HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics

Year: 2008 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 64-74
DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2008.64.74
Combining Ability and Heterosis for Yield and Fibre Quality Traits in LinexTester Crosses of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
S. Preetha and T.S. Raveendran

Abstract: The prime objective of cotton breeders is to develop new varieties with high yield and quality parameters. Present study aims to estimate general combining ability of the parents and specific combining ability and heterosis of hybrids for yield and fibre quality traits. Eight robust genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were crossed with four genotypes having compact plant type in line x tester fashion and the resulting thirty two hybrids were raised during summer 2003 in a randomized block design with two replications. Analysis of variance components indicated that 2.5% span length was predominantly controlled by additive gene action whereas the traits petiole length, length of sympodia, number of flowers per plant, days to fifty percent flowering, seeds per locule, ginning outturn, lint index, uniformity ratio and elongation percentage were governed predominantly by non-additive component. MCU 9 for seed cotton yield and 2.5% span length and KC 2 for bundle strength were the best combiners. TCH 1608xTCH 1002 exhibiting highest heterotic effect for seed cotton yield with highest per se performance and also highest SCA effect is the best combination in the present study, for direct exploitation. It also exhibited significant SCA effects for the important characters boll number and boll weight which is an encouraging feature in cotton breeding.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
S. Preetha and T.S. Raveendran, 2008. Combining Ability and Heterosis for Yield and Fibre Quality Traits in LinexTester Crosses of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 2: 64-74.

Keywords: Cotton, linextester analysis, general and specific combining ability and gene action

INTRODUCTION

Cotton occupies a pre-eminent place among cash crops as it guides the destiny of a large section of the farming community as well as that of a flourishing textile industry. Cotton plays a major role in India`s economy, both in terms of providing employment directly or indirectly to about 60 million people and in terms of production of wealth and earning foreign exchange for the country. Cotton breeders mainly focus on to develop cultivars earlier in maturity with high yield and good fibre quality. To combine all these traits together we need to identify suitable genotypes and use them in crossing programme. Knowledge on combining ability is useful for selection of desirable parents for exploitation of hybridity and transgressive expressions. It is also useful in assessing the ability of parents to generate potential hybrids with a reasonable level of stability. Combining ability studies also elucidate the nature and magnitude of gene action involved in the inheritance of seed cotton yield and its related characters, which will be useful to follow segregating material. The choice of parents for hybridization can be made on the basis of combining ability as well as the per se performance. Though the per se performance is important, the parents selected based on per se performance may not produce desirable hybrids in the event of the presence of non-additive gene action. In this context, combining ability effects provide sound basis for parental selection. Linextester analysis would reveal General Combining Ability (GCA) effects of parents and Specific Combining Ability (SCA) effects of hybrids.

Further evaluation of heterotic effect is essential to know whether new cross combinations are suitable for direct exploitation or whether these can be used to isolate useful and transgressive segregates from subsequent generation to develop a variety.

Earlier studies have shown that both additive and non-additive gene effects were important for controlling number of bolls and seed cotton yield (Khan and Idris, 1995; Kumaresan et al., 1999). However, Shakeel et al. (2001) and Ahuja and Dhayal (2007) have shown that bolls and seed cotton yield are governed by genes acting non-additively. For fibre quality traits, viz.,fibre length, fibre strength and micronaire non-additive gene action have been reported by Hassan et al. (2000) and Ahuja and Dhayal (2007). In contrast studies of Lukonge et al. (2007) revealed additive gene effects for fibre strength and micronaire and non-additive gene action for fibre length. The purpose of this study were to determine the GCA and SCA effects for yield parameters and fibre quality traits and to choose appropriate parents and hybrids for the investigated traits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present study, eight Gossypium hirsutum L. genotypes MCU 5, TCH 1608, TCH 1452, TCH 1599, TCH 1569, MCU 12, MCU 9 and TCH 1627, robust in plant type were used as lines and four genotypes having compact plant type viz., KC 2, TCH 1002, Sahana and Sumangala were used as testers. Each of the line was crossed with all the four testers individually in a linextester fashion (Kempthorne, 1957) to develop thirty two intra hirsutum hybrids. Hybridization technique described by Doak and Beasley (1934) was followed. The buds that are likely to open on the next day were emasculated by giving a cut with thumb nail and removing the staminal column. Immediately after emasculation the flowers were covered with red colour butter paper bag for easy identification. The next day, at peak anthesis the flowers from appropriate pollinator parent were collected and pollen was dusted on the stigma by gently smearing on the staminal column. After pollination the flowers were covered with white butter paper bag and proper labeling was done. A few plants of each parent were selfed by adopting clay and smear method (Ramanatha, 1936).

The thirty two intra-hirsutum hybrids along with their parents were raised in randomized block design with two replications during summer 2003, at Cotton Breeding Station, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. They were sown in 3 m ridges spaced 75 cm apart and with an interplant distance of 30 cm so as to accommodate ten plants in each row. Recommended agronomic practices and need based plant protection measures were followed. Five randomly selected plants were tag-labelled for recording the observations. A total of 22 characters including nine metric traits, thirteen yield and quality attributes were studied. The traits are Plant Height (PH), Petiole Length (PL), Internode Length number (IL), of sympodia per plant (NOS), Length of Sympodia (LOS), No. of Flower Bearing Nodes in sympodia (NFBN), No. of Flowers (NOF), Days to First Flowering (DFF), Days to 50% Flowering (DFPF), No. of Bolls per plant (NOB), Boll Weight (BW), No. of Locules per boll (NOL), No. of Seeds per Locule (NOSL), Seed Cotton Yield (SCY), Ginning Outturn (GOT), Seed Index (SI), Lint Index (LI), 2.5 percent span length (2.5% SL), Uniformity Ratio (UR), micronaire (MIC), Bundle Strength (BS), Elongation percent (EL) were recorded on the selected plants. Average data recorded on each character from the randomly selected plants represented the mean of that replication.

The data was subjected to combining ability analysis following the method suggested by Kempthorne (1957). The ratio of GCA/SCA was worked out for each character to find out the predominance of additive or non-additive gene action, assuming simple additive dominance model. Standard heterosis was worked out as percentmean deviation of the mean F1 performance over the mean performance of the standard variety (MCU 12).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The analysis of variance shown in Table 1 and 2 revealed significant divergence among the parents for all the characters excluding internode length, No. of flower bearing nodes in sympodia and uniformity ratio showing sufficient variability among the parents which can generate potential and promising hybrids. Significant differences among hybrids indicated the existence of variability among the cross combinations for all characters except internode length, No. of sympodia, No. of flower bearing nodes and locules per boll. The variance due to parents evrsus hybrid was significant for plant height, petiole length, number of sympodia per plant, days to first flowering, days to 50% flowering, boll weight, ginning outturn, 2.5% span length, micronaire, bundle strength and elongation percent indicating that significant heterosis could be expected in hybrids for these characters and comparison will be much relevant.

Table 1: Analysis of variance for biometrical traits from linextester analysis
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

Table 2: Analysis of variance for yield and quality traits from linextester analysis
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

The variance due to lines was significant for the characters internode length, length of sympodia, No. of flowers per plant, ginning outturn while the testers showed significant differences for internode length, 2.5% span length and uniformity ratio. The linextester component exhibited significant variability for all the characters except internode length, No. of flower bearing nodes in sympodia and 2.5% span length indicating that the hybrids were more variable than the parents. The lines contributed a major share to the genetic variance in respect of No. of flowers per plant and ginning outturn. The contribution of tester was maximum for internode length, while the linextester component had the maximum share of genetic variance in all other characters.

A critical comparison of the mean values of the parents and hybrids in respect of different characters revealed that hybrids were relatively shorter in duration. Plant height and length of sympodia were intermediate indicating the semicompact nature of the hybrids.

The GCA variances was predominant in 2.5% span length indicating that this character is governed by additive component of heritable variance. Under such situation improvement could be made following appropriate breeding programme of hybridization and selection which may take care of fixable gene effect. Predominance of additive component of genetic variance for 2.5% span length is in conformity with those reported by Kumar et al. (1992), Swati Bharad et al. (1999), Khorgade et al. (2000), El-Dahan et al. (2003), Iqbal et al. (2005) and Lukonge et al. (2007).

The GCA: SCA ratio was less than unity for the traits petiole length, length of sympodia, No. of flowers per plant, days to 50% flowering, seeds per locule, ginning outturn, lint index, uniformity ratio and elongation percentage suggesting that these characters were governed predominantly by non-additive component (Table 3, 4). These components can be exploited by heterotic breeding programme. The findings support earlier observation of Tang et al. (1993), Ahuja et al. (2007) (for elongation percentage), Krishna (1998) (for ginning outturn and lint index), Patel and Pethani (1998), Valarmathi and Jahangir (1998) and Ahuja and Tuteja (1999) (for ginning outturn), Khorgade et al. (2000) (for lint index) and Basbag et al. (2007) (for days to first flowering). The component of variance attributable to SCA for petiole length and uniformity ratio was relatively less in magnitude though they were larger than GCA variance. This indicated that both additive and non-additive variances were important for these two characters as reported by Nadarajan and Sree Rangaswamy (1992).

Table 3: Genetic components of variance and genetic contribution of lines, testers and linextester to biometrical traits
-: Negative estimates

Table 4: Genetic components of variance and genetic contribution of lines, testers and linextester to yield and quality traits
-: Negative estimates

In the present study, combining ability effects were studied (Table 5, 6) in which the line MCU 9 showed high GCA for seed cotton yield. In addition it also showed high GCA for plant height, number of bolls, locules per boll, seeds per locule and 2.5% span length and proved its worthiness in future hybridization programme. Further the study revealed that high and significant GCA effects for seed cotton yield resulted from combined effects of yield components viz., boll number, locules per boll and seeds per locule which indicated that this three components were jointly important in determining yield and further selection may be made on this basis of these characters. Similar results were obtained by Jagtap et al. (1992), Patel et al. (1992) and Bhatade and Sansar (1993).

Table 5: General combining ability effects of parents for biometrical traits
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

Table 6: General combining ability effects of parents for yield and quality traits
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

Considering earliness parameters namely the days to first flowering as well as 50% flowering the lines TCH 1452 and MCU 12, testers TCH 1002 showed desirable GCA effects. Apart from this MCU 12 was also found to be a good combiner for plant height and ginning outturn while TCH 1452 showed high GCA effects for ginning outturn and lint index and moderate GCA effects for seed cotton yield, No. of bolls, 2.5% span length and uniformity ratio. Tester KC 2 was found to be a good general combiner for earliness, seed index and bundle strength. It showed moderate GCA effects for boll weight, locules per boll, seed cotton yield and uniformity ratio. In the present study, there was no relationship between per se performance of hybrids and gca effects of parents which indicated the presence of epistatic interaction also. Further studies through generation mean analysis are triple test cross analysis may bring out more useful information on the nature of gene interaction in the material.

The cross TCH 1608xTCH 1002, MCU 9xSumangala and MCU 9xKC 2 exhibited significant standard heterosis of 61.89, 49.72 and 43.95%, respectively over MCU 12 (check) and all the three had high mean seed cotton yield (Table 7, 8). The crosses which expressed significant heterosis for seed cotton yield also expressed high heterosis for boll weight and No. of locules per boll. However no such relationship was observed for boll number. The results suggest that high yield does not necessarily depend on high heterotic expression of all yield components and high heterosis for some or few of the component traits, which are ultimately associated with yield, can generate significant yield heterosis. Similar results were reported by Kapoor et al. (2002).

Table 7: Expression of heterosis in hybrids(Percentage) for biometrical traits
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

Table 8: Expression of heterosis in hybrids (%) for yield and quality traits
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

The hybrids that were found to be significantly heterotic had SCA in the positive direction indicating that heterosis can be dependably exploited. The hybrid TCH 1608xTCH 1002 exhibiting highest heterotic effect (61.89%) for seed cotton yield with highest per se performance of 60.77 g plant-1 and also highest SCA effect of 22.601 is the best combination in the present study, for direct exploitation. It also exhibited significant SCA effects for the important improvement characters boll number and boll weight which is an encouraging feature in cotton breeding.

A perusal of SCAeffects (Table 9, 10) showed that superior performance of the hybrids TCH 1608xTCH 1002 and MCU9xSumangala could be attributed to the effect of maternal parent involved in the cross. However the good expression of MCU5xSumangala, TCH 1599xSumangala and MCU9xKC2 for boll weight indicated that Sumangala and KC 2 (compact types) were able to result in high SCA expression.

Evaluation of fibre quality is of paramount importance in varietal improvement research in cotton, as varieties not conforming to industrial standards in fibre quality will not stand the test of time. So, in present investigation importance was given to quality characters also. The hybrids TCH 1599x Sumangala and MCU 12xSumangala for ginning outturn and hybrid TCH 1627xSahana for elongation percentage had superior per se performance, significant standard heterosis with high SCA effects. The parents involved were also good general combiners. Such a combinations of all parameters may be due to additive genetic system and additive x additive gene interaction. These hybrids can be exploited as basic material for breeding. Similar results were reported by Mandloi et al. (1998) and Modi et al. (1999) (for ginning outturn). MCU 12xKC 2 (moderatexmoderate general combiner) for uniformity ratio and TCH 1452xSumangala (poorxgood general combiner) for micronaire were the other crosses with high heterotic expression, high per se performance and high SCA effects for respective characters. The results indicate the preponderance of non-additive genetic variation in the inheritance of these characters which was in accordance with the results obtained by Krishna (1998). The hybrid combinations which were found to be heterotic with high SCA and per se performance for seed cotton yield failed to exhibit good performance for quality characters. But even then hybrids recording superior performance for quality characters were found to involve at least one parent showing moderate GCA effect for seed cotton yield. This indicated the possibility for simultaneous improvement of yield and quality by exploiting these hybrids. Inter crossing the hybrids showing yield heterosis and those displaying quality characters may be taken up for parallel improvement of yield and quality.

Table 9: Specific combining ability effects of hybrids for biometrical traits
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

Table 10: Specific combining ability effects of hybrids for yield and quality traits
*, **Means significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively

The general good combiners were MCU 9 for seed cotton yield and 2.5% span length; KC 2 for bundle strength; TCH 1452, MCU 12 and TCH 1002 for earliness. Among the hybrids, TCH 1608x TCH 1002 was the best for the yield and yield related characters No. of sympodia, No. of bolls, boll weight, lint index and seed index and for fibre quality.

REFERENCES

  • Ahuja, S.L. and O.P. Tuteja, 1999. Genetic analysis of some quantitative characters in cotton (G. hirsutum L.). J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 24: 191-194.


  • Ahuja, S.L. and L.S. Dhayal, 2007. Combining ability estimates for yield and fibre quality traits in 4 x 13 line x tester crosses of Gossypium hirsutum Euphytica, 153: 87-98.
    Direct Link    


  • Basbag, S., R. Ekinci and O. Gencer, 2007. Combining ability and heterosis for earliness characters in line x tester population of Gossypium hirsutum L. Hereditas, 144: 185-190.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bhatade, S.S. and S.M. Sarsar, 1993. Evaluation of some cotton genotypes on the basis of combining ability in a diallel cross. Madras Agric. J., 80: 603-606.


  • Doak, C.C., 1934. A new technique in cotton hybridizing: Suggested changes in existing methods of emasculating and bagging cotton flowers. J. Hered., 25: 201-204.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • El-Dahan, M.A.A., E.O. Leid, M. Lopez and J.C. Gutierrez, 2003. Combining ability of yield and yield components in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drought stress conditions. Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference, March 9-13, 2003, Cape Town, South Africa, pp: 43-48.


  • Hassan, G., G. Mahmood, A. Razzaq and Hayatullah, 2000. Combining ability in inter-varietal crosses of Upland cotton. Sarhad J. Agric., 16: 407-410.
    Direct Link    


  • Iqbal, M., R.S.A. Khan, K. Hayat, N.U.I. Khan, 2005. Genetic variation and combining ability for yield and fibre traits among cotton F-1 hybrid population. J. Biological Sci., 5: 713-716.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jagtap, J.G., S. Holkar and S.W. Telang, 1992. L x T analysis for some attributes in upland cotton. J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 17: 109-114.


  • Kapoor, C.J., M. Singh and R.V. Maheswari, 2002. Heterosis for yield and yield attributing traits in Deshi cotton. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 16: 182-183.


  • Kempthorne, O., 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. 1st Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., Pages: 545


  • Khan, T.M. and M.A. Idris, 1995. Inheritance of boll weight, boll number and yield of seed cotton in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Sarhad J. Agric., 11: 599-605.


  • Khorgade, P.W., I.V. Satange and L.D. Meshram, 2000. Diallel analysis in American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Indian J. Agric. Res., 34: 172-175.


  • Krishna, R.K.V., 1998. Genetic nature of yield and fibre traits in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.). J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 23: 126-128.
    Direct Link    


  • Kumar, C.P., R. Joshi and P. Bhardwaj, 1992. Heterosis in Intra. Gossypium arboreum L. cotton hybrids. Indian J. Genet. Plant. Breed., 52: 183-186.
    Direct Link    


  • Kumaresan, D., P. Senthilkumar and J. Ganesan, 1999. Combining ability studies for quantitative traits in cotton. Madras Agric. J., 18: 430-432.


  • Lukonge, E.P., M.T. Labuschagne and L. Herselman, 2008. Combining ability for yield and fibre characteristics in Tanzanian cotton germplasm. Euphytica, 161: 383-389.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mandloi, K.C., G.K. Koutu, U.S. Mishra, S.C. Pandey and R. Julka, 1998. Combining ability analysis and inheritance of fibre quality characters in cotton. J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 23: 147-151.


  • Modi, N.D., U.G. Patel, J.C. Patel and A.T. Maisuria, 1999. General and specific combining ability for major yield components in diploid cotton. J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 24: 129-131.
    Direct Link    


  • Nadarajan, N. and S.R.S. Rangasamy, 1992. Genetic analysis of certain fibre characters in G. hirsutum L. Indian J. Genet. Plant. Breed., 52: 245-251.
    Direct Link    


  • Patel, G.S. and K.V. Pethani, 1998. Combining ability on quantitative components in Desi cotton over environments. J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 23: 48-53.


  • Patel, K.G., N.P. Mehta, U.G. Patel and S.B.S. Tikka, 1992. Genetic architecture of yield and yield components in diploid cotton. J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 17: 98-103.
    Direct Link    


  • Ramanatha, I., 1936. An inexpensive method of selfing cotton flowers. Emp. Cotton Growers Rev., 13: 28-30.


  • Shakeel, A., I.A. Khan and F.M. Azhar, 2001. Study pertaining to the estimation of gene action controlling yield and related traits in upland cotton. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 67-70.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Swati Bharad, L.D. Meshram, H.V. Kalpande and P.W. Khorgade, 1999. Combining ability studies on fibre and seed characters in colour linted cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 24: 120-124.


  • Tang, B., J.N. Jenkins, J.C. McCarty and C.E. Watson, 1993. F2 hybrids of host plant germplasm and cotton cultivars: Heterosis and combining ability for fibre qualities. Crop Sci., 33: 706-710.
    Direct Link    


  • Valarmathi, M. and K.S. Jehangir, 1998. Studies on genetic parameters for yield and fibre quality traits in intra varietal crosses of cotton (G. hirsutum L.). J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 23: 64-67.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved