HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Biotechnology

Year: 2018 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 86-94
DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2018.86.94
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of 29 Species of Genus Populus Assessed by AFLP Markers
Zhongcheng Zhou, Jiaping Yan, Xinghu Zhang, Zhongya Ye, Feng Xu and Jichi Yuan

Abstract: Background and Objective: Populus species are one of the world’s most important groups of forest trees, but distinguishing between cultivars and hybrids is a little difficult due to widespread interspecific hybridization and introgression and the high level intraspecific morphological variation. The objective of this study was to understand the genetic variation and heterozygosity of 29 Populus species from the Jianghan Plain of China and provided scientific guidance for the introduction of superior poplar varieties in Hubei province of China. Materials and Methods: The DNA was isolated from leaves of 29 poplar clones, digested by MseI and EcoRI endonucleases and subsequently used Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLP) analysis. The AFLP data was analyzed by GeneMapper software to display the fragment sizes as electropherograms and binary data. Fingerprint was constructed according to the AFLP analysis. Genetic similarity coefficients were calculated using Numeric Taxonomic System (NTSYS) PC version software 2.11 and the phylogenetic tree was constructed by cluster analysis using the UPGMA. Results: A total of 959 fragments were amplified, 806 of which were polymorphic with an average polymorphism percentage of 84.67%. Genetic similarity coefficients of the 29 Populus species ranged from 0.6111-0.8478 with an average of 0.7217. The highest average genetic similarity coefficient (0.7549) was found between "Danhongyang" with other Populus species and the lowest (0.6532) was found between "6204" with other Populus species. According to the genetic similarity coefficient of 0.7117, the 29 Populus species were divided into four categories by UPGMA cluster analysis. Finally, we built DNA fingerprint of the 29 Populus genotypes. Conclusion: It was concluded that 29 Populus species shared high genetic similarity and low genetic diversity. "107", "6204" and "6102" were three unique species and worth further utilizing in hybridization.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Zhongcheng Zhou, Jiaping Yan, Xinghu Zhang, Zhongya Ye, Feng Xu and Jichi Yuan, 2018. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of 29 Species of Genus Populus Assessed by AFLP Markers. Biotechnology, 17: 86-94.

Keywords: genetic relationship, genetic similarity, AFLP, Populus and molecular markers

INTRODUCTION

Poplar is one of the most important economical and ecological trees in the world, populating the most widely cultivated areas with the highest timber yield1-7. It is mainly distributed in the temperate regions between 19-70°N, whereas, several types are found in Africa8. According to the characteristics of organ composition, pollen, leaf, bud, branch and trunk, researchers divided the genus Populus into five major groups: Leuce, Aigeiros, Tacamahaca, Turanga and Leucoides 9,10. Extensive genetic variations exist among the Populus groups and their inter-species. Therefore, identification of poplar species and determination of genetic correlation bear importance for cultivation of new varieties and collection and preservation of germplasm resources11,12.

In the past few decades, a variety of molecular markers have emerged, enabling the exploration of genetic variation between Populus groups, related inter-species and different clones at the genome level13,14. At present, the molecular markers that are widely used in identification of poplar varieties include the following: Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)15-17, Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP)18,19, Random Amplified Polymorphism DNA (RAPD)20-22 and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR)18,22-24. Among these markers, AFLP is considered as an ideal and effective molecular marker technique. This technology combines the advantages of RFLP and RAPD, that is, the reliability of RFLP and convenience of RAPD. The AFLP features high polymorphism, co-dominant expression and absence of multiple allelic effects. The AFLP is present in small dosage and shows high sensitivity and can provide significant information in a short time25-30. Given these advantages, AFLP can provide accurate and reliable genetic markers for poplar production.

With the rapid development of plant molecular biology, AFLP molecular markers have been widely applied in some fields, such as poplar genetic diversity studies31,32, determining the genetic structure23,33, screen interspecific hybrids34,genetic map construction35,36 and variety identification18,37, providing a more clear genetic background for poplar. At present, although there are many poplar varieties, there are still many problems. Firstly, numerous poplar varieties are mixed and severely commercialized. Secondly, many areas breed poplar blindly regardless of the regional features. Consequently, they fail to plant the optimum varieties. Hubei province is located in the central part of China and features a relatively wide geographical area. Except that, climate, altitude and soil span across the province are widely different. Therefore, an simple and accurate germplasm identification approach is required urgently to rationally protect and utilize different germplasm resources for cultivation of suitable new varieties. Undoubtedly, identification of germplasm resources at the molecular level is the most fundamental and accurate approach. In this study, 29 clones from different Populus groups were used and their genetic diversities were analyzed by AFLP molecular marker technology. The present study aimed to determine genetic diversity and genetic differentiation among Populus clones, inter-species, inter-groups and parents and progenies at the DNA level to provide scientific guidance for the introduction of superior poplar varieties in Hubei province.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant materials and DNA extraction: Leaves of 29 poplar clones were provided by Qianjiang Research Institute of Forestry (Hubei, China, Table 1), which basically covered the main poplar cultivars in the Jianghan Plain and even the entire Yangtze River basin. Collected samples were dried with silica gel and stored at room temperature until DNA extraction. All of the samples were collected in early May, 2017 and this study was ended until November, 2017. The DNA isolation was carried out according to a modified protocol suggested by Murray and Thompson38. The DNA concentration and purity of each sample was determined by a spectrophotometer which equipped with the Thermo Scientific Nano Drop 2000 system (Wilmington, USA). The absorbance ratio at 260 and 280 nm (A260/280) was used to evaluate the purity of the DNA. The value of A260/280 in 1.8-2.0 represents that DNA meet the experimental requirements. All samples DNA were diluted to 200 ng L–1 and stored at -20°C. Primers used in this study were synthesized by The Beijing Genomics Institute (Table 2), in China.

AFLP analysis: The AFLP analysis was performed according to Vos et al.25 with a slight modification. Frequent cutter MseI and rare cutter EcoRI endonucleases purchased from New England Biolabs (NEB) were used for restriction digestion of genomic DNA. Restriction and ligation were then carried out together in which restriction ligation master mix. Pre-amplification mixture in a total volume of 20 μL containing 10 μL of 2×PCR Mix, 1 μL of each pre-PCR primers, 4 μL of restriction and ligation and 4 μL DNA template.

Table 1:Populus species used in this study

The DNA amplification was performed using the following program: 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 50°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min and a finally 72°C for 5 min. Pre-PCR products were diluted 20-fold and used as DNA template for selective amplification. Selective amplification was carried out using the following touchdown program: 95°C for 5 min, 95°C for 35 sec, 60°C for 35 sec and 72°C for 1 min, followed by 12 cycles of each with 0.7°C lowering of annealing temperature and finally 23 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min with a final hold of 72°C for 5 min. The AFLP products were denatured by heating at 95°C for 10 min and ran on a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel. The gels were viewed on a trans-illuminator and photographed. Following successful amplification viewed on the gel, the products were separated using automated capillary array system (ABI prism 3730 DNA analyser).

Data analysis: Data was analyzed using GeneMapper software to display the fragment sizes as electropherograms and binary data. The presence of an unambiguous band was scored as 1 and its absence as 0. All AFLP markers, both mono- and polymorphic, were scored in the data matrix. Only reproducible bands across two PCR amplification replicates were used in the subsequent analysis. The genetic relationship between sample populations was shown based on Nei’s genetic distances39 produced by TFPGA 1.3 software40. The NTSYS-PC software package version 2.10 was used for the cluster analysis41. Based on these genetic distances, cluster analysis was performed using the un-weighed pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and a dendrogram was constructed42. Bootstrap analysis, with 1000 re-samples, was computed using Win boot to determine the confidence limits of the UPGMA dendrogram35.

Table 2: Sequences of oligonucleotide adapters and primer combinations used in AFLP

RESULTS

AFLP polymorphism: In 29 Populus species from Jianghan Plain, a total of 24 combinations were screened and ten combinations successfully produced clear high-intensity, reproducible and relatively high polymorphism bands (Fig. 1). The total number of 959 common AFLP fragments were obtained (Table 3), of which 806 were polymorphic bands with an average polymorphism percentage of 84.67%.The number of polymorphism bands ranged from 56 by P2 (E50M48) to 95 by P12 (E77M84), while percentage of polymorphism bands varied from 74.74% for P10 (E84M60) to 96.55% for P2 (E50M48). Thus, each primer set generated an average of 95.5 fragments, 80.6 being polymorphic. Among them, the P2 (E50M48) presented the lowest number of amplification bands but the highest proportion of polymorphism. Therefore, specific levels of genetic differences exist among the 29 poplar samples.

Genetic similarity analysis: To compare the genetic differences among 29 poplar varieties, genetic similarity coefficients among the tested Populus species were calculated by using NTSYS PC version software 2.11 according to the AFLP data. Similarity coefficients among the 29 poplar clones measured were between 0.6111 and 0.8478, with the average value of 0.7217. Among them, the highest average similarity coefficient (0.7549) was measured between "Danhongyang" with other poplar varieties and the lowest average similarity coefficient (0.6532) was observed between "6204" and other poplar clones.

Genetic relationships: According to the genetic similarity, the phylogenetic tree was constructed by the UPGMA cluster to estimate the genetic relationship among 29 clones. As shown in Fig. 2, at a genetic similarity coefficient of 0.7117, the 29 poplar species were divided into four categories (A, B, C and D): category A includes two germplasm resources, "Chulin-2" and "DD66-1" (accounting for 6.90%). Category B contains 24 germplasm resources, including "Zhonglin-2025", "DD86-24", "Lushanyang", "222", "I-69", "95-4", "Hanyang-8", "Hanyang-2", "DD375", "Zhongqian-3", "Xianglin-75", "Xianglin-90", "Danhongyang", "DD66-0", "89-104", "Nanlin-95", "Zhongjia-8", "I-63", "I-72", "Zhonghuahongye", "261", "Nanlin-895", "Zhongshi-8" and "DD102-4" (accounting for 82.76%). Category C only comprises "107" (accounting for 3.45%). Category D contains two germplasm resources, "6204" and "6102" (accounting for 6.89%).

Fig. 1(a-b):
Amplified patterns by 24 pair of primer combinations. P1, P2, P3……P24 represent the number of primer combinations, respectively. P1 (E35M65), P2 (E50M48), P3 (E39M50), P4 (E75M61), P5 (E85M60), P6 (E83M49), P7 (E86M65), P8 (E44M48), P9 (E76M50), P10 (E84M60), P11 (E40M60), P12 (E77M84), P13 (E12M50), P14 (E13M61), P15 (E14M84), P16 (E15M65), P17 (E16M48), P18 (E20M22), P19 (E21M23), P20 (E23M25), P21 (E12M22), P22 (E13M17), P23 (E14M25), P24 (E16M12)

Table 3: Result of AFLP analysis of polymorphic bands of 29 poplar species

Fingerprint: Based on the 806 polymorphic bands from AFLP analysis, the fingerprints of 29 clones belonging to three major Populus groups (Aigeiros, Tacamahaca and Leuce) were constructed. In the fingerprints, each poplar manifested a unique band type, which distinguished it from the others and the fingerprints showed high polymorphism.

DISCUSSION

In this study, intersectional, interspecific and intraspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships among 29 Populus species belonging to the three sections (Aigeiros, Tacamahaca and Leuce) from Jianghan Plain, have been determined using AFLP markers for the first time. A total number of 959 common AFLP fragments were obtained, of which 806 were polymorphic bands with an average polymorphism percentage of 84.67%. The genetic similarity coefficient among the 29 poplar clones ranged from 0.6111-0.8478 and the average value was 0.7217. The cluster analysis of 29 poplar germplasms showed that all poplar germplasms can be classified into four categories at the genetic similarity coefficient of 0.7111.

Fig. 2: Dendrogram of 29 Populus genotype from cluster analysis based on AFLP data

As we know, AFLP is one of the most reliable and repeatable molecular marker for evaluating the genetic diversity of plant and animal populations43-51. Its ability of screening many polymorphic fragments throughout the genome of this species made it possible to show the genetic diversity within and among populations. The AFLP polymorphism analysis showed there are many clear bands with high polymorphism and signal strength and easy to distinguish (Fig. 1), which clearly demonstrated that AFLP markers can be used for the genetic diversity analysis of Populus species. In the past decades, AFLP was first used in trees to genetically map a disease resistance in Populus species52. In addition, AFLP technology also applied in the evaluation of Populus genetic diversity and obtained a lot of achievements18,53,54. Results showed that Populus possesses high genetic diversities, except that, different individuals in groups, inter-species within a group and intra-species also possess abundant genetic variations55-58.

Genetic diversity is the core of biological diversity, which reflects the capability of a given species to adapt the environment and the potential for long-term survival and evolution under continuous environmental changes59-61. UPGMA cluster analysis divided 29 Populus into four groups (Fig. 2). Among these groups, category B contained 24 germplasm resources, which basically involved the main poplar cultivars in the whole Yangtze River basin. This result indicated that these cultivars have relatively narrow genetic relationship. According to sources and parents of these germplasm resources, the vast majority of poplar germplasm resources are derived from hybrid progenies of a few poplar clones, such as "69", "63" and "72", which were introduced from Italy in 1970s (Table 1) and small genetic variations exist between these germplasm resources. In addition, each category features distinct primary and secondary compositions. These findings imply germplasms of the same species feature relatively high similarity. Poplar "107" formed a single category in cluster analysis, indicating that it possesses wide genetic variation. The large genetic differences in forest intra-species benefit hybrid breeding.

Taken together, combined with AFLP polymorphism, genetic similarity, fingerprints and cluster analysis, we understand if we want to cultivate superior new varieties that are suitable for cultivation in Jianghan Plain, we can start from two aspects. First, we should expand the introduction range, such as Poplar "107" which possesses wide genetic variation, and will benefit hybrid breeding. Secondly, we can hybridize black poplar with local poplar resources in Hubei province and introduce the genes of simon poplar (Tacamahaca), such as "6204" and "6102". These two clones were obtained by hybridizing "Lushanyang" and "Shengshanyang", respectively, with "Yichangxiaoyeyang" in our research group. These varieties grow well in low mountains and hills and not only have the fast-growing property of black poplar, but also the drought and barren resistance of simon poplar. On the one hand, the genetic basis of cultivated poplar species can be effectively expanded through these two ways. On the other hand, findings also indicated that clones, such as "107", "6204" and "6102", have further research value and can be used as parent resource for breeding superior new varieties.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that 29 Populus species from Jianghan Plain share high genetic similarity and low genetic diversity. Among them, "107", "6204" and "6102" were three unique species and worth to further utilizing in hybridization and they provided a scientific guidance for the introduction of superior poplar varieties in Hubei province. In the future, the theory and method of molecular marker technology will also be developed and improved in genetic breeding of poplar.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTS

This study assessed the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of the 29 Populus species using the powerful AFLP technique. The genetic similarity analysis showed the existence of some genetic similarities among poplar varieties and abundant genetic variation among these varieties. The knowledge of genetic variation and the genetic relationship between genotypes can be an important consideration for efficient rationalization and utilization of poplar germplasm resources. This is the first report on molecular analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of Populus from Jianghan Plain. Moreover, this study addressed important phylogenetic questions within 29 Populus species and recommended three varieties of poplars for use in future breeding programs, genomic studies and varieties improvement.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Demonstration Project of Forestry Science and Technology funded by the Central Government of China (The Plan of Forestry Department of Hubei Province, Grant No. [2015]HBTK07) and Hubei Provincial Key Technology Support Program of Forestry (Grant No. Lykjizc201209).

REFERENCES

  • The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden, 85: 531-553.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rahman, M.H. and O.P. Rajora, 2002. Microsatellite DNA fingerprinting, differentiation and genetic relationships of clones, cultivars and varieties of six poplar species from three sections of the genus Populus. Genome, 45: 1083-1094.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Meirmans, P.G., M. Lamothe, P. Perinet and N. Isabel, 2007. Species-specific single nucleotide polymorphism markers for detecting hybridization and introgression in poplar. Can. J. Bot., 85: 1082-1091.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fladung, M. and J. Buschbom, 2009. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in different Populus species. Trees, 23: 1199-1212.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liesebach, H., V. Schneck and E. Ewald, 2010. Clonal fingerprinting in the genus Populus L. by nuclear microsatellite loci regarding differences between sections, species and hybrids. Tree Genet. Genomes, 6: 259-269.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schroeder, H., A.M. Hoeltken and M. Fladung, 2012. Differentiation of Populus species using chloroplast Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers-essential for comprehensible and reliable poplar breeding. Plant Biol., 14: 374-381.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hamzeh, M. and S. Dayanandan, 2004. Phylogeny of Populus (Salicaceae) based on nucleotide sequences of chloroplast trnT-trnF region and nuclear rDNA. Am. J. Bot., 91: 1398-1408.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pospiskova, M. and I. Bartakova, 2004. Genetic diversity of a black poplar population in the Morava river basin assessed by microsatellite analysis. For. Genet., 11: 257-262.
    Direct Link    


  • Levsen, N.D., P. Tiffin and M.S. Olson, 2012. Pleistocene speciation in the genus Populus (Salicaceae). Syst. Biol., 61: 401-412.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Taylor, G., 2002. Populus: Arabidopsis for forestry. Do we need a model tree? Ann. Bot., 90: 681-689.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Song, H.Z., Q.W. Zhang and C.J. Zhou, 2007. Analysis of genetic diversity of some species in Populus by AFLP marker. Sci. Silvae Sin., 43: 64-69.


  • Yang, S.H., R.F. Zhang and S.Y. Sun, 2009. Application of AFLP molecular markers in poplar genetic and breeding. J. Henan For. Sci. Technol., 29: 55-58.


  • Deqiang, Z., Z. Zhiyi and Y. Kai, 2001. Application of molecular marker technique to genetic variation and classification in poplar. J. Beijing For. Univ. Chin. Edn., 23: 76-80.


  • Zhang, Z., S. Lin, D. Zhang and Q. Zhang, 2002. Applications of modern molecular biotechnology to genetic improvement in forest trees. J. Beijing For. Univ., 24: 250-261.
    Direct Link    


  • Villar, M., F. Lefevre, H.D. Bradshaw and E.T. du Cros, 1996. Molecular genetics of rust resistance in poplars (Melampsora larici-populina Kleb/Populus sp.) by bulked segregant analysis in a 2 × 2 factorial mating design. Genetics, 143: 531-536.
    Direct Link    


  • Vornam, B., S. Herzog, R. Preisig-Muller and H.H. Hattemer, 1994. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms of a chloroplast photosystem II gene from poplar and their use for species identification. Genome, 37: 747-750.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liu, Z. and G.R. Furnier, 1993. Comparison of allozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers for revealing genetic variation within and between trembling aspen and bigtooth aspen. Theor. Applied Genet., 87: 97-105.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fossati, T., I. Zapelli, S. Bisoffi, A. Micheletti, L. Vietto, F. Sala and S. Castiglione, 2005. Genetic relationships and clonal identity in a collection of commercially relevant poplar cultivars assessed by AFLP and SSR. Tree Genet. Genomes, 1: 11-20.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mutegi, S.M., A. Muchugi, S. Carsan, R. Kariba and R. Jamnadass et al., 2016. Genetic diversity of the African poplar (Populus ilicifolia) populations in Kenya. Tree Genet. Genomes, Vol. 12, No. 4.
    CrossRef    


  • Dhillon, R.S., T. Rani, R.S. Beniwal, K.S. Bangarwa, R.N. Sheokand and V. Dalai, 2016. Molecular evaluation of poplar clones using RAPD markers. Environ. Ecol., 34: 526-530.


  • Singh, M.K., N.B. Singh, S. Thakur and P.K. Naik, 2014. Molecular evaluations of thirty one clones of poplar based on RAPD and SSR molecular markers. Genetika, 46: 985-1001.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Smulders, M.J.M., J.E. Cottrell, F. Lefevre, J. van der Schoot and P. Arens et al., 2008. Structure of the genetic diversity in black poplar (Populus nigra L.) populations across European river systems: Consequences for conservation and restoration. For. Ecol. Manage., 255: 1388-1399.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Maksimovic, Z., D. Cortan, V. Ivetic, M.S. Drinic and M. Sijacic-Nikolic, 2014. Genetic structure of black poplar (Populus nigra L.) population in the area of Great War Island. Genetika, 46: 963-973.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jiang, D., G. Wu, K. Mao and J. Feng, 2015. Structure of genetic diversity in marginal populations of black poplar (Populus nigra L.). Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 61: 297-302.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans and T. van de Lee et al., 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res., 23: 4407-4414.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Hill, M., H. Witsenboer, M. Zabeau, P. Vos, R. Kesseli and R. Michelmore, 1996. PCR-based fingerprinting using AFLPs as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp. Theor. Applied Genet., 93: 1202-1210.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kafkas, S., Y. Dogan, A. Sabır, A. Turan and H. Seker, 2009. Genetic characterization of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars from Turkey using molecular markers. HortScience, 44: 1557-1561.
    Direct Link    


  • Ercisli, S., J. Gadze, G. Agar, N. Yildirim and Y. Hizarci, 2011. Genetic relationships among wild pomegranate (Punica granatum) genotypes from Coruh Valley in Turkey. Genet. Mol. Res., 10: 459-464.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ferrao, L.F.V., E.T. Caixeta, F.D.F. Souza, E.M. Zambolim, C.D. Cruz, L. Zambolim and N.S. Sakiyama, 2013. Comparative study of different molecular markers for classifying and establishing genetic relationships in Coffea canephora. Plant Syst. Evol., 299: 225-238.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mignouna, H.D., M.M. Abang and S.A. Fagbemi, 2003. A comparative assessment of molecular marker assays (AFLP, RAPD and SSR) for white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) germplasm characterization. Ann. Applied Biol., 142: 269-276.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Storme, V., A.V. Broek, B. Ivens, D. Haifmaerten and J. van Slycken et al., 2004. Ex-situ conservation of black poplar in Europe: Genetic diversity in nine gene bank collections and their value for nature development. Theor. Applied Genet., 108: 969-981.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chen, K. and Y. Peng, 2010. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in Populus cathayana Rehd originating from Southeastern Qinghai-Tibetan plateau of China. Pak. J. Bot., 42: 117-127.
    Direct Link    


  • Arens, P., H. Coops, J. Jansen and B. Vosman, 1998. Molecular genetic analysis of black poplar (Populus nigra L.) along Dutch rivers. Mol. Ecol., 7: 11-18.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chauhan, N., M.S. Negi, V. Sabharwal, D.K. Khurana and M. Lakshmikumaran, 2004. Screening interspecific hybrids of Populus (P. ciliate × maximowiczii) using AFLP markers. Theor. Applied Genet., 108: 951-957.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhang, D., Z. Zhang, K. Yang and B. Li, 2004. Genetic mapping in (Populus tomentosa × Populus bolleana) and P. tomentosa Carr. using AFLP markers. Theor. Applied Genet., 108: 657-662.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cervera, M.T., V. Storme, B. Ivens, J. Gusmao and B.H. Liu et al., 2001. Dense genetic linkage maps of three Populus species (Populus deltoides, P. nigra and P. trichocarpa) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Genetics, 158: 787-809.
    Direct Link    


  • Fossati, T., G. Patrignani, I. Zapelli, M. Sabatti, F. Sala and S. Castiglione, 2004. Development of molecular markers to assess the level of introgression of Populus tremula into P. alba natural populations. Plant Breed., 123: 382-385.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Murray, M.G. and W.F. Thompson, 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl. Acids Res., 8: 4321-4326.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Nei, M., 1973. The Theory and Estimation of Genetic Distances. In: Genetic Structure of Populations, Morton, N.E. (Ed.). University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, pp: 45-54


  • Miller, M.P., 1997. Tools for population genetic analysis TFPGA, 1.3: A windows program for analysis of Elysium and molecular population genetics data. http://www.marksgeneticsoftware.net/.


  • Rohlf, F.J., 2000. NTSYS-PC numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.10. Exeter Software, New York.


  • Sneath, P. and R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W H. Freeman, San Franscisco, USA., pp: 573-576


  • Mueller, U.G. and L.L. Wolfenbarger, 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14: 389-394.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kumar, P., V.K. Gupta, A.K. Misra, D.R. Modi and B.K. Pandey, 2009. Potential of molecular markers in plant biotechnology. Plant Omics J., 2: 141-162.
    Direct Link    


  • Assogbadjo, A.E., T. Kyndt, B. Sinsin, G. Gheysen and P. van Damme, 2006. Patterns of genetic and morphometric diversity in baobab (Adansonia digitata) populations across different climatic zones of Benin (West Africa). Ann. Bot., 97: 819-830.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Russell, J.R., C.A.C. Kadu, R. Jamnadass, A. Booth, N.J. Cordeiro, M. Woodhead and I.K. Dawson, 2009. AFLP and SSR diversity in the African fruit tree Allanblackia: Implications for management of a genus newly subject to domestication for the edible oil industry. Tree Genet. Genomes, 5: 517-527.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Breinholt, J.W., R. van Buren, O.R. Kopp and C.L. Stephen, 2009. Population genetic structure of an endangered Utah endemic, Astragalus ampullarioides (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot., 96: 661-667.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Di, X.Y. and M.B. Wang, 2013. Genetic diversity and structure of natural Pinus tabulaeformis populations in North China using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 51: 269-275.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Martins, S., F. Simoes, J. Matos, A.P. Silva and V. Carnide, 2014. Genetic relationship among wild, landraces and cultivars of hazelnut (Corylus avellana) from Portugal revealed through ISSR and AFLP markers. Plant Syst. Evol., 300: 1035-1046.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pioto, F., R.S. Costa, S.C. Franca, E.A. Gavioli, B.W. Bertoni and S.M. Zingaretti, 2015. Genetic diversity by AFLP analysis within Jatropha curcas L. populations in the state of são paulo, Brazil. Biomass Bioenergy, 80: 316-320.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tang, H., S. Xing, J. Li, X. Wang, L. Sun, S. Du and X. Liu, 2016. Genetic diversity of Ginkgo biloba half-sib families based on AFLP technology. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 68: 58-65.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cervera, M.T., J. Gusmao, M. Steenackers, J. Peleman and V. Storme et al., 1996. Identification of AFLP molecular markers for resistance against Melampsora larici-populina in Populus. Theor. Applied Genet., 93: 733-737.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jianming, G., Z. Shougong, Q. Liwang, Z. Yong, W. Chunguo and S. Wenqin, 2006. ISSR and AFLP identification and genetic relationships of Chinese elite accessions from the genus Populus. Ann. For. Sci., 63: 499-506.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhang, C., B. Vornam, K. Volmer, K. Prinz and F. Kleemann et al., 2015. Genetic diversity in aspen and its relation to arthropod abundance. Front. Plant Sci., Vol. 5.
    CrossRef    


  • Du, Q., B. Wang, Z. Wei, D. Zhang and B. Li, 2012. Genetic diversity and population structure of Chinese white poplar (Populus tomentosa) revealed by SSR markers. J. Hered., 103: 853-862.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Olson, M.S., A.L. Robertson, N. Takebayashi, S. Silim, W.R. Schroeder and P. Tiffin, 2010. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera). New Phytol., 186: 526-536.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wei, Z., Q. Du, J. Zhang, B. Li and D. Zhang, 2013. Genetic diversity and population structure in Chinese indigenous poplar (Populus simonii) populations using microsatellite markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 31: 620-632.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lu, Z., Y. Wang, Y. Peng, H. Korpelainen and C. Li, 2006. Genetic diversity of Populus cathayana Rehd populations in Southwestern China revealed by ISSR markers. Plant Sci., 170: 407-412.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tripathi, N., N. Saini, P. Nair and S. Tiwari, 2012. Lack of genetic diversity of a critically endangered important medicinal plant Chlorophytum borivilianum in Central India revealed by AFLP markers. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 18: 161-167.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chen, X., J. Guan, R. Ding, Q. Zhang, X. Ling, B. Qu and L. Zhang, 2013. Conservation genetics of the endangered terrestrial orchid Liparis japonica in Northeast China based on AFLP markers. Plant Syst. Evol., 299: 691-698.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rao, V.R. and T. Hodgkin, 2002. Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult., 68: 1-19.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved