate 36 (SP36), Urea and KCL of 20, 30, and 22 g, respectively, for each plot. Field maintenance was regularly conducted to maintain the optimum growth of cultivated Pegagan.

Harvest procedures: The harvest times of cultivated Pegagan as the treatment variable in this current study were set at day 56, 70 and 84 after planting which were denoted as U1, U2 and U3, respectively. Before harvest, the plots were wetted with water to facilitate easy removal of the plants. Each whole plant was taken out from the soil plots by hand. Cleaned plants were grouped according to the harvest times and part categories (leaves and roots) then weighed to determine their wet weights. Afterward, all samples were oven-dried for 3 days at 50°C and ground to powder for the subsequent bioactive compound analysis.

Bioactive compounds in pegagan: The powder sample harvested Pegagan (0.2 g for each sample) was prepared by pouring into a test tube, mixed with 4 mL of 90% methanol solution, shaken for 5 h. The supernatant was collected and then evaporated using a water bath set at 50°C. The dried supernatant was then mixed with 1 mL of 90% methanol solution (gradient grade for liquid chromatography), filtered using a 0.22 μM PTFE filter (Whatman membrane filter P/N E252 Buckinghamshire, England) and ready for the subsequent ultra fast liquid chromatography (UFLC) process. The analysis of bioactive compounds was performed at the Pharmacy Laboratory of the University of north Sumatera. Standard commercial asiaticoside, madecassoside and asiatic acid were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO., USA) and used to determine the retention time of each compound following the modified procedure of Jain and Agrawal18. The calibration of the UFLC Shimadzu DGU-20A3 followed the procedures described by Bonfill et al.13 and Mangas et al.19. The retention time of asiaticoside, madecassoside and asiatic acid were determined as 18.603, 13.196, and 21.054 min, respectively. The contents of asiaticoside, madecassoside an0d asiatic acid were determined by injecting 20 μL of the filtrates of each sample in the UFLC system with the retention times previously described. The measurement of each centelloside compound was repeated three times and the values were averaged.

Statistical analysis: Experimental data were analyzed using F-test in the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant differences among the treatments (p<0.05) were determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using the SPSS 17.0 software.

RESULTS

Asiaticoside concentration at different harvest times: The concentrations of asiaticoside in leaves (KAA, μg mL1) and roots (KAD, μg mL1) of Pegagan harvested at a different time (U1, U2, and U3) are presented in Fig. 1. The figure clearly shows that both Pegagan parts contained significantly different asiaticoside amounts according to the harvest times. The highest concentration of asiaticoside was found in the leaves of Pegagan (53.55 μg mL1) harvested at 70 DAP which was more than four times compared to that of the leaves harvested at 56 DAP (12.52 μg mL1). The ratio of asiaticoside content in the leaves and roots of U2 differed greatly compared to that of U1 and U3 (p<0.05).

Madecassoside concentration at different harvest times: The concentrations of madecassoside showed significant differences in different parts (leaves and roots) and harvest times (Fig. 2) (p<0.05). The leaves consistently had the highest concentration of madecassoside compared with the roots across different harvest times. The highest concentration of madecassoside was found in the leaves of Pegagan harvested at U3 (358.18 μg mL1) of almost four times of the lowest concentration in the leaves harvested at U2 and more than 17 times of the lowest concentration in the roots harvested at U2.

Asiatic acid concentration at different harvest times: Results in Fig. 3 shows that the contents of asiatica acid in the leaves of Pegagan were consistently high compared that of the roots (p<0.05). However, there was a clear decreasing pattern of asiatic acid content in the leaves (KAAD) of Pegagan from the shortest to the longest harvest times.

Fig. 1: Asiaticoside concentration (μg mL1) in leaves (KAD) and roots (KAA) of Pegagan harvested at 56 (U1), 70 (U2) and 84 (U3) DAP. Significant differences are indicated by different letters above the bars (F-tests, p<0.05)

Fig. 2: Madecassoside concentration (μg mL1) in leaves (KMD) and roots (KMA) of Pegagan harvested at 56 (U1), 70 (U2) and 84 (U3) DAP. Significant differences are indicated by different letters above the bars (F-tests, p<0.05).

The content of asiatic acid in Pegagan’s leaves harvested had decreased from the shortest harvest time (U1 : 611.6 μ mL1) to less than half in Pegagan’s leaves harvested at the longest time (U3 : 294.56 μ mL1). Despite the contents of asiatic acid in the roots (KAAA) were relatively stable at different harvest times, the F-test showed significant differences among the treatments with U3 had the highest asiatic acid followed by U1 and the lowest was U2 (p<0.05).

Dry and wet weight of harvested Pegagan at different times: The wet weight (WW) and dry weight (DW) of Pegagan harvested at U1 U2, and U3 and dried in an oven at 50°C for three days is presented in Table 1. The WWs and DWs of leaves and roots of harvested Pegagan at U3 were the highest and U1 were the lowest (p<0.05).

Fig. 3: Asiatic acid concentration (μg mL1) in leaves (KAAD) and roots (KAAA) of Pegagan harvested at 56 (U1), 70 (U2) dan 84 (U3) DAP. Significant differences are indicated by different letters above the bars (F-tests, p<0.05)

Table 1:Wet weight to dry weight of leaves and roots of Pegagan harvested at 56 (U1), 70 (U2) and 84 (U3) DAP
Note: Different values in the same column indicated significant difference at p<0.05. WW(L/R): Wet Weight of Leaves/roots, DW(L/R): Dry Weight of Leaves/roots

DISCUSSION

This current study found that there is an opposite relationship between the contents of asiaticoside-madecassoside and asiatic acid in both the leaves and roots of Pegagan cultivated at field condition. Asiaticoside- madecassoside content in whole plant of Pegagan increased over time whilst at the same time, the content of asiatic acid decreased. This finding reconfirms the findings of Kim et al.11 and Bonfill et al.13 who had found similar results with Pegagan cultivated under laboratory condition and treated with elicitors to increase the contents of centellosides. However, the level of centellosides in the whole plant of Pegagan found in this study was significantly higher particularly for asiaticoside which was up to five-fold higher compared to that of Bonfill et al.13 but relatively similar to that of Kim et al.11. The relatively higher content of centelloside found in this study was due to the twice longer cultivation period. This longer cultivation period had allowed the build-up of the secondary metabolites in the leaves and roots of Pegagan despite no elicitors used. Similar result was also reported by Rafi et al.1 that harvest time determines the concentration of centelloside which is going to be accumulated in whole plant Pegagan. However, their study did not distinguish the concentrations of different centellosides in leaves and roots of Pegagan. The field condition in which the Pegagan were cultivated is also argued to support all nutrients required by the plant compared to the more sterile and controlled laboratory condition. This was described by Rafi et al.1 and Jamil et al.20 as the effect of geographic location and environmental condition which also have the role the production of centellosides in Pegagan.

Furthermore, the patterns of centellosides showed a consistent trend that the leaves of Pegagan had a higher content of centellosides compared to the roots across different harvest times at field condition. A laboratory study by Kim et al.11 and Mangas et al.19 also found that Pegagan mainly synthesizes the secondary metabolites in leaves and an only limited amount in the roots. Similarly, Zainol et al.21 had found that leaves of Pegagan has the highest concentration of centellosides compared to the root. A detailed study by Gupta et al.16 also reported a high concentration of different centellosides in a similar order as found in this study. However, they studied the morphometric variation in relation to bioactive compounds of Pegagan leaves sourced from the wild population which is not comparable to this study. It can be said that accumulation of the secondary metabolites in the leaves of Pegagan is mainly for defense mechanism to predation and diseases due to its perennial nature. Rosenthal and Janzen22 argued that secondary metabolites occur in a large amount in a particular plant part as a defense mechanism to predation and diseases. Such a defense mechanism might explain some woody plants produce a higher amount of secondary metabolites in roots compared in the leaves. For example, cassava produces cyanogenic glucosides in its cassava tubers to deter root borers23. This might be the case for Pegagan where the higher amount of centellosides in leaves serves as a deterrent for disease, pest and predators although another study is required to confirm this. In addition, the roots dry weight of Pegagan was relatively heavier compared to that of the leaves across different harvest times. This implied that it is more economical to harvest the leaves than the roots because leaves are easier to harvest and have less weight compared to the root. It also corresponds to the higher amount of asiaticoside and madecassoside in the leaves that can be synthesized compared to that of the roots4,5.

Future research direction regarding the effect of harvest time on field-cultivated Pegagan can be focused on the addition of elicitors such as Methyl Jasmonate to stimulate the production of centellosides in Pegagan. The research on Methyl Jasmonate to increase centellosides in Pegagan cultivated under laboratory or controlled condition are huge in number which show a promising result. However, its application in field-cultivated Pegagan has yet to be done.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed that the Pegagan accession of Deli Serdang, Indonesia has asiaticoside and madecassoside in the leaves and roots which increases and asiatic acid which decreases with the passage of time. All the three centellosides are mainly found the leaves and very little in the roots across different harvest times suggesting that these secondary metabolites are for defense mechanism from pest, predation, and diseases due to the closeness of aerial parts of Pegagan to the ground.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study discovered different harvest time on Pegagan can be beneficial for maximizing the level of bioactive compounds in commercial field cultivation of this plant. This study presented new findings regarding bioactive compounds level of Pegagan cultivated in field-condition and harvested at different times, which are currently lacking in the literature. This study will help researchers, farmers and biopharmaceutical industries to uncover the critical areas of harvest time settings of field-cultivated Pegagan in order to maximize bioactive compounds in the plant that many researchers and practitioners were not able to explore. Thus, a new theory on harvest time and environmental factors which affect the plant production of bioactive compounds may be arrived at.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the research funding support grant number 097/K1.1.1/AT.1/2015, from the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, the Republic of Indonesia.

REFERENCES

  • Rafi, M., F. Handayani, L.K. Darusman, E. Rohaeti, Y. Wahyu, K. Honda and S.P. Putri, 2018. A combination of simultaneous quantification of four triterpenes and fingerprint analysis using HPLC for rapid identification of Centella asiatica from its related plants and classification based on cultivation ages. Ind. Crops Prod., 122: 93-97.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • James, J. and I. Dubery, 2011. Identification and quantification of triterpenoid centelloids in Centella asiatica (L.) Urban by densitometric TLC. JPC-J. Planar Chromatogr.-Modern TLC., 24: 82-87.
    Direct Link    


  • Ncube, E.N., P.A. Steenkamp, N.E. Madala and I.A. Dubery, 2017. Metabolite profiling of the undifferentiated cultured cells and differentiated leaf tissues of Centella asiatica. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 129: 431-443.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mangas, S., E. Moyano, L. Hernandez-Vazquez and M. Bonfill, 2009. Centella asiatica (L) Urban: An Updated Approach Terpenoids. In: Plant Secondary Terpenoids, Palazon, J. and R.M. Cusido (Eds.)., Research Signpost, Kerala, India, pp: 55-74


  • Ariffin, F., S.H. Chew, K. Bhupinder, A.A. Karim and N. Huda, 2011. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of fermented Centella asiatica herbal teas. J. Sci. Food Agric., 91: 2731-2739.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Gallego, A., K. Ramirez‐Estrada, H.R. Vidal‐Limon, D. Hidalgo and L. Lalaleo et al., 2014. Biotechnological production of centellosides in cell cultures of Centella asiatica (L) Urban. Eng. Life Sci., 14: 633-642.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vinolina, N.S., M. Nainggolan and R. Siregar, 2018. Production enhancement technology of Pegagan (Centella asiatica). Agrivita J. Agric. Sci., 40: 304-312.


  • IPB., 2005. Pasar domestik dan ekspor produk tanama obat. Bogor Agricultural University, Institut Pertanian Bogor.


  • Singh, S., A. Gautam, A. Sharma and A. Batra, 2010. Centella asiatica (L.): A plant with immense medicinal potential but threatened. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 4: 9-17.
    Direct Link    


  • Alqahtani, A., W. Tongkao-On, K.M. Li, V. Razmovski‐Naumovski, K. Chan and G.Q. Li, 2015. Seasonal variation of triterpenes and phenolic compounds in Australian Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Phytochem. Anal., 26: 436-443.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kim, O.T., M.Y. Kim, M.H. Hong, J.C. Ahn and B. Hwang, 2004. Stimulation of asiaticoside accumulation in the whole plant cultures of Centella asiatica (L.) Urban by elicitors. Plant Cell Rep., 23: 339-344.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lambert, E., A. Faizal and D. Geelen, 2011. Modulation of triterpene saponin production: In vitro cultures, elicitation, and metabolic engineering. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 164: 220-237.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Bonfill, M., S. Mangas, E. Moyano, R.M. Cusido and J. Palazon, 2010. Production of centellosides and phytosterols in cell suspension cultures of Centella asiatica. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 104: 61-67.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mangas, S., E. Moyano, L. Osuna, R.M. Cusido, M. Bonfill and J. Palazon, 2008. Triterpenoid saponin content and the expression level of some related genes in calli of Centella asiatica. Biotechnol. Lett., Vol. 30.
    CrossRef    


  • Ghulamahdi, M., S.A. Aziz and N. Bermawie, 2007. Evaluasi Karakter Morfologi, Fisiologi dan Genetik Pegagan Mendukung Standarisasi Mutu Pegagan. Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia


  • Gupta, A., S. Verma, P. Kushwaha, S. Srivastava and R. Aks, 2014. Quantitative estimation of asiatic acid, asiaticoside and madecassoside in two accessions of Centella asiatica (L) urban for morpho-chemotypic variation. Indian J. Pharm. Edu. Res., 48: 75-79.
    Direct Link    


  • Vinolina, N.S., L.A.M. Siregar and J.A. Napitupulu, 2012. Morphology of leaves and content of secondary metabolites asiaticoside in some accession of pegagan (Centella asiatica L. Urban) in North Sumatera. Proceedings of The Annual International Conference, Syiah Kuala University-Life Sciences and Engineering, November 22-24, 2012, Banda, pp: 200-205.


  • Jain, P.K. and R.K. Agrawal, 2008. High performance liquid chromatographic analysis of asiaticoside in Centella asiatica (L.) urban. Chiang Mai J. Sci., 35: 521-525.
    Direct Link    


  • Mangas, S., M. Bonfill, L. Osuna, E. Moyano and J. Tortoriello et al., 2006. The effect of methyl jasmonate on triterpene and sterol metabolisms of Centella asiatica, Ruscus aculeatus and Galphimia glauca cultured plants. Phytochemistry, 67: 2041-2049.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jamil, S.S., Q. Nizami and N. Salam, 2007. Centella asiatica (Linn.) Urban 6: A review. Natl. Product Radiance, 6: 158-170.


  • Zainol, M.K., A. Abd-Hamid, S. Yusof and R. Muse, 2003. Antioxidative activity and total phenolic compounds of leaf, root and petiole of four accessions of Centella asiatica (L.) urban. Food Chem., 81: 575-581.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rosenthal, G.H. and D.H. Janzen, 1979. Herbivores Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Vol. 12, Academic Press, New York


  • Bennett, R.N. and R.M. Wallosgrove, 1994. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytol., 127: 617-633.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved