HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Current Research in Dairy Sciences

Year: 2017 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-8
DOI: 10.3923/crds.2017.1.8
Improvement of some Rheological Characteristics of Jameed by Adding Whey Protein
Magdy Mohamed Ismail , Mohamed Nour-Eldin Farid Hamad and Reham Kamal El-Menawy

Abstract: Background and Objective: Jameed is a dried fermented milk product, usually formed as dried round balls. It is made up of sheep buttermilk. The aim of this research was to study the possibility of mixing different amounts of whey protein paste (by-product in Ras cheese production) with jameed paste and investigate the effect of this technic on the rheological properties of produced jameed. Materials and Methods: Nine treatments of jameed were made from sheep buttermilk, goat and cow skim milk with adding 10, 15 and 20% whey protein paste to jameed curd. Jameed samples were stored at room temperature for 180 days and chemically and microbiologically analysed every month. The obtained results were statistically analyzed using a software package based on analysis of variance (One-factor analysis of variance, ANOVA, with SPSS software). Results: The obtained results showed that values of wettability for sheep buttermilk jameed were higher than those of jameed made from goat or cow skim milk. Syneresis results had the opposite trend of wettability. Also, sheep buttermilk jameed had higher levels of hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness than goat or cow skim milk jameed. Adding whey protein considerably enhanced wettability of jameed but reduced values of hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness. The scanning electron micrographs showed that protein matrices of whey protein jameed had rigid plates structure, little aggregates and more spaces scattered in matrix. Conclusion: This study revealed that rheological properties of jameed such as wettability, hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness were highly improved by mixing 10 or 15% whey protein paste with jameed curd.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Magdy Mohamed Ismail, Mohamed Nour-Eldin Farid Hamad and Reham Kamal El-Menawy, 2017. Improvement of some Rheological Characteristics of Jameed by Adding Whey Protein. Current Research in Dairy Sciences, 9: 1-8.

Keywords: cohesiveness, hardness, whey protein paste, Jameed and microstructure

INTRODUCTION

Jameed is a dried fermented milk product that is wildly used in Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Northern Saudi Arabia and the western part of Iraq. Jameed plays an important role in the nutritional well-being of Bedouins where it forms a major component of their diets. Jameed is basically a hard cheese-like product considered a very stable and safe dried fermented milk product. It is mainly produced by Bedouins during the spring season when milk is produced in surplus amounts. It is preferably made from sheep and goat milk but it can be made from cow and camel milk. It is prepared from yoghurt (heat-fermented dairy product) and drained using bags of cheesecloth, followed by salting, pressing and drying in the sun to produce the final dairy product1.

On the other hand, whey is a major by-product of the cheese industry and is further processed by separation or fractionation techniques to remove water, lactose, lipids, minerals, plus enzymes, hormones and growth factors2. In addition to their nutritional contributions, some of the whey components also play physiological roles in healthy foods. Whey protein has been related with a lower risk of metabolic disorders and other diseases due to high content of biologically active components. Thus, whey protein is currently one of the most growing sectors in the dairy industry3. Whey protein contains a higher content of branched-chain amino acids, primarily leucine compared to other high quality proteins4. It has also been known that whey protein can improve the rheological properties of dairy products. Delikanli and Ozcan3 showed that enrichment of nonfat yoghurt with the whey protein additives led to increases in the hardness, cohesiveness and elasticity values, resulting in improved textural properties. Recently in Egypt, salted whey resulted from Ras cheese making is used for production whey protein paste5.

Texture, particularly in cheese, is one of the most important property which helps to measure the identity of a product. Fracture attributes of solid and semi-solid foods are important because of their relation to sensory texture6. In recent years, much attention has been given to the microstructure of cheese. In particular, the use of scanning electron microscopy has become the method of choice in many investigations. It has proved to be an efficacious method to identify cheese components when fat, protein and moisture are the major constituents. In complex food structures, like dairy products, the sizes and distributions of dispersed and continuous phase regions and also the fine structure within each phase and at interfaces, determine the mechanical (textural and rheological) properties of these systems7.

The aim of this study was to investigate the textural and microstructure characterizes of jameed made from sheep buttermilk, goat and cow skim milk. Also, the effect of adding different levels of whey protein paste to jameed paste on the solubility, textural and microstructure properties of jameed was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials: Fresh sheep, goat and cow milk were obtained from Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt. A commercial classic yoghurt starter containing S. thermophilus and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (1:1) (Chr. Hansen’s Lab A/S Copenhagen, Denmark) was used.

Preparation of whey protein: Ras cheese whey was skimmed and heated to 95°C for 10 min cooled and the flocculated denatured whey proteins were obtained by filtering through cheesecloth overnight. The precipitate was transferred to wooden frames and pressed for 2 h.

Jameed manufacture: Nine treatments of jameed were made from sheep buttermilk and from goat and cow skim milk according to the method of Quasem et al.8. Figure 1 illustrates jameed manufacture. After jameed kneading with 5% salt, jameed paste was re-kneaded with whey protein paste and shaped as a ball then dried in sun. Jameed samples were as follow:

•  Treatment A: Jameed made from sheep buttermilk (control)
•  Treatment B: Jameed made from goat skim milk
•  Treatment C: Jameed made from goat skim milk+10% (of jameed curd weight) whey protein
•  Treatment D: Jameed made from goat skim milk+15% (of jameed curd weight) whey protein
•  Treatment E: Jameed made from goat skim milk+20% (of jameed curd weight) whey protein
•  Treatment F: Jameed made from cow skim milk
•  Treatment G: Jameed made from cow skim milk+10% (of jameed curd weight) whey protein
•  Treatment H: Jameed made from cow skim milk+15% (of jameed curd weight) whey protein
•  Treatment I: Jameed made from cow skim milk+20% (of jameed curd weight) whey protein

The dried jameed balls were packaged in polyethylene bags and stored at room temperature for 180 days. Samples were analyzed when fresh and after 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days of storage period.

Fig. 1: Processing steps for jameed manufacture

Preparation of whey protein, jameed manufacture and analyses were carried out in the laboratory of Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt. The study was conducted within the period of January-June, 2015.

Chemical analyses: Total solids, fat, total nitrogen and ash contents of samples were determined according to AOAC9. Titratable acidity in terms of percentage of lactic acid was measured by titrating 10 g of sample mixed with 10 mL of boiling distilled water against 0.1 N NaOH using a 0.5% phenolphthalein indicator to an end point of faint pink color. The pH of the sample was measured at 17 to 20°C using a pH meter (Corning pH/ion analyzer 350, Corning, NY) after calibration with standard buffers (pH 4.0 and 7.0). The Volhard’s method as described by Richardson10 was used to determine the salt content of jameed.

Wettability (Diffusibility) test: A cube weighing ca. 45 g of jameed was cut using a hand saw from a whole jameed ball; 315 mL water were added to the piece placed in 500 mL cup and soaked for 24 h8. The excess free water was carefully decanting weighed to calculate the soaked amount as follows8:

(1)

where, X is the weight of excess water (g).

Syneresis (whey separation) test: The soaked cube (45 g) was mixed with (315 mL water) for 2 min using electrical hand mixer (Hinari, model FM2, China) with the whipping accessory. The dispersed jameed was transferred to a 100 mL graduated cylinder and the clear zone was measured after 1 and 24 h8. Syneresis (whey separation) was calculated, as follow:

(2)

where, X is the height of clear zone and Y is total height of jameed dispersion.

Textural measurements: Force and torque measurements of jameed treatments stored for six months were measured using a Texturometer model Mecmesin Emperor TMLite 1.17 (USA). Mechanical primary characteristics of hardness, springiness, gumminess and cohesiveness and also the secondary characteristic of chewiness (hardness×cohesiveness×springiness) were determined from the deformation Emperor TMLite Graph. Because jameed samples were very hard, they were soaked in distilled water for 6 h at room temperature before measurements.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Examination: Jameed samples were prepared for SEM according to the method of Brooker and Wells11. The specimens were viewed in a scanning electron microscope (JXA-840A Electron Probe Microanalyzer-JEOL-Japan) after dehydrated using Critical Point Dried instrument and coating with gold using S150A Sputter Coater-Edwards England.

Statistical analysis: The obtained results were statistically analyzed using a software package12 based on analysis of variance. One-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out with SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) version 17. When F-test was significant, Least Significant Difference (LSD) was calculated according to Duncan13 for the comparison between means. Significance was set at p<0.05. The data presented in the tables are the mean (±Standard Deviation) of 3 experiments.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Chemical composition of milk and whey protein used in jameed manufacture: Results of the chemical composition of milk and whey protein used in jameed making are presented in Table 1. Acidity value of sheep buttermilk was higher than goat or cow skim milk whereas, total solids and solids-not-fat values were higher in goat and cow skim milk than that of sheep buttermilk. Goat skim milk had the highest fat content among milk samples. Sheep buttermilk is richer in protein than goat or cow skim milk.

Whey protein paste characterized with high acidity and low pH values which may be attributed to increasing whey acidity during Ras cheese manufacture. Because Ras cheese whey was skimmed, the fat content of whey protein paste was very low. Conversely, protein content was high. The addition of salt through Ras cheese production caused rising of salt level in whey protein paste. On a general note, the chemical composition results of whey protein paste detected in this study located in the ranges cleared by Ismail et al.5.

Changes in solubility of jameed during storage: In foods, protein solubility is affected by the pH, ionic strength, temperature, solvent polarity, isolation method, processing conditions, interactions with other components and mechanical treatments. These factors affect the solubility of the proteins, mainly causing alterations in the hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions of the surface groups of the protein with the solvent. Milk whey protein concentrates and isolates show good solubility throughout a wide range of pH values, temperatures, protein concentrations, water activities and ionic strengths14. The results given in Table 2 describe the influence of utilization of various milk types and mixing whey protein on wettability and syneresis properties of jameed. Values of wettability for sheep buttermilk jameed were higher than other treatments. The wettability levels of goat skim milk jameed were higher than jameed prepared from cow skim milk.

Blending of whey protein paste with jameed paste made from goat and cow skim milk considerably enhanced the wettability values. The highest wettability levels recorded in jameed samples contained 20% whey protein paste. This may be attributed to the high Water Holding Capacity (WHC) of whey protein. These outcomes indicate improvement the most important property of jameed by adding whey protein. Consequently, mixing of whey protein paste with jameed facilitates and accelerates the reconstitution process. These results are in agreement with the observation of Delikanli and Ozcan3, who found that the addition of whey protein increased the WHC of yoghurts during storage time.

Table 1: Chemical composition of milk and whey protein used in jameed manufacture
a-eDifferent letters indicate significant differences between milk treatments, Significance was set at p<0.05, data are expressed in ±SD

Table 2: Effect of mixing whey protein with jameed on wettability and syneresis
a-eDifferent letters indicate significant differences between jameed treatments, A-DDifferent letters indicate significant differences between storage times, Significance was set at p<0.05, data are expressed in ±SD

The highest values were obtained with the yoghurts enriched with whey protein concentrates, while the lowest values were recorded with the yoghurts fortified whey protein isolates.

In contrast to wettability values, syneresis levels of sheep buttermilk jameed were lower than those of jameed made from goat or cow skim milk. Jameed manufactured from cow skim milk possessed higher syneresis values than those of goat skim milk jameed. However syneresis values often contradict with wettability results but effect of adding whey protein to jameed exhibited opposite trend. As wettability values of jameed increased by mixing whey protein, also syneresis levels increased.

Changes in textural characterizes of jameed at the end of storage: The force necessary to attain a given deformation with a maximum force bite when the sample is placed between molars is termed as hardness15. Cohesiveness is defined as the extent to which a sample can be deformed before it ruptures16. Gumminess is defined as the energy needed to disintegrate a semisolid food until it becomes ready for swallowing15. Chewiness is defined as the number of masticates required for a certain amount of sample in order to satisfactorily decrease the consistency for swallowing15. The results of texture parameters obtained from texture profile analysis for jameed samples at the end of storage period are given in Table 3. The average hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness values of sheep buttermilk jameed samples were higher while springiness values were lower than those of jameed made from goat or cow skim milk. On the other side, using of cow skim milk in jameed manufacturing slightly increased the levels of these textural properties except springiness comparing with goat skim milk jameed. These results indicate that the textural attributes of jameed affected by the milk type used in production. These findings are in line with those reported by Fox et al.17 and Gunasekaran and Ak18, who stated that texture is affected during production and ripening of cheese. Network structure of curd is critically affected by composition of milk and technological conditions of coagulation.

Table 3: Textural properties of jameed at the end of storage period
a-eDifferent letters indicate significant differences between jameed treatments, Significance was set at p<0.05, data are expressed in ±SD

Therefore, cheese production technology cause varieties in cheese texture. Moreover, there are effects of moisture, pH, salt content, proteolysis which is affected by ripening conditions on cheese texture. Fox et al.17 explained that salting affects cheese texture due to protein solubility and protein conformation and cause hard cheese.

As it is well known, jameed is a stone hard balls thus for measuring texture parameters, jameed samples were soaked in distilled water for 6 h at room temperature before measurements. Because of high water holding capacity of whey protein, the levels of hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness of whey protein jameed were the lowest among various treatments. Jameed sample contained 20% whey protein recorded the weakest textural properties values but springiness. In agreement with this finding, Rashidi et al.19 reported that hardness and gumminess decreased when WPC (20 g kg–1) was added to the low-fat Feta cheese. The WPC increased moisture of cheese and disrupted protein matrix so that less force was needed to disrupt the texture of cheese in compression stage. Also, the minimum chewiness was observed when WPC was the only fat replacer used. The WPC decreased chewiness of low-fat cheese and this finding showed that this level of the WPC was able to loosen the structure of the protein matrix of cheese. Therefore, less energy is needed for chewing of the cheese in the mouth and preparing it for being swallowed. Mihulova et al.20 showed that the effect of whey protein addition on the texture and rheology of cheese was dependent on protein concentration and modification. Native whey concentration in comparison with water decreased hardness and chewiness and enhanced adhesiveness of samples. Higher concentration increased hardness and chewiness and lowered adhesiveness. Modified whey compared to the native one produced softer and better chewable products.

Microstructure of jameed at the end of storage period: In recent years, much attention has been given to the microstructure of cheese. In particular, the use of scanning electron microscopy has become the method of choice in many investigations. It has proved to be an efficacious method to identify cheese components when fat, protein and moisture are the major constituents. In complex food structures, such as dairy products, the sizes and distributions of dispersed and continuous phase regions and also the fine structure within each phase and at interfaces, determine the mechanical (textural and rheological) properties of these systems7. The effect of milk type and whey protein addition on the microstructures of jameed samples at the end of storage period are shown in Fig. 2.

The micrographs of scanning electron showed that the protein matrix for the sheep buttermilk jameed (sample A) was thicker than the jameed made from goat and cow skim milk (samples B and F, respectively). On the other side, the protein matrix of goat and cow skim milk jameed was coarser and more granular as compared with that of sheep buttermilk jameed. Comparing between the images of samples B and F cleared that the protein matrix of cow skim milk jameed was relatively denser structure than that of goat skim milk jameed. In both kinds of jameed, the small voids contained fat globules scattered in the protein network but they were clearer in goat skim milk jameed.

Pronounced differences were found between scanning electron micrographs of jameed samples with respect to adding whey protein. In jameed treatments manufactured from goat or cow skim milk with the addition of 10, 15 and 20% whey protein (samples C, D, E, G and H), protein matrices had rigid plate’s structure, little aggregates and more spaces scattered in matrix.

Cow skim milk jameed contained 20% whey protein (sample I) showed completely different structure. Protein network exhibited a very compact matrix with very small casein micelles. The matrix was highly interspersed with very small fat globules. Fat globules appeared to be losing their membranes and were uniform in size and shape and evenly distributed throughout the jameed matrix.

Fig. 2(a-i):
Scanning electron micrographs of jameed at the end of storage period (a) Sample A, (b) Sample B, (c) Sample C, (d) Sample D, (e) Sample E, (f) Sample F, (g) Sample G, (h) Sample H and (i) Sample I

Zhang et al.21 reported that microstructure analysis of the nonfat goats’ milk yogurt by scanning electron microscopy revealed that Heat-treated Whey Protein Concentrate (HWPC) interacted with casein micelles to form a relatively compact network in the yogurt gel. The results indicated that HWPC could be used as a fat replacer for improving the consistency of nonfat goats’ milk yogurt and other similar products.

CONCLUSION

Jameed is usually made from sheep butter milk. The results of this study proved that jameed can be made with good rheological properties from goat or cow skim milk. Adding 10 and 15% whey protein highly improved the wettability which is the most important property of jameed. Consequently, mixing of whey protein paste with jameed facilitates and accelerates the reconstitution process.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTS

This study discovers the possible improvement impact of whey protein paste (by-product in Ras cheese manufacture) that can be beneficial for rheological properties of Jameed such as wettability, hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness and microstructure. This study will help the researcher to uncover the critical area of Jameed reconstitution process that many researchers were not able to explore. Thus, a new theory on rheological properties and microstructure may be achieved.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported by the Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center under Grant (13/5/1-19/5/2013), Giza, Egypt.

REFERENCES

  • Al-Omari, A., J.M. Quasem and A.S. Mazahreh, 2008. Microbiological analysis of solar and freeze-dried jameed produced from cow and sheep milk with the addition of carrageenan mix to the jameed paste. Pak. J. Nutr., 7: 726-729.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Baldasso, C., T.C. Barros and I.C. Tessaro, 2011. Concentration and purification of whey proteins by ultrafiltration. Desalination, 278: 381-386.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Delikanli, B. and T. Ozcan, 2014. Effects of various whey proteins on the physicochemical and textural properties of set type nonfat yoghurt. Int. J. Dairy Technol., 67: 495-503.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tang, J.E. and S.M. Phillip, 2009. Maximizing muscle protein anabolism: The role of protein quality. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care, 12: 66-71.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Ismail, M., E.T. Ammar and R. El-Metwally, 2011. Improvement of low fat Mozzarella cheese properties using denatured whey protein. Int. J. Dairy Technol., 64: 207-217.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ak, M.M. and S. Gunasekaran, 1992. Stress-strain curve analysis of Cheddar cheese under uniaxial compression. J. Food Sci., 57: 1078-1081.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lobato-Calleros, C., E. Rodriguez, O. Sandoval-Castilla, E.J. Vernon-Carter and J. Alvarez-Ramirez, 2006. Reduced-fat white fresh cheese-like products obtained from W1/O/W2 multiple emulsions: Viscoelastic and high-resolution image analyses. Food Res. Int., 39: 678-685.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Quasem, J.M., A.S. Mazahreh, I.A. Afaneh and A. Al Omari, 2009. Solubility of solar dried jameed. Pak. J. Nutr., 8: 134-138.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • AOAC., 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 234


  • Richardson, G.H., 1985. Standard Methods of the Examination of Dairy Products. 15th Edn., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC., USA


  • Brooker, B.E. and K. Wells, 1984. Preparation of dairy products for scanning electron microscopy: Etching of epoxy resin-embedded material. J. Dairy Res., 51: 605-613.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • SAS., 1991. SAS User's Guide Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC


  • Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • De Carvalho-Silva, L.B., F.Z. Vissotto and J. Amaya-Farfan, 2013. Physico-chemical properties of milk whey protein agglomerates for use in oral nutritional therapy. Food Nutr. Sci., 4: 69-78.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nateghi, L., 2012. Effects of different adjunct starter cultures on proteolysis of reduced fat Cheddar cheese during ripening. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11: 12491-12499.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chen, A.H., J.W. Larkin, C.J. Clark and W.E. Irwin, 1979. Textural analysis of cheese. J. Dairy Sci., 62: 901-907.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fox, P.F., T.P. Guinee, T.M. Cogan and P.L.H. McSweeney, 2000. Fundamentals of Cheese Science. 1st Edn., Chapter 10. Aspen Publishers Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA


  • Gunasekaran, S. and M.M. Ak, 2003. Cheese Rheology and Texture. 1st Edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., ISBN-13: 978-1587160219, Pages: 512


  • Rashidi, H., M. Mazaheri-Tehrani, M.A. Razavi and M. Ghods-Rohany, 2015. Improving textural and sensory characteristics of low-fat UF Feta cheese made with fat replacers. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 17: 121-132.
    Direct Link    


  • Mihulova, M., M. Vejlupkova, J. Hanusova, J. Stetina and Z. Panovska, 2013. Effect of modified whey proteins on texture and sensory quality of processed cheese. Czech J. Food Sci., 31: 553-558.
    Direct Link    


  • Zhang, T., J. McCarthy, G. Wang, Y. Liu and M. Guo, 2015. Physiochemical properties, microstructure and probiotic survivability of nonfat goat’s milk yogurt using heat-treated whey protein concentrate as fat replacer. J. Food Sci., 80: M788-M794.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved