HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Agronomy

Year: 2007 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 137-141
DOI: 10.3923/ja.2007.137.141
Variations in Proline, Chlorophyll and Mineral Elements Contents of Wheat Plants Grown under Salinity Stress
Murat Ali Turan, Vahap Katkat and Suleyman Taban

Abstract: Variations in proline, chlorophyll, Na, Cl, N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn concentrations and growth of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L. cv: Cakmak-79) grown under salinity stress were investigated in greenhouse conditions. For this purpose, 0, 25 and 50 mM NaCl were applied to the experimental soil taken from Aridisol lands. The growth of wheat plants was inhibited by salinity. The increased amount of NaCl applied to soil resulted in lower dry weight. Application of NaCl caused an increase on proline, Na, Cl, P, Zn and Mn concentrations, whereas decreases in chlorophyll, N, K, Fe and Cu concentrations were detected.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Murat Ali Turan, Vahap Katkat and Suleyman Taban, 2007. Variations in Proline, Chlorophyll and Mineral Elements Contents of Wheat Plants Grown under Salinity Stress. Journal of Agronomy, 6: 137-141.

Keywords: Wheat, growth, salt, mineral elements, proline and chlorophyll

INTRODUCTION

Salinity is a serious problem in arid and semi-arid zones (Maas and Grattan, 1999). In these areas, salt tends to accumulate in the upper soil profile and layer soil surface, where precipitation leads to an insufficient leaching (Rhoades et al., 1992). Plantation of salt-tolerant species, distinctly N2-fixing species, is the advantageous practice in rehabilitating regions with salinity problems (Oba et al., 2001). There are a great number of plant species which are regarded as salt-tolerant, the most competitive being those that are able to become established, grow to maturity and survive until they are able to reproduce (Khan et al., 2000). Salinity and its effects on biomass production have been considered by numerous authors (Khan et al., 2000; Mehari et al., 2005).

Adaptation of plants to salinity is associated with osmoregulation adjustment. Osmotic regulators in plants include potassium, soluble sugar, proline and betaine. These small molecules are important physiological indicators for evaluating osmotic adjustment ability (Zhu, 2000; Conceicao et al., 2002; Yordanov et al., 2003; Hong-Bo et al., 2006) and drought resistance in wheat species and genotypes.

Salt tolerance in plants is a complex phenomenon involving morphological, physiological and biochemical processes. The accumulation of proline is essential for plants under osmotic stress (Nanjo et al., 1999) and salt stress up-regulates the key enzyme, P5CS, for proline biosynthesis in Arabidopsis (Hare et al., 1999). Proline accumulation is increased in the plant tissue of crops due to salinity stress (Irrigoyen et al., 1992; Kundu and Paul, 1997). Soluble sugars are believed to accumulate in plant tissues and cells due to drought stress. This may act as an osmotic adjustment or osmotic-protectant factor (Irrigoyen et al., 1992; Bohnert et al., 1995; Sanchez et al., 1998).

Agricultural soils have many kinds of salt ions; however, NaCl is usually the damaging and predominant salt. Increased sodium chloride-salinity causes decreases on vegetative growth and the rate of photosynthesis (Cusido et al., 1987). In saline soils, water availability and nutrient uptake by plant roots is limited because of high osmotic potential and toxicity of Na and Cl ions (Al-Karaki, 1996). Thus excessive uptake of Na and Cl may lead to ionic disturbance of whole plants. Although most salt-tolerant species control the accumulation of inorganic ions as the basic mechanism to adjust their internal tissue osmotic potential against external salinity, they differ widely in the extent to which they accumulate inorganic ions (Munns, 1993; Glenn et al., 1996).

This research was carried out to determine the effect of salinity on the growth, proline, chlorophyll and mineral elements composition of wheat plants grown in greenhouse conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experimental soil taken from Aridisol is calcareous (212 g kg-1 CaCO3), clay loam in texture, slightly alkaline (pH 8.04, E.C. 0.108 dS cm-1, both in water extract). The soil sample has 42.9 mg kg-1 extractable Na and 6.37 mg kg-1 water extractable Cl.

In the greenhouse, for the pot experiment conducted at under natural light conditions, the soil (2000 g) put into the pots was salinised at the rates of 0, 25 and 50 mM NaCl.

Before sowing the seeds to the pots, as being basal fertilizers, 100 mg N kg-1 as ammonium nitrate, 60 mg P kg-1 as triple super phosphate and 75 mg K kg-1 as potassium sulphate were applied.

Fifteen bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv: Cakmak-79) seeds were sown into each pot. After emergence, wheat plants were thinned to ten. Plants were harvested eight weeks after sowing. After weighting, the fresh plants were washed, for chlorophyll and proline determinations 2.0 g samples were taken and the remaining plant samples were dried at 65°C in order for determination of dry matter values with Na, Cl, P, K, Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn concentrations. Total nitrogen was determined by Kjeldahl digestion method according to Bremner (1965). Chloride was analyzed in aqueous extracts by potentiometric titration with AgNO3 (Lambert and DuBois, 1971). Sodium and potassium were determined by flame photometry (Eppendorf Flex 6361 model). Iron, Zn, Cu and Mn were determined by AAS (Philips model 9200x).

Proline was extracted from 0.5 g of fresh leaf tissue into 10 mL of 3% sulfosalicylic acid and filtered through Whatman No: 2 filter papers. Proline was determined by the ninhydrine method (Bates et al., 1973) in Shimadzu UV-1201 model spectrophotometer, using pure proline as a standard.

Chlorophyll was estimated according to the method described by Withan et al. (1971) using spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1201 model) at 652 nm.

The experimental design was a completely randomized design with three replicates, including three different salt concentrations. The data obtained from the different measurements were evaluated by Minitab Package Program (Minitab Release 10.51) and treatment means were evaluated using the MSTAT Package Program (Version 3.00) for Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

RESULTS

Dry weights of wheat plants: Plant growth was inhibited by soil salinity and dry weights were decreased significantly (p<0.01) on contrary to increased amount of NaCl applied (Table 1). The highest reduction (-27.87%) at both growth and dry weight values were observed at 50 mM NaCl treatment. Growth and dry weight of wheat plants at 25 mM NaCl was not significantly different from non-salinised control plants (Table 1).

Mineral elements concentration of wheat plants: NaCl salinity affected ion concentrations of wheat plants (Table 2 and 3). Except Na, P, Zn, Cl and Mn, other mineral elements concentrations decreased with increasing NaCl salinity. Na and Cl accumulation is increased with increased salinity. The more Na accumulation in the plant, the lower K/Na ratio was observed (Table 2).

Total Chlorophyll and Proline Contents of Wheat Plants: Total chlorophyll and proline contents of wheat plants were affected by salinity (p<0.001) (Table 4). NaCl treatments caused a decrease in total chlorophyll contents as 21.61% at 25 mM NaCl and 45.23% at 50 mM NaCl (Table 4). Proline contents of plants ascended with increased salinity (Table 4). The increases in proline content of plants were 48.00% at 25 mM NaCl and 131.90% at 50 mM NaCl levels.

Table 1: Dry weight (g pot-1) of wheat subject to different NaCl treatments
** Significant at p<0.01 level; Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different (Duncan’s Multiple Range test at p<0.01)

Table 2: Effects of NaCl on Na, Cl, K, N concentrations and K/Na ratio of wheat
**Significant at p<0.01 level; ***Significant at p<0.001 level; Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different (Duncan’s Multiple Range test at p<0.01)

Table 3: Effects of NaCl on P, Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn concentrations of wheat
**Significant at p<0.01 level; ***Significant at p<0.001 level; Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different (Duncan’s Multiple Range test at p<0.01)

Table 4: Effects of NaCl on total chlorophyll and proline contents of wheat
***Significant at p<0.001 level; Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different (Duncan’s Multiple Range test at p<0.01)

DISCUSSION

NaCl-salinity is described to cause an inhibition on the growth of wheat plants by affecting water absorption and biochemical processes (Cusido et al., 1987) and increasing energy losses for salt exclusion mechanisms, usually decreasing nutrient uptake that leading to reduced plant growth (Lauchli, 1984). On the other hand, salinity is known to decrease soil structural index, hydraulic conductivity to water in to soil and reduced root zone aeration (De Pascale and Barbieri, 2000).

It was observed in the study, particularly, application of 50 mM NaCl might result in ceased plant growth.

It is known that competition effects between different anions and cations are occurred in saline environment (Bar et al., 1997) and the balance between mineral elements break down to benefit of Na and Cl. These results are in agreement with Chavan and Karadge (1986), Cusido et al. (1987) and Taban et al. (1999). On account of the antagonism between Cl and N (De Witt et al., 1963), high concentration of Cl was negatively correlated with nitrogen concentration. Moreover, NaCl salinity decreased nitrogen concentration in the plants (Cordovilla et al., 1995) and has a negative interference on the nitrogen acquisition and utilization (Lewis, 1986). As a result, Cl or NaCl may depress the nitrogen uptake by plants. In most cases, salinity decreases the concentration of P in plant leaves (Award et al., 1990; Sharpley et al., 1992). Nevertheless, P concentration of wheat plants was found to increase with high salinity. This may be the result of enhanced availability of P in the soil or synergistic effect of Na, which is involved in P uptake and/or transport to the shoot (Grattan and Maas, 1988). Plant K concentration was decreased as mentioned by Siegel et al. (1980) due to antagonism between Na and K (Glenn et al., 1996).

Reports on the effects of NaCl on micronutrients concentration in plants are often contrasting. In fact, unlike the results of Maas et al. (1972) and Bhivare and Nimbalkar (1984), it was found that NaCl decreased Fe concentration in plants. Similar results for increased Fe concentration were reported by Shrivastava et al. (1993) and Taban et al. (1999). On the contrary of the result of Shukla and Mukhi (1985) and Mehrota et al. (1986), Zn concentrations of plant were increased by NaCl application. On the other hand, with increased salinity levels Mn concentrations increased (Khattak and Jarrell, 1989) and Cu concentrations (Rahman et al., 1993).

Salinity decreased the chlorophyll content of wheat leaves. It is attributed to a salt-induced weakening of protein-pigment-lipid complex (Strogonov et al., 1970) or increased chlorophyllase (EC: 3.1.1.14) enzyme activity (Stivsev et al., 1973). Proline contents of wheat plants increased under salt-stress conditions. Proline is defined as an indicator of tolerating or adapting plant to saline conditions (Chowdhury et al., 1993; Madan et al., 1994). Accumulated free proline was correlated with tissue Na ion concentration for many plant species, suggesting playing a possible role for osmoregulation mechanism under salt-stress (Lewitt, 1980).

Consequently, soil salinity significantly inhibited the growth and caused a decrease in dry matter of wheat plants. While NaCl lead to increase proline content, decreased chlorophyll content of wheat plants.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank to Mrs. Cigdem Vardar and Mrs. Nilgun Taban for technical assistance during this research.

REFERENCES

  • Al-Karaki, G.N., 1996. Response of three tomato cultivars to increasing salt stress. Mu=ta J. Res. Studies, 11: 23-28.


  • Award, A.S., D.G. Edwards and L.C. Campbell, 1990. Phosphorus enhancement of salt tolerance of tomato. Crop Sci., 30: 123-128.


  • Bar, Y., A. Apelbaum, U. Kafkafi and R. Goren, 1997. Relationship between chloride and nitrate and its effect on growth and mineral composition of avocado and citrus plants. J. Plant Nutr., 20: 715-731.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldren and I.D. Teare, 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205-207.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bhivare, V.N. and J.D. Nimbalkar, 1984. Salt stress effects on growth and mineral nutrition of French beans. Plant Soil, 80: 91-98.


  • Bohnert, H.J., D.E. Nelson and R.G. Jensen, 1995. Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell., 7: 1099-1111.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Bremner, J.M., 1965. Total Nitrogen. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Black, C.A. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA., pp: 1149-1178


  • Chavan, D. and B.A. Karadge, 1986. Growth, mineral nutrition, organic constituents and rate of photosynthesis in Sesbania grandiflora L. grown under saline conditions. Plant Soil, 93: 395-404.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chowdhury, J.B., S. Jain and R.K. Jain, 1993. Biotechnological approaches for developing salt-tolerant crops. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol., 2: 1-7.
    Direct Link    


  • Conceicao, V.S., I.P. Falcao and G.C. Pinto, 2002. Nutrient responses and glutamate and proline metabolism in sunflower plants and calli under Na2SO4 stress. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 165: 366-372.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cordovilla, M.P., A. Ocana, F. Ligero and C. Luch, 1995. Salinity effects on growth analysis and nutrient composition in four grain legumes-rhisobium symbiosis. J. Plant Nutr., 18: 1595-1609.


  • Cusido, R.M., J. Palazon, T. Altobella and C. Morales, 1987. Effect of salinity on soluble protein, free amino acids and nicotine contents in Nicotiona rustica L. Plant Soil, 102: 55-60.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • De Pascale, S. and G. Barbieri, 2000. Yield and quality of carrots as affected by soil salinity from long-term irrigation with saline water. Acta Hortic., 537: 621-628.


  • De Witt, C.T., W. Dijkshoorn and J.C. Noggle, 1963. Ionic Balance and Growth of Plants. Verslagen von Landbouwkundige Ondorzoekingen, Wageningen, NL


  • Glenn, E.R., Pfister, J.J. Brown, T.L. Thompson and J. O`leary, 1996. Na and K accumulation and salt tolerance of Atriplex canescens (Chenopodiaceae) genotypes. Am. J. Bot., 83: 997-1005.
    Direct Link    


  • Grattan, S.R. and E.V. Maas, 1988. Effect of salinity on phosphate accumulation and injury in soybean. II. Role of substrate Cl and Na. Plant and Soil, 109: 65-71.


  • Hare, P.D., W.A. Cress and J. van Staden, 1999. Proline synthesis and degradation: A model system for elucidating stress-related signal transduction. J. Exp. Bot., 50: 413-434.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hong-Bo, S., C. Xiao-Yan, C. Li-Ye, Z. Xi-Ning and W. Gang et al., 2006. Investigation on the relationship of proline with wheat anti-drought under soil water deficits. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 53: 113-119.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Irigoyen, J.J., D.W. Einerich and M. Sanchez-Diaz, 1992. Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativd) plants. Physiol. Plant., 84: 55-60.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Khan, M.A., I.A. Ungar and A.M. Showlter, 2000. The effect of salinity on the growth, water status and ion content of a leaf succulent perennial halophyte, Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk. J. Arid Environ., 45: 73-84.
    CrossRef    


  • Khattak, R.A. and W.M. Jarrell, 1989. Effect of saline irrigation waters on soil manganese leaching and bioavailability to sugar beet. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53: 142-146.


  • Kundu, P.B. and N.K. Paul, 1997. Effect of water stress on chlorophyll, proline and sugar accumulation in rape (Brassica compestris L.). Bangladesh J. Bot., 26: 83-85.


  • Lambert, R.S. and R.J. DuBois, 1971. Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate in the presence of chloride. Anal. Chem., 43: 494-501.


  • Lauchli, A., 1984. Salt Exclusion: An Adaptation of Legume for Crops and Pastures Under Saline Condition. In: Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Strategies for Crop Improvement, Stoples, R.C. and G.H. Toenniessen (Eds.). John Willey and Sons, New York, pp: 171-187


  • Lewis, O.A.M., 1986. The processing of inorganic nitrogen by the plant. Plants and Nitrogen. Butterworth, A.E. (Ed.), England.


  • Lewitt, J., 1980. Salt Stresses: Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Academic Press, New York, USA


  • Maas, E.V., G. Ogata and M.J. Garber, 1972. Influence of salinity on Fe, Mn and Zn uptake by plants. Agron. J., 64: 793-795.


  • Maas, E.V. and S.R. Grattan, 1999. Crop Yields as Affected by Salinity. In: Agricultural Drainage Agronomy Monograph No. 38, Skaggs, R.W. and J. van Schilgaarde (Eds.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI., pp: 55-108


  • Madan, S., H.S. Nainawatee, S. Jain, R.K. Jain, M.S. Malik and J.B. Chowdhury, 1994. Leaf position-dependent changes in proline, proline-5-carboksilate reductase activity and water relations under salt stress in genetically stable salt-tolerant samaclones of Brassica juncea L. Plant Soil., 163: 151-156.


  • Mehari, A., T. Ericsson and M. Weih, 2005. Effects of NaCl on seedling growth, biomass production and water status of Acacia nilotica and Acacia tortilis. J. Arid Environ., 62: 343-349.
    Direct Link    


  • Mehrota, N.K., V.K. Khanna and S.C. Agarwala, 1986. Soil-sodicity-induced zinc deficiency in maize. Plant Soil, 92: 63-71.


  • Munns, R., 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: Some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant Cell Environ., 16: 15-24.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nanjo, T., M. Kobayashi, Y. Yoshida, Y. Kakubari, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and K. Shinozaki, 1999. Antisense suppression of proline degradation improves tolerance to freezing and salinity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Febs Lett., 461: 205-210.
    Direct Link    


  • Oba, G., I. Nordal, N.C. Stenseth, J. Stave, C.S. Bjora, J.K. Muthondeki and K.A. Bii, 2001. Growth performance of exotic and indigenous tree species in saline soils in Turkana, Kenya. J. Arid Environ., 47: 499-511.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rahman, S., G.F. Vance and L.C. Munn, 1993. Salinity induced effects on the nutrient status of soil, corn leaves and kernels. Com. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 24: 2251-2269.


  • Roades, J.D., A. Kandiah and A.M. Mashali, 1992. The Use of Saline Water for Crop Production. FAO, United Nations, Rome, pp: 48


  • Sanchez, F.J., M. Manzanares, E.F. de Andres, J.L. Tenorio and L. Ayerbe, 1998. Turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crops Res., 59: 225-235.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sharpley, A.N., J.J. Meisinger, J.F. Power and D.L. Suarez, 1992. Root extraction of nutrients associated with long-term soil management. Adv. Soil Sci., 19: 151-217.


  • Shrivastava, A.K., R. Darash, S.P. Shukla, A. Kumar and G.B. Singh, 1993. Effect of NaCl induced salt stress on iron uptake, partitioning and accumulation in sugar cane. Sugar Cane, 4: 17-21.


  • Shukla, U.C. and A.K. Mukhi, 1985. Ameliorative role of zinc on maize growth (Zea mays) under salt-affected soil conditions. Plant Soil, 87: 423-432.


  • Siegel, S.M., B.Z. Siegel, J. Massey, P. Lahne and J. Chen, 1980. Growth of corn in saline waters. Physiologia Plantarum, 50: 71-73.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sivtsev, M.V., S.A. Ponomareva and E.A. Kuznetsova, 1973. Effect of salinization and a herbicide on chlorophyllase activity in tomato leaves. Fiziol. Rast., 20: 62-65.


  • Strogonove, B.P., V.V. Kabanov, L.P. Lapina and L.S. Prykhodko, 1970. Structure and Function of Plant Cells under Salinity Conditions. 1st Edn., Nauka Publishing House, Moscow


  • Taban, S., N. Ozguven, H. Celik,and V. Katkat, 1999. Effect of potassium on macroelements distribution in maize plant grown under salt stress. Dahlia Greidinger International Symposium Nutrient Management Under Salinity and Water Stress, 1-4 March 1999, Hafia-Israel.


  • Witham, F.H., D.F. Blaydes and R.M. Devlin, 1971. Experiments in Plant Physiology. 1st Edn., Van Nostrand, New York, ISBN-10: 0442781865, pp: 44-46


  • Yordanov, I., V. Velikova and T. Tsonev, 2003. Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol., 29: 187-206.
    Direct Link    


  • Zhu, J.K., 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 53: 247-273.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved