HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Poultry Science

Year: 2010 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 12 | Page No.: 1087-1091
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.1087.1091
Presence of Males Within Laying Hens Affects Tonic Immobility Response and Sociality
Khaled Ghareeb

Abstract: Fear can be a damaging factor, resulting in poor production and impaired animal welfare. Often fear reactions are elicited in situations that are in some way related to predator defense. As males have a guarding role, mixing the sexes might be a way of reducing fear in flocks of laying hens. Tonic Immobility (TI) is anti-predator behaviours shown by poultry and has been used in behavioural studies to measure the level of fear or stress. A runway test was used in many studies to measure level of sociality in poultry. The effect of males on duration of TI and sociality in female laying hens was studied. ISA Brown and Lohmann Tradition lines were used in each treatment. The treatments were: 1- Female hens and males mixed in a ratio of 1 male to 10 females; 2- All female hens. The presence of males had an effect (p<0.05) on TI-duration and Emergence Time (ET) and Social Reinstatement Time (SRT); females in the mixed-sex groups had shorter TI-duration and showed shorter latency to emerge from the start box and quicker to reinstate with a companion bird than females in the all-female groups. These results indicate that female laying hens show less signs of fear and higher level of sociality if the flock contains males.

Fulltext PDF

How to cite this article
Khaled Ghareeb , 2010. Presence of Males Within Laying Hens Affects Tonic Immobility Response and Sociality. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 1087-1091.

Keywords: Fear, hens, males, rearing and sociality

REFERENCES
  • Bilcik, B., L.J. Keeling and R.C. Newberry, 1998. Effect of group size on tonic immobility in laying hens. Behav. Proces., 43: 53-59.
    CrossRef    

  • Bizeray, D., I. Estevez, C. Leterrier and J.M. Faure, 2002. Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poult. Sci., 81: 767-773.
    Direct Link    

  • Campo, J.L. and S.G. Davila, 2002. Influence of mating ratio and group size on indicators of fearfulness and stress of hens and cocks. Poult. Sci., 81: 1099-1103.
    Direct Link    

  • Cornetto, T., I. Estevez and L.W. Douglass, 2002. Using artificial cover to reduce aggression and disturbances in domestic fowl. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 75: 325-336.

  • Cunningham, D.L., A. Tienhoven and G. Gvaryahu, 1988. Population size, cage area and dominance rank effects on productivity and well-being of laying hens. Poult. Sci., 67: 399-406.
    PubMed    

  • Duncan, I.J.H.S., 1985. How do fearful birds respond. Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, (WPSA'85), Worlds Poultry Science Association (WPSA), pp: 96-106.

  • Gallup, G.G., 1977. Tonic immobility: The role of fear and predation. Psychol. Record, 27: 316-317.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • Ghareeb, K., K. Niebuhr, W.A. Awad, S. Waiblinger and J. Troxler, 2008. Stability of fear and sociality in two strains of laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci., 49: 502-508.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • Hocking, P.M., C.E. Channing, D. Waddington and R.B. Jones, 2001. Age-related changes in fear, sociality and pecking behaviours in two strains of laying hen. Br. Poult. Sci., 42: 414-423.
    PubMed    

  • Johnson, R.A., 1963. Habitat preference and behaviour of breeding jungle fowl in Central Western Thailand. Wilson Bull., 75: 270-272.
    Direct Link    

  • Jones, R.B., 1989. Chronic stressors, tonic immobility and leucocytic responses in the domestic fowl. Physiol. Behav., 46: 439-442.
    CrossRef    PubMed    

  • Jones, R.B., 1986. The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl: A review. Worlds Poult. Sci. Assoc. J., 42: 82-96.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • Jones, R.B., 1996. Fear and adaptability in poultry: Insights, implications and imperatives. World's Poult. Sci. J., 52: 131-174.
    CrossRef    

  • Jones, R.B., G. Beuving and H.J. Blokhuis, 1988. Tonic immobility and the heterophil/lymphocyte responses of the domestic fowl to corticosterone infusion. Physiol. Behav., 42: 249-253.

  • McBride, G., J. Parer and F. Foenander, 1969. The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. Monography, 2: 127-181.

  • Mills, D.S. and C.J. Nicol, 1990. Tonic immobility in spent hens after catching and transport. Vet. Record, 126: 201-212.
    Direct Link    

  • Nash, R.F. and G.G. Gallup Jr., 1976. Habituation and tonic immobility in domestic chickens. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 90: 870-876.
    PubMed    

  • Newberry, R.C., 1995. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 44: 229-243.
    Direct Link    

  • Oden, K., 1996. Agonistic behaviour and social tension in groups of domestic hens in different environments. Report to The National Board of Agriculture, pp: 10 (In Swedish).

  • Riedstraa, B. and T.G.G. Groothuis, 2002. Early feather pecking as a form of social exploration: The effect of group stability on feather pecking and tonic mobility in domestic chicks. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 77: 127-138.
    Direct Link    

  • Scott, G.B., B.J. Connell and N.R. Lambe, 1998. The fear levels after transport of hens from cages and a free-range system. Poult. Sci., 77: 62-66.
    PubMed    

  • Suarez, S.D. and G.G. Gallup Jr., 1983. Emotionality and fear in birds: A selected review and reinterpretation. Bird Behav., 5: 22-30.
    Direct Link    

  • Sullivan, M.S., 1991. Individual and social behaviour of red jungle fowl. J. World Pheasant Assoc., 15-16: 57-72.

  • Thompson, R.K.R. and M. Liebreich, 1987. Adult chicken alarm calls enhance tonic immobility in chicks. Behav. Processes, 14: 49-61.
    CrossRef    

    • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved