HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

International Journal of Pharmacology

Year: 2017 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 8 | Page No.: 1092-1097
DOI: 10.3923/ijp.2017.1092.1097
Relationship Between Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Patients
Archana Iyer , Susan Lanham-New, Sawsan Khoja, Maryam Al-Ghamdi and Huda Al Doghaither

Abstract: Background and Objective: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is considered as an autoimmune disease, in which both environmental and genetic factors are involved. Vitamin D (Vit D) is a vital hormone that plays an important role in immune system homeostasis, acting through vitamin D receptor (VDR). Gene polymorphisms in VDR were shown to be associated with immune diseases. The aim of this study was to look for a possible association between T1DM and the polymorphisms in VDR gene at the sites namely TaqI, BsmI and ApaI. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 T1DM patients (F = 25, M = 25) were studied. Patients and 50 age matched controls were genotyped for BsmI, ApaI and TaqI polymorphisms using PCR-RFLP assay. Statistical analyses were performed using MegStat® version 9.0 computer program. Differences in distribution of the genotypes were compared using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results: The results of the present study clearly showed for the first time, that there is an association between VDR gene polymorphisms and T1DM at the BsmI site in Saudi diabetic patients. Conclusion: This study could help us to establish the role of VDR gene in occurrence of T1DM. This would help us to develop a pharmacogenomic approach towards treatment of diabetes in relation to serum vit D levels.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Archana Iyer, Susan Lanham-New, Sawsan Khoja, Maryam Al-Ghamdi and Huda Al Doghaither, 2017. Relationship Between Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Patients. International Journal of Pharmacology, 13: 1092-1097.

Keywords: PCR-RFLP, vitamin D receptor gene, BsmI site, Type 1 diabetes mellitus and genotypes

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks and destroys the beta cells. People with this type of diabetes require insulin injections for survival. There are many complications related to Diabetes Mellitus (DM) such as dehydration, weakness and fatigue, vaginal or penile yeast infection, weight loss, blurred vision and confusion1. The long-term complications are categorized into 2 types: microvascular and macrovascular. The microvascular relate to the small blood vessels and capillaries and lead to kidney, eye and nerve disease. The macrovascular complications relate to disease of medium-sized and large blood vessels and lead to heart attacks, circulation problems in the legs and strokes2.

Vitamin D (Vit D) plays a major role in the development and maintenance of bone tissue and also in maintaining normal homeostasis of calcium and phosphorus. Recently, vit D has been associated with metabolic syndrome3. The 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3[1,25(OH)2D3] plays a major role in affecting components of the immune system4. Vitamin D is obtained both through dietary intake (10-20%) as well as cutaneous synthesis on exposure to sunlight (80-90%)5. Vitamin D3 or cholecalciferol and vitamin D2 or D3 undergo hydroxylation in the liver, leading to formation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D or 25(OH)D, that is the chief circulating form. About 25(OH)D then undergoes hydroxylation in the kidney with the help of 1α-hydroxylase enzyme to form the biologically active, dihydroxylated form of vit D, calcitriol or 1,25(OH)2D, which acts through specific vit D receptors to regulate not only calcium metabolism, but also is involved in the differentiation of various cell types6.

It is postulated that in addition to its major role in bone mineralization, calcium homeostasis and related disorders, vit D may play a role in muscle strength7-9, pathogenesis of psoriasis10, certain cancers11,12, Multiple Sclerosis (MS)13, diabetes14 and blood pressure, among other physiological and pathophysiological processes, all these indicating the high importance of maintaining normal levels of serum vit D to lead a healthy life. It is very challenging to determine vit D status of a population.

Vitamin D exerts its genomic action via the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR), that exhibits significant polymorphism. The highly polymorphic VDR gene is located on chromosome 12q (12-12q14). The VDR is expressed widely in many cell types, such as lymphocytes, macrophages and pancreatic-cells15. Four major polymorphic sites have been described within the VDR gene. Polymorphic BsmI and ApaI sites are present in intron 8 and a silent T to C substitution creates a TaqI restriction site in exon 916. Investigation on association between some VDR gene polymorphisms and DM have shown that they influence susceptibility to DM in many populations17,18. It has been well established that a length of the VDR, affected by the presence of the polymorphisms, could result in lower activation of target cells, as a longer VDR protein seems to have a decreased transcriptional activity19,20.

The aim of the present study was to look for a possible correlation between polymorphisms in the VDR gene and the occurrence of T1DM in Saudi patients. The results of the study will help to understand the molecular mechanism of interaction between vit D status and metabolic disorders such as DM. This information will help us in designing a pharmacogenomic approach towards treatments of DM making it more effective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection: Blood samples were collected from King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) from 50 control subjects with normal blood glucose levels and 50 type 1 diabetic patients. Informed consent was taken from all study subjects to participate in the research. The study was carried out between 2015 and 2016 a King Fahd Medical Research Center (KFMRC). Fasting glucose was measured by Dimension Vista® System (Siemens, Germany) and vitamin D (Total) levels was measured using ADVIA Centaur® immunoassay System (Siemens, USA). A K2-EDTA tube was used for DNA extraction from whole blood. All chemicals used in the study were of analytical grade.

DNA extraction: Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, USA, Cat. No. 51104). The extracted DNA was stored at -20°C for PCR amplification. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA was calculated automatically by Nanodrop2000c instrument from Thermo Scientific (USA).

Polymerase chain reaction: For Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), the master mix from Thermo Scientific (Maxima Hot Start Green PCR Master Mix (2X), K1061, USA) was used. The primers were purchased from Biolegio, Netherlands. The forward primer was (5’-CAA CCA AGA CTA CAA GTA CCG CGT CAG TGA-3’) and the reverse primer was (5’-GCA ACT CCT CAT GGC TGA GGT CTC-3’) according to Uitterlinden et al.21. The 100 μM stock of these primers was prepared according to the manufactures instructions and then 10 μM aliquots were prepared by 1:10 dilution using sterile distilled water.

Table 1: PCR reaction components

For PCR, the reaction mixer (50 μL) contained 2X reaction buffer (containing 500 mM KCl, 100 mM tris-HCl pH 8.3 and 1% Triton X-100 final concentrations), 4 mM Mg2+ 4 μM deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.45 U Taq DNA polymerase and 10-30 ng of DNA template. The total reaction volume was made up to 50 μL with nuclease free water (Table 1).

The master mix and the sample were divided into the PCR tubes in pre-PCR area before transferring them to the thermal cycler GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Model No. N805S3052708) supplied from Applied Biosystem, Japan. The amplification conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, an annealing at 60°C for 1 min and an extension at 68°C for 2 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min and ended at hold at 4°C.

To verify PCR product, horizontal gel equipment (Model No. 48205) and an electrophoresis power supply (Model No. 041BR) from Bio-Rad, UK were used. The amplification products were resolved in 1% agarose ethidium bromide stained gels and 1X Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) electrophoresis buffer. The gel of electrophoresis was prepared using agarose, ethidium bromide promega (USA) and TBE buffer (10X) which were purchased from Thermo Scientific, US. DNA loading dye (R0611) and DNA ladder (SM0314) ranging from 250-10,000 bp were used in each run. Gel documentation system (Model No.M03 2746) from UVitec, Cambridge, UK, was used to visualize the PCR product.

RFLP analysis of VDR gene polymorphism: Amplified PCR products (5 μL) were digested with 3000 U of each restriction enzyme from Thermo Scientific, USA. These enzymes are ApaI, BsmI and TaqI. These enzymes were used according to the supplier-recommended protocols (Thermo Scientific, US, Canada). By using the thermal cycler, the reaction was incubated in 37°C for 1 h which is the activation temperature of BsmI and ApaI, then the enzymes were inactivated by incubation at 65°C for 20 min. After that, the reaction was incubated 65°C for 1 h which is the activation temperature of TaqI, then the enzymes were inactivated by incubation at 80°C for 20 min. The RFLP products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel. All chemicals used were of analytical grade and were used as received without any further.

Statistical analysis: All statistical analyses were performed using the MegStat® version 9.0 computer program. Data were given as Mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Differences among the two groups were tested using the t-test. Differences in distribution of the genotypes were compared using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Rare genotypes (n = 0 in any group) were excluded from the analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-value <0.0522.

RESULTS

The volunteers in this study were classified according to Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) test as two groups: T1DM and the control group. Each group consisting of 25 females and 25 males, total 50 subjects each matched in age. The clinical and biochemical parameters for the two groups, T1DM and control sample are shown in Table 2. The age between T1DM and the control group showed significant differences (p<0.05), but non-significant differences between females and males in the 2 groups. The FBG values between T1DM and control subjects shows significantly different at p<0.05 but non-significant difference between females and males in the 2 groups. The vit D total values between each of the 2 groups, females and males, were not significantly different (p>0.05) between T1DM and control subjects.

The PCR products in our samples from Saudi volunteers, ~2229 bp as shown in Fig. 1, were digested with the BsmI, TaqI and ApaI restriction enzymes. Accordingly, the allele frequencies were 28% for B and 72% for b in BsmI, 50% for A and 50% for a in ApaI and 52% for T and 48% for t in TaqI RFLPs. The most frequent genotype was the recessive homozygous genotype in BsmI (60%). Interestingly, in BsmI genotype, the homozygous recessive was more frequent in diabetic people compared to control subjects, with bb frequency of 60% in diabetics compared to 24% in the control group (Table 3).

Fig. 1:
One percent agarose gel showing the results of three restriction enzymes ApaI, BsmI and TaqI
 
Lane M: DNA marker, Lane 2, 3: Negative control and PCR products yielded one band of size 2229 bp, Lane 4-8: Comparisons between three restriction enzymes ApaI, BsmI, TaqI according to T1DM (P) and the control group (C)

Table 2: Clinical and biochemical characteristics of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and controls
FBG: Fasting blood glucose, Values represented as the Mean±Standard Deviation (SD), p1: Value for female and male control groups, p2: Value for female and male T1DM, p3: Value for control groups and T1DM

Table 3: Distribution of the genotypes in the control and diabetic patients

DISCUSSION

This study has revealed for the first time, that there is an association between VDR gene polymorphisms and T1DM at the BsmI site in Saudi diabetic patients. The majority of T1DM is considered as a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease and vit D compounds are well known to supress T-cell activation via the binding to VDR and thus VDR gene polymorphism were shown to associated with immune diseases23. Therefore, the aim of present study was to investigate the possible relationship between polymorphisms in the VDR gene and occurrence of T1DM in Saudi population. As far as the authors are aware, this was the first study that showed a positive relationship between T1DM and VDR gene polymorphisms in Saudi patients. Results from the present study demonstrated that B allele of BsmI gene polymorphisms was more frequent in healthy controls compared with T1DM patients and there was a highly significant difference (p<0.05) in allele frequency between the cases and the controls. In control subjects, the frequency of homozygous recessive genotype bb was only 24% while in T1DM patients it was 60%. Therefore, allele b in BsmI region is a risk allele. A similar study carried out on Japanese population by Motohashi et al.23 analyzed the polymorphism at the BsmI site on the VDR gene and found that BsmΙ polymorphism is associated with acute-onset type 1 diabetes. In agreement with our results, a study on Taiwanese, has shown that T1DM was associated with B allele24.

In contrast, there is no significant difference between T1DM and controls in the allele and genotype frequency in TaqI and ApaI gene polymorphisms in Saudi patients. In contradictory to our results, a recent study on Egyptian population has shown that ApaI and TaqI VDR gene polymorphisms have an association with T1DM25. In Saudi population, a study showed that ApaI was found to be in low frequency in T1DM26.

This outcome matches the outcome of the largest metadata which found relationship between BsmI polymorphisms in VDR and T1DM, whereas the ApaI and TaqI polymorphisms do not appear to have a significant association with overall T1DM risk. Therefore, the BsmI variant B allele (BB or Bb) carriers might have a 30% increased risk of the T1DM when compared with the bb homozygote carries27. In contrast, a meta-analysis in 2006 showed that there was no association between VDR gene polymorphisms and T1DM in case-control and family transmission studies28. A recent study by Iyer et al.29, found that ApaI polymorphism of VDR gene is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi population.

Furthermore, the variations of the results between this study and other studies might be due to ethnic differences and the interactions with other genetic or environmental factors that are involved in the pathogenesis of T1DM30. Recently, it was observed that many people do not respond to standard diabetic drugs31. Though many pharmacogenomics researches have described a relationship between single nucleotide variations and drug resistance, there are still conflicting results32. Thus, performing a pharmacogenomics analysis that might help us in the long run to formulate and administer the correct anti-diabetic drug according to the patient’s genetic variation of the VDR gene.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study clearly demonstrated that the B allele of BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene is associated with increased risk of T1DM in Saudi patients. The homozygous recessive genotype bb seems to be more predominant in diabetic patients while the homozygous dominant genotype BB is less frequent in diabetic patients indicating that the B allele clearly offers protection against T1DM. This study is an important milestone in establishing the correlation between a particular SNP and prognosis of T1DM and will pave the way to develop a pharmacogenomic approach towards appropriate treatment of T1DM.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTS

This study has clearly shown that the BsmI allele of the vitamin D receptor gene is significantly associated with T1DM in Saudi population. Although many studies have been carried out previously on the vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism’s possible role in T1DM, results have been very different in various ethnic groups. This study has revealed that the homozygous recessive genotype bb is associated with T1DM and this is an important finding that throws light on the protective role of the dominant B allele of BsmI site in healthy controls, making it a candidate gene for further pharmacogenomic studies in the prognosis and treatment of T1DM.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This Project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. RG-8-130-36. The authors, therefore, with acknowledge thanks DSR for technical and financial support.

REFERENCES

  • Katsarou, A., S. Gudbjörnsdottir, A. Rawshani, D. Dabelea and E. Bonifacio et al., 2017. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers, Vol. 3.
    CrossRef    


  • Masharani, U., 2008. Diabetes Demystified: A Self-Teaching Guide. McGraw-Hill, New York


  • Strange, R.C., K.E. Shipman and S. Ramachandran, 2015. Metabolic syndrome: A review of the role of vitamin D in mediating susceptibility and outcome. World J. Diabetes, 6: 896-911.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Tanner, S.B. and S.A. Harwell, 2015. More than healthy bones: A review of vitamin D in muscle health Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis., 7: 152-159.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rizzoli, R. and J.P. Bonjour, 2004. Dietary protein and bone health. J. Bone Miner. Res., 19: 527-531.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nair, R. and A. Maseeh, 2012. Vitamin D: The sunshine vitamin. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacotherap., 3: 118-126.
    Direct Link    


  • Holick, M.F., 1999. Evolution, Biologic Functions and Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D. In: Vitamin D: Physiology, Molecular Biology and Clinical Applications, Holick, M.F. (Ed.). Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, pp: 1-16


  • Girgis, C.M., R.J. Clifton-Bligh, M.W. Hamrick, M.F. Holick and J.E. Gunton, 2013. The roles of vitamin D in skeletal muscle: Form, function and metabolism. Endocr. Rev., 34: 33-83.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hamilton, B., 2010. Vitamin D and human skeletal muscle. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, 20: 182-190.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Barrea, L., M.C. Savanelli, C. Di Somma, M. Napolitano, M. Megna, A. Colao and S. Savastano, 2017. Vitamin D and its role in psoriasis: An overview of the dermatologist and nutritionist. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord., 18: 195-205.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fleet, J.C., M. DeSmet, R. Johnson and Y. Li, 2012. Vitamin D and cancer: A review of molecular mechanisms. Biochem. J., 441: 61-76.
    CrossRef    


  • Garland, F.C., C.F. Garland, E.D. Gorham and J.F. Young, 1990. Geographic variation in breast cancer mortality in the United States: A hypothesis involving exposure to solar radiation. Prev. Med., 19: 614-622.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Alharbi, F.M., 2015. Update in vitamin D and multiple sclerosis. Neurosciences, 20: 329-335.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gulseth, H.L., C. Wium, K. Angel, E.F. Eriksen and K.I. Birkeland, 2017. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in subjects with type 2 diabetes and vitamin D deficiency: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care,
    CrossRef    


  • Pittas, A.G., S.S. Harris, P.C. Stark and B. Dawson-Hughes, 2007. The effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose and markers of inflammation in nondiabetic adults. Diabetes Care, 30: 980-986.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Rostand, S.G., 1997. Ultraviolet light may contribute to geographic and racial blood pressure differences. Hypertension, 30: 150-156.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jones, G., R. Horst, G. Carter and H.L.J. Makin, 2007. Contemporary diagnosis and treatment of vitamin D-related disorders. J. Bone Miner. Res., 22: V11-V15.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dawson-Hughes, B., R.P. Heaney, M.F. Holick, P. Lips, P.J. Meunier and R. Vieth, 2005. Estimates of optimal vitamin D status. Osteoporosis Int., 16: 713-716.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mithal, A., D.A. Wahl, J.P. Bonjour, P. Burckhardt and B. Dawson-Hughes et al., 2009. Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporosis Int., 20: 1807-1820.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Baroncelli, G.l., A. Bereket, M. El-Kholy, L. Audi and Y. Cesur et al., 2008. Rickets in the Middle East: Role of environment and genetic predisposition. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 93: 1743-1750.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Uitterlinden, A.G., H.A.P. Pols, H. Burger, Q. Huang and P.L.A. van Daele et al., 1996. A large‐scale population‐based study of the association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density. J. Bone Miner. Res., 11: 1241-1248.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wasserstein, R.L. and N.A. Lazar, 2016. The ASA's statement on p-values: Context, process and purpose. Am. Statistician, 70: 129-133.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Motohashi, Y., S. Yamada, T. Yanagawa, T. Maruyama and R. Suzuki et al., 2003. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism affects onset pattern of type 1 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 88: 3137-3140.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chang, T.J., H.H. Lei, J.I. Yeh, K.C. Chiu and K.C. Lee et al., 2000. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms influence susceptibility to type 1 diabetes mellitus in the Taiwanese population. Clin. Endocrinol., 52: 575-580.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Elgazzaz, M.G., E.A.E. Mohammed, H.A. Atwa and F.M. Badr, 2016. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and type 1 diabetes in an Egyptian population. Mol. Biol., Vol. 5.
    CrossRef    


  • El-Badrawy, E.S., Z.S. Ibrahim, A. Aziz, M.M. Kamel, G.M. Shehab and A. Kamal, 2013. Association of vitamin D receptor genes polymorphism (Apa I and Taq I) with type 1 diabetes in Saudi Arabia (KSA). Life Sci. J., 10: 1555-1562.
    Direct Link    


  • Riachy, R., B. Vandewalle, J.K. Conte, E. Moerman and P. Sacchetti et al., 2002. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 protects RINm5F and human islet cells against cytokine-induced apoptosis: Implication of the antiapoptotic protein A20. Endocrinology, 143: 4809-4819.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Guo, S.W., V.L. Magnuson, J.J. Schiller, X. Wang, Y. Wu and S. Ghosh, 2006. Meta-analysis of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and type 1 diabetes: A HuGE review of genetic association studies. Am. J. Epidemiol., 164: 711-724.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iyer, A.P., S. Lanham-New, S. Khoja, M.A. Al-Ghamdi and S. Bahlas, 2017. Association of Apa I polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi population. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci., 5: 271-276.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mohammadnejad, Z., M. Ghanbari, R. Ganjali, J.T. Afshari and M. Heydarpour et al., 2012. Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and type 1 diabetes mellitus in Iranian population. Mol. Biol. Rep., 39: 831-837.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Crowley, M.J., R. Holleman, M.L. Klamerus, H.B. Bosworth, D. Edelman and M. Heisler, 2014. Factors associated with persistent poorly controlled diabetes mellitus: Clues to improving management in patients with resistant poor control. Chronic Illness, 10: 291-302.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pollastro, C., C. Ziviello, V. Costa and A. Ciccodicola, 2015. Pharmacogenomics of drug response in type 2 diabetes: Toward the definition of tailored therapies? PPAR Res., Vol. 2015.
    CrossRef    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved