HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics

Year: 2008 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 35-41
DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2008.35.41
Analysis of Genetic Relationships of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Landraces from Zimbabwe, Using Microsatellites
E. Chakauya and P. Tongoona

Abstract: Pearl millet landraces collected from two districts of Zimbabwe, Nyanga North and Tsholotsho were analysed to assess genetic relationships based on ten microsatellite primers and indigenous farmer given names. Analysis was done by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide. Simple matching coefficients were compared and the genetic relationships between genotypes were clarified on dendrograms by unweighted pair-group averages (UPGMA). Two polymorphic primers (PSMP2008 and PSMP2013) were able to detect some level of polymorphism at DNA level clustering the landraces into four major clusters joined at 64% similarity level. Sixteen accessions from Nyanga were identical to those from Tsholotsho. Fourteen accessions from Nyanga and 18 from Tsholotsho were identical to at least one genotype from the same district. Despite the same local names, genotypes were scattered throughout the clusters suggesting either poor discrimination by the primers or marked genetic differences. The Simpson Index of diversity were almost the same at 0.690 and 0.700 for Nyanga and Tsholotsho respectively. In conclusion, our results show the potential of microsatellites in studying diversity in pearl millet and show marked duplication of the germplasm both in genetic relationships and local names. However, the study provides a strong background for further analysis of the germplasm.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
E. Chakauya and P. Tongoona, 2008. Analysis of Genetic Relationships of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Landraces from Zimbabwe, Using Microsatellites. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 2: 35-41.

Keywords: Pearl millet, landraces, microsatellites and genetic diversity

INTRODUCTION

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is ranked seventh most important cereal crop in the world (FAOSTAT, 2004) and a staple food for people situated in the semi-arid areas where environmental stress such as drought, high temperature and poor soil nutrient availability are endemic. Besides the use as a grain, fodder, construction material, brooms and syrup, pearl millet has great potential for making bioethanol, an area that has not been adequately explored. Given enough research, pearl millet has the potential of playing a leading role in hunger alleviation in drier areas of Africa (O`Kennedy and Girgi, 2007) especially under the ever changing and unpredictable climate in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Zimbabwe`s pearl millet yields are relatively low at about 500 kg ha-1 (FAOSTAT, 2004), a yield far lower than the global average of 780 kg ha-1. This is partly because of farmers dependence on uncharacterized, low producing but well-adapted landraces. Despite their low yield, other factors such as prevalence of indigenous knowledge and perceptions about storability, nutritional value and resistance to both biotic and abiotic stress, make landraces very good candidates for communal agriculture. Farmers usually grow mixtures of landraces, maturing at different times, to meet intermediate food requirements (Rao and Mushonga, 1987). While communal agriculture is dependent on the rich agrobiodiversity of landraces, relatively little attention has been accorded to the conservation of this genetic diversity in communal areas. Moreover, the data is poorly documented especially for collections from Zimbabwe. Nevertheless, there is a growing realization of the importance of information of genetic diversity millets.

Several methods have been used to study pearl millet genetic diversity including isozymes (Tostain, 1992, 1994), AFLP markers (Vom Brocke et al., 2003), RFLP markers (Bhattacharjee et al., 2002), SSCP-SNP (Bertin et al., 2005) and recently microsatellites (Mariac et al., 2006). Microsatellites are the marker of choice for practical breeding applications particularly in developing countries. They are highly polymorphic, informative and co-dominant markers which are often broadly applicable since loci are frequently conserved between related species and sometimes genera. In the current study we used microsatellites to analyse genetic relationships among pearl millet landraces collected from Zimbabwe`s communal areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out using 47 landraces of pearl millet that had been collected by the National Genebank of Zimbabwe from two districts of that nation, Tsholotsho and Nyanga North in 1998 (Mafa, 1999) (Table 1). The two districts are in almost opposite ends of Zimbabwe and isolated from each other by climates that are not very suitable for pearl millet and their climates are significantly distinct (Table 2), sample collection was as described earlier (Chakauya et al., 2006). DNA was extracted by a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method as described by Saghai-Maroof et al. (1984). Fresh leaf material was taken from 3 to 4 week old plants grown in a greenhouse. Five to eight plants of each accession were sampled and the material bulked.

For microsatellite analysis, ten primers (Qi et al., 2004, Table 3) provided by John Innes Centre were used. PCR reactions were performed in 25 μL-volumes containing 30 ng template DNA, 1x PCR Buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mm Tris-HCl, (pH 8.3), 1.5 mm MgCl2), 0.25 mm deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 4.13 to 5.68 pmoles (30 ng) of each primer (Table 3) and 1.2 units Taq polymerase. Temperature cycling was performed on a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Perkin-Elmer) programmed to run 4 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 1 min at annealing temperature (Table 3) and 72°C for 1 min. The final cycle was identical to the above but had a final elongation of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis using 1xTBE on 8% PAGE, stained with ethidium bromide and band sizes estimated with a 100 base pair ladder (Roche Diagnostics).

Gels were scored manually with each polymorphic band being treated as a unit character and scoring was for the presence (1) or absence (0) of a band. Two criteria were used for scoring bands: the band being scored had to stain strongly and there had to be an unambiguous difference between the allelic states of the band being scored (i.e.presence or absence of a band). The statistical analyses were carried out in the R statistics environment version 1.7.1 (Venables et al., 2003). The degree of similarity between collections was calculated using the implementation of the simple matching coefficient in the R function daisy of the package cluster version 1.7.4 (Struyf et al., 1996). Hierarchical clustering was done with the R function hclust in the package mva, version 1.7.1, using the unweighted pair-group method of arithmetic averages (UPGMA). The Kelley-Gardner-Sutcliffe penalty function for a hierarchical cluster tree was calculated using the function kg in the package maptree (Kelley et al., 1996) to suggest a number of clusters in the dataset.

Table 1: Collection identities, farmer-given local names and origin of pearl millet landraces analysed for microsatellite polymorphisms

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Out of the ten primers screened for the ability to amplify and detect polymorphism, four did not produce amplification products (Table 3), four were monomorphic (PSMP2019, PSMP2059, PSMP2056 and PSMP2069), while two primers (PSMP2008, PSMP2013) were polymorphic with 2-4 bands ranging between 150 and 220 base pairs (Fig. 1). The two polymorphic primers were used for cluster analysis. The hierarchical clustering of the accessions grouped into four hierarchical clusters (Fig. 2) joined at 64% similarity level. The Kelly-Gardener-Sutcliffe penalty function minimized at four clusters which form the basis of all the analysis below. With the exception of the last cluster with predominantly material from Tsholotsho, the accessions from the two districts showed almost similar evenness in distribution among the clusters. This is shown by the similar Simpson index of diversity of 0.690 and 0.700 for Nyanga and Tsholotsho. This index is interpreted as the probability that a second accession sampled will belong to a different cluster to the first.

Table 2: Comparison of monthly rainfall and mean temperature in Nyanga North and Tsholotsho showing the substantial differences that exist between the two sites

Table 3: Characteristics of pearl millet microsatellite primers used in the study

Fig. 1: Polymorphism analysis of marker PSMP2013 against a panel of eight pearl miller lines

Fig. 2: Hierarchical clustering of Pearl millet collections from Zimbabwe based on a simple matching co-efficient and unweighted pair-group method of arithmetic averages (UPGMA). The labels are from the left to right, accession number and farmer-given names

A total of nine local farmer given names were recorded for the 47 accessions used, including PMV-3 a product of the national pearl millet breeding program in Zimbabwe. Halale was the most common name used for more than half the accessions from Tsholotsho, followed by Mudhambure with 12 accessions. Nyagushe and Isifumbata had four accessions, Isigumu and Tsholotsho-bearded with four, PMV-3 for two accessions while Nyauthi-Halale and an unspecified genotype with one accession each. Interestingly, the local names were used for more than one collection often fell in different clusters based on microsatellite classification. Eighteen accessions from Tsholotsho were identical to at least one accession from the same location compared to 14 for accessions from Nyanga. Moreover, 16 accessions from Nyanga were identical to the material from Tsholotsho. This observation suggests either poor discrimination by the primers used for the study or an indication of marked genetic differences between the genotypes.

CONCLUSION

Zimbabwe has a rich source of pearl millet germplasm which might play a major role in breeding programs to address current challenges of food security, biotic and abiotic stress and biofuel demands. This study showed that the two polymorphic primers (PSMP2008 and PSMP2013) could detect some level of polymorphism among the germplasm analyzed. The utility of microsatellites in pearl millet diversity studies has already been shown elsewhere (Mariac et al., 2006; Qi et al., 2004). Our results from microsatellite analysis contrast with preliminary agromorphological characterization data results of the same germplasm that showed variability plant height, head shape, maturity levels and size of awns for most lines (Mafa, 1999). This variability does not however seem evident in the molecular data. Although, further analysis of the germplasm is needed in order to make firm conclusions, some interesting inferences can be made from the data. The limited number of polymorphic primers reduced the discrimination power of the microsatellites resulting in the tendency to classify accessions with different names as identical and vice versa. Farmer-given local names are generally not unique indicating complexity in farmer classification as described earlier (Chakauya et al., 2006) and difficulty in using it for sampling. For further investigations more polymorphic primers would need to be used to make a more informed inferences on the germplasm.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Grateful acknowledgements are given to Dr. Charles Mutengwa, Dr. Andrew Matibiri and Collins Musimwa for comments during the study. The research was funded by IFAD in a collaborative project among the Genebank of Zimbabwe, IPGRI and FAO.

REFERENCES

  • Bertin, I., J.H. Zhu and M.D. Gale, 2005. SSCP-SNP in pearl millet- a new marker system for comparative genetics. Theor. Applied Genet., 110: 1467-1472.
    CrossRef    


  • Bhattacharjee, R., P.J. Bramel, C.T. Hash, M.A. Kolesnikova-Allen and I.S. Khairwal, 2002. Assessment of genetic diversity withing and between pearl millet landraces. Theor. Applied Genet., 105: 666-673.
    CrossRef    


  • Chakauya, E., P. Tongoona, E.A. Matibiri and M. Grum, 2006. Genetic diversity assessment of sorghum landraces in Zimbabwe using microsatellites and indigenous local names. Int. J. Bot., 2: 29-35.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • FAOSTAT, 2004. FAOSTAT statistical database. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/faostat.


  • Kelley, L.A., S.P. Gardner and M.J. Sutcliffe, 1996. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally-related subfamilies. Protein Eng., 9: 1063-1065.
    Direct Link    


  • Mafa, A., 1999. Germplasm collection report. Development of strategies for in situ conservation of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe. Proceedings of the Annual Review Workshop Genebank of Zimbabwe, IPGRI and FAO Collaborative Project, 1999, DR and SS, Harare, Zimbabwe, pp: 13-43.


  • Mariac, C., V. Luong, I. Kapran, A. Mamadou, F. Sagnard and M. Deu et al., 2006. Diversity of wild and cultivated pearl millet accessions (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] Br.) in Niger assessed by microsatellites. Theor. Applied Genet., 114: 49-58.
    CrossRef    


  • O’Kennedy, M.M. and M. Girgi, 2007. Pearl Millet. In: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry Vol. 59: Transgenic Crops IV. Pua, E.C. and M.R. Davey (Eds.). Springer Verlag, USA., pp: 119-127
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rao, S. and J.N. Mushonga, 1987. A Catalogue of Passport and Characterisation Data of Sorghum, Pearl Millet and Finger Millet Germplasm from Zimbabwe. 1st Edn. IBPGR, Rome, Italy, pp: 15-46
    Direct Link    


  • Saghai-Maroof, M.A., K.M. Soliman, R.A. Jorgensen and R.W. Allard, 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barly: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 81: 8014-8018.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Struyf, A., M. Hubert and P.J. Rousseeuw, 1996. Clustering in an object-oriented environment. J. Stat. Software, 1: 1-30.
    Direct Link    


  • Tostain, S., 1992. Enzyme diversity in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). 3 Wild Millet. Theor. Applied Genet., 83: 733-742.
    CrossRef    


  • Tostain, S., 1994. Isoenzymatic classification of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum, Poaceae) landraces from Niger (West Africa). Plant Syst. Evol., 193: 81-93.
    CrossRef    


  • Venables, W.N. and D.M. Smith, 2003. An Introduction to R. Notes on R: A programming environment for data analysis and graphics. Version 1.7.1. http://www.cran.r-project.org/ (2003-06-16)


  • Vom Brocke, K., A. Christinck, E.R. Weltzien, T. Presterl and H.H. Geiger, 2003. Farmers’ seed systems and management practices determine pearl millet genetic diversity patterns in semi-arid regions of India. Crop Sci., 43: 1680-1689.
    Direct Link    


  • Qi, X., T. Pittaway, S. Lindup, H. Liu, E.Waterman, F. Padi, C. Hash, J. Zhu, M. Gale and K. Devos, 2004. An integrated genetic map and a new set of simple sequence repeat markers for pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum. Theor. Applied Genet., 109: 1485-1493.
    CrossRef    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved