HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Agronomy

Year: 2016 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 173-178
DOI: 10.3923/ja.2016.173.178
Evaluation of Mulberry (Morus spp.) Genotypes for Growth, Leaf Yield and Quality Traits under Southwest Ethiopian Condition
Waktole Sori and Wosene Gebreselassie

Abstract: Background and Objective: Mulberry, Morus spp., a temperate plant well adapted to tropical and subtropical climatic conditions gives continuous yield, the leaf, which is used as a sole nutrient source for mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. The plant is commonly grown in Ethiopia as a fence. The experiment was initiated to evaluate different mulberry genotypes for agronomic and quality attributes as a feed for silk worm. Methodology: Eleven locally available genotypes were collected and evaluated for their growth, leaf yield and attributes under Jimma conditions for 2 years using a randomized complete block design, each replicated thrice. Results: There were statistical differences in growth, leaf yield and quality attributes among the genotypes. Generally, Kumbi and M4 genotypes were superior in their growth, yield and quality attributes. Better establishment, maximum shoot length, number of leaves and branches, leaf area, internodes length, leaf fresh and dry weight, leaf yield per hectare and per plant, total chlorophyll, moisture percentage, total soluble protein, total soluble sugar and NPK contents of the leaf were obtained from Kumbi collection followed by M4 genotype in all cases. Minimum growth, leaf yield and leaf quality attributes were recovered from genotype S13 followed by Saja. Conclusion: Kumbi and M4 genotypes are recommended for mulberry garden establishment as future planting material sources and further multiplied for silkworm rearing purpose in Jimma area. However, the need for further studies was suggested to investigate the effects of the genotypes on the quantity and quality of mulberry silkworm silk cocoon production.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Waktole Sori and Wosene Gebreselassie, 2016. Evaluation of Mulberry (Morus spp.) Genotypes for Growth, Leaf Yield and Quality Traits under Southwest Ethiopian Condition. Journal of Agronomy, 15: 173-178.

Keywords: quality trait, Bombyx mori, Mulberry genotype, silkworm and growth attribute

INTRODUCTION

Ethiopia has diverse climatic conditions congenial for the cultivation of many crops of tropical, subtropical and temperate origin. One of the many crops of temperate origin suitable to Ethiopia’s climatic condition is mulberry, Morus spp. Mulberry is a perennial crop cultivated for more than 15 years for its leaves as a sole feed source for mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L.1. Mulberry silkworm, B. mori is a monophagous fully domesticated useful insect in the order Lepidoptera and family Bombycidae, the larvae of which produces the silk. Silk being the most prized natural protein fiber known as "Queen of textiles" because of its quality and durability is produced by many silkworms, the most important being mulberry silkworm, B. mori. The B. mori depends solely on mulberry leaves for its nutrition. The nutritional quality of mulberry leaf greatly influences the growth and development of the larvae as well as cocoon and silk production of B. mori 2,3 besides environmental factors and adoption of technologies for better silkworm growth, development and cocoon production4.

Sericulture is an important agro-based occupation of resource poor farmer of the world playing a major role in poverty alleviation by providing employment in the rural areas. Sericulture is characterized with high employment potential, low capital investment and it is highly remunerative. In traditionally sericultural countries like India, with improved production practices, 75 mt ha–1year–1mulberry leaf5 and well above 30 kg/100 dfls (diseases free laying) of cocoon6 can be harvested. In many developing countries of the world sericulture has occupied an important place in socio-economic development of the farming communities. However, in Ethiopia, despite its long time introduction and congenial climatic condition for the cultivation of host plants and rearing of silkworm species, sericulture has not yet been fully practiced by the farming communities. Presently, the government of Ethiopia through the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Regional Bureaus of Agriculture has established Apiculture and Sericulture implementation strategy and there is case team at each woreda (Ethiopian administrative structure equivalent to district) throughout the country. However, adoption is not what was expected primarily due to lack of market for cocoons, land shortage, limited skill and knowledge and lack of seed7.

Nevertheless, the continuous rise of unemployed educated youth, presence of sufficient land in the rural areas for cultivation of host plants and availability of irrigation water, conduciveness of the climatic condition for cultivation of mulberry and rearing of silkworms, availability of microfinance/loan, availability of the skills and knowledge of sericulture at educational institutions and agricultural research centers and multiple production of cocoons per year makes sericulture an ideal agro-based practice for Ethiopian agriculture. Traditionally, mulberry sericulture has two important components, the mulberry and the silkworm. Availability of mulberry leaf is the key factor that decides the success and sustainability of sericulture. Quality and quantity of mulberry leaf production depends on mulberry variety/genotype8, cultivation practices, soil moisture and nutrient status, pests and diseases management both on mulberry plant and the silkworm9. Quality cocoons are produced when developing silkworm larvae are fed with quality mulberry leaves10. Sixty percent of the cost of silk cocoon production is spent for mulberry cultivation11,12. Hence, cultivation of mulberry plants deserve due attention in mulberry sericulture industry. Leaf quantity and quality are important parameter used for evaluation of mulberry varieties aimed at selection of superior varieties for enhanced rearing performance8. Superior mulberry variety is important to sustain the sericulture industry. Therefore, there is a need to establish mulberry gardens for continuous supply of mulberry cuttings and the seeds for host plant cultivation to farmers. In this study, therefore, different mulberry genotypes available throughout the country were collected and evaluated for their agronomic characteristics and quality attributes for two years under Jimma conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was conducted at Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (JUCAVM) agricultural experimental station, Eladalle, Jimma-Ethiopia in 2014 and 2015 cropping seasons. The study materials were 11 mulberry genotypes, mainly grown as a fence and/or shade around home garden; collected from central, South and Southwestern parts of Ethiopia and brought to JUCAVM. Mulberry cuttings with three eye buds were prepared from each genotype and planted at a spacing of 60 cm between plants and 90 cm between rows on 5.4×3.5 m plot size. Similar agronomic practices were applied to each plot. The plants were maintained for 1 year and pruned at ground level at the beginning of the 2nd year immediately at the onset of the main rainy season (early June, 2014 and again pruned early June, 2015). The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 11 genotypes and three replications. Data on growth, yield and quality variables such as stand count, shoot length, leaf and shoot per branch number, leaf area, internodes length, fresh and dry leaf weight, fresh leaf yield per hectare and plant, total chlorophyll, percentage leaf moisture, total soluble sugar and protein and NPK content of the leaf were collected 45 and 90 days after bottom pruning (DAP).

Leaf moisture was determined by the oven drying method using the formula developed by AOAC13 as follows:

Leaf area was determined using leaf area meter. Total soluble protein, total soluble sugar and total chlorophyll content of the leaf were determined by the methods of Lowry et al.14, DuBois et al.15 and Hiscox and Israelstam16, respectively. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in leaf were analyzed as per the standard procedures17. Finally, analysis of variance was performed using SAS software18 package version 9.2 and treatments found significant were compared using Least Significance Difference (LSD) method at 5% level of significance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The analysis of variance on mulberry growth, yield and quality variables for the 2 years data showed significant difference (p<0.05) among genotypes and the results of each variable is presented and discussed.

Mulberry growth variables: Mulberry cutting establishment (stand count), average shoot length, average number of leaves per plant (Table 1), average number of shoots per plant, average leaf area (Table 2) and average internodes length (Table 3) were found to be statistically significantly different (p<0.05) among the genotypes compared.

In terms of mulberry cuttings establishment (stand count) from the 16 cuttings planted in a plot, on an average 15.67 cuttings were established for kumbi, M4, K2 and Gatama genotypes which were statistically similar with Awassa, Anno, Bedele and Saja genotypes. On the contrary, S-13 was poorly established with 10 cuttings failing to establish among the 16 cuttings planted indicating its poor adaptation to Jimma condition. Maximum and significantly (p<0.05) higher shoot length of 43.27, 92.80 and 109.67 cm was recorded from kumbi genotype on 45, 90 and 135 days of bottom pruning, respectively assuring its better growth performance under Jimma condition (Table 1). Similarly, maximum leaf (57.33, 96.17 and 98.00) and shoot number (3.93, 5.33 and 5.07) per plant on 45, 90 and 135 DAP respectively, leaf area (132.33 cm2) and internodes length (4.40 and 4.13) on 45 and 90 DAP were obtained from kumbi genotype followed by M4 (Table 1-3). The least and significantly lower growth attributes of mulberry was recorded from S-13 genotype in all cases. This might be because of the genetic nature of the genotypes and relatively less conduciveness of Jimma condition for S-13 and better congeniality of the condition for Kumbi and M4 mulberry genotypes. Differences in mulberry genotypes in growth, yield and quality attributes are expected because of the heterozygous and cross pollinating nature of mulberry. Madan and Sharma19 reported differential responses of three mulberry varieties (Sujanpuri, Kanva-2 and a local) in terms of above ground biomass and leaf yield both under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Chowdhury et al.20 reported that the use of organic inputs such as vermi-wash, bio-fertilizers, enriched vermi-compost, green manuring were highly effective, sustainable and economical in improving the growth characters and quality attributes of S-1635 variety of mulberry under irrigated conditions in gigantic alluvial soil condition of West Bengal in India.

Table 1: Mulberry stand count, shoot length and leaf number as affected by genotypes under Jimma condition
*Significant at 5% level significance, means within column followed by the same alphabetical letter(s) are non-significantly different from each other (α = 5%), DAP: Days after bottom pruning

Table 2: Number of shoots and leaf area of mulberry plant as affected by genotypes under Jimma condition
*Significant at 5% level of significance, means within column followed by the same alphabetical letter(s) are non-significantly different from each other (α = 5%), DAP: Days after bottom pruning

Table 3: Internodes length of mulberry plant as affected by genotypes under Jimma condition
*Significant at 5% level of significance, means within column followed by the same alphabetical letter(s) are non-significantly different from each other (α = 5%), DAP: Days after bottom pruning

Mulberry leaf yield: Maximum and significantly (p<0.05) higher quantity of fresh (27.00 g) and dry (7.73 g) leaf weight for five randomly plucked mulberry leaves was recorded from Kumbi genotype followed by M4, 25.00 g and 7.20 g/5 leaves for fresh and dry weight respectively (Table 4). This is because these genotypes had maximum leaf area that contributed for overall increased fresh and dry leaf weight showing their better adaptation to Jimma environmental conditions. On the other hand, S-13 followed by Saja genotype had the lowest fresh (13.67 g/5 leaves) and dry (3.67 g/5 leaves) leaf weight, indicating poor adaptability of the genotype to the area. Also, quantitative fresh leaf yield per hectare, 19.60 t and per plant,358.33 g were obtained from Kumbi collected genotype.

Table 4: Mulberry leaf biomass and fresh leaf yield as affected by genotypes under Jimma condition
*Significant at 5% level of significance, means within column followed by the same alphabetical letter(s) are non-significantly different from each other (α = 5%), DAP: Days after bottom pruning

This is because this genotype had maximum shoot length, leaf and shoot number, leaf area, fresh and dry leaf weight than other genotypes that positively influenced the fresh leaf yield obtained both on hectare and plant basis.

Mulberry leaf quality variables: Leaf quality variable such as total chlorophyll, moisture percentage, soluble protein and sugar and NPK content of the leaves of different genotypes tested were statistically significantly (p<0.05) different among the genotypes (Table 5). However, Kumbi genotype recorded maximum total chlorophyll (1.77 mg g–1), moisture percentage (78.73%), soluble protein (8.31 mg g–1), soluble sugar (48.89 mg g–1), percentage N (4.29%), P (0.45%) and K (1.92%) content of the leaf. Kumbi genotype was followed by M4 and Gatama in all quality variables. On the other hand, S-13 followed by Saja genotype registered minimum quality variables (Table 5). More moisture content of the leaf is positively correlated with palatability and assimilability of nutrients by the feeding larvae of silkworm21. Leaf water content positively influences the growth and development of mulberry silkworms by increasing leaf ingestion and digestion capacity of the silkworms because it has gustatory and olfactory stimulant effects22. They further stated the direct relationship between mulberry leaf quality and larval food consumption, larval growth, digestive coefficient and food absorption by silkworm larvae. Leaf moisture content and moisture retention rate are important qualitative variables of mulberry leaf especially from the point of young age silkworm rearing23.

Table 5: Mulberry leaf quality variables as affected by genotypes under Jimma conditions
*Significant at 5% level of significance, means within column followed by the same alphabetical letter(s) are non-significantly different from each other (α = 5%)

They reported V1 and M5 mulberry varieties with highest and lowest moisture retention capacity, respectively among five varieties they studied in southern India. In a separate study on mulberry quality attributes, Horie24 reported that total nitrogen, total soluble sugar and total soluble protein are the most important biochemical constituents of mulberry leaf that positively favors silkworm larval growth and cocoon yield. This is because it is the leaf nitrogen which is converted to the silkworm protein, the silk.

The highest total chlorophyll content of genotype Kumbi might be associated with better photosynthetic efficiency of the genotype that leads to better yield of the leaf and its quality. Higher level of leaf chlorophyll is indicative of photosynthetic efficiency of the plant system9. Urea, sulphate of ammonia and NPK application to different mulberry variety had significant impact on growth and quality variables of the varieties25. On the contrary, application of NPK, piggery dung and Leucaena leucocephala leaves had no significant effect on mulberry leaf quality but on fat content, growth and yield potential of mulberry plant26. According to the study conducted in India by Reddy et al.27, multi-nutrient foliar application had a positive influence on growth, yield and quality attributes of V1 mulberry variety. Caccam and Mendoza28 opined the use of sustainable and organic farming techniques can be a good alternative to conventional farming to improve the productivity of sericulture farms. Whereas combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers were recommended for better mulberry growth and leaf quality29. Organic farming approaches contributes for an increased growth and quality attributes20,30 of mulberry and its sustainable quality leaf production and further reduces the incidence of pests on mulberry and increases the feed utilization and growth of silkworm, B. mori 30. Application of nutrient phosphorus31 and potassium32 significantly influences the growth attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of mulberry significantly.

CONCLUSION

Among the genotypes compared in this experiment Kumbi and M4 genotypes were found to adapt and perform better than the remaining nine genotypes under Jimma environmental conditions. Therefore, considering the growth attributes, leaf yield and quality variables studied, these two genotypes could be recommended for the area for immediate use though undoubtedly more genotypes from different mulberry growing areas should be brought and tested for leaf yield and quality attributes. In addition, the existing materials need to be further tested over a wide range of location and years to determine their differential response at different environments and develop stable genotypes that could be recommended to a wider range of environments focusing on resource poor farmers who may not afford commercial agricultural inputs.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine for providing financial support for the research.

REFERENCES

  • Vijayan, K., P.P. Srivastava, P.J. Raju and B. Saratchandra, 2012. Breeding for higher productivity in mulberry. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 48: 147-156.
    Direct Link    


  • Singhal, B.K., V.R. Mala, A. Sarkar and R.K. Datta, 1999. Nutritional disorders of mulberry (Morus spp.) III. Leaf nutrient guide for secondary nutrients. Sericologia, 39: 599-609.


  • Nagaraju, J., 2002. Application of genetic principles for improving silk production. Curr. Sci., 83: 409-414.
    Direct Link    


  • Purohit, K.M. and T.P. Kumar, 1996. Influence of various agronomical practices in India on the leaf quality in mulberry, a review. Sericologia, 36: 27-50.
    Direct Link    


  • Saratchandra, B., K. Vijayan, P.P. Srivastava and R.P. Jayarama, 2011. Three new authorized mulberry varieties. Indian Silk, 2: 14-15.


  • Bagchi, S.N., D. Pandit, S. Ghosh, A.K. Saha, A. Ghosh, P. Mitra and A.K. Bajpai, 2009. Impact on productivity of mulberry leaf and cocoon under institute village linkage programme in Murshidabad district. J. Crop Weed, 5: 19-22.
    Direct Link    


  • Tesfa, A., K. Ejigu, A. Yetayew and H. Assefa, 2014. Assessment of value chain of sericulture products in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Eng. Nat. Resour., 1: 61-69.
    Direct Link    


  • Bongale, U.D., Chaluvachari, R.S. Mallikarjunappa, B.V.N. Rao, M.N. Anantharaman and S.B. Dandin, 1997. Leaf nutritive quality associated with maturity levels in fourteen important varieties of mulberry (Morus spp.). Sericologia, 37: 71-87.


  • Patil, S.V., 1998. A correlative analysis of the components of leaf yield and quality in improved genotypes of mulberry. Ph.D. Thesis, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India.


  • Ravikumar, C., 1988. Western ghat as a bivoltine region prospects, challenges and strategies for its development. Indian Silk, 26: 39-54.


  • Das, B.C. and S. Krishnaswami, 1965. Some observations on interspecific hybridization in mulberry. Indian J. Sericult., 4: 1-8.


  • Zhao, W., R. Fang, Y. Pan, Y. Yang, J.W. Chung, I.M. Chung and Y.I. Park, 2009. Analysis of genetic relationships of mulberry (Morus L.) germplasm using Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism (SRAP) markers. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8: 2604-2610.
    Direct Link    


  • AOAC., 1970. Official Methods of Analysis. 11th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA


  • Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr and R.J. Randall, 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193: 265-275.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • DuBois, M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers and F. Smith, 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem., 28: 350-356.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hiscox, J.D. and G.F. Israelstam, 1979. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can. J. Bot., 57: 1332-1334.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Piper, C.S., 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hani Publisher, Bombay, India


  • SAS Institute, 2002. SAS (R) proprietary software 9.2 (TS2M0). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.


  • Madan, M. and S. Sharma, 1999. Biomass yield of hybrid varieties of mulberry in a non-moriculture area. Biomass Bioenergy, 17: 427-433.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chowdhury, P., G.C. Setua, A. Ghosh, R. Kar, Shivnath, S.K. Maity and A.K. Bajpai, 2009. Organic farming approach for sustainable quality leaf production in mulberry (Morus alba L.) var. S-1635 under irrigated condition. J. Crop Weed, 5: 38-43.
    Direct Link    


  • Parpiev, B.A., 1968. Water metabolism in silkworms fed with a different strain changing diet. Sheik, 39: 15-17.


  • Paul, D.C., G.S. Rao and D.C. Deb, 1992. Impact of dietary moisture on nutritional indices and growth of Bombyx mori and concommitant larval duration. J. Insect Physiol., 38: 229-235.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ramachandra, Y.L., S.P. Rai, H.V. Sudeep, P.S.S. Ganapathy , B.T. Kavitha and N.B. Krishnamurthy, 2008. Evaluation of relative moisture loss from leaves of five mulberry varieties during silk worm rearing. Asian J. Biosci., 3: 245-246.
    Direct Link    


  • Horie, Y. and H. Watanabe, 1980. Recent advances in sericulture. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 25: 9-71.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sylvester, A.A., 2013. Influence of different N sources on the growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry (Morus alba). M.Sc. Thesis, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.


  • Adeyemi, T., 2012. Effect of different fertilizers on the growth, yield and nutritive quality of mulberry leaf in Akure, Ondo-state Nigeria. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Forestry Association of Nigeria, December 5-10, 2011, Oshogbo, Osun State, Nigeria -.


  • Reddy, M.M., M.G. Sabitha, M.V. Rajan and S.M.H. Qadri, 2011. Effect of foliar spray of multinutrients of on mulberry growth, leaf yield and quality. Plant Arch., 11: 813-816.
    Direct Link    


  • Caccam, M.M. and T.C. Mendoza, 2015. Improving mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaf yield and quality to increase silkworm productivity in Northern Luzon, Philippines. Ann. Trop. Res., 37: 1-25.
    Direct Link    


  • Rashmi, K., M.A. Shankar, K.R. Shashidhar and T.K. Narayanaswamy, 2009. Growth and foliar constituents of mulberry (M5) cultivated under organic based nutrient management. Int. J. Ind. Entomol., 19: 165-169.
    Direct Link    


  • Samuthiravelu, P., B. Sangeetha, N. Sakthivel, J. Ravikumar, L. Isaiarasu, R. Balakrishna and S.M.H. Qadri, 2012. Impact of organic nutrients on the incidence of major pests, leaf productivity in mulberry and food consumption and utilization of Bombyx mori L. J. Biopesticides, 5: 228-232.
    Direct Link    


  • Bose, P.C., B.D. Dash, R. Kar and A.K. Bajpai, 2009. Effect of potassium on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of mulberry (Morus alba L.) in Eastern ghat region of Orissa. J. Crop Weed, 5: 34-37.
    Direct Link    


  • Bose, P.C., D.P. Srivastava, R. Kar and A.K. Bajpai, 2009. Effect of phosphorus on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of rainfed mulberry (Morus alba L.) and its economics in Chotanagpur plateau of Jharkhand. J. Crop Weed, 5: 23-26.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved