HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Ecologia

Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 12-19
DOI: 10.3923/ecologia.2017.12.19
FPOM Feeding Mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Insecta) from South India: Life History and Secondary Production
Chellapandian Balachandran , Sankarappan Anbalagan and Sundaram Dinakaran

Abstract: Objective: We analyzed the lifecycle pattern and secondary production of FPOM feeding three dominant mayfly species from a tropical stream of Southern Eastern Ghats, India. Methodology: Month-wise sampling for a period of a year was done. The collected specimen were stored and reared. The size frequency and cohort production methods were used for analyzing life histories and secondary production. Results: The present study showed that C. alagarensis and L. silambarensis had asynchronous nymphal development with a continuous emergence in a year while, C. grimiensis had asynchronous pattern but mass emergence with two seasons. The cohort P/B ratio was analyzed for measuring secondary production. Conclusion: These findings address the need for more quantitative accounts of population dynamics (life cycle patterns, fecundity, development rates, production and P/B) of aquatic insect species in streams across environmental gradients.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Chellapandian Balachandran, Sankarappan Anbalagan and Sundaram Dinakaran, 2017. FPOM Feeding Mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Insecta) from South India: Life History and Secondary Production. Ecologia, 7: 12-19.

Keywords: collector, mayfly, stream, CPOM, production, Choroterpes, Labiobaetis, Caenis and Fine particulate organic matter

INTRODUCTION

The Coarse Particulate Organic Matter (CPOM) is transported to streams from allochthonous and autochthonous sources. Allochthonous carbon inputs comprise mainly terrestrial plant litter which has been characterized as a dominant input of energy source into stream ecosystem1. This CPOM provides two distinct sources such as food and substrate or habitat for a variety of aquatic organisms. Entry of CPOM in stream, there are two mechanisms occur in stream to convert Fine Particulate Organic Matter (FPOM) that microbial colonization, which leach the input of litter, consequently change into palatable for macroinvertebrate colonization1-3. The FPOM is an amorphous collection of particles <1 mm, originating from instream CPOM breakdown, sloughed cells of algae, invertebrate fecal pellets and fragments derived from the terrestrial environment4.

In general, aquatic macroinvertebrates play a very important role in the litter processing and nutrient cycling, which are belong to several specialized feeding groups such as filter-feeders, collectors, scrapers (sometimes called grazers), shredders and predators5. Shredders are commonly found where there are large accumulations of CPOM in forested headwater streams and the mouthparts of this group adapted for maceration of the CPOM particles, which they tear and shred while feeding. Their feeding results in the initiation of the conversion of CPOM to FPOM by physically breaking up the CPOM and by production of FPOM in the form of fecal pellets. The FPOM accumulates in many places on the streambed wherever the current slackens enough to permit it to settle from the water column and accumulate in these deposition zones. Mayflies (Baetis, Labiobaetis, Caenis and Leptophlebiids) are a common example of this functional group6.

Life cycle information on collectors is a fundamental importance for nutrient cycling7. Secondary production is a useful measure associated with life histories because it combines individual growth with population survivorship. Mayflies have the ability to adopt different life cycle strategies ranging from a single generation to two or more generations per year, which is reported worldwide8-10. Mayflies have generally similar trophic roles (they feed principally by scraping or collecting food from surfaces), therefore, when resources are limited, we may expect them to segregate either by food type, habitat or space9.

In India, lifecycle pattern of mayflies was recorded as multivoltine with asynchronous development of Leptophlebiidae (Petersula courtallensis and Notophlebia jobi), Ephemeridae (Ephemera nadinae), Heptageniidae (Thalerosphyrus flowersi, Afronurus kumbakkaraiensis and Epeorus sp.) Baetidae (Baetis) in the hill streams of South India11-14. Similar study was observed on Cloeon sp. (Baetidae) in Northern India15. Some pioneering studies have been confirmed that temperature is one among the main factors disturbing from the early stage of nymphal growth to the fecundity of adult16,17. Other factors regulating the growth and development of aquatic insects are determined by food quality and quantity, habitat and competition18,19. These factors have a direct influence on the nymphal size before emergence, on emergence timing, population densities and consequently on secondary production. Mainly, the study of the life history of a single species is essential in order to achieve a full knowledge of the ecosystem itself and the relations within it. Hence, the present study was aimed to inventorize the lifecycle pattern and secondary production of FPOM feeding three dominant mayfly taxa: Choroterpes alagarensis (Leptophlebiidae), Labiobaetis silambarensis (Baetidae) and Caenis grimiensis (Caenidae) from a tropical stream of Southern Eastern Ghats, India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: The present study was carried out in Alagar hills. It forms a discontinuous minor range in the Deccan plain and appears as an extension of Eastern Ghats. It comes under Natham range in Dindigul forest division and located 22 km North East of Madurai city (10°00’-10°30’ N and 75°55’-78°20’ E). The deciduous forests of Alagar hill is composed of both disturbed and protected vegetation, which are varies due to change in topography of the area (Sriganesan 1984, 1987). The famous Alagar kovil, the temple of ‘The God of Beauty’ is situated at the foot of the hills (275 m). There are three streams: Hanuman theertham (350 m), Silambar odai and the Nooburagangai (425 m). The specimen was collected from the Nooburagangai stream. The rainfall regime is erratic. This area comes under dissymmetric rainfall regime with the bulk of the rains during the retreating Northeast monsoon (October-November). Some rain is also received during the Southwest monsoon (April-May).

Sampling: In this study, the specimen of C. alagarensis, L. silambarensis and C. grimiensis were collected once in a month from September, 2008 to August, 2009, using ‘D-net’ and hand picking methods according to Sivaramakrislman20. In each study site, three replicate samplings were done. The pool and riffle areas were chosen for sampling. In riffle, 1 m2 areas were randomly selected. In pool habitat, specimens were collected with the help of D-net, bearing mesh size 300 μm. The collected specimens were carefully removed with the help of a fine and soft brush. The collected specimens were separated in two sets. First set was preserved in the field using 70% ethanol and second set was brought to the laboratory for rearing purposes.

Laboratory analysis: In the laboratory, both samples were segregated at species level and labeled each group of species with the help of a binocular stereo-microscope, Leica, Germany, Model. The growth pattern was analyzed based on the total length measurements. Each nymph was measured to the nearest 0.1 mm of length of a nymph (from the anterior margin of the labrum to the posterior margin of the last abdominal segment) and width of the head, using a micrometer. Assessing the degree of nymphal developments and different stages were recognized according to morphological features based on wing pad size and length of nymph21,22. Hatching periods were determined by the presence of small-sized nymphs, while the emergence periods were recognized by the presence of dark wing pads in mature nymphs and from observations of imagoes in the field23-25. The dark wing pad of respective nymphs were also collected from field and reared in the laboratory for 1 day in a BOD incubator adjusted to stream water temperature to identify the respective species. Estimates of secondary production were established using the size frequency method26. Values were corrected for Cohort Production Interval (CPI) according to Benke27. The relationship between length and width of mayflies were measured by regression analysis with 95% of confidential intervals.

RESULTS

Choroterpes alagarensis: The nymphal stages of C. alagarensis are typically found underside of the pebbles than accumulation of plant material. The population of C. alagarensis was abundant in March with densities about 254±32.2 individuals m–2, while very low abundance was recorded in June and November. The size frequency histograms showed that C. alagaresnsis have asynchronous pattern, overlapping generation with the continuous emergence in a year (Fig. 1).

Labiobaetis silambarensis: The nymph of L. silambarensis inhabits a wide range of stream substrates. Typically, they are more abundant in leaf litter rather than other substrates.

Fig. 1(a-b): Size frequency histogram of (a) Body length and (b) Head width of Choroterpes alagarensis

Fig. 2(a-b): Size frequency histogram of (a) Body length and (b) Head width of Labiobaetis silambarensis

Table 1: Relationship between body length and head width of three mayfly taxa

The abundance of L. silambarensis population was high in February with a density of 185±22.7 individuals m–2, while very low mean abundance was recorded in the month of June and July with density 20.7±5.1 and 15.8±4.7 individuals m–2, respectively. The size frequency histograms for body length and width of head capsule of the L. silambarensis (Fig. 2), explained the asynchronous nymphal development with a continuous emergence in a year.

Caenis grimiensis: Nymphs of C. grimiensis occur frequently in organic rich plant debris area of stream pool and they are quite tolerant of organic pollution. Maximum abundance of C. grimiensis was recorded in February and September, with density of about 72±6.3 and 70±12.7 individuals m–2, respectively, while minimum abundance during July and November with density of 15±2.1 and 20±3.6 individuals m–2 respectively. The size frequency histograms for body length and head capsule width of the C. grimiensis (Fig. 3) revealed that the nymphal development was two generations in a year. There was a long winter generation, the newly hatched young nymph appeared in May and their growth continued till October. The eggs laid by the adult of the winter generation yield the individuals of a short summer generation, which developed from December-April. The first generation was emerged in October, similarly the second generation in April.

Production dynamics: Linear regression analysis was used to correlate between the body length and head width of three analyzed species. Result of this analysis was significantly correlated with 99.99% confidence interval for three species (Fig. 4, Table 1). Production dynamic details (densities, biomass and secondary production (P) and ratio of cohort production and biomass) of C. alagarensis, L. silambarensis and C. grimiensis were given in the Table 2. The maximum production of above mentioned three mayfly taxa was observed in March (657.07 mg m–2), whereas, minimum production was recorded in November (360.86 mg m–2). The annual secondary production and cohort production/biomass ratio (P/B) of C. alagarensis (2158 and 8.17 mg m–2 year–1) was higher than the L. silambarensis (2056.02 and 7.34 mg m–2 year–1) and C. grimiensis (1196.23 and 6.41 mg m–2year–1).

Fig. 3(a-b): Size frequency histogram of (a) Body length and (b) Head width of Caenis grimiensis

Table 2: Production values of three mayfly species from Southern Eastern Ghats

DISCUSSION

The classification of the mayfly life cycle patterns were categorized based on the number of generation per year and also each life cycle into periods of slow and fast growth28. This pattern varies from species to species or within species in a different environment, e.g., Baetis alpinus showed high plasticity, being bivoltine at lower altitudes and univoltine at higher altitude29. Mayfly population almost multivoltine life cycles in temperate and tropical region30-32, while cold-temperate and subarctic region have univoltine with hatching, growth and emergence restricted to a very short part of the year33. McClure and Stewart34 reported that the Choroterpes mexicanus was multivoltine with three relatively distinct generations in the Brazos river, Texas. In contrast, C. alagarensis (Leptophlebiidae) had multivoltine with 8 distinct generations. Several researchers31 suggested a wide range of life cycle types in the Ephemeroptera, claims that the water temperature is a major factor determining the egg development and nymphal growth. Campbell35 reported that the water temperature remained above 18°C for most of the year in Queensland, supports occurrence of three or more generations of Jappa spp. (Leptophlebiidae). This report supports the increasing number of generations of C. alagarensis in tropical stream. The production of species is directly related to consumption, it represents a quantification of a population’s resource utilization (food and space) in a given time interval36. The present study estimated that annual production of C. alagarensis were higher (2158 mg m–2 year–1) than the following species: Choroterpes species (202.7 mg m–2 year–1) in Hong kong stream9, C. mexicanus in the Brazos River, Texas34, Thraulodes sp. and Leptohyphes sp., from Costa Rica37.

The genus Labiobaetis has a wide distribution; it appears to be present all over the world except in Australia, Central and South America38. Life cycle pattern of this genus is not reported elsewhere so far. The newly described species, L. silambarensis had an asynchronous nymphal development with multiple generations in a year.

Fig. 4(a-c):
Regression analysis shows the relationship between body length and head width of mayflies with 95% confidence line for each regression line, (a) Choroterpes alagarensis, (b) Labiobaetis silambarensis and (c) Caenis grimiensis

The peak emergence was observed in the month of February and March. Similar findings were observed on the life cycle patterns of Baetis sp. and Cloeon sp., in the Umkhrah stream, Shillong, India39,40.

Caenis grimiensis sp. nov., had two distinct generations and emergence during October and April, which coincides with some European Caenids like C. horaria and C. latipennsis species41. Similar result was reported in various studies30,31,42-45. The estimated annual production of C. grimiensis is lower than C. luctuosa (6349.81 mg m–2), while the production of C. grimiensis was higher than C. horaria, C. amica and C. rivulorum46. According to Benke and Jacobi47 the most important factor limiting production in the riverine ecosystem where food is not a limiting factor than habitat characteristics, so production would be optimal when the functional habitat per unit area is high. Cid et al.19 documented the production of Ephoron virgo were determined the proportion of habitat than the availability of foods. Now-a-days, the present study area of Nooburagangai stream in Alagar hill is highly impacted by anthropogenic an activity which leads to the destruction of stream habitat and accumulation of wastes. Further enhances the habitat destruction and leads stressful life history patterns of mayfly population. Government should concern over this problem and ensure to prevent the entry of pilgrim’s wastes into stream. If it happens over a period of time there would be a chance for the extinction of sensitive species. For example, Dinakaran and Krishnan48 reported that Isca sp., was found missing in the same region and this species may be under threatening/disappeared49.

CONCLUSION

Basic autecology studies, including describing life histories of aquatic insects are fundamental to the understanding of stream ecology. The present study showed that C. alagarensis and L. silambarensis had asynchronous nymphal development with a continuous emergence in a year, which indicate that both the species belong to multivoltine. Caenis grimiensis had only two generation in a year. The cohort P/B ratio was 6.41, 7.34 and 8.17 in C. grimiensis, L. silambarensis and C. algarensis, respectively. It clearly shows that, the studied mayfly populations play a major role in energy transfer within stream ecosystems. These findings emphasize the need for more quantitative accounts of population dynamics (life cycle patterns, fecundity, development rates, production and P/B) of aquatic insect species in streams across environmental gradients.

SIGNIFICANT STATEMENTS

The present study revealed that mayfly populations play a major role in energy transfer within stream ecosystems
Life cycle pattern of mayfly would be used to assess the water quality in stream
Secondary production is addressing to nutrient cycling of stream ecosystem level and also used indicate climate change

REFERENCES

  • Suberkropp, K., 1992. Interactions with Invertebrates. In: The Ecology of Aquatic Hyphomycetes, Barlocher, F. (Ed.). Chapter 6, Springer, Berlin, ISBN: 978-3-642-76857-6, pp: 118-134
    Direct Link    


  • Cummins, K.W. and M.J. Klug, 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 10: 147-172.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Webster, J.R. and E.F. Benfield, 1986. Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 17: 567-594.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • LeRoy, C.J. and J.C. Marks, 2006. Litter quality, stream characteristics and litter diversity influence decomposition rates and macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biol., 51: 605-617.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lamberti, G.A. and J.W. Moore, 1984. Aquatic Insects as Primary Consumers. In: The Ecology of Aquatic Insects, Resh, V.H. and D.M. Rosenberg (Eds.). Praeger Publishers, New York, pp: 164-195


  • Allan, J.D. and M.M. Castillo, 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Functions of the Running Water. 2nd Edn., Springer, Netherlands, ISBN: 9781402055836, Pages: 436


  • Bottova, K., T. Derka, P. Beracko and J.M.T. de Figueroa, 2013. Life cycle, feeding and secondary production of Plecoptera community in a constant temperature stream in Central Europe. Limnologica-Ecol. Manage. Inland Waters, 43: 27-33.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dudgeon, D., 1999. Tropical Asian Streams: Zoobenthos, Ecology and Conservation. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, ISBN: 9789622094697, pp: 197-288


  • Salas, M. and D. Dudgeon, 2003. Life histories, production dynamics and resource utilisation of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in two tropical Asian forest streams. Freshwater Biol., 48: 485-499.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dobrin, M. and D.J. Giberson, 2003. Life history and production of mayflies, stoneflies and caddisflies (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) in a spring-fed stream in Prince Edward Island, Canada: Evidence for population asynchrony in spring habitats? Can. J. Zool., 81: 1083-1095.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sivaramakrishnan, K.G. and S.V. Job, 1981. Studies on mayfly populations of Courtallam streams. Zool. Surv. India, 2: 105-116.


  • Balasubramanian, C., K. Venkataraman and K.G. Sivaramakrishnan, 1992. Bioecological studies on the burrowing mayfly Ephemera (Aethephemera) nadinae McCafferty and Edmunds 1973 (Epremeroptera: Ephemeridae) in Kurangani stream, Western Ghats. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 89: 72-77.
    Direct Link    


  • Sivaruban, T., S. Barathy, K. Venkataraman and M. Arunachalam, 2010. Life cycle studies of Heptageniidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) in Kumbbakarai stream of Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. J. Threatened Taxa, 2: 1223-1226.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Anbalagan, S., S. Dinakaran and M. Krishnan, 2014. Life cycle and secondary production of four species from functional feeding groups in a tropical stream of South India. Int. J. Zool.
    CrossRef    


  • Gupta, S., R.G. Michael and A. Gupta, 1993. Laboratory studies on the life cycle and growth of Cloeon sp. (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Meghalaya State, India. Aquat. Insects: Int. J. Freshwater Entomol., 15: 49-55.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Briers, R.A., J.H.R. Gee, H.M. Cariss and R. Geoghegan, 2004. Inter-population dispersal by adult stoneflies detected by stable isotope enrichment. Freshwater Biol., 49: 425-431.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sand, K. and J.E. Brittain, 2009. Life cycle shifts in Baetis rhodani (Ephemeroptera) in the Norwegian mountains. Aquat. Insects: Int. J. Freshwater Entomol., 31: 283-291.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chadwick, M.A. and A.D. Huryn, 2005. Response of stream macroinvertebrate production to atmospheric nitrogen deposition and channel drying. Limnol. Oceanography, 50: 228-236.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cid, N., C. Ibanez and N. Prat, 2008. Life history and production of the burrowing mayfly Ephoron virgo (Olivier, 1791) (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae) in the lower Ebro river: A comparison after 18 years. Aquat. Insects: Int. J. Freshwater Entomol., 30: 163-178.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sivaramakrislman, K.G., 1984. A new genus and species or Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae from Southern India (Ephemeroptera). Int. J. Entomol., 26: 194-203.
    Direct Link    


  • Clifford, H.F., 1970. Analysis of a Northern mayfly (Ephemeroptera) population, with special reference to allometry of size. Can. J. Zool., 48: 305-316.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cianciari, S., 1980. Stages and Physiological Periods in the Development of Cloeon dipterum (L.) (Baetidae). In: Advances in Ephemeropteran Biology, Flannagan, J.F. and K.E. Marshall (Eds.). Plenum, New York, pp: 265-276


  • Sivaramakrishnan, K.G. and K. Venkataraman, 1987. Observations on feeding propensities, growth rate and fecundity in mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Proc.: Anim. Sci., 96: 305-309.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Arnekleiv, J.V., 1996. Life cycle strategies and seasonal distribution of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in a small stream in Central Norway. Fauna Norvegica Ser. B, 43: 19-30.
    Direct Link    


  • Taylor, J.M. and J.H. Kennedy, 2006. Life history and secondary production of Caenis latipennis (Ephemeroptera: Caenidae) in Honey Creek, Oklahoma. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 99: 821-830.
    Direct Link    


  • Hamilton, A.L., 1969. On estimating annual production. Limnol. Oceanogr., 14: 771-781.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Benke, A.C., 1979. A modification of the Hynes method for estimating secondary production with particular significance for multivoltine populations. Limnol. Oceanogr., 24: 168-171.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Landa, V., 1968. Developmental cycles of Central European Ephemeroptera and their interrelations. Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca, 65: 276-284.
    Direct Link    


  • Landa, V., 1969. Jepice-ephemeroptera. Fauna CSSR, 18: 1-351.
    Direct Link    


  • Clifford, H.F., 1982. Life cycles of mayflies (Ephemeroptera), with special reference to voltinism. Quaestiones Entomologicae, 18: 15-90.
    Direct Link    


  • Brittain, J.E., 1991. Life History Characteristics as a Determinant of the Response of Mayflies and Stoneflies to Manmade Environmental Disturbance (Ephmeroptera and Plecoptera). In: Overview and Strategies of Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera, Alba-Tercedor, J. and A. Sandez-Ortega (Eds.). Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville Florida, ISBN: 9781877743085, pp: 539-545


  • Salas, M. and D. Dudgeon, 2001. Laboratory and field studies of mayfly growth in tropical Asia. Archiv Hydrobiologie, 153: 75-90.
    Direct Link    


  • Clifford, H.F., M.R. Robertson and K.A. Zelp, 1973. Life cycle patterns of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) from some streams of Alberta, Canada. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ephemeroptera, August 17-20, 1970, Florida A&M University, pp: 122-131.


  • McClure, R.G. and K.W. Stewart, 1976. Life cycle and production of the mayfly Choroterpes (Neochoroterpes) mexicanus Allen (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 69: 134-144.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Campbell, I.C., 1995. The Life Histories of three Tropical Species of Jappa Harker (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) in the Mitchell River System, Queensland, Australia. In: Current Directions in Research on Ephemeroptera, Corkum, L.D. and J.J.H. Ciborowski (Eds.). Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, ISBN: 9781551300757, pp: 197-206


  • Benke, A.C., 1993. Concepts and patterns of invertebrate production in running waters. Verhandlungen Internationalen Vereinigung Theoretische Angewandte Limnologie, 25: 15-38.


  • Ramirez, A. and C.M. Pringle, 1998. Structure and production of a benthic insect assemblage in a neotropical stream. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 17: 443-463.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • McCafferty, W.P. and R.D. Waltz, 1995. Labiobaetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae): new status, new North American species and related new genus. Entomol. News, 106: 19-28.
    Direct Link    


  • Gupta, A. and R.G. Michael, 1981. Population ecology and feeding propensities of two co-existing species of Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Proceedings of the Symposium on Ecology of Animal Population, October 26-28, 1978, Calcutta, India, pp: 95-104.


  • Gupta, A., 1993. Life histories of two species of Baetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in a small North-East Indian stream. Archiv Hydrobiologie, 127: 105-114.
    Direct Link    


  • Huryn, A.D. and J.B. Wallace, 2000. Life history and production of stream insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 45: 83-100.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Elliott, J.M., 1967. The life histories and drifting of the plecoptera and ephemeroptera in a dartmoor stream. J. Anim. Ecol., 36: 343-362.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sowa, R., 1975. Ecology and biogeography of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of running waters in the polish part of the Carpathians. 2: Life cycles. Acta Hydrobiologica, 17: 319-353.


  • Humpesch, U.H., 1979. Life cycles and growth rates of Baetis spp. (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in the laboratory and in two stony streams in Austria. Freshwater Biol., 9: 467-479.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Brittain, J.E., 1982. Biology of mayflies. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 27: 119-147.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Li, X.Y. and Y.J. Yan, 2008. Life cycle and secondary production of two mayflies Leptophlebia sp. and Ephemera sp. in Heizhuchong stream, Hubei, China. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol., 25: 97-103.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Benke, A.C. and D.I. Jacobi, 1986. Growth rates of mayflies in a subtropical river and their implications for secondary production. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 5: 107-114.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dinakaran, S. and N. Krishnan, 1997. Study on diversity of aquatic insects in a tropical stream of Alagar hill (Eastern Ghats). Proceedings of the Seminar on Biodiversity, (SB'97), K.V. College, Thanjavur, India, pp: 111-113.


  • Dinakaran, S. and S. Anbalagan, 2007. Anthropogenic impacts on aquatic insects in six streams of South Western ghats. J. Insect Sci., Vol. 7, No. 1.
    CrossRef    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved