Routines, Cluster and Innovation
Abstract:
This study examines the relationship between firms' innovative behavior and firm/cluster level routines. Specifically, the firm level factors are firms age and innovative routines and cluster level factors are number of firms in the same industry. We test a few hypotheses based on different theories by the use of data from auto parts manufacturers. The results show that firm's age is an indicator of slack resources and has positive effects on their innovation; Firms R and D routines matter in firm's innovation. Meanwhile, we find that cluster can promote general firms innovation but they will harm the innovative firms innovative behavior. These results contribute to our understanding of firms innovsation.
How to cite this article
Shue Wu, Weizhou Zhong and Zhenlei Huang, 2013. Routines, Cluster and Innovation. Information Technology Journal, 12: 7501-7505.
REFERENCES
Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal, 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Q., 35: 128-152.
CrossRef Direct Link
Gilbert, C.G., 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Manage. J., 48: 741-763.
CrossRef Direct Link
Greve, H.R., 1998. Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Q., 43: 58-86.
Direct Link
Henderson, R.M. and K.B. Clark, 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart., 35: 9-30.
Direct Link
Hu, A.G., 2010. Propensity to patent, competition and China's foreign patenting surge. Res. Policy, 39: 985-993.
CrossRef Direct Link
Kim, T.Y., H. Oh and A. Swaminathan, 2006. Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev., 31: 704-720.
CrossRef Direct Link
Marshall, A., 1920. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. 8th Edn., Macmillan and Co., London, UK
Mokyr, J., 1992. Technological inertia in economic history. J. Econ. History, 52: 325-338.
CrossRef
Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter, 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp: 929-964
Schreyogg, G. and M. Kliesch-Eberl, 2007. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Manage. J., 28: 913-933.
CrossRef Direct Link
Tushman, M.L. and P. Anderson, 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Q., 31: 439-465.
CrossRef Direct Link
© Science Alert. All Rights Reserved