HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Current Research in Bacteriology

Year: 2015 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 18-25
DOI: 10.3923/crb.2015.18.25
Bacillus sp. 1A1 as a Producer of Antibacterial Crude Extract: Taxonomy, Cultivation and Partial Purification
Ayat H. Al- Tarawni, Wael A. Al- Zereini and Khaled A. Tarawneh

Abstract: Despite the availability of modern medicine, number of new infections and resistant bacterial strains is escalating. As a large number of soil bacteria are currently unknown, they represent a promising source for new bioactive natural products. Bacillus sp. 1A1 was isolated from a soil sample, identified, cultivated and its crude extract and purified fractions were evaluated for their potent antibacterial activities. It was identified based on morphological, biochemical and physiological characteristics as well as on molecular level. The 16S rRNA revealed that Bacillus sp. 1A1 is closely related to B. amyloliquefaciens. Its crude extract exhibited inhibiting activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Partial purification of the produced crude extract by size exclusion chromatography yielded three antibacterial fractions that caused inhibition zones of 10-20 mm in agar diffusion assay. Fraction S3 was the most promising fraction that inhibited the growth of tested Gram-positive bacteria with Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) 31-125 μg mL-1.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Ayat H. Al- Tarawni, Wael A. Al- Zereini and Khaled A. Tarawneh, 2015. Bacillus sp. 1A1 as a Producer of Antibacterial Crude Extract: Taxonomy, Cultivation and Partial Purification. Current Research in Bacteriology, 8: 18-25.

Keywords: crude extract, antibacterial, Bacillus and Jordan

INTRODUCTION

Interestingly, a large number of drugs approved nowadays are based on natural products. Thirteen natural product related drugs were approved from 2005-2007 (Harvey, 2008) and a total of twenty five natural products and natural products derived drugs were approved for marketing from 2008-2013 (Butler et al., 2014), some of which are of microbial origin. These compounds are derived from secondary metabolism of these microorganisms (Bérdy, 2005). Moreover, several studies pointed out to the microbial origin of some pharmaceutical active agents that were previously ascribed to macroorganisms (Arai et al., 1979; Piel, 2004). Due to their chemical diversity, the activity of these compounds extends beyond inhibition of microbial growth (i.e., antibiotics) to metabolites that act as effectors of ecological competition and symbiosis, enzyme inhibitors, antitumor agents and growth promoters of animals and plants (Demain, 1998). Nevertheless, new infections and resistant pathogens are still emerged. Therefore, the need for novel therapeutically active compounds is urgent.

As less than 1% of soil bacterial species are currently known, soil represent a large untrapped pool for discovering new natural products (MacNeil et al., 2001). Among the interesting genera is Bacillus. Various reports confirmed the ability of Bacillus members to produce antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and compounds with potential biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications (Awais et al., 2007; Hassan et al., 2014). Herein, isolation and cultivation of Bacillus sp. 1A1 is described as well as the activity of its crude extract and the partially purified fractions against selected bacterial test strains.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation of producing organism: Bacillus sp. 1A1 was isolated from soil sample collected from Al-Mazar (south Al-Karak/Jordan) by serial dilution technique. It has been deposited in the collections of the Department of Biology, Mutah University.

Identification of Bacillus sp. 1A1
Morphological, biochemical and physiological characterization: Morphological studies were carried out on culture grown for 48-72 h on nutrient agar plates (Oxoid, U.K) using a stereomicroscope (Nikon/Japan). Gram-staining was examined under a light compound microscope (Olympus CX2, China). Physiological and biochemical characteristics were determined using standard procedures (Baumann et al., 1972; Bowman et al., 1997; Corstvet et al., 1982; Schaeffer and Fulton, 1933; Steel, 1961). Production of acid from different carbohydrates was carried out as described by Helmke and Weyland (1984).

Sequencing and analysis of 16S rRNA: Genomic DNA was prepared using the EZ-10 Spin Column Genomic DNA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio Basic Inc. Canada). The 16S rRNA was amplified using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) as mentioned previously (Al-Zereini et al., 2007). The primers were synthesized by MWG-biotech (Ebersberg, Germany). The PCR product (~1500 bp) was detected by electrophoresis (Sambrook and Russell, 2001) and purified with E.Z.N.A Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The 16S rRNA gene sequence was compared with those available in the GenBank and Ribosomal database project II (RDP).

Cultivation of Bacillus sp. 1A1, extraction of culture fluid and partial purification of crude extract: Bacillus sp. 1A1 was inoculated in (10×2 L) Erlenmeyer flasks containing 1 L of nutrient broth (Oxoid, U.K) on orbital shaker (130 rpm, Forma Orbital Shaker, Thermo electron cooperation, USA) at 27°C. During cultivation process, 50 mL sample and thereafter daily samples were collected and used to measure bacterial growth parameters. Growth was followed by measuring the increase in Optical Density (OD600nm) (UV. Spectrometer, Lambda 16, Perkin-Elmer, LANGEN) and changes in pH values (pH model 523, WTW, Germany). The cultivation was stopped directly after the OD600nm value decreased. The cells were separated from the culture fluid by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 15 min, Sorvall® RC-5B Refrigerated super speed, Dupont company/USA). The supernatant was adjusted to pH 8 and extracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The organic phase was dried over sodium sulfate (anhydrous) and concentrated in vacuum evaporator at 45°C (Büchi Rotavapor R-215, Switzerland). The resulting crude extract was dissolved in methanol to 50 mg mL–1 and stored at 4°C.

The crude extract was partially purified by size exclusion chromatography (Sephadex LH-20, column size 3x35 cm) and eluted with methanol and dichloromethane (9:1) under atmospheric pressure. The 10 mL fractions were collected and monitored by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC). The fractions with similar bands migration pattern on TLC were combined together and concentrated in vacuum evaporator at 45°C.

The resulting combined fractions were re-spotted on TLC plates, detected using UV light at 254 and 366 nm. Moreover, developed spots were visualized with ninhydrin (2,2-dihydroxyin-1,3-dandion; 0,1% spray-reagent) with warming at 120°C for the detection of amino acids, bromocresol green (0.1 g bromocresol green in 500 mL ethanol and 5 mL 0.1 M NaOH) for the detection of organic acid and bromothymol blue (0.1% bromothymol blue in 10% aqueous ethanol) for detection of lipid and phospholipids (Touchstone, 1992).

In vitro antibacterial activity: Antibacterial activity of the bacterial crude extract and partially purified fractions was determined by agar diffusion technique and serial dilution assay using standard methods as mentioned in National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards in 2004 with modifications described by Al-Zereini (2014).

The test microorganisms used in present work were the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), Micrococcus luteus (ATCC 10240) and the Gram-negative bacteria Proteus vulgaris (ATCC 13048), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883) seeded on LB agar plates (0.5% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl, 1.8% agar). Aliquots of 500 μg/disc of crude extract and 200 μg/disc of partially purified fractions were used in agar diffusion test, while concentrations starting from 200 μg mL–1 of silica gel fractions and 100 μg mL–1 of positive control (Penicillin G) were used in serial dilution assay to deduce the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). All assays were performed in triplicate and mean values were presented.

Evolutionary analyses: Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 free software. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura and Nei (1993).

RESULTS

Strain 1A1 formed white circular colonies with entire margin on nutrient agar. The colonies became transparent after 7 days of cultivation. It was found to be Gram positive, endospore-forming, capsulated bacilli. The cells are 1.7-3 μm long and 1-1.2 μm wide. It is oxidase negative and catalase positive. Reduce nitrate into nitrite. The biochemical and physiological characteristics are listed in Table 1.

16S rRNA sequence of this isolate revealed that strain 1A1 is closely related to Bacillus bacteria (97-98% similarity level). The depicted phylogenetic tree showed that strain 1A1 has highest homology with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain MPA 1034 (98% similarity level, access No. NR_117946) (Fig. 1).

Cultivation of Bacillus sp. 1A1 varied between 72-96 h. During which, the pH value was increased up to 8.7 at the end of cultivation period. The antibacterial activity against M. luteus could be detected early in the logarithmic growth phase, after 12 h, reaching the maximum at the beginning of the stationary phase with no significant decrease during prolonged incubation (Fig. 2). Extraction of culture fluid gave rise to 30 μg mL–1 of crude extract. Applying of 500 μg/disc of the resulting crude extract caused 17-21 mm inhibition zones in tested Gram-positive bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to the tested extract.

Partial purification of the bacterial extract (0.3 g) by size exclusion chromatography yielded four fractions: S1 (2 mg), S2 (15 mg), S3 (60.6 mg) and S4 (5.7 mg). Fractions S1-S3 exhibited antibacterial activity against susceptible Gram-positive bacteria with S3 being the most potent bioactive metabolite (MIC 31-125 μg mL–1) as shown in Table 2 and 3.

Table 1: Biochemical characterization of Bacillus sp. 1A1

Table 2: Inhibition zones caused by 200 μg/disc of bioactive sub-fractions from Bacillus sp. 1A1 crude extract against the susceptible bacterial strains in the agar diffusion test
d: Diffused inhibition zone

Table 3: Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the bioactive sub-fractions in the serial dilution assay against the susceptible bacterial strains
s: Bacteriostatic, c: Bactericidal

Fig. 1: Phylogenetic tree of strain 1A1, reconstructed by using the maximum likelihood algorithm based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain 1A1 and related members of the Firmicutes phylum. The scale bar indicates 1% estimated base substitution per nucleotide position

Fig. 2:Cultivation parameters of Bacillus sp. 1A1 in nutrient broth medium. Changing in pH values and increase in cell density (OD600 nm) are shown with the inhibition zone caused by 500 μg/disc of applied crude extract against M. luteus

DISCUSSION

In this study the authors were interested in obtaining bacterial isolates able to produce bioactive crude extracts. Isolated soil bacterial strain Bacillus sp. 1A1 produced metabolites that exhibited antibacterial activity, mainly against Gram positive test strains. Based in 16S rRNA sequence it was found to be related to B. amyloliquefaciens, a species name given and revised by Priest et al. (1987) with high affinity to B. subtilis. Although percentage of similarity between both strains reach to 98% but the isolated soil strain was able to utilize D-xylose and hydrolyze DNA. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens was found to be neither able to utilize this type of sugar nor degrade DNA (O’Donnell et al., 1980; Priest et al., 1987). Therefore, strain 1A1 is a distinct species in the genus Bacillus.

Bacillus sp. 1A1 produced bioactive crude extract that through bioactivity-guided fractionation resulted in having three bioactive sub-fractions. S3 fraction was the only promising fraction that may harbor metabolites causing pronounced inhibition for growth of tested Gram-positive bacteria. On the other hand, Gram-negative test strains showed resistance to applied metabolites which may be attributed to presence of the low permeable outer membrane and the lipopolysaccharide barrier for the hydrophobic compounds.

In accordance with the present results, it was documented that Bacillus species are considered a source of interesting bioactive secondary metabolites and the most promising candidates for microbial biocontrol agents (Arguelles-Arias et al., 2009; Benitez et al., 2012). Several antibacterial agents were isolated and identified from several Bacillus species among which were the B. subtilis group of bacteria including B. amyloliquefaciens (Cao et al., 2011; Wulff et al., 2002). Moreover, they are known as a source of antifungal compounds (Athukorala et al., 2009).

Bacillus strains may produce a large number of antimicrobial peptides with different chemical structures, such as bacteriocins, bacteriocin-like substances and lipopeptides (Balhara et al., 2011). Lipopeptide antibiotics like iturin A and surfactin were reported to have antagonistic and repressive activity over plant pathogens; Bacteriocins like subtilin from B. subtilis and subtilosin A from some strains of both B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens are ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides that inhibit or kill microorganisms. The production of such agents was reported to be growth phase dependents. For instance surfactin and iturins are typical secondary metabolites produced during the stationary growth phase. During this work, the production of bioactive crude extract started early in exponential phase which coincided with production kinetics observed for subtilin, subtilosin and bacteriocin-like substances that were synthesized by different species of Bacillus during the exponential phase (Barboza-Corona et al., 2007; Stein, 2005). Nevertheless, spraying of TLC plate with chromogenic reagents indicated none of partially purified fraction was amino acid, organic acid or phospholipids in nature. Consequently, this work confirmed that Bacillus species are still considered as a proliferative agent for antimicrobial compounds.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that Bacillus species are still considered as a proliferative agent for antimicrobial compounds. They could be used as a producer of antimicrobial and biocontrol agents in pharmaceutical and agricultural fields.

REFERENCES

  • Al-Zereini, W.A., 2014. Bioactive crude extracts from four bacterial isolates of marine sediments from Red Sea, Gulf of Aqaba, Jordan. Jordan J. Biol. Sci., 7: 133-137.
    Direct Link    


  • Al-Zereini, W., I. Schuhmann, E. Helmke, H. Laatsch and H. Anke, 2007. New aromatic nitro compounds from Salegentibacter sp. T436, an arctic sea ice bacterium: Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and biological activities. J. Antibiot., 60: 301-308.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Arai, T., K. Takahashi, A. Kubo, S. Nakahara, S. Sato, K. Aiba and C. Tamura, 1979. The structures of novel antibiotics, saframycin B and C. Tetrahedron Lett., 20: 2355-2358.
    CrossRef    


  • Arguelles-Arias, A., M. Ongena, B. Halimi, Y. Lara, A. Brans, B. Joris and P. Fickers, 2009. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GA1 as a source of potent antibiotics and other secondary metabolites for biocontrol of plant pathogens. Microb. Cell Factories, Vol. 8.
    CrossRef    


  • Athukorala, S.N., W.D. Fernando and K.Y. Rashid, 2009. Identification of antifungal antibiotics of Bacillus species isolated from different microhabitats using polymerase chain reaction and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Can. J. Microbiol., 55: 1021-1032.
    CrossRef    


  • Awais, M., A.A. Shah, A. Hameed and F. Hasan, 2007. Isolation, identification and optimization of bacitracin produced by Bacillus sp. Pak. J. Bot., 39: 1303-1312.
    Direct Link    


  • Balhara, M., S. Ruhil, S. Dhankhar and A.K. Chhillar, 2011. Bioactive compounds hold up-Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as a potent bio-control agent. Nat. Prod. J., 1: 20-28.
    Direct Link    


  • Barboza-Corona, J.E., H. Vazquez-Acosta, D.K. Bideshi and R. Salcedo-Hernandez, 2007. Bacteriocin-like inhibitor substances produced by Mexican strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. Arch. Microbiol., 187: 117-126.
    CrossRef    


  • Baumann, L., P. Baumann, M. Mandel and R.D. Allen, 1972. Taxonomy of aerobic marine eubacteria. J. Bacteriol., 110: 402-429.
    PubMed    


  • Benitez, L.B., R.V. Velho, A.D.S. Da Motta, J. Segalin and A. Brandelli, 2012. Antimicrobial factor from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens inhibits Paenibacillus larvae, the causative agent of American foulbrood. Arch. Microbiol., 194: 177-185.
    CrossRef    


  • Bérdy, J., 2005. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J. Antibiot., 58: 1-26.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bowman, J.P., S.A. McCammon, J.L. Brown, P.D. Nichols and T.A. McMeekin, 1997. Psychroserpens burtonensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Gelidibacter algens gen. nov., sp. nov., psychrophilic bacteria isolated from Antarctic lacustrine and sea ice habitats. Int. J. Systematic Bacteriol., 47: 670-677.
    CrossRef    


  • Butler, M.S., A.A.B. Robertson and M.A. Cooper, 2014. Natural product and natural product derived drugs in clinical trials. Nat. Prod. Rep., 31: 1612-1661.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cao, H., S. He, R. Wei, M. Diong and L. Lu, 2011. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens G1: A potential antagonistic bacterium against eel-pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med., Vol. 2011.
    CrossRef    


  • Corstvet, R.E., M.J. Gentry, P.R. Newman, J.A. Rummage and A.W. Confer, 1982. Demonstration of age-dependent capsular material on Pasteurella haemolytica serotype 1. J. Clin. Microbiol., 16: 1123-1126.
    Direct Link    


  • Demain, A.L., 1998. Microbial natural products: Alive and well in 1998. Nat. Biotechnol., 16: 3-4.
    Direct Link    


  • Harvey, A.L., 2008. Natural products in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 13: 894-901.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hassan, A., B. Ali and I. Sajid, 2014. Antimicrobial screening and metabolic fingerprinting of soil Bacilli against Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) causing E. coli. Sci. Int. (Lahore), 26: 1569-1576.
    Direct Link    


  • Helmke, E. and H. Weyland, 1984. Rhodococcus marinonascens sp. nov., an Actinomycete from the sea. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 34: 127-138.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • MacNeil, I.A., C.L. Tiong, C. Minor, P.R. August and T.H. Grossman et al., 2001. Expression and isolation of antimicrobial small molecules from soil DNA libraries. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 3: 301-308.
    Direct Link    


  • O'Donnell, A.G., J.R. Norris, R.C.W. Berkeley, D. Claus, T. Kaneko, N.A. Logan and R. Nozaki, 1980. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens by pyrolysis gas-liquid chromatography, deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization, biochemical tests and API systems. Int. J. Systematic Bacteriol., 30: 448-459.
    CrossRef    


  • Piel, J., 2004. Metabolites from symbiotic bacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep., 21: 519-538.
    CrossRef    


  • Priest, F.G., M. Goodfellow, L.A. Shute and R.C.W. Berkeley, 1987. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Systematic Bacteriol., 37: 69-71.
    CrossRef    


  • Sambrook, J. and D.W. Russell, 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd Edn., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780879695774, Pages: 2344
    Direct Link    


  • Schaeffer, A.B. and M.D. Fulton, 1933. A simplified method of staining endospores. Science, 77: 194-194.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Steel, K.J., 1961. The oxidase reaction as a taxonomic tool. J. Gen. Microbiol., 25: 297-306.
    CrossRef    


  • Stein, T., 2005. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: Structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol. Microbiol., 56: 845-857.
    CrossRef    


  • Tamura, K. and M. Nei, 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 10: 512-526.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Touchstone, J.C., 1992. Practice of Thin Layer Chromatography. 3rd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, ISBN: 9780471612223, Pages: 400


  • Wulff, E.G., C.M. Mguni, K. Mansfeld-Giese, J. Fels, M. Lubeck and J. Hockenhull, 2002. Biochemical and molecular characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis and B. pumilus isolates with distinct antagonistic potential against Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Plant Pathol., 51: 574-584.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved