HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Poultry Science

Year: 2018 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 10 | Page No.: 507-514
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2018.507.514
Characteristics of Broiler Feather Protein Concentrate Prepared Under Different Production Processes
Muhammad Irfan Said, Effendi Abustam, Wempie Pakıdıng, Muhammad Zain Mıde and Asyhadi Umar

Abstract: Background and Objective: Broiler feather waste (BFW) resulting from poultry slaughter houses (PSHs) is considered a serious solid waste problem. To deal with this problem, the waste can be hydrolyzed to create broiler feather protein concentrate (BFPC), which has the potential to serve as feed material for non-ruminant animals. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro protein digestibility (In-VtPD), yield and chemical composition (CC) of Broiler feather protein concentrate (BFPC) prepared under different conditions. Methodology: This study involved four types of processes and used a combination of chemical and physical processes. The chemical processes used 1 M HCl (10 and 20% (v/v) and 1 M NaOH [10 and 20% (w/v)], while the physical processes used a high pressure heating system. The treatment consisted of four conditions including P0 (control /without hydrolysis), P1 [(20% (w/v) 1 M NaOH+autoclaving (21 Psi)], P2 [(20% (v/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi)] and P3 [10% (v/v) 1 M NaOH+10% (w/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi)]. A completely randomized design (CRD) with 5 replications was used and the data obtained were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The results showed that different hydrolysis conditions had significant effects (p<0.01) on the In-VtPD, yield, Cc and pH of BFPC but had no significant effect (p>0.05) on the protein content. The hydrolysis process using 20% (w/v) 1 M NaOH+autoclaving (21 Psi) (P1) significantly increased the In-VtPD of BFPC (59.53±0.7%). The combination of chemical and physical processes was able to hydrolyze the components of keratin protein in feather waste. The resulting yield was not different from that of the other treatments (P2 and P3). The hydrolysis process uses a chemical and physical combination to maintain a stable protein composition but the digestibility level of the protein increases. The amino acid profiles of BFPC before and after the hydrolysis process did not differ significantly. The amino acid component in BFPC is dominated by glutamic acid. In the composition of the constituent substances BFPC is dominated by K2O and CaO compounds. Conclusion: The hydrolysis process that uses a combination of chemical [20% (w/v) 1 M NaOH] and physical processes (autoclaving) (P1) is the best hydrolysis treatment. Therefore, this treatment is recommended as the best process to produce feather flour concentrate.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Muhammad Irfan Said, Effendi Abustam, Wempie Pakıdıng, Muhammad Zain Mıde and Asyhadi Umar, 2018. Characteristics of Broiler Feather Protein Concentrate Prepared Under Different Production Processes. International Journal of Poultry Science, 17: 507-514.

Keywords: hydrolysis, digestibility, Broiler feather waste, feather meal and animal feed

INTRODUCTION

Broiler feather waste (BFW) resulting from poultry slaughterhouses (PSHs) has been regarded as a problematic solid waste. To reduce waste production, an effort is needed to utilize the waste. One of the efforts made is processing into animal feed. This study is very important as one of the solutions in reducing the production of livestock waste, especially feather. Declining waste production will improve environmental quality and improve human health status. Broiler feather are rich in keratin protein1-2, which is an abundant polymer in the world3-5. The waste rapidly decays, leading to undesirable effects on the environment6. At present, livestock by-products have been widely used to meet human needs. Livestock by-products that have been used such as skin, bones and feathers7-9. The feather waste contains various components that can accelerate the process of decomposition, such as feces, blood, fat and soil. Each feather is histologically composed primarily of keratin proteins. Keratin structure has activity in the process of digestion and this structure can be degraded by the keratinase enzyme10. Increasing the uses of BFW could enable the presence of BFW in the environment to be reduced. Therefore, this current study aimed to reduce BFW through a process and also use of BFW as an alternative protein source for livestock.

The use of chicken feather waste for the production of a protein source has been widely studied. However, this waste has some disadvantageous properties such as low digestibility, which is associated with a large number of disulfide bonds (S-S) present in keratin. The major component of feathers is keratin, which contains a high sulfur content in its amino acids11. This type of keratin is different from the keratin comprising wool, nails and horns. Feather waste can also be an alternative source of protein especially for monogastric animals12, as well as a source of nutrients for plants13.

Broiler feather protein concentrate (BFPC) with higher digestibility could be prepared from BFW. The BFPC is considered as a good protein source in feed formulation and produced through some physical and chemical treatments. The physical treatment including the provision of pressure in a certain time provides different characteristics14. The BFPC product was identified as capable of improving the digestibility of protein components in feathers that can be utilized as feed ingredients of alternative protein sources. BFPC is a processed product produced through several processes to improve the digestibility of both ruminants and non-ruminants15. This study aimed to evaluate the In vitro protein digestibility (In-VtPD), yield and chemical composition (CC) of BFPC produced under different conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of broiler feather samples: BFW was obtained from PSHs in Daya district, Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. BFW samples (1000 g) were prepared for all treatments. The feathers were washed and dried at 60°C for 15 h. For hydrolysis treatment, 1 M HCl solution [10 and 20% (v/v)] (Merck, USA) and 1 M NaOH [10 and 20% (v/v)] were used.

Preparation and analysis of BFPC: The feather sample (50 g) was soaked in the hydrolysis solution (P1, P2, or P3) for 4 h, then heated autoclave (Olla Autoclave Electrica All American 75×) at a pressure of 21 Psi (1.24 atm) for 10 h. The hydrolyzed feather was dried using oven (Memmert) at 60°C for 24 h and ground using electrical blender (Sanyo) to produce BFPC powder. For In vitro protein digestibility (In-VtPD), the procedure was performed according to a previous study which imitated the digestive function of livestock16. In this study, In-VtPD of BFPC was performed using pepsin method. BFPC sample (1 g) was placed in a porcelain cup to determine the dry matter and the organic material. Each cup was added 25 mL of pepsin acid solution (Merck), incubated in a shaking incubator for 72 h at 50°C. Filtration was performed using crucible no 2. The crucible was dried overnight at 103°C and furnace at 520°C for 3 h. In-VtPD value was calculated by the following equation:

where, A is sample weight, B is crucible weight after oven and C is empty crucible weight. The yield was calculated using a following equation17:

Yield = A/B×100%

where, A is weight of BFPC (g), B is weight of BFW (g). For chemical composition, proximate analysis including water content Wc (%), fat content Fac (%), fiber content Fic (%) and ash content Ac (%) was performed18. pH meter was used to determine pH18.

Experimental design and statistical analysis: A completely randomized design (CRD) consisting of 4 treatments and 5 replications was used. The treatments included P0 (control/without hydrolysis), P1 [20% (w/v) 1 M NaOH+autoclaving (21 Psi)], P2 [20% (v/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi)] and P3 [10% (v/v) 1 M NaOH+10% (w/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi)]. Data were analyzed using One Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS (Version 15.0) statistical program. Significant difference between means were determine using Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT) at 5%19.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In vitro protein digestibility (In-VtPD): Digestibility represents the number of substances that can be absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract. The digestibility rate is strongly related to the quality of the feed ingredients. Fig. 1(a) displays the In-VtPD of BFPC prepared under various treatments. The results showed that the hydrolysis conditions significantly affected (p<0.01) the In-VtPD of BFPC. The P1 treatment resulted in the highest In-VtPD (59.53±0.7%), which was much higher than that of P0 (21.38±0.54%), P2 (42.81±1.01%) and P3 (45.92±0.39%). Physical treatment using autoclaving combined with NaOH can improve the In-VtPD value of BFPC compared to the control (19.20%, n = 3). The soaking process of BFW in NaOH solution enables to weaken chemical bonds in the feather. Thus, the use of heating process can improve performance of BFPC digestibility. Hydrolysis is considered as the technique to degrade sulfur bonds in cystine. In-VtPD of BFW under treatment of hydrolysis using NaOH and heating process was 59.53±0.57% (n = 3), which was lower than that of using the enzymatic hydrolysis (68-70%)20.

Yield: Figure 1(b) presents the yield of BFPC prepared under various conditions. The results showed that the application of different processes had significant effects (p<0.01) on the yield of BFPC. Hydrolysis treatment using NaOH, HCl or their combination tended to reduce yield of BFPC. The yield of BFPC under the treatment of P0 (90.8±1.23%) was higher than that of P1 (83.7±1.94%), P2 (84.5±0.74%) and P3 (80.3±1.13%). Decreased yield indicates that the production process is less efficient21.

Water content: The water content (Wc) of a food product determines its quality and storability. Therefore, the determination of Wc is very important and aids in the understanding of the proper process and distribution methods. Fig. 2(a) displays the Wc of BFPC prepared under different conditions. The results showed that the treatments strongly affected (p<0.01%) the Wc. The P2 treatment resulted in the lowest Wc (4.11±0.31%) when compared with P1 (5.83±0.53%), P3 (4.67±0.58%) and P0 (5.21±0.56%). This finding may be due to the presence of the OH- group in NaOH used as the hydrolyzing agent. When NaOH is dissolved in water, exothermic reactions occur that releases heat into the air. The accurate determination of Wc in animal feed materials is very important for the feed industry. Most of the analytical methods used to determine the clear Wc of feed ingredients are empirical. Such methods involve estimating the amount of water evaporation and weight lost during the drying process (oven drying method)22.

Protein content: The results indicated that different conditions had no significant effects on the protein content (PC) of BFPC [Fig. 2(b)]. This result indicates that the hydrolysis process had no impact on changes in the protein content of BFPC. This result also indicates that the hydrolysis process using a combination of chemical and physical processes was effective in BFPC production. The PC value of BFPC is similar to that of hair meal from Bali cattle23. Feather meal is an excellent source of amino acids with a predominant supply of cysteine24.

The PC of BFPC ranged from 89.07±6.04-91.77±3.69% (P1, P2 and P3, respectively; n = 5), which was not different from that in the control (88.53±7.15%)25.

Fig. 1(a-b): In vitro protein digestibility (In-VtPD) and Yield of BFPC prepared under different hydrolysis processes
  P0 (control/without hydrolysis), P1 (20% (w/v) 1 M NaOH+autoclaving (21 Psi), P2 (20% (v/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi) and P3 (10% (v/v) 1 M NaOH+10% (w/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi)). Different superscripts in each treatment showed very significant differences (p<0.01)

Fig. 2(a-f): Water, protein, fat, fiber, ash and pH content of BFPC prepared under different hydrolysis processes
  P0 (control/without hydrolysis), P1 [20% (w/v) 1 M NaOH+autoclaving (21 Psi)], P2 [20% (v/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi)] and P3 [10% (v/v) 1 M NaOH+10% (w/v) 1 M HCl+autoclaving (21 Psi)]. Different superscripts in each treatment showed very significant differences (p<0.01)

Feathers from livestock have potential as a source of protein in livestock feed26. Feather meal added with hydrogen peroxide (5% w/w) can increase the degradability of in situ proteins but not change the dry matter intake, average weight, feed efficiency and improved carcass characteristics27. The poultry not only requires amount of protein but also requires the intake of carbohydrates to meet energy needs for the body28. The use of NaOH in the hydrolysis process could affect the feather protein structure. NaOH is a type of alkaline solution enabling to alter the salt bridge on the protein structure. The denaturation process can occur due to the change of ions in the protein structure of the feather.

Fat content: Figure 2(c) indicates that different hydrolysis conditions strongly affected (p<0.01) the fat content (FC) of BFPC. The application of P1, P2 and P3 significantly reduced the FC by 2.79±0.56, 3.56±0.32 and 2.91±0.39%, respectively. These FC values were lower than that in P0 (5.08±0.83%). The process of fat dissolution was caused by the high temperature heating treatments and pressure using an autoclave. The average FC of BFPC was higher than that of feather meal in another study29. Fiber in acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) is regarded as difficult to digest but it is directly involved in the nutrient digestion process30. Keratin is a fiber protein that forms hair, feathers and nails and is rich in cysteine and cystine. Feather meal from poultry can be used as a protein source feed of 8% in pigs without affecting the growth performance or carcass characteristics26. The protein content of poultry meal reached 63.46% which was used as pig feed31. The NaOH compound is a chemical compound having alkaline properties resulting in a higher pH. Some protease can hydrolyze the feather waste at pH 5.5-7.032.

Fiber content: Figure 2(d) shows that fiber content of BFPC is significantly affected by different hydrolysis conditions (p<0.01). The treatments (P1, P2, P3) resulted in higher fiber content ranging from 8.42±0.93-12.74%±1.67) than P0 (1.07%±0.75). Similarly, this finding was also in accordance with a result observed in Bali cattle hair (0.002 - 0.01%)23. Fiber compound in BFPC was regarded soluble, thus it was applicable for a feed ingredient. Fiber in ADF and NDF form is difficult to digest. ADF and NDF were directly involved in the nutrient digestion process30.

Ash content: Figure 2(e) demonstrates that different hydrolysis conditions significantly affected (p<0.01) ash content of BFPC, ranging from 0.15±0.05-1.81±0.25%. P1 resulted in the highest ash content (1.81±0.25%). The results also indicated that average ash content of BFPC was lower than that of the concentrate of cattle hair23. The hydrolysis using NaOH could change minerals in BFPC into carbon-carbon bonds in the arrangement of amino acids cysteine to form keratin.

pH value: Figure 2(f) shows that different hydrolysis conditions significantly affect pH of BFPC (p<0.01). P1 resulted in the highest pH value (6.32±0.08) compared to P0 (5.40±0.27), P2 (2.90±0.12) and P3 (2.94±0.09). This presumably reflects the use of NaOH as a hydrolyzing agent.

Amino acid profile: Amino acids are protein-forming molecules. The main protein that makes up feathers in poultry is keratin. The amino acid test results showed that the amino acid profiles before and after hydrolysis were not significantly different (Fig. 3). This result shows that the hydrolysis process did not substantially change the amino acid composition of the BFPC. This finding means that the level of damage to amino acid components during the hydrolysis process can be minimized. Based on Fig. 3, it can be seen that the amino acid type of glutamic acid has the highest composition. Glutamic acid in the amino acid structure has the composition of each (14.87 and 14.46%) for BFPC without hydrolysis and with hydrolysis. Next is leucine amino acids (10.68 and 9.77%). The results of these amino acid profiles did not differ significantly with the results of previous studies. The highest levels of amino acids were glutamic acid (14.46%) and leucine (9.77%)33. Amino acid glutamic acid is one type of amino acid that can give a savory flavor to a product. This property strongly supports this product as an alternative to animal feed ingredients.

Composite compounds of BFPC: The test results on the components of the compounds that make up the BFPC show that, K2O and CaO compounds are the most dominant components in the BFPC structure (Fig. 4 and Table 1). The oxide component formed comes from the material used in the hydrolysis process. Besides that, the SO3 compound was also found in the BFPC but the value was very small. The components that make up SO3 are sulfur (S) elements which are the main elements that make up keratin proteins. Sulfur is a major component in keratin protein formation (>90%). This component is rich in hydrophobic residues and cysteine amino acids. This component has a cross link in the form of disulfide bonds34. Disulfide bond is a determinant of strength in feathers35-37.

Fig. 3: Amino acid profile of BFPC un hydrolyzed and hydrolyzed process
  Lys: Lysin, Ala: Alanine, Arg: Arginine, Asp Acid: Aspartate Acid, Cys: Cysteine, Gly: Glycine, Glu Acid: Glutamic Acid, Hys: Histidine, Iso: Isoleucine, Leu: Leucine, Met: Methionine, Phe: Phenylalanine, Pro: Proline, Ser: Serine, Thre: Threonine, Trip: Tryptophan, Tyr: Tyrosine and Val: Valine

Fig. 4: Appearance of dispersion results spectrogram showing the compounds that compose from BFPC
  Cl: Chlorine, K: Potassium, Ca: Calcium, O: Oxygen, Na: Sodium, Mg: Magnesium, Al: Aluminum, Si: Silicon, P: Phosphorus and S: Sulfur

Table 1: Composite compounds of BFPC after hydrolysis process using energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (VEGA 3 TESCAN)

The hydrolysis process was needed to improve the quality and digestibility of feather waste. Combination of chemical and physical process can be applied to hydrolyze broiler feather waste (BFW) into broiler feather protein concentrate (BFPC) as an alternative animal feed ingredient. The use of 20% (w/v) 1 M (NaOH) concentration is recommended for application in the process of hydrolysis of feather waste.

CONCLUSION

The application of different hydrolysis processes results in different attributes of BFPC. In this study, different hydrolysis conditions significantly affected the In-VtPD, yield, water content, fat content, fiber content, ash content and pH but not the protein content of BFPC. The hydrolysis process using 20% (w/v) 1 M NaOH (P1) demonstrated optimum protein digestibility with more varied chemical compositions.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study discover that the process of hydrolysis using chemical compounds (NaOH) combined with high-pressure heating (21 Psi) is very effective in increasing digestibility of feather meal from broilers. This study is very helpful for the feed industry as a source of scientific information in the production process of feather concentrate by utilizing poultry slaughterhouse waste. The very low digestibility of broiler feather waste due to keratin disulfide bonds can be increased by a combination of hydrolysis processes. This combination of processes can also maintain protein and amino acid levels as in fresh conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thanks the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia, Rector of Hasanuddin University, Institute for Research and Community Service (IRCS) of Hasanuddin University for financial support under scheme of Riset Unggulan Unhas (RUNAS).

REFERENCES

  • Riffel, A. and A. Brandelli, 2006. Keratinolytic bacteria isolated from feather waste. Braz. J. Microbiol., 37: 395-399.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Darah, I., A. Nur-diyana, S. Nurul-Husna, K. Jain and S. Lim, 2013. Microsporum fulvum IBRL SD3: As novel isolate for chicken feathers degradation. Applied Biochem. Biotechnol., 171: 1900-1910.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Martinez-Hernandez, A.L. and C. Velasco-Santos, 2012. Keratin Fibers from Chicken Feathers: Structure and Advances in Polymer Composites. In: Keratin: Structure, Properties and Applications, Dullaart, R. and J. Mousques (Eds.)., Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp: 149-211


  • Amieva, E.J.C., C. Velasco-Santos, A.L. Martinez-Hernandez, J.L. Rivera-Armenta, A.M. Mendoza-Martinez and V.M. Castano, 2014. Composites from chicken feathers quill and recycled polypropylene. J. Compos. Mater., 49: 275-283.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cao, Z.J., D. Lu, L.S. Luo, Y.X. Deng, Y.G. Bian, X.Q. Zhang and M.H. Zhou, 2012. Composition analysis and application of degradation products of whole feathers through a large scale of fermentation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 19: 2690-2696.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kazemi-Bonchenari, M., A. Alizadeh, L. Javadi, M. Zohrevand, N.E. Odongo and A.Z.M. Salem, 2017. Use of poultry pre-cooked slaughterhouse waste as ruminant feed to prevent environmental pollution. J. Cleaner Prod., 145: 151-156.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Said, M.I., S. Triatmojo, Y. Erwanto and A. Fudholi, 2011. Gelatin properties of goat skin produced by calcium hydroxide as curing material. J. Media Peternakan, 34: 184-189.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Said, M.I., E. Abustam, A.W. Wahab, Sartini and A. Hifizah, 2015. Chemical characteristics of collagen extract from scapula of Bali Cattle (Os scapula) produced using different extractant. Pak. J. Nutr., 14: 174-179.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Said, M.I., Y. Erwanto and E. Abustam, 2016. Properties of edible film produced using combination of collagen extracts of bligon goatskin with glycerol. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci., 11: 151-159.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gopinath, S.C.B., P. Anbu, T. Lakshmipriya, T.H. Tang and Y. Chen et al., 2015. Biotechnological aspects and perspective of microbial keratinase production. BioMed Res. Int., Vol. 2015.
    CrossRef    


  • Pruekvimolphan, S. and R.R. Grummer, 2001. Lactation responses to sulfur-containing amino acids from feather meal or rumen-protected methionine. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2515-2522.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hasni, M.S., H.A. Sahito, M.A. Memon, M.I. Sanjrani, M.A. Gopang and N.A. Soomro, 2014. Effect of feeding various levels of feather meal as a replacement of fish meal on the growth of broiler. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res., 3: 505-511.
    Direct Link    


  • Zheljazkov, V.D., 2005. Assessment of wool waste and hair waste as soil amendment and nutrient source. J. Environ. Qual., 34: 2310-2317.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Moritz, J.S. and J.D. Latshaw, 2001. Indicators of nutritional value of hydrolyzed feather meal. Poult. Sci., 80: 79-86.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Scholljegerdes, E.J., P.A. Ludden and B.W. Hess, 2005. Effect of restricted forage intake on ruminal disappearance of bromegrass hay and a blood meal, feather meal and fish meal supplement. J. Anim. Sci., 83: 2146-2150.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Moyano, F.J., M.A.S. de Rodriganez, M. Diaz and A.G. Tacon, 2015. Application of in vitro digestibility methods in aquaculture: Constraints and perspectives. Rev. Aquacult., 7: 223-242.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gimenez, B., M.C. Gomez-Guillen and P. Montero, 2005. Storage of dried fish skins on quality characteristics of extracted gelatin. Food Hydrocolloids, 19: 958-963.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • AOAC. International, 1997. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th Edn., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD


  • Steel, R.D.G. and J.A. Torrie, 1991. Principle and Procedure of Statistics. 2nd Edn., International Book Company, Tokyo


  • Eaksuree, W., A. Prachayakitti, T. Upathanpreecha, R. Taharnklaew, S. Nitisinprasert and S. Keawsompong, 2016. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals. SpringerPlus, Vol. 5.
    CrossRef    


  • Kolodziejska, I., E. Skierka, M. Sadowska, W. Kolodziejski and C. Niecikowska, 2008. Effect of extracting time and temperature on yield of gelatin from different fish offal. Food Chem., 107: 700-706.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Thiex, N. and C.R. Richardson, 2003. Challenges in measuring moisture content of feeds. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 3255-3266.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Said, M.I., F.N. Yuliati, M.Z. Mide, W. Pakiding and M. Sidik, 2016. Chemical characteristics and macrostructure of hair concentrates of Bali Cattle produced from waste of skin crackers industry. Am.-Eurasian J. Sustainable Agric., 10: 32-38.
    Direct Link    


  • Klemesrud, M.J., T.J. Klopfenstein and A.J. Lewis, 2000. Evaluation of feather meal as a source of sulfur amino acids for growing steers. J. Anim. Sci., 78: 207-215.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Umar, A., 2017. Pengaruh kombinasi proses perendaman dan pengukusan terhadap sifat kimia tepung bulu ayam ras pedaging (Broiler). Skripsi, Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar.


  • Van Heugten, E. and T.A.T.G. van Kempen, 2002. Growth performance, carcass characteristics, nutrient digestibility and fecal odorous compounds in growing-finishing pigs fed diets containing hydrolyzed feather meal. J. Anim Sci., 80: 171-178.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Loest, C.A., E.C. Titgemeyer, J.S. Drouillard, C.M. Coetzer, R.D. Hunter, D.J. Bindel and B.D. Lambert, 2002. Supplemental betaine and peroxide-treated feather meal for finishing cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 2234-2240.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yasar, S., M.S. Gok and Y. Gurbuz, 2016. Performance of broilers fed raw or fermented and redried wheat, barley and oat grains. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 40: 313-322.
    Direct Link    


  • Zerdani, I., M. Faid and A. Malki, 2004. Feather wastes digestion by new isolated strains Bacillus sp. in Morocco. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 3: 67-70.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Keegan, T.P., J.M. DeRouchey, J.L. Nelssen, M.D. Tokach, R.D. Goodband and S.S. Dritz, 2004. The effects of poultry meal source and ash level on nursery pig performance. J. Anim. Sci., 82: 2750-2756.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liu, J., C. Bai, L. Yan, S. Chen, Y. Zhang and H. Yang, 2014. Nutritional value evaluation of Saccharum spontaneum L. germplasm resources. Agric. Sci. Technol., 15: 1981-1986.
    Direct Link    


  • Pedersen, M.B., S. Yu, P. Plumstead and S. Dalsgaard, 2012. Comparison of four feed proteases for improvement of nutritive value of poultry feather meal. J. Anim. Sci., 90: 350-352.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Said, M.I., E. Abustam, F.N. Yuliati and M.Z. Mide, 2018. Characteristics of feather protein concentrates hydrolyzed using Bacillus subtilis FNCC 0059. OnLine J. Biol. Sci., 18: 138-146.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dou, Y., X. Huang, B. Zhang, M. He, G. Yin and Y. Cui, 2015. Preparation and characterization of a dialdehyde starch crosslinked feather keratin film for food packaging application. RSC Adv., 5: 27168-27174.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Garrido, T., I. Leceta, K. de la Caba and P. Guerrero, 2018. Chicken feathers as a natural source of sulphur to develop sustainable protein films with enhanced properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 106: 523-531.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kim, W.K. and P.H. Patterson, 2003. In situ evaluation of hen mortality meal as a protein supplement for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 3337-3342.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kim, W.K. and P.H. Patterson, 2000. Nutritional value of enzyme- or sodium hydroxide-treated feathers from dead hens. Poult. Sci., 79: 528-534.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved