HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Plant Pathology

Year: 2011 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 15-25
DOI: 10.3923/ijpp.2011.15.25
Survey on Incidences and Severity of Rice Yellow Mottle Virus Disease in Eastern Uganda
Dennis Ochola and Geoffrey Tusiime

Abstract: The present study was conducted to assess the incidences and severities of Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) disease in Eastern Uganda. In September 2009, a field survey was conducted in 11 rice-growing districts by randomly selecting rice fields along main roads and occasionally on feeder roads. Symptoms assessment and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) were used as tools of disease diagnosis. The collected 49 samples showed a strong positive reaction with polyclonal antiserum raised against an S4 isolate from Madagascar. Narrow serological and biological variability among samples confirmed that the S4 strain was prevalent in all surveyed lowland rice-growing districts. Disease incidence and severity were high with mean values of 72% and 2.3 respectively but did not vary significantly (p = 0.05) among districts, varieties, altitudes and cultivation ecologies. Bugiri recorded the highest disease incidence (80%) and severity (2.5) respectively, while Namutumba had the lowest incidence (62%) and severity (2.1), respectively. Moreover, disease was most severe in districts closest to the Lake Victoria Basin. The farmer-preferred varieties showed varying degrees of susceptibility. The highest levels of disease occurred in variety K5, whereas the variety K85 had the lowest levels of disease. The results indicate that the continuous cultivation of susceptible varieties has lent impetus for the widespread of a highly infectious RYMV strain in Eastern Uganda. Plant breeders should provide significant agronomical protection against adverse effects of the virus by identification of different sources of durable resistance genes to be pyramided into the farmer preferred lowland varieties that possess good culinary traits.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Dennis Ochola and Geoffrey Tusiime, 2011. Survey on Incidences and Severity of Rice Yellow Mottle Virus Disease in Eastern Uganda. International Journal of Plant Pathology, 2: 15-25.

Keywords: farmer-preferred varieties, lake victoria basin, durable resistance, agronomic protection and Degrees of susceptibility

INTRODUCTION

Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) an emergent virus in Africa is a major rice health constraint endemic to the continent (Abo et al., 1998; Fargette et al., 2002; Banwo et al., 2004). RYMV was first detected 45 years ago in Otonglo near Kisumu along the shore of the Kivorondo Gulf of Lake Victoria (Abo et al., 2000). Ever since then, this notorious disease has spread to all major rice growing zones of sub-Saharan Africa and to the neighboring Islands of Zanzibar and Madagascar (Banwo, 2002; Reckhaus and Adriamasintseheno, 1997). Outbreaks causing variable yield losses have been reported in irrigated lowland and water swamped rice production systems (Traore et al., 2001). Reductions in yield ranging from 58-68% were reported in the Republic of Niger; 54-97% in Sierra Leone; 20-45% in Burkina Faso; 64-100% in Mali; 67-84% in Cotè d’ Ivoire; 25-100% in Tanzania (Taylor et al., 1990; Sere, 1991; Sy et al., 1993; Luzi-Kihupi et al., 2000; Kouassi et al., 2005). A notable example was the devastating epidemic in Marovoay and Lake Aloatra, Madagascar (Reckhaus and Randrianangaly, 1990) and in Zamfara State, Nigeria (Alegbejo et al., 2001) that resulted in rice farmers abandoning their fields for cattle grazing. Abundant evidence suggests that in an attempt to increase rice production, cultivation practices encouraged creation of conditions that favored the widespread of RYMV and its vectors, while restricting opportunities necessary for mutual adaptations (Fargette et al., 2006). Just recently, Pinel-Galzi et al. (2006) produced the first report of the occurrence of RYMV in Uganda. It is most likely that the disease was present in the country for a number of years being confused with nitrogen deficiency. However, because no quantifiable information is readily available on the incidence and severity of the virus, there is a wide knowledge gap of its epidemiology and transmission among researchers, extension officers and farmers in Uganda, yet such information is a necessity for management approaches for the disease to be developed. This study aimed at generating some of such fundamental information, like the prevalence, severity and incidence of RYMV in Eastern Uganda.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field survey: A field survey was conducted in September and October 2009 covering 11 rice-growing districts in Uganda, namely Butaleja, Mbale, Budaka, Pallisa, Namutumba, Iganga, Mayuge, Bugiri, Bukedea, Soroti and Lira (Fig. 1). The criteria for selection of districts was based on emerging reports of the persistent yellowing and stunting in rice fields that were irreversible by the application of nitrogen fertilizers. Rice fields were randomly selected in each rice-growing area along main roads and occasionally on feeder roads. Fifteen plants were randomly sampled per rice field in a two-way diagonal pattern.

Fig. 1: Map of Uganda showing surveyed districts in Eastern Uganda

Fig. 2: Field and Screen house evaluation scales of rice yellow mottle virus developed based on the reaction of the virus on susceptible variety IR64. Modification of evaluation scale by Raymundo et al. (1979); †† Modification of the evaluation scale by John and Thottappilly (1987)

However, fields with young transplanted rice plants and those with re-growths were most preferred, since they facilitated clear identification of RYMV infected plants. Disease incidence was assessed as a visual estimate of the percentage coverage of plants infected in each field. Disease severity was assessed using a modification of an earlier scale by Raymundo et al. (1979). The modification was done by the addition of intermediate scores to capture a wider magnitude of disease presence, so that 0 = 0% (no infection); 1 = less than 5%; 1.5 = 6-25%; 2 = 26-75%; 2.5 = 76-95%; 3 = 96-100% (Fig. 2). The altitudes, longitudes and latitudes were recorded for each sampled field using the GPS handset, Geko® 301 Personal Navigator (Garmin International Inc., Olathe, Kansas, USA). The collected data were used to generate a map of sampled points by interpolating the surface from GPS points and the associated field severity data using the inverse distance, from which mean values were calculated for all factors measured for each field and rice growing area using ARC-VIEW 3.3®.

Serological detection and infectivity of rice yellow mottle virus: Double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) (Clark and Adams, 1977) was used to test for the presence of RYMV in 49 leaf samples collected from Eastern Uganda. A polyclonal antiserum produced against a Madagascan S4 isolate was used as the primary antibody in this study. A Benchmark® microplate reader (BIO-RAD Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA) measured the optical density (A405 nm) after a substrate hydrolysis for 1, 12 (overnight) and 24 h. Samples considered positive were those with optical density values greater than twice the value for the healthy control. Positive ELISA reactions were classified as weak (+), intermediate (++), strong (+++) and very strong (++++). Regeneration of RYMV from leaf samples was conducted to propagate and ascertain the infectivity of each isolate on the highly susceptible cultivar IR64. Seeds of IR64 were soaked in water for 24 h and incubated for 48 h at room temperature (25°C) to facilitate sprouting. Three pre-sprouted seeds were sowed in 40 cm diameter buckets. Two weeks later, inoculum was prepared by squashing 1 g of finely sliced infected leaf tissue in a drop of double distilled water using sterile mortars and pestles prior to dilution with 10 mL of double distilled water. The resulting homogenate was filtered with cheesecloth and preserved at 4°C in a refrigerator. Mechanical inoculation was done using the finger-rub technique (Raymundo et al., 1979). During this process, pieces of cotton wool were dipped in inoculum mixed with fine sand and subsequently rubbed onto leaves ensuring maximum wetting and formation of mild bruises that would act as infection passageways. Appearance of symptoms was monitored from 7 to 20 days post inoculation (dpi) using the scale 0-9 modified from John and Thottappilly (1987).

Data analysis: Based on the data collected during the survey, variance and mean comparisons of disease severity scores and percentage incidence were performed. The effects of type of rice variety, cultivation environment and elevation on the observed disease severities and incidence were analyzed using GENSTAT 13 statistical software (VSN International, UK).

RESULTS

Virus incidence and severity in Eastern Uganda: Forty-nine rice fields in the altitude ranges 1083-1154 meters above sea level (m.a.s.l) were surveyed in 11 rice-growing districts in 2009. Rice yellow mottle virus was present in all rice fields surveyed in Butaleja, Mbale, Budaka, Pallisa, Namutumba, Iganga, Mayuge, Bugiri, Bukedea, Soroti and Lira (Table 1). Disease incidence and severity were high with mean values of 72% and 2.3, respectively but did not vary significantly (p = 0.05) among districts, varieties, altitudes and cultivation environments. The highest incidences were registered in Bugiri (80%) followed by Mayuge and Pallisa with 78 and 76% respectively. On the other hand, the lowest incidences occurred in Soroti (69%), Lira (66%) and least in Namutumba (62%). Moderate to severe symptoms were prevalent in sampled rice fields ranging between 2.1 and 2.5 in each district. Moreover, disease was most severe in districts closest to the Lake Victoria Basin, namely Bugiri and Mayuge (Table 1). Differences in cultivation environment between irrigated and rainfed lowland fields did not significantly influence disease incidence and severity (Table 2). The farmer-preferred varieties showed varying degrees of susceptibility. The highest incidence of disease occurred in variety K5, whereas the variety K85 had the lowest incidence (Table 3).

Table 1: Altitude, severity and incidence of rice yellow mottle virus disease in eleven districts of Eastern Uganda surveyed in 2009
ns: Not significant, * m.a.s.l: Meters above sea-level

Table 2: Effect of rice ecology on severity and incidence of rice yellow mottle virus
ns: Not significant

Table 3: Effect of rice variety on severity and incidence of rice yellow mottle virus
ns: Not significant

Fig. 3: Narrow variability of optical density readings of 49 rice yellow mottle virus isolates recorded after 1, 12 (overnight) and 24 h of substrate hydrolysis

Disease severities in the range 2.3 to 2.4 revealed the absence of resistance among the encountered varieties in the surveyed districts (Table 3). This result indicates that the continuous cultivation of susceptible varieties has lent impetus for the widespread of this highly infectious viral disease in Eastern Uganda.

Serological detection and infectivity of rice yellow mottle virus: All leaf samples collected during the survey showed a strong positive reaction with polyclonal antiserum raised against an S4 isolate from Madagascar. Narrow serological variability in Optical Density (OD) readings among isolates (Fig. 3) confirmed that the S4 strain was prevalent in all surveyed lowland rice-growing districts. The isolate Ug 20 originating from Pallisa had the highest OD reading of 1.83 while Ug 30 from Mayuge had the lowest OD of 1.37 after 1 h substrate hydrolysis.

Fig. 4: Variations in percentage infectivity of susceptible variety IR64 by 49 rice yellow mottle virus isolates from Eastern Uganda

Fig. 5: Percentage infectivity of susceptible variety IR64 by 49 isolates averaged according to their districts of origin in Eastern Uganda

However, no significant differences in OD readings were observed after 12 h (Overnight) and 24 h substrate hydrolysis (Fig. 3). Biological tests of infectivity of the highly susceptible check IR64 by 49 isolates was characterized by early disease initiation between 7 to 10 dpi, rapid disease development and highest mean disease severities. However, it did not reveal significant differences (p = 0.05) in the capability of 49 isolates to induce disease on the highly susceptible cultivar IR64 which supports the possible lack of pathotype variability among the existent S4 strains in Eastern Uganda. Variations in the levels of isolate aggressiveness ranging between 64 and 100% were observed. The most aggressive isolates, namely Ug 7, Ug 12, Ug 15, Ug 19, Ug 38 and Ug 48 led to high mortality of IR64 plants (Fig. 4). After virus regeneration and maintenance on rice cultivar IR64, an assessment of aggressiveness of isolates by district of origin showed that the most aggressive isolates originated from the districts of Iganga (90%) and Bukedea (98%) (Fig. 5).

DISCUSSION

The serological detection of Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) in the 49 collected field samples revealed a narrow variability in absorbance readings among isolates and confirmed that S4 strains were prevalent in Eastern Uganda. This is consistent with an earlier report by Pinel-Galzi et al. (2006) who found four samples collected from a subsistence rice field northeast of Lake Victoria in Uganda to contain isolates of the East African S4, a strain which is also found in Madagascar, Kenya and Tanzania. However, since all isolates were serologically the same, our results seemed to contradict the findings of Sere et al. (2007) who asserted that isolates emanating from the same locality, field or host were serologically different. Biological tests did not reveal significant differences in the capability of 49 isolates to induce disease on the highly susceptible cultivar IR64. Thus, suggesting a narrow serological and biological variability of the existent S4 strain in Eastern Uganda. This result supports the finding by Traore et al. (2005) who noted that strain distribution was not linked to pathogeny, host species or agroecology. However, it contradicted the view that biological tests of RYMV were more sensitive than serological detection of the virus by Traore et al. (2008). Nevertheless, Onasanya et al. (2006) asserts that as isolate populations increase in the future, there is a probability for pathotypes to interact leading to the emergence of new highly virulent strains. Fortunately, our results indicated limited pathotype variability among Eastern Uganda strains. Notwithstanding, plant viruses are a salient biotic constraint causing serious productivity losses of a wide range of economically important crops worldwide (Bhyan et al., 2007) to be taken lightly. The potential impact of RYMV disease on the rice industry in Uganda was reflected by its occurrence in the 11 surveyed rice-growing districts in Eastern Uganda. This represents the capability of this emergent plant virus to cause serious epidemics in irrigated lowland and water swamped rice production systems across the region (Traore et al., 2001; Fargette et al., 2006). This study shows that the highest disease incidences and severities occurred in the districts of Mayuge and Bugiri which are located on the periphery of the Lake Victoria Basin. Based on the analysis of historical precedents of rice cultivation in Uganda by Wilfred (2006), the establishment of large-scale rice schemes in Eastern Uganda circa 1960 was indeed contemporaneous with the first detection of RYMV in Western Kenya along the shores of the Kavirondo Gulf of Lake Victoria (Banwo et al., 2004; Fargette et al., 2006). Due to the close proximity of Eastern Uganda to Western Kenya, there is consistent indication that the virus was present in the northeastern plains of Lake Victoria in Uganda, where it survived on wild grass hosts until when changes in rice cultivation practices created conditions that favored its spread (Pinel-Galzi et al., 2006; Sere et al., 2008). This observation is reconcilable with earlier and recent reports that natural sources of virus infection for the spread of the disease to rice crops were present in a few water-dependent wild grasses, such as Echinocloa colona and Panicum repens (Abo et al., 2000; Nwilene et al., 2009). The intensive usage of irrigation in rice cultivation is implicated to have enhanced growth and continuity of a wide range of weeds that acted as alternative hosts and reservoirs from which the viral inoculum spreads to healthy rice crops (Konate et al., 1997; Traore et al., 2009). For this reason, our study had anticipated higher disease incidences in irrigated rather than in rainfed lowlands fields, for the most part because high humidity of soils is associated with high incidences of several virus diseases (Pourrahim et al., 2007). Unfortunately, our findings indicated that differences in source of water required for rice cultivation (irrigated or rainfed) did not significantly influence disease incidence and severity in the lowlands of Eastern Uganda. However, the results indicated the absence of resistant varieties as the proximate cause for the widespread of RYMV disease in the surveyed districts. All the encountered farmer-preferred varieties, namely K5, K85 and Supa were unable to withstand the incursion by isolates of the virus found in the different districts. This supports findings of Abo et al. (1998) implicating the introduction of more vulnerable new varieties from Asia with the erosion of several advantages associated with heterogeneity of traditional landraces in restricting the spread of virus diseases. It is likely that earlier forms of rice culture practiced in Eastern Uganda achieved great levels of stability against RYMV by the direct sowing of a mixture of traditional landraces such as Cakala, Matama, Kawemba, Kigaire and Seena in the same field (Wilfred, 2006). RYMV vectorial transmission is notably by leaf feeding beetles belonging to the Chrysomelidae family (Banwo et al., 2001). Yet, in view of the prevailing number of beetles, short retention time of the virus within its vectors and the absence of seed-borne transmission, there is a need to elucidate modes of transmission that must have facilitated the East-North dispersal of RYMV across Uganda (Konate et al., 2001). Therefore, this study asserts that farmers’ operations readily contributed to the widespread of the virus in Eastern Uganda. Among the cropping practices that have facilitated the build-up of the virus inoculum and the perpetuation of RYMV disease in the surveyed districts is the incorporation of rice stubble back into soil during land preparation. This observation is in consonant with earlier reports by Reckhaus and Andriamasintseheno (2001) and Traore et al. (2008). The latter authors associated this practice with the release of large inoculum supply that contaminates soil and provides the initial foci of infection in succeeding crops especially if the stubble was heavily infected. Apparently, survival and regeneration of stubble after harvest is facilitated by the abundance of irrigation water (Abo et al., 2000). During this present study, we also noticed that farmers grazed their livestock, particularly cattle on rice regenerated from infected stubble during the off-season. Moreover, Sarra (2005) reported that as livestock graze from field-to-field, viral inoculum was transferred from infected fields to the neighboring uninfected fields, thus further perpetuating the disease. In addition, Sarra and Peters (2003) reiterated that the number of infected plants increases 5-to-10 fold whenever animals have access to plots with infected plants. Furthermore, Ugandan rice farmers frequently use overage-etiolated seedlings which they trimmed to half the normal length prior to transplanting. The cultural practice of trimming overage rice seedlings with contaminated farm implements was implicated by Tsuboi et al. (1995) to transfer virus inoculum to healthy seedlings (Abo et al., 2000). Apparently, together with bruises caused to root tissues in the process of uprooting seedling from seedbeds, such injuries act as avenues for primary infection by inoculum present in contaminated soils (Traore et al., 2006). For this reason, this study presents the likelihood for transplantation of infected seedlings as the most efficient means of mechanical dissemination of the virus, responsible for its widespread in rice-growing areas of Eastern Uganda.

CONCLUSION

Prior to this study, there was no available data on the incidences and severity of RYMV in Uganda. We have provided plausible evidence that a highly infectious S4 strain has spread beyond its renowned hotspots in Butaleja to as far as the northwestern districts of Lira and Soroti. The introduction of irrigated rice cultivation practices coupled with the adoption of susceptible varieties and a drift from direct seeding in favor of transplantation of seedlings must have increased the importance of this hitherto minor virus into a continental problem. In particular, there is a consistent indication that the continuous cultivation of susceptible varieties in the surveyed rice-growing districts has lent impetus for the widespread of RYMV disease in Eastern Uganda. In this respect, breeding of rice varieties with durable resistance is recommended as a main component of an integrated pest management system for controlling RYMV spread in rice fields. Therefore, the onus is on plant breeders to provide significant agronomical protection against adverse effects of disease throughout the commercial life of the cultivar. However, in view of the narrow genetic base of the available rice germplasm in Uganda, there is an urgent need for the identification of different sources of durable resistance genes to be pyramided into the farmer preferred lowland varieties that possess good culinary traits. A potentially useful breeding strategy should employ a combination of RYMV strains with different levels of aggressiveness that will exert sufficient prerelease challenge to avoid the future breakdown of then deployed resistant cultivars.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Special thanks to R. Edema for the logistical assistance during the field surveys; Mr. R. Obonyo for the serological work; and Mr. N. Anguzu for maintenance of infectivity experiment.

REFERENCES

  • Abo, M.E., A.A. Sy and M.D. Alegbejo, 1998. Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) in Africa: Evolution, distribution, economic significance on sustainable rice production and management strategies. J. Sustainable Agric., 11: 85-111.
    Direct Link    


  • Abo, M.E., M.D. Alegbejo, A.A. Sy and S.M. Misari, 2000. An overview of the mode of transmission, host plants and methods of detection of Rice yellow mottle virus. J. Sustain. Agric., 17: 19-36.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Alegbejo, M.D., B.A. Raja and I.U. Abubaker, 2001. Report on an outbreak of rice yellow mottle sobemovirus in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.


  • Banwo, O.O. and R.H. Makundi, 2001. Newly recorded species of Chaetocnema, vector of Rice yellow mottle virus in Tanzania. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci., 29: 61-65.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Banwo, O.O., 2002. Vector identity, bionomics and molecular characterization of rice yellow mottle virus in Tanzania. Ph.D. Thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.


  • Banwo, O.O., M.D. Alegbejo and M.E. Abo, 2004. Rice yellow mottle virus genus Sobemovirus: A continental problem in Africa. Plant Prot. Sci., 39: 26-36.
    Direct Link    


  • Bhyan, S.B., M.A.H. Chowdhury, M.M. Alam and M.S. Ali, 2007. Incidence and severity of tomato yellow leaf curl virus under phytopesticidal management. Int. J. Agric. Res., 2: 590-598.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Clark, M.F. and A.N. Adams, 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol., 34: 475-483.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Fargette, D., A. Pinel, H. Halimi, C. Brugidou, C. Fauquet and M. Van Regenmortel, 2002. Comparison of molecular and immunological typing of the isolates of rice yellow mottle virus. Arch. Virol., 147: 583-596.
    Direct Link    


  • Fargette, D., G. Konate, C. Fauquet, E. Muller, M. Peterschmitt and J.M. Thresh, 2006. Molecular ecology and emergence of tropical plant viruses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 44: 235-260.
    Direct Link    


  • John, V.T. and G. Thottappilly, 1987. A scoring system for Rice yellow mottle virus disease. Int. Rice Res. Newslett., 12: 26-26.
    Direct Link    


  • Konate, G., O. Traore and M.M. Coulibaly, 1997. Characterization of rice yellow mottle virus isolates in Sudano-Sahelian area. Arch. Virol., 142: 117-124.
    PubMed    


  • Kouassi, N.K., P. N'Guessan, L. Albar, C.M. Fauquet and C. Brugidou, 2005. Distribution and characterization of Rice yellow mottle virus: A threat to African farmers. Plant Dis., 89: 124-132.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Luzi-Kihupi, A., M.R.S. Mlozi, R.B. Mabagala, D.M.K. Mushobozy and S. Msolla-Nchimbi, 2000. Occurrence of rice yellow mottle virus in Tanzania. Tanzania J. Agric. Sci, 3: 87-96.


  • Nwilene, F.E., A.K. Traore, A.N. Asidi, Y. Sere, A. Onasanya and M.E. Abo, 2009. New records of insect vectors of Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) in Cote d'Ivoire, West Africa. J. Entomol., 6: 189-197.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Onasanya, A., Y. Sere, M. Sie, K. Akator, M. M. Coulibaly and A. Hamadoun, 2006. Existence of two pathotypes of rice yellow mottle virus, genus Sobemovirus, in Mali. Plant Pathol. J., 5: 368-372.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wilfred, O.R., 2006. Japan International Cooperation Agency, (JICA) in collaboration with sasakawa africa association uganda. Final Survey Report On The Status of Rice Production. Processing and Marketing in Uganda. http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/bunya/agriculture/pdf/uganda_report.pdf.


  • Pourrahim, R., S. Farzadfar, A.R. Golnaraghi and A. Ahoonmanesh, 2007. Incidence and distributions of Grapevine fanleaf virus in North-East of Iran. Plant Pathol. J., 6: 254-259.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Raymundo, S.A., I.W. Buddenhagen, S.N. Fomba, and D.T. Akibo-Betts, 1979. Recent advances in knowledge of rice viruses and resistance to beetle-transmitted mottle of rice in West Africa. Proceedings of 6th Seminar on Rice Breeding and Varietal Improvement, (RBVI'79), ADRAO, Monrovia, Liberia, pp: 203-212.


  • Reckhaus, P.M. and H.E. Andriamasintseheno, 1997. Rice yellow mottle virus in Madagascar and its epidemiology in the Northwest of the Island. J. Plant Dis. Protect., 104: 289-295.
    Direct Link    


  • Reckhaus, P.M. and S. Randrianangaly, 1990. Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) on rice in Madagascar. Int. Rice Res. Newslett., 15: 30-30.


  • Reckhaus, P.M. and H.F. Andriamasintseheno, 2001. Development of Integrated Pest Management Strategy to Fight Rice yellow mottle virus and Constraints to its Implementation in Madagascar. In: Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV), Economic Importance, Diagnosis and Management Strategies, Sy, A.A., J. Hughes and A. Diallo (Eds.). West Africa Rice Development Association, Bouake, pp: 232-236


  • Sarra, S. and D. Peters, 2003. Rice yellow mottle virus is transmitted by cows, donkeys and grass rats in irrigated rice crops. Plant Dis., 87: 804-808.
    Direct Link    


  • Sarra, S., 2005. Novel insights in the transmission of Rice yellow mottle virus in irrigated rice. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.


  • Sere, Y., 1991. Phytopathology of rice-synthesis of activities 1990. Report of Activities of the Rice Program, Doc. Roneot. INERA, Ouagadougou, pp: 72-97.


  • Sere, Y., A. Onasanya, K. Akator, A. Afolabi and M.E. Abo, 2007. Serological differentiation indices and phylogenetic analysis ofRice yellow mottle virus isolates in cote d`Ivoire. J. Boil. Sci., 7: 1147-1154.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sere, Y., A. Onasanya, F.E. Nwilene, M.E. Abo and K. Akator, 2008. Potential of insect vector screening method for development of durable resistant cultivars to rice yellow mottle virus disease. Int. J. Virol., 4: 41-47.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sy, A.A., K. Aluri and K. Akator, 1993. Selection of RYMV resistant and estimation of RYMV induce yeld loss under natural and artificial pressure. WARDA Annual Report 1993, pp: 44-45.


  • Taylor, D.R., A.S. Fofie and M. Suma, 1990. Natural infection of rice yellow mottle virus disease (RYMV) on rice in Sierra Leone. Int. Rice Res. Newslett., 15: 19-19.
    Direct Link    


  • Traore, O., A. Pinel, D. Fargette and G. Konate, 2001. First report and characterisation of rice yellow mottle virus in Central Africa. Plant Dis., 85: 920.1-920.1.
    Direct Link    


  • Traore, O., F. Sorho, A. Pinel, Z. Abubakar and O. Banwo et al., 2005. Process of diversiofication and dispersion of rice yellow mottle virus inferred from large-scale and high-resolution phylogeographical studies. Mol. Ecol., 14: 2097-2110.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Traore, O., A. Pinel, E. Hebrard, M.Y.D. Gumedzoe, D. Fargette, A.S. Traore and G. Konate, 2006. Occurrence of resistance-breaking isolates of rice yellow mottle virus in West and central Africa. Plant Dis., 90: 259-263.
    Direct Link    


  • Traore, M.D., V.S.E. Traore, A. Galzi-Pinel, D. Fargette, G. Konate, A.S. Traore and O. Traore, 2008. Abiotic transmission of Rice yellow mottle virus through soil and contact between plants. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 11: 900-904.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Traore, O., A. Pinel-Galzi, F. Sorho, S. Sarra and M. Rakotomalala et al., 2009. A reassessment of the epidemiology of Rice yellow mottle virus following recent advances in field and molecular studies. Virus Res., 141: 258-267.
    CrossRef    


  • Tsuboi, T., A. Goto, B. Boua and H. Koto, 1995. Outbreak of rice yellow mottle virus in paddy rice Bandoma basin of Ivory Coast and its epidemiological causes. Paper Presented at the 1st International Symposium on RYMV held at WARDA, Mbe/Bouake, Cote d'Ivoire, 18-22 September,1995.


  • Pinel-Galzi, A., D. Fargette and R. Hull, 2006. First report of Rice yellow mottle virus in rice in Uganda. Plant Dis., 90: 683.2-683.2.
    Direct Link    


  • Konate, G., S. Sarra and O. Traore, 2001. Rice yellow mottle is seed-borne but not seed transmitted in rice seeds. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 107: 361-364.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved