HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Scientific Research

Year: 2019 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 241-248
DOI: 10.3923/ajsr.2019.241.248
In vitro Antioxidant Profiles and Phytochemical Content of Different Organs of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duchesne)
Irda Fidrianny , Fadhila Syifa and Muhamad Insanu

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Antioxidants are able to stabilize or eliminate free radicals before they attack the cells. Antioxidant compounds such as flavonoid substances are essential for maintaining optimum cellular work. Phenol and flavonoid compounds are widely contained in plants, included in strawberry. The purposes of this research were to compare antioxidant profiles from different organs of strawberry using two antioxidant testing methods 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Cupric reducing antioxidant capacities (CUPRAC) and also its phytochemical content. Materials and Methods: Antioxidant activities, total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) were conducted by UV-Vis spectrophotometry. Correlation of TPC and TFC with their IC50 of DPPH and EC50 CUPRAC were analyzed by Pearson’s method. Results: All different organs extracts of strawberry exposed IC50 of DPPH varied from 0.22-10.14 μg mL–1 and EC50 of CUPRAC from 130.42-250.14 μg mL–1. Ethanol stem extract gave the highest TPC 18.62 g gallic acid equivalent (GAE) 100 g–1, while ethyl acetate leaves extract showed the highest TFC 7.40 g quercetin equivalent (QE) 100 g–1. The TPC in fruit and leaves extract were significantly negative correlation with their IC50 DPPH (r = -0.865; r = -0.970, p<0.01). Conclusion: All different organs extracts of strawberry were very strong antioxidant by DPPH method. Waste products of strawberry (leaves and stem) had antioxidant potential. The major contributor in antioxidant activities of fruit and leaves extracts by DPPH assay were phenolic compounds. Only strawberry fruits extract showed linear results in DPPH and CUPRAC assays.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Irda Fidrianny, Fadhila Syifa and Muhamad Insanu, 2019. In vitro Antioxidant Profiles and Phytochemical Content of Different Organs of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duchesne). Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 12: 241-248.

Keywords: DPPH, waste product, Antioxidant potential, strawberry organs, stem extract and CUPRAC

INTRODUCTION

Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) increases simultaneously with lifestyle the society. The excessive of free radical is closely related with many degenerative diseases such as diabetic, hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerosis cardiovascular1.

Consumption of fruits and vegetables rich phenolic and flavonoid compounds had been suggested to prevent development in degenerative diseases such as cancer and heart diseases2,3. Exogenous antioxidant namely as natural antioxidant which can be from foods, vegetables and fruits, included strawberry can prevent the excessive of free radical.

Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duchesne) belong to Rosaceae family contained many phenolic and flavonoid compounds such as anthocyanin, hydroxycinnamic acid, flavonol, flavan-3-ol, ellagic acid, ellagitannin, pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside4-7. Many previous researches published that flavonoid and phenolic compounds had anti-cancer8, antimicrobial9, anti-inflammatory10 and antioxidant activity11-15.

Previous researches stated that phenolic compounds linked with its antioxidant capacities of fruits16-18. Several studies revealed that strawberry have antioxidant activity which was related with its phenolic content19,20 and its antioxidant activity around 2 to 11-fold of antioxidant activities of grapes, apples and oranges21-22. Research regarding comparison between maceration using hydromethanol solvent, infusion and decoction of strawberry roots have been done by Dias et al.23, but comparison between three organs of strawberry using three polarities solvent have not been reported yet. Leaves and stem were the waste products of strawberry, which might have similar antioxidant potential with their fruit.

The goals of this study were to compare antioxidant activity by DPPH and CUPRAC methods, phenolic and flavonoid content of among three polarities extracts of different organs of strawberry, then analyze a correlation of their chemical content and antioxidant activities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), neocuproine, gallic acid and quercetin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA). Other chemicals used were analytical grade.

Collection of sample: Three organs of strawberry were fruits namely as FRT, leaves as LEV and stem as STM. Strawberry was collected from Lembang, West Java-Indonesia, identified in Herbarium Bandungense-School of Life Science and Technology-Bandung Institute of Technology and stated as strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duchesne). Sample was selected, washed, dried and grinded into powder.

Preparation of extraction: Different polarity solvents were used to extract each sample. Extraction was done triplicate by reflux for each solvent. Sample 300 g was extracted using n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol, consecutively. There were three n-hexane extracts (namely FRT1, LEV1 and STM1), three ethyl acetate extracts (FRT2, LEV2 and STM2) and three ethanol extracts (FRT3, LEV3 and STM3).

In vitro antioxidant activities by DPPH assay: Each extract was prepared in various concentrations. Ascorbic acid was used as standard, methanol as a blank and DPPH 50 μg mL1 as control. Antioxidant activity by DPPH assay was conducted using modification of Blois’s method24. Extract 2 mL was added into 2 mL DPPH 50 μg mL1. After incubation 30 min, the absorbance was read at wavelength 515 nm by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The IC50 (inhibitory concentration 50%) of DPPH scavenging activity exposed its antioxidant activity which can be calculated using its calibration curve.

In vitro antioxidant activities by CUPRAC assay: The CUPRAC solution was prepared in ammonium acetate buffer pH 7 using modified Apak’s method25. Each extract was prepared in various concentrations and pipetted 2 mL extract into 2 mL CUPRAC 100 μg mL1. After incubation 30 min, the absorbance was observed at wavelength 450 nm. Ammonium acetate buffer was used as a blank, CUPRAC 100 μg mL1 as control and ascorbic acid as standard. Concentration of sample or standard that can exhibit 50% of CUPRAC capacity is EC50 (exhibitory concentration 50%) of CUPRAC capacity. The EC50 of CUPRAC capacity presented its antioxidant capacity which was determined using its calibration curve.

Total phenolic content (TPC): Folin-ciocalteu reagent was used to investigate total phenolic content. Gallic acid 40-120 μg mL1 was used as standard. Gallic acid 0.5 mL was added by 5 mL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (which diluted 1:10 with aquadest) and 4 mL sodium carbonate 1 M. Keep solution 15 min at room temperature, then absorbance was seen at wavelength 765 nm. The same procedure was carried out for sample. The TPC of sample was calculated using calibration curve of gallic acid and reported as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per 100 g extract (g GAE 100 g1)26.

Total flavonoid content (TFC): Quercetin 36-104 μg mL1 was used as standard. Modified Chang’s method was performed to determine TFC. Quercetin solution 0.5 mL was diluted by adding 1.5 mL methanol, 0.1 mL aluminium (III) chloride 10%, 0.1 mL sodium acetate 1M and 2.8 mL aquadest. Sample was conducted by the same procedure. Absorbance was read at wavelength 415 nm after incubation 30 min. Quercetin equivalent (QE) expressed TFC per 100 g extract (g QE100 g1)27.

Statistical analysis: All of results are means±standard deviation at least triplicate experiments. Statistical analysis was investigated using one way ANOVA post hoc Tukey (p<0.05) by SPSS 16 for Windows. Meanwhile the correlations between TFC, TPC and their antioxidant activities and also between two antioxidant testing methods were analyzed by Pearson’s method.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Extraction: Crude drug was separated using three different polarities solvents such as n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol, consecutively, to extract most nonpolar compound by n-hexane, most semi polar compound by ethyl acetate and most polar compound using ethanol.

Density of extracts: The similarity density among extracts was important point. The higher density extract may give higher activity and or phytochemical content compared to extract with lower density. It was difficult to put 100% concentrated (thick extract) into pycnometer, so it can be presented by 1 and 5% or other concentration. In the present study, density of each extract of strawberry organs were determined as density 1% extract and showed similarity density around 0.66-0.9 g mL1 for all extracts.

Antioxidant activities: Inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50) of DPPH scavenging activities of different extracts of strawberry organs presented their antioxidant activities by DPPH assay, ranged from 0.22-10.14 μg mL1 (Table 1). The highest antioxidant activity was demonstrated by the lowest of IC50 compared to IC50 of DPPH of ascorbic acid as standard.

The present study found the ethanol leaves extract of strawberry had the highest antioxidant activity by DPPH assay (IC50 0.22 μg mL1) compared to its fruit and stem extracts. It was similar to the other research reported that methanol leaves extract of Malus Sparkler cultivar of crabapples which was belong to the same family with strawberry (Rosaceae) found the highest antioxidant activity by DPPH assay [277.76 mmol Trolox equivalent (TE) g1] among seven cultivars of crabapples and compared to its flower and fruit extracts28. The IC50 DPPH of ethanol leaves extract of strawberry was lower than IC50 DPPH of ascorbic acid (0.56 μg mL1). Ascorbic acid was used as standard to verify DPPH assay that conducted in the present study. All extracts (n-hexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol) of different organs of strawberry (fruit, leaves and stem) varied from 0.22-10.14 μg mL1 (IC50 DPPH <50 μg mL1), therefore it can be classified as very strong antioxidant24. Dias et al.23 studied regarding antioxidant activities of roots extract of commercial and wild strawberry which were extracted by infusion, decoction and maceration methods. The results exhibited that hydromethanolic roots extract of wild strawberry by maceration gave the lowest EC50 of DPPH (50.03 μg mL1) compared to commercial strawberry and the others extraction methods.

Research by Chaves et al.4 presented that acidified methanol strawberry fruit extract of Camarosa cultivar showed the highest antioxidant activity by DPPH assay (EC50 76.73 mg mL1) compared to Albion, Aromas, Camino real, Monterey, Portola, San Andreas cultivars. Two cultivars of strawberry (Sweet Charlie and Camarosa) with four maturation stages (green, greenish white, whitish red and red) were evaluated by Mandave et al.29. Each sample was extracted using ethanol and 0.2% acetic acid, then each extract was evaluated its antioxidant activity by DPPH and reducing power assays. The result demonstrated that 0.2% acetic acid extract of Sweet Charlie strawberry cultivar with red maturation stages had the highest antioxidant activity by DPPH assay which exposed the lowest EC50 DPPH (9.71 mg mL1) compared to other maturation stages and Camarosa cultivar.

Table 1: Antioxidant activities of strawberry organs by DPPH methods
a-dDifferent letter in the same column means significant different (p<0.05)

Table 2: Antioxidant capacities of strawberry organs by CUPRAC methods
a-dDifferent letter in the same column means significant different (p<0.05), CUPRAC: Cupric reducing antioxidant capacities

Research by Dyduch-Sieminska et al.30 was recorded antioxidant activity of water fruit extract of wild strawberry by percentage DPPH scavenging activity, which shown dried fruit of Regina cultivar gave the highest percentage DPPH scavenging activity (24.60%). The higher percentage of DPPH scavenging activity was not always given by higher concentration of sample, otherwise the lower percentage of DPPH scavenging activity was not always given by the lower concentration. It was presented by previous study31, which exposed that methanol pineapple peel extract 100 μg mL1 had higher percentage of DPPH scavenging activity (95.74%) compared to 200 μg mL1 (95.17%) and 400 μg mL1 (94.96%). It might be only some compounds in extract had antioxidant activities, while the other compounds act as antagonist of antioxidant. In methanol peel extract 100 μg mL1 the antagonist antioxidant compounds have not reach their effective minimum concentration yet, meanwhile in 200 μg mL1 they reached the effective minimum concentration, then reduced the percentage of DPPH.

The CUPRAC was the other method that carried out in the present study. The exhibitory concentration 50% (EC50) of CUPRAC capacity in the range of 130.42-417.28 μg mL1 (Table 2), which FRT2 gave the lowest EC50 (130.42 μg mL1) and showed the highest antioxidant activity by CUPRAC method compared to the other extracts. The EC50 CUPRAC of ascorbic acid standard was 12.58 μg mL1. It means that antioxidant capacity of ascorbic acid around 10-fold of FRT2 by CUPRAC method. The CUPRAC reagent was prepared in ammonium acetate buffer pH 7 by mixing Cupric (II) chloride and neocuproine. Sample will act as antioxidant in CUPRAC assay if it had reduction potential lower than reduction potential of Cu (II)/Cu (I) which was 0.159 V. Complex Cu (I)-neocuproine gives yellow color and shows characteristic absorption at wavelength 450 nm25. Amount of Cu (II) that can be reduced to Cu (I), related with the intensity of yellow color and amount of antioxidant compounds in sample.

Liu et al.28 presented that methanol leaves extract of Malus Sparkler, one of crabapples cultivar (Rosaceae) showed the highest reducing power (119.05 mg vitamin C equivalent (VE) 100 g1) compared its fruits and flowers, also compared to the others cultivars. Hydromethanolic roots of wild strawberry which was extracted by maceration had the highest antioxidant activity by reducing power method (EC50 40.98 μg mL1) compared to the other extracts23. It was contrary with its antioxidant activity using beta- carotene bleaching (BCB) method which revealed that infusion of commercial strawberry had the highest antioxidant (EC50 23.44 μg mL1) by BCB method. The other research exposed that Camarosa strawberry cultivar with red maturation stages had the highest antioxidant activity (EC50 24.16 mg mL1) compared to other maturation stages and Sweet Charlie cultivar by reducing power assay29.

Phytochemical content: The STM3 gave the highest TPC 18.62 g GAE 100 g1, followed by LEV3 (17.11 g GAE 100 g1), while the lowest was shown by FRT 1 (1.45 g GAE 100 g1) (Fig. 1).

The TFC among different extracts of strawberry organs were exposed in term of quercetin equivalent per 100 g varied from 0.48-7.40 g QE 100 g1. The STM3 demonstrated the lowest TFC (0.48 g QE 100 g1), while the highest given by LEV2 (7.40 g QE 100 g1) (Fig. 2).

Research by Dias et al.23 expressed that root infusion of wild strawberry gave the highest total phenolic content (TPC) 253.42 mg g1 compared to commercial strawberry and other extraction methods. Dyduch-Sieminska et al.30 reported that the highest total flavonoid content of water fruit extract of wild strawberry was found in Baron von Solemarcher cultivar (1.245 mg QE g1), meanwhile Regina cultivar had the highest total phenolic acid content (4.858 mg caffeic acid equivalent g1).

The TPC in STM3 (18.62 g GAE 100 g1) and TFC in LEV2 (7.40 g QE 100 g1) were the highest among all extracts, but STM3 and LEV2 did not show the highest antioxidant activities by DPPH method. It demonstrated that the highest TPC and or TFC in sample didn’t always gave the higher antioxidant activities. Antioxidant activities of ethyl acetate and ethanol strawberry fruit extracts using DPPH assay were higher than their n-hexane extracts. It might be correlated with their phenolic content.

Fig. 1: Total phenolic content in different organs of strawberry, n = 3

Fig. 2: Total flavonoid content in different organs of strawberry, n = 3

The TPC in methanol leaves extract of Malus Sparkler cultivar of crabapples (Rosaceae) (3419 mg GAE 100 g1) was the highest compared to its fruits and flowers and also to the other cultivars28. The highest TFC (127.52 mg rutin equivalent (RE) 100 g1) was presented by methanol crabapples leaves extract of Malus Royalty cultivar, meanwhile the highest total anthocyanin was exposed by its flowers extract (374.87 mg catechin equivalent (CE) 100 g1). Similar to the present research which revealed that the highest TFC was shown by LEV2 (7.40 g QE 100 g1), but the highest TPC was demonstrated by STM3 (18.62 g GAE 100 g1). A study regarding seven cultivars of strawberry exhibited that total anthocyanin among all cultivars extracts in the range of 15.67-27.62 mg pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside per 100 g, which was the highest shown by Camarosa cultivars4, while the highest total phenolic content using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent given by Monte Rey cultivars. Mandave et al.29 revealed that chlorogenic acid was the most phenolic compound in strawberry fruit compared to catechin, rutin and quercetin. The fruit of Sweet Charlie strawberry cultivar with greenish white maturation which was extracted using ethanol gave the highest chlorogenic acid (843.4 mg kg1 fresh weight). The similar result was shown by ethanol extract of greenish white maturation of Camarosa strawberry cultivar. The other previous research compared major classes of phenylpropanoids/flavonoids between Fragaria vesca and Fragaria x ananassa 6. The most compound in red and white genotype of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria x ananassa was ellagic acid, shown by earliglow (red genotype of Fragaria x ananassa) which had the highest ellagic acid (29.6 mg 100 g1 fruit fresh).

Roy et al. 6 reported that fruit of strawberry contained most of ellagic acid and flavan-3 ol compared to anthocyanin, hydroxycinnamic acid, flavonol and ellagitannin, which ellagic and flavan-3-ol were soluble in ethyl acetate and ethanol.

Table 3: Correlation of TPC and TFC with its antioxidant activities
**Significant at p<0.01, ns: Not significant, TPC: Total phenolic content, TFC: Total flavonoid content

Table 4: Correlation pearson of DPPH and CUPRAC methods
**Significant at p<0.01, ns: Not significant

Ellagic acid have ortho di-OH in its structure, which may have related with its antioxidant capacity, while substitution OH in C3’ and C4’ in flavan-3-ol influence to give higher antioxidant activities32.

In the present study exhibited that TFC in FRT 2 (1.65 g QE 100 g1) was similar to TFC in STM 2 (1.69 g QE 100 g1). The antioxidant capacities of FRT2 and STM2 by CUPRAC assay were not similar, which EC50 CUPRAC FRT2 130.42 μg mL1 and STM2 201.43 μg mL1. It can be predicted that many of flavonoid compounds in FRT2 had lower redox potential than 1.59 V (Eo Cu(II)/Cu(I)).

Pearson’s correlation: Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was significantly negative if -0.61<r<-0.97 and significantly positive if 0.61<r<0.9733. The higher TFC and TPC are often similar with the higher antioxidant activities, which exposed by lower IC50 DPPH and EC50 CUPRAC, therefore their correlation was significantly negative correlation34.

Correlation between TPC and TFC in all extracts of (n-hexane, ethyl acetate, ethanol) of strawberry organs and their antioxidant activities by DPPH and CUPRAC methods can be found in Table 3, meanwhile correlation between two antioxidant testing methods in Table 4.

In the present research showed that TPC in different organs (fruit, leaves and stem) of strawberry were significant and negative correlation with their IC50 of DPPH (r = -0.970, r = -0.865, r = -0.873, p<0.01) and only TFC in stem also had significantly negative correlation with its IC50 of DPPH (r = -0.894, p<0.01). Research by Chaves et al.4 expressed that total anthocyanin in seven cultivars of strawberry had significantly negative correlation with their EC50 DPPH (r = -0.94, p<0.01), meanwhile its TPC showed no significant correlation (r = -0.49). Analyze of correlation between two antioxidant testing methods (Table 4) exposed that IC50 of DPPH in strawberry leaves was linear with its EC50 CUPRAC (r = 0.399, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Waste product of strawberry (leaves and stem) had antioxidant activities. Two antioxidant testing methods (DPPH and CUPRAC) gave different results in antioxidant activities of different organs of strawberry. All extracts of fruits, leaves and stem of strawberry can be categorized as very strong antioxidant, using DPPH assay. The higher TPC and or TFC did not always show the higher antioxidant capacities.

Phenolic compounds in fruits and leaves extracts of strawberry were the major contributor in their antioxidant activities by DPPH method.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTS

This study discovered that the waste products of strawberry (leaves and stem) had antioxidant activities and potential to be recommended as sources of further natural antioxidant. The higher TPC and or TFC did not always show the higher antioxidant capacities.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by Research, Community Service and Innovation Program for Research Group from Institute for Research and Community Service-Bandung Institute of Technology with grant number 298b/I1.B04/SPK-WRRIM/III/2018. The authors are grateful to the authorities of School of Pharmacy, Bandung Institute Technology for providing the necessary facilities to perform this research.

REFERENCES

  • Carocho, M. and I.C.F.R. Ferreira, 2013. A review on antioxidants, prooxidants and related controversy: Natural and synthetic compounds, screening and analysis methodologies and future perspectives. Food Chem. Toxicol., 51: 15-25.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chen, F., F. Li, L. Lu, X. Zhang, X. Xu and D. Li, 2014. Phenolic profile and changes in the antioxidant activity of crabapple (Malus domestica cv Royalty) fruit during maturation on the tree. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 49: 1680-1688.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vinson, J.A., L. Zubik, P. Bose, N. Samman and J. Proch, 2005. Dried fruits: Excellent in vitro and in vivo antioxidants. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 24: 44-50.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Chaves, V.C., E. Calvete and F.H. Reginatto, 2017. Quality properties and antioxidant activity of seven strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch) cultivars. Scient. Hortic., 225: 293-298.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sun, J., X. Liu, T. Yang, J. Slovin and P. Chen, 2014. Profiling polyphenols of two diploid strawberry (Fragaria vesca) inbred lines using UHPLC-HRMSn. Food Chem., 146: 289-298.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Roy, S., B. Wu, W. Liu and D.D. Archbold, 2018. Comparative analyses of polyphenolic composition of Fragaria spp. color mutants. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 125: 255-261.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wang, S.Y. and W. Zheng, 2001. Effect of plant growth temperature on antioxidant capacity in strawberry. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 4977-4982.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Folmer, F., U. Basavaraju, M. Jaspars, G. Hold, E. El-Omar, M. Dicato and M. Diederich, 2014. Anticancer effects of bioactive berry compounds. Phytochem. Rev., 13: 295-322.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Parashar, S., H. Sharma and M. Garg, 2014. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of fruits and vegetable peels: A review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 3: 160-164.
    Direct Link    


  • Joseph, S.V., I. Edirisinghe and B.M. Burton-Freeman, 2014. Berries: Anti-inflammatory effects in humans. J. Agric. Food Chem., 62: 3886-3903.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iqbal, E., K.A. Salim and L.B.L. Lim, 2015. Phytochemical screening, total phenolics and antioxidant activities of bark and leaf extracts of Goniothalamus velutinus (Airy Shaw) from Brunei Darussalam. J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 27: 224-232.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Raman, S.T., A.K.P.G. Ganeshan, C. Chen, C. Jin, S.H. Li, H.J. Chen and Z. Gui, 2016. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of flavonoid extracted from mulberry fruit (Morus alba L.). Pharmacogn. Mag., 12: 128-133.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yadav, B.S., R. Yadav, R.B. Yadav and M. Garg, 2016. Antioxidant activity of various extracts of selected gourd vegetables. J. Food Sci. Technol., 53: 1823-1833.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhou, L., X. Lin, A.M. Abbasi and B. Zheng, 2016. Phytochemical contents and antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of selected black and white sesame seeds. BioMed. Res. Int., Vol. 2016.
    CrossRef    


  • Zou, Z., W. Xi, Y. Hu, C. Nie and Z. Zhou, 2016. Antioxidant activity of Citrus fruits. Food Chem., 196: 885-896.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Halvorsen, B.L., M.H. Calrsen, K.M. Philips, S.K. Bohn, K. Holte, D.R. Jacobs, Jr. and R. Blomhoff, 2006. Content of redox-active compounds (ie, antioxidants) in foods consumed in the United States. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 84: 95-135.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Othman, A., N.J. Mukhtar, N.S. Ismail and S.K. Chang, 2014. Phenolics, flavonoids content and antioxidant activities of 4 Malaysian herbal plants. Int. Food Res. J., 21: 759-766.
    Direct Link    


  • Proteggente, A.R., A.S. Pannala, G. Paganga, L. van Buren and E. Wagner et al., 2002. The antioxidant activity of regularly consumed fruit and vegetables reflects their phenolic and vitamin C composition. Free Radical Res., 36: 217-233.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vinson, J.A., X. Su, L. Zubik and P. Bose, 2001. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods:  Fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 5315-5321.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wang, S.Y. and H. Jiao, 2000. Scavenging capacity of berry crops on superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen. J. Agric. Food Chem., 48: 5677-5684.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Giampieri, F., S. Tulipani, J.M. Alvarez-Suarez, J.L. Quiles, B. Mezzetti and M. Battino, 2012. The strawberry: Composition, nutritional quality, and impact on human health. Nutrition, 28: 9-19.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Scalzo, J., A. Politi, N. Pellegrini, B. Mezzetti and M. Battino, 2005. Plant genotype affects total antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in fruit. Nutrition, 21: 207-213.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dias, M.I., L. Barros, M.B.P.P. Oliveira, C. Santos-Buelga and I.C.F.R. Ferreira, 2015. Phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of commercial and wild Fragaria vesca L. roots: A comparison between hydromethanolic and aqueous extracts. Ind. Crops Prod., 63: 125-132.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Blois, M.S., 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181: 1199-1200.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Apak, R., S. Gorinstein, V. Bohm, K.M. Schaich, M. Ozyurek and K. Guclu, 2013. Methods of measurement and evaluation of natural antioxidant capacity/activity (IUPAC technical report). Pure Applied Chem., 85: 957-998.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ravipati, A.S., L. Zhang, S.R. Koyyalamudi, S.C. Jeong and N. Reddy et al., 2012. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of selected Chinese medicinal plants and their relation with antioxidant content. BMC Complement. Alternat. Med., Vol., 12
    CrossRef    


  • Karabegovic, I., M. Nikolova, D. Velickovic, S. Stojicevic, V. Veljkovic and M. Lazic, 2011. Comparison of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of methanolic extracts of the Artemisia sp. recovered by different extraction techniques. Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 19: 504-511.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liu, F., M. Wang and M. Wang, 2018. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of flowers, leaves and fruits of five crabapple cultivars (Malus mill. species). Scient. Hortic., 235: 460-467.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mandave, P.C., P.K. Pawar, P.K. Ranjekar, N. Mantri and A.A. Kuvalekar, 2014. Comprehensive evaluation of in vitro antioxidant activity, total phenols and chemical profiles of two commercially important strawberry varieties. Scient. Hortic., 172: 124-134.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dyduch-Sieminska, M., A. Najda, J. Dyduch, M. Gantner and K. Klimek, 2015. The content of secondary metabolites and antioxidant activity of wild strawberry fruit (Fragaria vesca L.). J. Anal. Methods Chem., Vol. 15.
    CrossRef    


  • Emmanuel, E.U., E.S. Onagbonfeoana, O.C. Adanma, O.C. Precious, A.I. Faith and O.Y. Ndukaku, 2016. In vivo and in vitro antioxidant and hypolipidemic activity of methanol extract of pineapple peels in wistar rats. Int. J. Biosci., 8: 64-72.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Heim, K.E., A.R. Tagliaferro and D.J. Bobilya, 2002. Flavonoid antioxidants: Chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. J. Nutr. Biochem., 13: 572-584.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Thaipong, K., U. Boonprakob, K. Crosby, L. Cisneros-Zevallos and D.H. Byrne, 2006. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal., 19: 669-675.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fidrianny, I., Y. Johan and Sukrasno, 2015. Antioxidant activities of different polarity extracts from three organs of makrut lime (Citrus hystrix DC) and correlation with total flavonoid, phenolic, carotenoid content. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res., 8: 239-243.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved