HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics

Year: 2015 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 13-21
DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2015.13.21
Phaseolus spp.: Valuable but Underutilized Genetic Resource in Nigeria
A. I. Adesoye and O. A. Ojobo

Abstract: The genus Phaseolus (bean) has been reported to be of great economic importance in human and animal nutrition. In Eastern and Southern Africa, it is the second most important source of dietary protein. It is considered one of the best non-meat sources of iron, providing 23-30% of the daily recommended levels of iron from a single serving and has been associated with several health benefits. However, it is highly underutilized in Nigeria and its potentials to contribute to food security and poverty alleviation are not fully exploited. This could be due to the need for prolonged cooking and the presence of antinutritional compounds. This study was an investigation into the status of the crop based on available information from Plateau and Taraba states. Data was collected during expedition through direct observation, individual interviews and field visits using questionnaire with the principal respondents being farmers, traders and consumers of the crop. Most of the respondents were between 45-54 years. Only 13.7% had tertiary education. Majority (82.76%) use only the seeds and were generally aware of 5-8 landraces or varieties. The most important factor limiting the use of this crop is prolonged cooking time. About 55% believed the crop had average contribution to household income, while 44.8% opined that it had average contribution to women empowerment. The most common processing technique aimed at reducing antinutrients and associated discomfort was soaking. It is evident that there is limited knowledge of this crop even amongst respondents from the two states in Nigeria were it is believed to have a wider cultivation and consumption. Also genetic improvement is urgently needed in softening its seed coat and reducing the antinutritional contents for greater acceptability. This will only be possible through increasing its genetic diversity probably through mutation and selecting for these traits from available genotypes.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
A. I. Adesoye and O. A. Ojobo, 2015. Phaseolus spp.: Valuable but Underutilized Genetic Resource in Nigeria. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 9: 13-21.

Keywords: Phaseolus spp., neglected and underutilized species, plant genetic resources, Nigeria, genetic diversity and Phaseolus vulgaris

INTRODUCTION

Plant genetic resources are seeds and planting materials of traditional varieties and modern cultivars, crop wild relatives and other wild plant species useful as food, feed for domestic animals, fibre, clothing, shelter and energy. They are the biological basis of food security and directly or indirectly support the livelihoods of every person on earth. Local communities and researchers rely upon genetic resources to improve the quality and output of food production. When these resources are eroded, humankind loses potential means of adapting agriculture to new socio-economic and environmental conditions. The most significant of these erosions in the recent decades have resulted from the introduction of desirable plant varieties (Vellve, 1993; Clunies-Ross, 1995).

The genus Phaseolus (bean) has been reported to be of great economic importance in human and animal nutrition. Five species have been domesticated and these include P. vulgaris (Common bean), P. lunatus (Lima bean), P. acutifolius (Tepary bean), P. coccineus (Runner bean) and P. polyanthus out of which P. vulgaris is the most widely cultivated (Laing et al., 1984) and studied. Phaseolus vulgaris makes up half of the grain legumes consumed worldwide (Broughton et al., 2003) and is ranked the third most important grain legume worldwide superseded only by soybean (Glycine max) and peanut (Arachis hypogea) (Stoilova and Berova, 2009). In Eastern and Southern Africa, it is the second most important source of dietary protein and the fourth in tropical America, where it is also the third most important source of calories after maize and cassava (Wartmann et al., 1998; Rao, 2001). It is considered one of the best non-meat sources of iron, providing 23-30% of the daily recommended levels of iron from a single serving (Shimelis and Rakshit, 2005) and is also a good source of dietary fibre (Anderson et al., 1994). Meiners et al. (1976) and Messina (1999) described it as a good source of essential vitamins, minerals and phytochemicals. In animal nutrition, Achi et al. (2007) reported significant weight gain in birds fed with meals made of P. lunatus seeds which is a cheaper and more affordable source of protein in poultry farming compared to fishmeal, soybean and groundnut that are used as conventional poultry feeds in the tropics (Ojewola and Udom, 2005). Phaseolus forms a good source of income for farm families. Although largely grown for subsistence (mainly by women), approximately 40% of production of P. vulgaris is marketed at a market value of 452 million dollars (David et al., 2000).

The consumption of beans has been associated with several health benefits including reduction of cholesterol level (Rosa et al., 1998), coronary heart diseases (Anderson et al., 1999; Bazzano et al., 2001), favourable effects against cancer (Hangen and Bennick, 2002), decrease of diabetes and obesity (Geil and Anderson, 1994), high antioxidant capacity (Heimler et al., 2005) and anti-mutagenic as well as anti-proliferative effects (Aparicio-Fernandez et al., 2006). Epidemiological studies (Correa, 1981; Kolonel et al., 2000) confirmed highly significant inverse correlation between P. vulgaris intake and age adjusted mortality for colon, breast and prostate cancers.

In addition, Shimelis et al. (2006) examined the physico-chemical properties and pasting behavior of the starch extracted from P. vulgaris and reported that the starch has useful technological properties for many applications both in the food industry and some non-food applications like in paper and textile industries. The seeds of P. vulgaris are highly sensitive to crude oil toxicity and its germination on bio-remedied crude oil-imparted agricultural lands is good biological indices for evaluation of the rehabilitation of such lands (Aboaba et al., 2007).

Despite its importance, Phaseolus spp. is highly underutilized in Nigeria (Audu and Aremu, 2011) where its potentials are not fully exploited to contribute to food security and poverty alleviation. The level of underutilization is also shown in the fact that it is poorly documented and researched; is adapted and grown in few agro-ecological niches; have no known existing seed supply system and is produced with no external input. In addition, while there is paucity of information on the consumption of P. vulgaris in West Africa for instance, consumption in East and Southern Africa exceeds 50 kg per person per year and reaches 66 kg per person in parts of Kenya (Wartmann et al., 1998). In Uganda, it is a major food security crop, readily available and popular among both urban and rural population with the per capita consumption in Uganda at 58 kg (David, 1999).

Across the globe, the factors that have limited its use have been the need for prolonged cooking and the presence of antinutritional compounds some of which include phytic acid, flatulence factors, saponins, lectins and toxin factors (Lyimo et al., 1992). Flatulence producing oligosaccharides induce flatulence due to the absence of α-galactosidase in humans, leading to the anaerobic fermentation of the constituent oligosaccharides by microorganisms to produce carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane (Price et al., 1988). Phytic acid binds trace element and macronutrients such as zinc, calcium, magnesium and iron in the gastrointestinal tract, making dietary minerals unavailable for absorption and utilization by the body. Beans also form complexes with proteins, proteases and amylases of the intestinal tract, thus inhibiting proteolysis (Tabekhia and Luh, 1980). Most of these antinutritional factors are however heat labile and inactivated by cooking which also enhances digestion and assimilation of proteins and starch (Kigel, 1999).

Although Gwary et al. (2012) reported collections of P. vulgaris from both field and storage facilities in the Sahel Savanna Agro-ecological Zone (AEZ) of Nigeria, the legume is poorly known in Nigeria except in the Mid-altitude AEZ (particularly Plateau State and parts of Taraba State) where it is relatively widespread and grown by farmers for the local markets. This study was an investigation into the status of the crop with a view to provide information on this poorly researched and utilized species in Nigeria that is currently lacking.

METHODOLOGY

The study focused on two states: Plateau (8°24'-9°31'N, 9°00'-10°38'E) and Taraba (6°25'N, 9°36'E) states both within the Mid-altitude AEZ. Data was collected during expedition through direct observation, individual interviews and field visits using questionnaire with the principal respondents being farmers, traders and consumers of the crop. The study sought to highlight the status of the crop by providing answers to the following research questions:

1. What part of the plant is used?
2. What special techniques are employed in processing the seeds for consumption?
3. How many varieties of the crop are available?
4. What factors currently limit its use?
5. What is the extent of production?
6. What is the degree of consumption?
7. What is the level of perceived nutritional value?
8. What is its contribution to household income?
9. How much does it contribute to women empowerment?

Questions 5-9 were scored 3 for low, 5 for average and 7 for high. The questionnaire also assessed some demographic parameters (age, marital status, educational attainment and occupation) of the respondents. The data generated was analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents: The socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (Table 1) showed that a number of the respondents (37.93%) were between ages 45-54 years followed by ages 35-44 years with a percentage of 24.14.

Table 1:Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

A greater percentage (55.17%) of the respondents was married, while most were traders and farmers with percentages of 34.48 and 27.59, respectively. On the educational attainment, 13.79% had tertiary education, 41.38% had secondary education, while 17.24% had no formal education.

Respondent’s knowledge on P. vulgaris: Table 2 shows the knowledge of the respondents on P. vulgaris. While some of the respondents (13.79%) use both the seeds and leaves, 82.76% use only the seeds while 34.48% use only the leaves. Generally, the respondents opined that there are 5-8 landraces known with majority of respondents (48.28%) reporting five landraces.

Table 2 shows that cooking time, cost, antinutritional factors, taste and appearance when cooked have been highlighted by respondents as factors which limit the crop use with cooking time being the highest rated limiting factor (89.66%). However, Kigel (1999) reported great variability in Phaseolus gene pool with regard to the cooking characteristics of the seeds and this can be exploited for genetic improvement. Cooking time is known be to affected by seed hardness and seed coat permeability (Hohlberg and Stanley, 1987) while Agbo et al. (1987) showed differences in micropyle size and in other microstructural characteristics that are related to seed coat permeability and water uptake by the seed. Seed coat permeability, seed hardness and water absorption are affected by environmental and genetic factors as well as genotypexenvironment interaction (Ghaderi et al., 1984; Escribano et al., 1997). Stamboliev et al. (1995) corroborated this when they reported that higher rainfall was associated with thinner seed coat and shorter cooking time due to changes in seed coat characteristics and permeability to water. The cooking time and seed hardness increased when bean was grown in soils rich in calcium and magnesium and with higher average annual temperature (15-24°C), compared to soils poor in magnesium and phosphorus and with lower temperatures ranging from 11-18°C (Paredes-Lopez et al., 1989).

Table 2:Respondent’s knowledge on Phaseolus vulgaris

The antinutritional factors in Phaseolus spp. are inherited quantitatively with the environment having significant effects on their quantity in seed varieties hence limiting chances of breeding through classical breeding efforts. Angenon et al. (1999) therefore suggests that gene engineering can contribute significantly to Phaseolus improvement especially where conventional breeding cannot readily provide solutions. Similarly, Nwokolo and Smartt (1996) suggested genetic transformation of Phaseolus through gene engineering for the sulphur-containing amino acids (methionine and cysteine) which is currently deficient. Success in such genetic transformations have been reported by Tabe and Higgins (1998) where genetic transformation resulted in enhanced seed methionine levels in several grain legumes including Glycine max, Vicia narbonensis and Lipinus angustifolium. Methionine-rich seed proteins and their corresponding genes have been identified in Bertholletia excelsa, Helianthus annuus and Zea mays.

Table 3:Seed characteristics of some accessions of P. vulgaris

Caution must however be exercised when performing genetic manipulations on these antinutritional factors as they have some beneficial effects to the plants (Ali and Muzquiz, 1998).

On the extent of production, 68.97% of the respondents reported low production, 48.28% considered P. vulgaris a crop with high nutritional value while 55.17% believe that it makes an average contribution to household income. As regards women empowerment, 44.83% of the respondents consider it as making an average contribution to empowering women.

Table 3 shows the seed characteristics of some accessions of P. vulgaris collected. Empirical observation of Phaseolus spp. shows many different phenotypes with regard to seed colour and size.

Reports show there is a higher genetic diversity in the Mesoamerican gene pool than the Andean gene pool (the two centres of origin of the crop) for both the wild and domesticated populations (Papa and Gepts, 2003; McClean et al., 2004). Andean beans have been distinguished from the Mesoamerican beans on the basis of morphological and biochemical differences such as seed size, seed proteins as well as various types of molecular markers (Gepts, 1998). Adesoye and Ojobo (2012) have also reported a broad genetic base in few cultivars analysed for genetic diversity from the Mid-altitude agroecological zone of Nigeria. Morphological variations are also found in the growth habit, pigmentation, pod, seed and phenology (Leakey, 1988; Singh, 1989) of all Phaseolus spp. studied. On the basis of allozyme data, the genetic diversity of P. lunatus is evenly distributed between the Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools (Maquet et al., 1997) and at the molecular level, P. polyanthus is said to be closer to P. coccineus by nuclear DNA comparison (Pinero and Eguiate, 1988) but more similar to P. vulgaris by chloroplast DNA comparison (Llaca et al., 1994) indicating P. polyanthus probably originated from a cross that involved P. vulgaris as the maternal parent, with successive backcrosses to P. coccineus as the paternal donor (Schmit et al., 1993; Llaca et al., 1994).

CONCLUSION

Information on Phaseolus spp. in Nigeria is sparse with only very few people having knowledge of the crop. Limited researches have been conducted on the landraces grown in Nigeria compared with other legumes. The few farmers of the crop grow them with no external input and no seed supply system exists making the crop very expensive. Conservation of Phaseolus germplasm in genebank is very insignificant and no known effort being made to improve on the factors limiting the crop’s use.

Few studies in Nigeria have shown heritable diversity in various germplasms studied. More researches aimed at understanding the genotypes and genotypexenvironment interaction with a view to improving on the factors currently limiting the use of this crop is highly recommended as species of the genus are possible candidates for food security. Effort should be made towards conserving available germplasms to check possible genetic erosion of available landraces.

REFERENCES

  • Aboaba, O.A., O.O. Aboaba, N.C. Nwachukwu, E.E. Chukwu and S.C.U. Nwachukwu, 2007. Evaluation of bioremediation of agricultural soils polluted with crude oil by planting beans seeds, Phaseolus vulgaris. Nature Sci., 5: 53-60.
    Direct Link    


  • Achi, I., M.A. Adelanwa and A.B. Ahmed, 2007. Performance of broiler chickens fed on lima bean, groundnut and soybean diets. Sci. World J., 2: 13-16.
    Direct Link    


  • Adesoye, A.I. and O.A. Ojobo, 2012. Genetic diversity assessment of Phaseolus vulgaris L. landraces in Nigeria's mid-altitude agroecological zone. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv., 4: 453-460.
    Direct Link    


  • Agbo, G.N., G.L. Hosfield, M.A. Uebersax and K. Klomparens, 1987. Seed microstructure and its relationship to water uptake in isogenic lines in a cultivar of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Microstruct., 6: 91-102.


  • Ali, R. and M. Muzquiz, 1998. ANFs in Tropical Legume Seeds for Human Nutrition. In: Recent Advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds and Rapeseed, Jansman, A.J.M. (Ed.). Wageningen Pers, The Netherlands, pp: 107


  • Anderson, J.W., B.M. Smith and C.S. Washnock, 1999. Cardiovascular and renal benefits of dry bean and soybean intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 70: 464S-474S.
    Direct Link    


  • Anderson, J.W., B.M. Smith and N.J. Gustafson, 1994. Health benefits and practical aspects of high fibre diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 59: 1242S-1247S.
    Direct Link    


  • Angenon, G., J. De Clercq, W. Dillen, A. Goossens, J. Kapila, M. Zambre and M. Van Montagu, 1999. Strategies for improving the nutritional quality of Phaseolus beans through gene engineering. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 3: 233-236.
    Direct Link    


  • Aparicio-Fernandez, X., T. Garcia-Gasca, G.G. Yousef, M.A. Lila, E.G. de Mejia and G. Loarca-Pina, 2006. Chemopreventive activity of polyphenolics from black Jamapa bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on hela and hacat cells. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 2116-2122.
    PubMed    


  • Audu, S.S. and M.O. Aremu, 2011. Nutritional composition of raw and processed pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Food Agric. Environ., 9: 72-80.
    Direct Link    


  • Bazzano, L., J. He, L.G. Ogden, C. Loria, S. Vupputuri, L. Myers and P.K. Whelton, 2001. Legume consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in US men and women: NHANES i epidemiologic follow-up study. Arch. Int. Med., 161: 2573-2578.
    Direct Link    


  • Broughton, W.J., G. Hernandez, M. Blair, S. Beebe, P. Gepts and J. Vanderleyden, 2003. Beans (Phaseolus spp.)-model food legumes. Plant Soil, 252: 55-128.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Correa, P., 1981. Epidemiological correlations between diet and cancer frequency. Cancer Res., 41: 3685-3690.
    Direct Link    


  • Clunies-Ross, T., 1995. Mangolds, manure and mixtures. The importance of crop diversity on British farms. Ecologist, 25: 181-187.


  • David, S., 1999. Beans in the Farming System and Domestic Economy of Uganda: A Tale of Two Parishes. Vol. 28, CIAT. Network on Bean Research in Africa, Kampala, Uganda, Pages: 44


  • David, S., R. Kirkby and S. Kasozi, 2000. Assessing the Impact of Bush Bean Varieties on Poverty Reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Uganda. Vol. 31, Network on Bean Research in Africa, Kampala, Uganda, Pages: 27


  • Escribano, M.R., M. Santalla and A.M. de Ron, 1997. Genetic diversity in pod and seed quality traits of common bean populations from Northwestern Spain. Euphytica, 93: 71-81.
    CrossRef    


  • Geil, P.B. and J.W. Anderson, 1994. Nutrition and health implication of dry beans: A review. J. Am. Colloid Nutr., 113: 549-558.
    Direct Link    


  • Gepts, P., 1998. Origin and evolution of common bean: Past events and recent trends. HortScience, 33: 1124-1130.
    Direct Link    


  • Ghaderi, A., G.L. Hosfield, M.W. Adams and M.A. Uebersax, 1984. Variability in culinary quality, component interrelationships and breeding implications in navy and pinto beans. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 109: 85-90.
    Direct Link    


  • Gwary, O.M., S.S. Hati, G.A. Dimari and V.O. Ogugbuaja, 2012. Pesticide residues in bean samples from Northeastern Nigeria. ARPN J. Sci. Technol., 2: 79-84.
    Direct Link    


  • Hangen, L. and M.R. Bennink, 2002. Consumption of black beans and navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) reduced azoxymethane-induced colon cancer in rats. Nutr. Cancer, 40: 60-65.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Heimler, D., P. Vignolini, M.G. Dini and A. Romani, 2005. Rapid tests to assess the antioxidant activity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. dry beans. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: 3053-3056.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Hohlberg, A.I. and D.W. Stanley, 1987. Hard-to-cook defect in black beans. Protein and starch considerations. J. Agric. Food Chem., 35: 571-576.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kigel, J., 1999. Culinary and nutritional quality of P. vulgaris seeds as affected by environmental factors. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 3: 205-209.
    Direct Link    


  • Kolonel, L.N., J.H. Hankin, A.S. Whittemore, A.H. Wu and R.P. Gallagher et al., 2000. Vegetables, fruits, legumes and prostate cancer: A multiethnic case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark Prev., 9: 795-804.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Laing, D.G., P.G. Jones and J.H.C Davis, 1984. Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In: Physiology of Tropical Field Crops, Goldsworthy P.R. and N.M. Fisher (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons Limited, Chichester, pp: 305-351


  • Llaca, V., A.D. Salinas and P. Gepts, 1994. Chloroplast DNA as an evolutionary marker in Phaseolus vulgaris complex. Theor. Applied Genet., 88: 646-652.
    CrossRef    


  • Lyimo, M., J. Mugula and T. Elias, 1992. Nutritive composition of broth from selected bean varieties cooked for various periods. J. Sci. Food Agric., 58: 535-539.
    CrossRef    


  • Maquet, A., I.Z. Bi, M. Delvaux, B. Wathelet and J.P. Baudoin, 1997. Genetic structure of Lima bean base collection using allozyme markers. Theor. Applied Genet., 95: 980-991.
    CrossRef    


  • McClean, P.E., R.K. Lee and P.N. Miklas, 2004. Sequence diversity analysis of dihydroflavanol reductase intron 1 in common bean. Genome, 47: 266-280.
    PubMed    


  • Meiners, C.R., N.L. Derise, H.C. Lau, S.J. Ritchey and E.W. Murphy, 1976. Proximate composition and yield of raw and cooked mature dry legumes. J. Agric. Food Chem., 24: 1122-1126.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Messina, M.J., 1999. Legumes and soybeans: Overview of their nutritional profiles and health effects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 70: 439S-450S.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Nwokolo, E. and J. Smart, 1996. Food and Feed from Legumes and Oilseeds. Chapmann & Hall, London, ISBN: 978-1-4613-8050-4
    Direct Link    


  • Ojewola, G.S. and S.F. Udom, 2005. Chemical evaluation of the nutrient composition of some unconventional animal protein sources. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 745-747.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Papa, R. and P. Gepts, 2003. Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theor. Applied Genet., 106: 239-250.
    CrossRef    


  • Paredes-Lopez, O., C. Reyes-Moreno, R. Montes-Riveira and A. Carabez-Trejo, 1989. Hard-to-cook phenomenon in common beans-influence of growing location and hardening procedures. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 24: 535-542.
    CrossRef    


  • Pinero, D. and L. Eguiarte, 1988. The origin and biosystematic status of Phaseolus coccineus sp. polyanthus: Electrophoretic evidence. Euphytica, 37: 199-203.


  • Price, K.R., J. Eagles and G.R. Fenwick, 1988. Saponin composition of 13 varieties of legume seed using fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. J. Sci. Food Agric., 42: 183-193.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rao, I.M., 2001. Role of Physiology in Improving Crop Adaptation to Abiotic Stresses in the Tropics: The Case of Common Bean and Tropical Forages. In: Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology, Pessarakli, M. (Ed.). CRC Press, New York, USA., ISBN: 9780203908426, pp: 613


  • Rosa, C.O., N.M. Costa, P.F. Leal and T.T. Oliveira, 1998. The cholesterol-lowering effect of black beans (P. vulgaris L.) in hypocholesterolemic rats. Arch. Latinoamerican Nutr., 48: 306-310, (In Portuguese).
    PubMed    


  • Schmit, V., P. du Jardin, J.P. Baudoin and D.G. Debouck, 1993. Use of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms for the phylogenetic study of seven Phaseolus taxa including P. vulgaris and P. coccineus. Theor. Applied Genet., 87: 506-516.
    CrossRef    


  • Shimelis, E.A., M. Meaza and S.K. Rakshit, 2006. Physico-chemical properties, pasting behavior and functional characteristics of flours and starches from improved bean (P. vulgaris L.) varieties grown in East Africa. Agric. Eng. Int., Vol. 8.


  • Shimelis, E.A. and S.K. Rakshit, 2005. Proximate composition and physico-chemical properties of improved dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in Ethiopia. LWT- Food Sci. Technol., 38: 331-338.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Singh, S.P., 1989. Patterns of variation in cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot., 43: 39-57.
    CrossRef    


  • Stamboliev, M., D. Georgiev, K. Tsvetanoa and T. Tonev, 1995. Effects of some agrotechnical and agroclimatic factors on the technological quality of Phaseolus vulgaris grown on calcareous chernozem. Rastenievedni Nauki, 32: 65-67.


  • Stoilova, T. and M. Berova, 2009. Morphological and agronomical study on local germplasm of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 23: 385-388.
    CrossRef    


  • Tabekhia, M.M. and B.S. Luh, 1980. Effect of germination, cooking and canning on phosphorous and phytate retention on dry beans. J. Food Sci., 45: 406-408.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vellve, R., 1993. The decline of diversity in European agriculture. Ecologist, 23: 64-69.


  • Wortmann, C.S., R.A. Kirby, C.A. Eledu and D.J. Allan, 1998. Atlas of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Production in Africa. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture Publication, Colombia, ISBN: 958-9439-94-2, Pages: 133
    Direct Link    


  • Leakey, C.L.A., 1988. Genotypic and Phenotypic Markers in Common Bean. In: Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans, Gepts, P. (Ed.)., Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA., pp: 245-327


  • Tabe, L. and T.J.V. Higgins, 1998. Engineering plant protein composition for improved nutrition. Trends Plant Sci., 3: 282-286.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved