A New Variation Particle Swarm Optimization for Multi-objective Reactive
Power Optimization
Abstract:
In order to overcome the particle swarm algorithm easy to fall into local optimal value and the lack of late slow convergence, this study presents a cloud model based on adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm. The algorithm according to the fitness value of the particle populations of particles into the near optimal values closer to the optimal value and away from the optimal value of three subgroups and the generation of different populations to adopt a different strategy to generate inertia weight, where the normal cloud generator algorithm uses adaptive dynamic adjustment closer to the optimal particle subgroups of inertia weight, get rid of the shackles of algorithms into local optimum value; in the iteration algorithm uses the normal cloud to the mutation operation of the particle which makes the algorithm can quickly converge to the optimal solution. In summary presented Could Adaptive Variation Particle Swarm Optimization (CAVPSO) to solve the multi-objective optimization problem of reactive power. Use standard IEEE30 node system to test simulation results show that the use of CAVPSO algorithms to solve multi-objective optimization of reactive power superiority.
How to cite this article
Wenqing Zhao and Liwei Wang, 2013. A New Variation Particle Swarm Optimization for Multi-objective Reactive
Power Optimization. Information Technology Journal, 12: 5731-5735.
REFERENCES
Kennedy, J. and R. Eberhart, 1995. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Volume 4, November 27-December 1, 1995, Perth, WA., pp: 1942-1948.
Li, D., 2000. Uncertainty in knowledge representation. Eng. Sci., 2: 73-79.
Li, J., L. Yang and J.L. Liu, 2011. Multi-objective reactive power optimization based on adaptive chaos particle swarm optimization algorithm. Power Syst. Protect. Control, 39: 26-31.
Liu, C.Y., D.Y. Li and Y. Du, 2005. Some statistical analysis of the normal cloud model. Inform. Control, 34: 236-239.
Liu, S., Q. Li, W.R. Chen, C. Lin and Y.K. Zheng, 2009. Multiobjective reactive power optimization based on modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 29: 31-36.
Li, Z.H., Y.H. Li and X.H. Duan, 2009. A novel partition approach of control variables in cooperative coevolutionary computation for reactive power optimization. Proceed. CSEE, 29: 28-34.
Direct Link
Li, Z., X. Chen, K. Yu, H.M. Liu and B. Zhao, 2008. Hybrid particle swarm optimization for distribution network reconfiguration. Proceed. CSEE, 28: 35-41.
Lou, S.H., Y. Li, Y.W. Wu and X.Y. Xiong, 2005. Multi-objective reactive power optimization using quantum genetic algorithm. High Voltage Eng., 31: 69-71.
Xiong, H.G. and H.Z. Cheng, 2006. Multi-objective reactive power optimization based on immune algorithm. Proceed. CSEE, 26: 102-108.
Zhao, L. and J. Lu, 2010. Multi-objective reactive power optimization of wind farm based on improved genetic algorithm. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 30: 84-88.
Direct Link
© Science Alert. All Rights Reserved