HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Agronomy

Year: 2004 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 137-140
DOI: 10.3923/ja.2004.137.140
Comparison of Some Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) Genotypes from Turkey for Seed Yield and Yield Related Characters
Erkut Peksen and Cengiz Artik

Abstract: In this study, six cowpea genotypes from different locations in Turkey (Dalbahçe, Doganca, Duragan, Igdir, Kirazlik 1 and Kirazlik 2) and two registered cultivars (Akkiz-86 and Karagöz-86) as control were compared for their seed yield and yield related characters during 2002 and 2003 years. In addition, correlation and path coefficients between seed yield per plant and yield related characters were determined. The highest seed yields per hectare were obtained from Kirazlik 2 (1120.9 kg ha-1), Doganca (1093.1 kg ha-1), Duragan (1078.6 kg ha-1), Kirazlik 1 (1066.6 kg ha-1), Dalbahçe (993.6 kg ha-1) and Igdir (922.1 kg ha-1). Seed yields of Akkiz-86 and Karagöz-86 were highly significantly lower than the other genotypes. Karagöz-86 was the superior for seed yield per plant (10.70 g plant-1). This followed by Doganca (8.27 g plant-1) and the rest of the genotypes were not statistically different from each other for seed yield per plant. Pod length and 100 seed weight showed a positive and highly significant correlation with seed yield per plant. Path analysis results revealed that pod length had the highest direct positive effect on seed yield per plant, followed by 100 seed weight and pods number per plant. On the other hand, seed yield per plant was directly and negatively affected by first pod height and branches number per plant.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Erkut Peksen and Cengiz Artik, 2004. Comparison of Some Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) Genotypes from Turkey for Seed Yield and Yield Related Characters. Journal of Agronomy, 3: 137-140.

Keywords: Vianga unguiculata, Correlation, cowpea, path analysis and seed yield

INTRODUCTION

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) is an important food legume and an integral part of traditional cropping systems in the semi-arid regions of the tropics[1]. Cowpea is not only grown for dry seed for human consumption and fodder for animal feed, but is also utilized the leaves and fruits for vegetables. In worldwide, area and production of cowpeas is 9825035 ha and 3721850 tons, respectively. The largest production is in Africa, with Nigeria and Niger predominating[2]. Cowpea sowing area of Turkey was 2900 ha and production was 2000 tons in 2001. Vegetable for fresh pods was 12000 tons for the same year[3]. Cowpea is widely grown in Aegean and Mediterranean regions of Turkey. In the middle Black Sea region, cowpea is cultivated in Sinop and Kastamonu provinces and some villages of Samsun’s Çarşamba district to supply only family requirements[4]. There are several research on cowpea in Black Sea region[5-8].

The study was carried out to compare the cowpea genotypes from different locations in Turkey, in terms of seed yield and yield related characters. In addition, correlation and path coefficients between all investigated characteristics were determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted at the Agricultural Faculty Experimental Field in Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun (41.3°N, 36.3°E), Turkey in 2002 and 2003. The average temperature and total rainfall during the field experiment were 20.77°C and 235.7 mm in 2002 and 20.28°C and 387.3 mm in 2003, respectively. Six cowpea genotypes from different locations in Turkey and two registered cultivars (Akkız-86 and Karagöz-86) as control were used in the study (Table 1). Days to emergence and days to first flowering from sowing and 100 seed weight were established. Plant height, first pod height, number of branches and pods per plant, pod length and number of seeds per pod, dry straw yield per plant and seed yield per plant were determined in ten plants or ten pods randomly selected from each plot. Plants were dried at 80°C for 48 h to determine the dry straw weight per plant. Sowing was performed on 23 May 2002 and 20 May 2003 by hand. Distance between rows and plants in a row were 60 cm and 10 cm, respectively.

Table 1: The names and collection sites of cowpea genotypes
*: Registered by Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture

The soil of experimental area was heavy clay, slightly acidic, without lime and salt, medium in phosphorus and rich in potassium and organic matter. Ammonium sulphate was applied at the rate of 40 kg N ha-1 as a starter dose. Plants were irrigated when they need water.

The study was planned in randomized complete block design with three replications. Combined analysis of variance over years was performed. TARIST and SPSS statistical program were used to carry out statistical analysis. Means showing significance statistically were compared using Least Significance Difference (LSD) Test at 0.05 or 0.01 probability level related to significance level of means. Data for seed yield per hectare were subjected to analysis of covariance to reduce the error sourced from differences in the number of harvested plants. Simple linear correlations and path coefficients between seed yield per plant and yield related characters were also calculated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Durağan, Iğdır and Kirazlık 2 genotypes had mustard seed coat, while the others had white. The flower colours of Akkız-86 and Karagöz-86 were white. Kirazlık 1 had light purple flowers and the rest of the cowpea genotypes had purple flowers. Cowpea genotypes showed highly significant (P<0.01) differences for days to emergence and days to the first flowering time. Days to emergence were varied between 7.67 in Kirazlık 2 and 11.83 days in Karagöz-86. Karagöz-86, Iğdır and Akkız-86 were late emerging genotypes. Elapsed time to first flowering was the longest in Iğdır, Doğanca and Durağan (Table 2).

Highly significant differences (P<0.01) were found between genotypes for plant height and first pod height. Plant height was ranged from 126.25 cm in Durağan to 68.77 cm in Kirazlık 2. Doğanca and Durağan which have climbing plant type were the most longest genotypes for first pod height. Means of the genotypes for the first pod height were varied between 43.83 cm in Doğanca and 26.23 cm in Akkız-86. Although Akkız-86 and Karagöz-86 had more the number of branches and pods per plant than the other cowpea genotypes, there were no significant differences among genotypes for branches and pods number per plant.

Table 2: Seed coat, flower colour and means of days to emergence and the first flowering time for cowpea genotypes
**:There are no significant differences (P<0.01) among means indicated by the same letters

Karagöz-86 has produced the longest pods (16.06 cm), while Kirazlık 2 has produced the shortest pods (12.62 cm). Karagöz-86 gave the lowest seeds number per pod, although it has more and longer pods than the others. The highest value for the seeds number per plant was obtained from Doğanca (12.29 seeds plant-1). Weight of 100 seeds was ranged from 21.84 g in Karagöz-86 to 9.40 g in Iğdır. There was no statistically significant differences among genotypes for the dry straw weight per plant. The greatest seed yield per plant was obtained from Karagöz-86 (10.70 g plant-1) due to its high 100 seed weight. This followed by Doğanca (8.27 g plant-1) and the rest of the genotypes were not statistically different from each other. Seed yield per hectare ranged from 680.2 kg ha-1 in Akkız-86 to 1120.9 kg ha-1 in Kirazlık 2. Akkız-86 and Karagöz-86 had highly significantly lower seed yield per hectare than the other genotypes because of their poor emergence in both years (Table 3). Plant density was under optimum density for Karagöz-86 and Akkız-86 cultivars in both year, although their seed were sown in several times.

Simple linear correlations among some morphological characteristics and seed yield per plant in cowpea genotypes are given in Table 4. Plant height showed strong positive correlation with the first pod height and dry straw weight per plant. A positive and significant correlation was found between plant height and the number of seeds per pod. First pod height was positively and highly significantly correlated with the number of seeds per pod and dry straw weight per plant. A negative and highly significant correlation was found between first pod height and the number of branches per plant. The number of pods per plant was increased with increases in the number of branches per plant (Table 4). Hundred seed weight was positively and highly significantly correlated with pod length, while it was negatively and highly significantly correlated with the number of seeds per pod. Pod length and 100 seed weight showed a positive and highly significant correlation with seed yield per plant (Table 4).

Table 3: Means of cowpea genotypes for some morphological characteristics and seed yield per plant and seed yield per hectare
ns: Non significant, **:There are no significant differences (P<0.01) among means indicated by the same letters. PH: Plant height (cm), FPH: First pod height (cm), BN: Branches number per plant, PN: Pods number per plant, PL: Pod length (cm), SN: Seeds number per pod, HSW: 100 seed weight (g), SDW: Dry straw weight per plant (g plant-1), PSY: Plant seed yield (g plant-1), SY: Seed yield (kg ha-1)

Table 4: Simple linear correlations among some morphological characteristics and seed yield per plant
ns: Non significant, **:There are no significant differences (P<0.01) among means indicated by the same letters. PH: Plant height (cm), FPH: First pod height (cm), BN: Branches number per plant, PN: Pods number per plant, PL: Pod length (cm), SN: Seeds number per pod, HSW: 100 seed weight (g), SDW: Dry straw weight per plant (g plant-1), PSY: Plant seed yield (g plant-1)

Table 5: The direct and indirect effects of some morphological characteristics on seed yield per plant
PH: Plant height (cm), FPH: First pod height (cm), BN: Branches number per plant, PN: Pods number per plant, PL: Pod length (cm), SN: Seeds number per pod, HSW: 100 seed weight (g), SDW: Dry straw weight per plant (g plant-1), PSY: Plant seed yield (g plant-1)

Simple correlation coefficients indicated that seed yield per plant was correlated significantly and positively with pods per plant, seeds per pod and branches per plant[9]. Seed yield was significantly and positively correlated with branches per plant, inflorescences per plant, pods per plant, pod length, seeds per pod, 100 seed weight and harvest index[10].

Pod length, 100 seed weight and pods number per plant showed positive direct effects on seed yield per plant, first pod height and branches number per plant had the highest negative indirect effects on seed yield per plant. Pod length, 100 seed weight and pods number per plant were the most important yield components because of their positive direct effects on seed yield per plant (Table 5).

Kalaiyarasi and Palanisamy[11] determined that pod length had negative direct effect on seed yield per plant, while Choulwar and Borikar[12] found a positive direct effect for pod length on seed yield per plant. The number of pods per plant and 100 seed weight had positive direct effects on seed yield per plant[13,14]. In contrast to our finding for the number of branches, Chikkadyavaiah[15], Kalaiyarasi and Palanisamy[11,16] found that this variable had direct positive effect on seed yield per plant.

Ombakho and Tyagi[17] informed that seeds per pod, pods per plant and pod length would be the most useful components for selection. The most important yield components were number of pods per plant, 100 seed weight and number of seeds per pod[18]. The number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weight were the main contributing characters towards the seed yield. Pod length contributed indirectly towards seed yield via the number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weight[19]. Vineeta Kumari et al.[14] found that selection for higher seed yield should involve early-maturing genotypes with high 100 seed weight and number of clusters and pods per plant.

All genotypes except for Akkız-86 and Karagöz-86 were the superior for seed yield per hectare. Doğanca, Durağan and Iğdır were the most latest genotypes in terms of elapsed time to first flowering, but they completed their flowering period in a short time.

In conclusion, it was determined that Kirazlık 2, Doğanca, Durağan, Kirazlık 1 and Dalbahçe could be recommended as prominent cowpea genotypes for Black Sea Region. In addition to high seed yield, Doğanca had extra advantage due to its large and white seeds.

REFERENCES

  • Singh, B.B., H.A. Ajeigbe, S.A. Tarawali, S. Fernandez-Rivera and M. Abubakar, 2003. Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops Res., 84: 169-177.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • FAO, 2003. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. FAO Statistic Series, No. 176, 56, Rome, pp: 106-115.


  • DIE, 2001. Agricultural structure: Production, price, value. Republic of Turkey, Prime Ministry State Institute of Statistics (SIS), Ankara, Turkey.


  • Gulumser, A., F. Tosun and H. Bozoglu, 1989. A study on the production of cowpea under the ecological conditions of samsun. J. Fac. Agric. OMU, 4: 49-65.


  • Peksen, E., A. Peksen, H. Bozoglu and A. Gulumser, 2000. Determination of some seed characteristics in different cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) genotypes. OMU, 15: 65-72.
    Direct Link    


  • Peksen, A., E. Peksen and H. Bozoglu, 2002. Effects of sowing dates on yield and quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes grown in greenhouse. Acta Hortic., 579: 351-354.
    Direct Link    


  • Ozturan, Y., 2003. The effects of different row spacing and nitrogen fertilization on yield and yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) under samsun conditions. M.Sc. Thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey, pp: 66.


  • Peksen, A., 2004. Fresh pod yield and some pod characteristics of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes from Turkey. Asian J. Plant Sci., 3: 269-273.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Altinbas, M. and H. Sepetolu, 1993. A study to determine components affecting seed yield in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Turk. J. Agric. For., 17: 775-784.


  • Sawant, D.S., 1994. Association and path analysis in cowpea. Ann. Agric. Res., 15: 134-139.


  • Kalaiyarasi, R. and G.A. Palanisamy, 2002. Path analysis of F3 populations in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Legume Res., 25: 47-49.


  • Choulwar, S.B. and S.T. Borikar, 1985. Path analysis for harvest index in cowpea. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 10: 356-357.


  • Patil, S.J., R. Venugopal, J.V. Goud and R. Parameshwarappa, 1989. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in cowpea. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 2: 170-175.


  • Vineeta Kumari, V., R.N. Arora and J.V. Singh, 2003. Variability and path analysis in grain cowpea. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Arid Legumes, for Food Nutrition Security and Promotion of Trade, May 15-16, India, pp: 59-62.


  • Chikkadyavaiah, 1985. Genetic divergence in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 19: 131-132.


  • Kalaiyarasi, R. and G.A. Palanisamy, 1999. Correlation and path analysis in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Madras Agric. J., 86: 216-220.


  • Ombakho, G.A. and A.P. Tyagi, 1987. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and its components in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). East Afr. Agric. For. J., 53: 23-37.


  • Siddique, A.K.M.A.R. and S.N. Gupta, 1992. Path coefficient analysis of yield components in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Ann. Biol. (Ludhiana), 8: 77-80.


  • Aman Kapoor, M.S., S.M. Beri Sohoo and B.L. Bhardwaj, 2000. Correlation and path analysis in cowpea. Crop Improvement, 27: 250-251.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved