HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Information Technology Journal

Year: 2013 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 24 | Page No.: 8604-8608
DOI: 10.3923/itj.2013.8604.8608
Measuring the True Technical Efficiency of Farmers’ Forest Management in Fujian, China: A Three-stage Dea Analysis
Jinyu Shen, Zhao jing and Yali Wen

Abstract: Technical efficiency of farmers’ forest management is the core issue of forestry development. This study applied three-stage data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the technical efficiency, pure technical and scale technical of farmers’ forest management, excluding the impact of environmental effect and statistical noise. Questionnaires were collected and analyzed from 700 heads of households in Fujian, China. The results from the first-stage indicated that overall efficiency were low. In addition, the environmental variables had significant effect on the technical efficiency such as financial subsidies and farmer’s technological level through stochastic frontier analysis. After the adjustment of environmental variables and statistical noise, the average technical efficiency in the third-stage DEA improve significantly than the first stage. The results also indicated that nearly half of farmers had capital and labor input slack. Therefore, our findings suggest that increasing farmers’ financial subsidies, introducing advanced technology and expanding scale of production should be take into consideration to improve technical efficiency.

Fulltext PDF

How to cite this article
Jinyu Shen, Zhao jing and Yali Wen, 2013. Measuring the True Technical Efficiency of Farmers’ Forest Management in Fujian, China: A Three-stage Dea Analysis. Information Technology Journal, 12: 8604-8608.

Keywords: technical efficiency, environmental effect and three-stage DEA

REFERENCES

  • Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell, S.S. Schmidt and S. Yaisawarng, 2002. Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. J. Prod. Anal., 17: 157-174.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jondrow, J., C.A.K. Lovell, I.S. Materov and P. Schmidt, 1982. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J. Econometrics, 19: 233-238.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kao, C. and Y.C. Yang, 1991. Measuring the efficiency of forest management. For. Sci., 31: 1239-1252.
    Direct Link    


  • OECD Manual, 2001. Measuring productivity: Measurement of aggregate and industry-level productivity growth. Statistics Portal, pp: 1-156. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/EconStatKB/Attachment291.aspx.


  • Nyrud, A.Q. and S. Baardsen, 2003. Production efficiency and productivity growth in Norwegian sawmilling. For. Sci., 49: 89-97.
    Direct Link    


  • Sowlati, T., 2005. Efficiency studies in forestry using data envelopment analysis. For. Prod. J., 55: 49-57.
    Direct Link    


  • Wang, Y. and Y. Yao, 2003. Sources of China's economic growth 1952-1999: Incorporating human capital accumulation. China Econ. Rev., 14: 32-52.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Xu, J.T., 2010. Collective forest tenure reform in China: What has been achieved so far? Proceedings of the World Bank Conference on Land Governance, April 26-27, 2010, World Bank, Washington, DC.-.


  • Zang, Y.Q., 2006. Development of experience harvest table of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in weimin forest farm. J. Fujian For. Sci. Tech., 33: 47-51.
    Direct Link    


  • Frey, G.E., H.E. Fassola, A.N. Pachas, L. Colcombet and S.M. Lacorte et al., 2012. A within-farm efficiency comparison of silvopasture systems with conventional pasture and forestry in Northeast Argentina. Land Econ., 88: 639-657.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved