HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Poultry Science

Year: 2019 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 12 | Page No.: 598-603
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2019.598.603
Cost-Effective Media for Production of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Poultry in Kuwait
Hamad Almansour , Thnayan Alonaizi, Mohamed Kishk, Ahmad Hadi, Tahani Alsurrayai, Mohamed Alawadi and Siby Varughese

Abstract: Background and Objective: Poultry is a primary source of meat in Kuwait. Abuse of antibiotics in the poultry industry can lead to unfavorable effects on food safety. However safer approaches, such as probiotic use, can be expensive. The present study screened cost-effective media formulations which support growth of lactic acid bacteria. Materials and Methods: Shake flask experiments were conducted using three bacterial strains isolated from Kuwaiti poultry farms (Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus parabuchneri and Pediococcus pentosaceus). Ten media formulations containing different concentrations of tomato serum, molasses and yeast extract were inoculated with bacteria and incubated at 30, 35, or 37°C. Samples were taken periodically (0, 24 and 48 h), plated on selective agar and incubated overnight; growth was measured the next day. Statistical analysis revealed the formulation that supports the highest growth when compared to de Man Rogosa and Sharpe medium. Results: The formulation containing 5 g L–1 yeast extract, 200 mL L–1 tomato serum and 10 g L–1 molasses resulted in the best overall growth and supported a longer exponential phase compared to the commercial medium. Conclusion: This new media could be used as a cost-effective alternative for large-scale production of certain poultry probiotics.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Hamad Almansour, Thnayan Alonaizi, Mohamed Kishk, Ahmad Hadi, Tahani Alsurrayai, Mohamed Alawadi and Siby Varughese, 2019. Cost-Effective Media for Production of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Poultry in Kuwait. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18: 598-603.

Keywords: Poultry production, probiotics, tomato serum, yeast extract, molasses and bacterial growth media

INTRODUCTION

Food safety and security is crucial to maintain nutritional stability in any country. In developed countries, legislators have established firm industry regulations that benefit the economy, farmers and citizens. For a fast-developing country, such as Kuwait, food security and safety is important due to a high demand for limited local food supplies. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, poultry consumption in Kuwait increased from 58,000 metric tons in 1993-135,000 metric tons in 2013. Moreover, their Statistics Division reported the consumption of poultry meat per capita tripled from 1993 (23.3 kg capita1 year1) to 2011 (63.6 kg capita1 year1)1. Since poultry is the most consumed meat in Kuwait, it is essential to find the most effective and economical way to ensure the safety of this industry and its products.

The poultry industry is highly affected by environmental factors (e.g., weather) and susceptible to infection by microbes from various sources, such as water. Microbes that affect animal health and mortality have a direct effect on a country’s food security. Furthermore, transfer of some microbes (e.g., Salmonella) to humans can lead to sickness and e ven death. Various drugs and antibiotics, such as chlortetracycline, penicillin and diclazuril, used to control microbial infections have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration2-5. However, several countries in the European Union have banned and/or limited the use of antibiotics in favor of natural biological approaches to protect and improve the quality and safety of poultry meat4. For example, successful application of probiotics to control foodborne pathogens is well-documented. Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms that, when administrated in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host6. Probiotics are an indigestible food ingredient that selectively stimulate the growth and activity of one or a limited number of bacterial populations in the host digestive system7.

Specifically, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, have been intensively used as human and livestock probiotics8. Considering the market for animal feed probiotics is expected to reach $7.0 billion by 20259, LAB use in the livestock industry will largely depend on the development of more economical media which support its mass production. Therefore, the present study examined various media formulations to determine a more cost-effective way to produce LAB for use with poultry in Kuwait.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial Isolates: Bacterial isolates used were taken from local poultry farms in Kuwait in a previous study10. The selected strains used (Lactobacillus brevis, L. parabuchneri and Pediococcus pentosaceus) are considered to have probiotic characteristics helpful to poultry health. The selected strains were stored in cryogenic vials at -80°C, carefully thawed and then subcultured in de Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS)medium (Oxoid, UK) before experimental testing. Analysis of experimental media formations commenced once bacterial growth and purity were up to laboratory standards.

Media testing: Shake flask cultures were used to examine bacterial growth characteristics in 10 different experimental media formulations containing various concentrations of yeast extract, tomato serum and molasses (Table 1) compared to commercial MRS medium. For each experimental test, the media was sterilized by autoclave (121°C, 15 min), aliquoted into sterile tubes (30 mL tube1) and then inoculated with fresh bacterial cultures equal to 10% of the final volume. Tubes were incubated at three different temperatures (30, 35 and 37°C), with a fixed mixing speed of 100 RPM on a rotatory shaker. Bacterial samples (100 μL) were taken from each tube at different time intervals (0, 24 and 48 h), plated on selective MRS agar (Oxoid, UK), incubated at 37°C for 24 h11 and then growth measured as the number of colony forming units; sampling after initial inoculation (0 h) served as a baseline control.

Table 1: Experimental media content

Growth of samples maintained in commercial MRS medium served as a positive control. Each formulation and temperature was tested in triplicate.

Statistical analysis: Data were presented as the averages for each formulation and temperature. Differences were determined by 2-way analysis of the variance and Duncan’s multiple range testing using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS ©). Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Lactobacillus parabuchneri growth: The results showed that media formulations 8, 9 and 10 yielded the highest L. parabuchneri growth at all three incubation temperatures (Fig. 1a, b) compared to other formulations at all temperatures. While medium 8 appears to support the most growth at 35°C, this difference was insignificant. Followed by medium 9 for 48 h at 30°C and medium 8 for 48 h at 30°C. Cultivation of L. parabuchneri in MRS medium resulted in higher growth at 24 h regardless of temperature, with highest growth at 37°C. Based on these results, medium 8 should be used for large-scale cultivation of L. parabuchneri for 24 h at 35°C as it promotes the most growth. Complete data for all other media formulations can be found in Fig. 2 (a-c).

Lactobacillus brevis growth: Figure 3 (a, b) shows that L . brevis grew the best in media 9 and 10 at 24 and 48 h.

Fig. 1(a-b):
Average growth of Lactobacillus parabuchneri after (a) 24 h and (b) 48 h

Fig. 2(a-c):
Average growth of Lactobacillus parabuchneri at 30, 35 and 37°C after 24 and 48 h

Fig. 3(a-b): Average growth of Lactobacillus brevis after (a) 24 h (b) and 48 h

Fig. 4(a-c):
Average growth of Lactobacillus brevis at 30, 35 and 37°C after 24 and 48 h

Cultivation in medium 10 for 24 h at 35°C resulted in the highest amount of growth (α = 0.05) compared to all other media, temperatures and cultivation times. While, the best L. brevis cultivation time and temperature using MRS medium was at 30°C for 48 h. Moreover, 24 h growth at 35°C was higher than that at 48 h. These results demonstrate that cultivation of L. brevis in medium 10 at 35°C for up to 24 h produces the greatest amount of growth compared to other formulations. Complete data for all other media formulations is shown in Fig. 4 (a-c).

Pediococcus pentosaceus growth: Interestingly, Pediococcus pentosaceus showed very unstable and inconsistent growth in all media formulations, especially when cultivated at 37°C (Fig. 5 a, b). Nonetheless, medium 10 supported the highest amount of growth at 37°C, followed by 30 and 35°C, relative to all other formulations. Optimal P. pentosaceus growth using MRS medium was at 30°C for both 24 and 48 h. Similar to the other bacterial strains, medium 10 supported the best P. pentosaceus grow that 30°C at 24 h. Fig. 6 (a-c) shows complete data for all other media formulations.

Fig. 5(a-b):
Average growth of Pediococcus pentosaceus after (a) 24 h and (b) 48 h

Fig. 6(a-c):
Average growth of Pediococcus pentosaceus at 30, 35 and 37°C after 24 and 48 h

Table 2: Lactic acid bacteria cultivation summary
MRS, de Man Rogosa and Sharpe media

Table 3:Media composition price in USD
*Based on higher cost, MRS, de Man Rogosa and Sharpe media

DISCUSSION

To support the cost-effective mass production of LAB as probiotics for poultry in Kuwait, the present study revealed that cultivation in media containing 5 g L1 yeast extract, 200 mL L1 tomato serum and 10 g L1 molasses (medium 10) resulted in the best overall growth and supported a longer exponential phase of all three LAB tested. Specifically, growth of all strains was optimal after 24 h of cultivation, though each preferred a different incubation temperature (Table 2). Selection of these three relatively cheap media components was based on LAB growth characteristics and the content of different commercially available formulations. The experimental media assessed herein were compared to growth in MRS medium, which is commonly used to cultivate LAB and has replaced previous formulations by Briggs (tomato juice-based) and deMan (meat extract tomato juice-based)12.

LAB lack various biosynthetic pathways, making them fastidious microbes that rely heavily on external nutrient sources. Yeast extract provides a rich source of nitrogen and vitamin B, which are known to enhance lactic acid production13. Tomato juice provides necessary carbon, protein, acidity and is considered especially important for the growth of tomato juice factor bacteria14. Moreover, 4’-o-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)-D-pantothenic acid is reportedly a growth factor present in tomato juice that stimulates P. cerevisiae growth15 Molasses is an important agro-industrial byproduct that is high in sugar (48-50%) and other nutrients, making it a cheap carbon source. It also has a buffering capacity that is advantageous for maintaining the pH of the medium above 5.3 during fermentation16.

Importantly, the nutrients required for growth in media containing yeast extract, tomato juice and molasses are still available after autoclaving15. The present study demonstrated media containing these three ingredients supports greater bacterial growth than MRS medium. Specifically, the addition of tomato juice and molasses apparently helped prolong the exponential phase of bacterial growth, which will be useful for continuous culture of LAB strains17.

The three key media ingredients used herein are known to be relatively cost-effective in Kuwait. The price of tomatoes ranges from about 0.1-5 USD18 kg1, depending on the season, with an annual average price of 1.3 USD19 kg1. During the high-yield season (March–April), the average price is approximately 0.15 USD kg1 and most of the harvested produce not sold ends up discarded as waste. During the low-yield season (October-January), the price of tomatoes increases to about 2.5 USD kg1. According to Informa UK Limited20 molasses is a byproduct of the cane and beet sugar refining process, averaging approximately 160 USD t1. The price of yeast extract, on the other hand, averages from 100-260 USD kg1 (e.g., from Hi Media and Sigma Aldrich).Though yeast extract is the most expensive component, its cost is offset by use of relatively larger amounts of the substantially cheaper tomato juice and molasses. Furthermore, media formulated with these three ingredients is much more cost-effective than MRS medium, which is priced at around 200 USD kg1 (e.g., from Oxoid). In fact, 1 L of commercially available MRS media is 5 times more expensive than media formulation 10 (Table 3).

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study showed that media formulation 10 should serve as a beneficial substitute for producing large-scale quantities of probiotic LAB in a relatively short time period (24 h) and at a very reasonable price. Additionally, this media may also be suitable for a wider range of LAB strains, though this notion requires further investigation.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study reports formulation of a new medium for cultivation of probiotics using relatively cost-effective sources readily available in Kuwait. The composition of the formulated medium (tomato serum, molasses and yeast extract) supported optimal growth of three LAB strains. The results indicate that large-scale production of these bacterial strains for use as a possible feed additive in the poultry industry is economical and potentially profitable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research for support and funding.

REFERENCES

  • FAO., 2014. FAO Statistatical Year Book 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.


  • Goncalves-Tenorio, A., B.N. Silva, V. Rodrigues, V. Cadavez and U. Gonzales-Barron, 2018. Prevalence of pathogens in poultry meat: A meta-analysis of European published surveys. Foods, Vol. 7, No. 5.
    CrossRef    


  • Stromberg, Z.R., J.R. Johnson, J.M. Fairbrother, J. Kilbourne, A. van Goor 3rd, R. Curtiss and M. Mellata, 2017. Evaluation of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy chickens to determine their potential risk to poultry and human health PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 7.
    CrossRef    


  • Peralta-Sánchez, J.M., A.M. Martín-Platero, J.J. Ariza-Romero, M. Rabelo-Ruiz and M.J. Zurita-González et al., 2019. Egg production in poultry farming is improved by probiotic bacteria Front. Microbiol., Vol. 10.
    CrossRef    


  • Phan, T.T., L.T. Khai, N. Ogasawara, N.T. Tam, A.T. Okatani, M. Akiba and H. Hayashidani, 2005. Contamination of Salmonella in retail meats and shrimps in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. J. Food Protect., 65: 1077-1080.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Hill, C., F. Guarner, G. Reid, G.R. Gibson and D.J. Merenstein et al., 2014. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 11: 506-514.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gibson, G.R. and M.B. Roberfroid, 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr., 125: 1401-1412.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Vlasova, A.N., S. Kandasamy, K.S. Chattha, G. Rajashekara and L.J. Saif, 2016. Comparison of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria effects, immune responses and rotavirus vaccines and infection in different host species. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 172: 72-84.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Research and Markets, 2019. Probiotics in animal feed market by livestock (Poultry, ruminants, swine, aquaculture, pets), source (Bacteria [Lactobacilli, Streptococcus Thermophilus, Bifidobacteria] and Yeast & Fungi), form (Dry and liquid) and region-Global forecast to 2025. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4763770/probiotics-in-animal-feed-market-by-livestock.


  • Balba, M., A. Yateem, S. Al-Zenki, T. Al-Surrayai, R. Al-Daher and Y. Al-Shayji, 2012. Isolation, characterization and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria for the development of poultry probiotics. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Report No. KISR 11219.


  • Sanders, E.R., 2012. Aseptic laboratory techniques: Plating methods. J. Vis. Exp., Vol. 63.
    CrossRef    


  • De Man, J.C., M. Rogosa and M.E. Sharpe, 1960. A medium for the cultivation of Lactobacilli. J. Applied Bacteriol., 23: 130-135.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Juturu, V. and J.C. Wu, 2016. Microbial production of lactic acid: the latest development. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 36: 967-977.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Fugelsang, K.C. and C.G. Edwards, 2006. Wine Microbiology: Practical Applications and Procedures. 2nd Edn., Springer Berlin, Germany, Pages: 394
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Eto, M. and A. Nakagawa, 1975. Identification of a growth factor in tomato juice for a newly isolated strain of Pediococcus cerevisiae. J. Inst. Brew., 81: 232-236.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Quan, Z.X., Y.S. Jin, C.R. Yin, J.J. Lee and S.T. Lee, 2005. Hydrolyzed molasses as an external carbon source in biological nitrogen removal. Bioresour. Technol., 96: 1690-1695.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tamizharasi, V., J. Srinkanth and G. Santhalakshmi, 2005. Molasses-based medium requires no nitrogen supplement for culturing three entomopathogenic fungi. J. Biol. Control, 19: 135-140.
    Direct Link    


  • Numbeo, 2019. Cost of living. https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/.


  • Abdal, M., M. Suleiman, N.R. Bhat and S. Jacob, 2009. Cost of cultivation of tomato in Kuwait in uncooled plastic tunnel system-A case study. World Applied Sci. J., 6: 1625-1628.
    Direct Link    


  • Informa UK Limited, 2019. World molasses & feed ingredients report. https://www.agra-net.com/agra/world-molasses-and-feed-ingredients-report/.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved