HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Plant Sciences

Year: 2020 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 246-251
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2020.246.251
Response of Vegetable Soybean (Glycin max L. Merr.) Plant by Application of Integrated Fertilizers in Volcanic Soil
Maria Theresia Darini , Sri Widata and Wahyu Setya Ratri

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Vegetable soybean has been developed rapidly due to its capability to fulfilling not only nutritious food but also fodder forage. The research aims to observe the responses of vegetable soybean as a functional food and forage feed in volcanic soil which were planted and fertilized by using cow manure and chemical fertilizers. Materials and Methods: The research was arranged in a factorial randomized complete block design with 3 replications. The first factor was 3 various rates of cow manure fertilizer (10, 20 and 30 t ha1). The second factor was source and dosages of nitrogen: consists of urea dosages (50, 75 and 100 kg ha1) and Ammonium Sulphate (AS) dosages (100, 150 and 200 kg ha1). Plant responses that had been observed were: growth components, pod yields and yield of forage feed. Results: It obtained that there was no interaction between cow manure rates with nitrogen fertilizer sources on all observational variables. The rate 10-30 t ha1 of cow manure does not affect the growth, pod yields and forage feed. Conclusion: The application of cow manure 10 t ha1 rate and nitrogen ammonium sulphate source dosage of 200 kg ha1 increases plant growth, yield of pods functional food and vegetable soybean forage feed.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Maria Theresia Darini, Sri Widata and Wahyu Setya Ratri, 2020. Response of Vegetable Soybean (Glycin max L. Merr.) Plant by Application of Integrated Fertilizers in Volcanic Soil. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 19: 246-251.

Keywords: vegetable soybean, functional food, number of pod, Forage feed and cow manure

INTRODUCTION

Vegetable soybean (edamame) [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a low input, high nutritional value, short crop cycle and soil-enriching profitable crop. It offers quick economic return and provides health benefits to the consumers. The market demand for edamame has begun to flourish and expand dramatically in recent decades due to increased awareness of nutritional properties and the change in life styles towards healthier food1. Then the consumption of edamame can also really contribute to reducing deficiencies in children and eve adults, through its great nutritional content and good health benefits2.

By product of legumes have potential to contribute significantly to sustainable intensification of livestock production in the tropics, along with the provision of ecosystem services3. Prasanthi and Venkateswaralu4 reported the effect of different planting patterns on fodder quality as compared to sole cropping. The development of genomics and bioinformatics together with genome offer great scope to improve forage feed crops, this opportunity has enormous potention to improve food security and political stability5.

Market demand for vegetable soybean has increased in the last few decades due to increased awareness of nutritional properties and lifestyle changes towards healthy food6. Those legumes have the potential to significantly contribute to the ongoing intensification of animal production in the tropics, along with the provision of ecosystem services7. In addition to land conversion, there is also competition between food, feed and biofuels. The availability of biofuel is still related to food and feed production, such as soybeans, corn and cassava8.

The forages browsed by the livestock can be classified into 2 main groups: ephemeral annual plants, which germinate and remain green for only a few weeks after rain, perennial shrubs and tree fodders. Despite their potential as feeds, little research has determined their nutritive value. In vivo evaluation is the best estimation method of feed’s nutritional value, however it is very laborious and difficult to standardize with browsing animals. On the contrary, in vitro methods are less expensive, less time consuming and allow a better control of experimental conditions than in vivo experiments9. One factor that determines the merits of the development of cattle is feed. Feed can be classified into sources of protein, energy and crude fiber. Animal feed is the main source of crude fiber.

Therefore, it was necessary to conduct the research on vegetable soybean plant to observe their growth and yield on volcanic soil with the used of integrated fertilizer and it can function as functional food and fodder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: The research was carried out in Pakem, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta, August to October 2019.

Land management: The experiment field was made of three blocks, the distance between the block was 50 cm. Each block was made 15 units of experiment plots. Each plot with size 1×1 m2, planting distance 20×20 cm, so that obtained 25 plants. Plants were fertilized by using cow manure fertilizer with various rates: 10, 15 and 20 t ha1 or equivalent 1, 2 and 3 kg plot1. Vegetable soybean seed Ryoko 75 var. were planted one seed per hole. After seed germination, plants were treated by supplementary fertilizer from sources of urea nitrogen at various dosages: 50, 75, 100 and AS fertilizer at dosages: 100, 150 and 200 kg ha1. The urea and ammonium sulphate were applied 50% of dosage and then a month later the remaining 50% was applied to plants.

Plant's physical treatment includes watering once every 2 days and replacing the un grown seeds after 7 days of planting. Pest control was done manually by picking and killing it and then buried. Weeding was done after one month and in accordance with the conditions of the land. Harvesting on 63-days aged pods provided that the seeds in the pods have protruded and hardened (ripe). The growth component was observed in three sample plants (as a representation), meanwhile pods were observed for nine sample plants per plot. Statistical analysis was performed by using variance and followed by Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05)10.

RESULTS

There was no statistical interaction between the dosage of cow manure fertilizer with nitrogen sources on all observed variables.

Plant height: Plant height was not significantly different neither by the application of cow manure 10-20 t ha1, nor by application of nitrogen fertilizer at various dosages (Table 1). The application of urea fertilizer at dosages of 50-100 kg and AS dosages of 100-200 kg ha1 showed no significant difference in plant height.

Leaf number plant: Cow manure rate of 10-20 t ha1 did not significantly affect on leaf number plant, but the source and dosage of nitrogen fertilizer significantly caused different leaf number per plant. The application of 75 kg urea fertilizer or 150 kg AS fertilizer, resulted the highest number of leaves per plant, while lower number of leaves was shown in the application of 50 or 100 kg urea and ammonium sulphate of 100-200 kg ha1.

Table 1: Average of plant height, number of leaves, leaf weight, flowering age and pod numbers
  Observed parameters
Rates of cow manure and nitrogen dosage sources
Plant height (cm)
Number of leaves/plant
Fresh weight/plant (g)
Blooming period (day)
Cow manure 10 t ha1 (P1)
51.28a
26.76a
40.39a
36.61a
Cow manure 15 t ha1(P2)
50.96a
25.15a
38.01a
36.78a
Cow manure 20 t ha1 (P3)
49.39a
24.78a
36.84a
36.94a
Urea 50 kg (N1 )
49.22a
25.23b
32.34c
38.67a
Urea 75 kg (N2 )
51.59a
27.87a
39.33a
36.89ao
Urea 100 kg (N3 )
50.74a
24.87b
35.34b
38.50a
AS 100 kg (N4 )
49.37a
22.83b
39.45a
36.22a
AS 150 kg (N5 )
52.78a
28.11a
45.54a
35.78a
AS 200 kg (N6 )
49.59a
24.22b
42.45a
35.11a
No Interaction
(p>0.05)
(p>0.05)
(p>0.05)
(p>0.05)
Numbers followed by the same letter in the same column show no significant difference (p≤0.05)


Table 2: Average of number of pods, weights pods, plant fresh weights, plant dry weights and pod weights
  Observed variables
Rates of cow manure and nitrogen dosage sources
No. of pod/plants
Weight of leave ha1 (t)
Dry weight plant1 (g)
Weight of pods/plant (g)
Cow manure 10 t ha1 (P1)
31.09a
3.51a
10.03a
16.85a
Cow manure 15 t ha1 ( P2)
29.09a
3.42a
9.51b
16.57a
Cow manure 20 t ha1 (P3)
27.78a
3.51a
8.41b
16.01a
Urea 50 kg (N1 )
25.14b
2.27c
11.24a
14.07c
Urea 75 kg (N2 )
27.09a
2.51c
8.86b
15.67b
Urea 100 kg (N3 )
27.63a
3.53b
9.98b
16.08a
AS 100 kg (N4 )
28.26a
3.18b
9.79b
16.18a
AS 150 kg (N5 )
32.48a
3.55b
11.44a
18.44a
AS 200 kg (N6 )
33.11a
3.82a
10.69a
18.48a
No Interaction
(p>0.05)
(p>0.05)
(p>0.05)
(p>0.05)
Numbers followed by the same letter in the same column show no significant difference (p≤0.05)

Plant fresh weight: Cow manure 10-20 t ha1 did not significantly affect plant fresh weight whereas, the source of nitrogen fertilizer is significantly influence plant fresh weight. The highest plant fresh weight was obtained by giving 75 kg urea fertilizer or ammonium sulphate of 100-200 kg ha1. Lower plant fresh weight was obtained from the application of 100 kg ha1 urea and given 50 kg ha1 urea, the lowest plant fresh was obtained (Table 1).

Flowering period: Table 1 showed that neither application of cow manure 10-20 t ha1, nor application of urea and ammonium sulphate at various dosage did not significantly affect flowering period of vegetable soybean. Likewise, the use of urea fertilizer with a dosage of 50-100 kg and AS fertilizer dosage 100-200 kg ha1 was not significantly different on the blooming period of vegetable soybean flowers.

Pod number plant: Pod number per plant presented in Table 2, was not significantly different by the application of cow manure rate of 10-20 t ha1, but significant differences was obtained when the sources and dosages of nitrogen fertilizer was applied. High number of pods was obtained by application of urea with a dosage of 75-100 kg and ammonium sulphate of 100-200 kg ha1, while the lowest pod number was obtained when 50 kg ha1 urea was applied.

Pod weight plant: The application of cow manure 10-20 t ha1 resulted no significant difference on pod weight per plant, while the sources and dosages of nitrogen fertilizer significantly affect pod weight. High pod weight was obtained by giving ammonium sulphate dosage 100-200 kg ha1, while the application of urea at 75-100 kg ha1 resulted lower pod weight and the lowest pod weight was obtained at urea fertilizer at 50 kg ha1 (Table 2).

Plant dry weight: Cow manure rate of 10-20 t ha1 significantly affected plant dry weight of vegetable soybean, so did the sources and dosages of nitrogen fertilizer. High plant dry weight was obtained at 10 t ha1 cow manure rate, while 15-20 t of rate was obtained lower plant dry weight. At the application of nitrogen fertilizer, high plant dry weight was obtained at 50 kg urea dosage or AS fertilizer dosage 150-200 kg ha1, while other dosages obtained lower plant dry weight (Table 2).

Fig. 1:
Plant fresh weight and pods weight t ha1 in different rates of cow manure and nitrogen dosage source
Different letters have different significant level, P1: Cow manure 10 t ha1, P2: Cow manure 15 t ha1, P3: Cow manure 20 t ha1, N1: Urea 50 kg, N2: Urea 75 kg, N3: Urea 100 kg, N4: AS 100 kg, N5: AS 150 kg, N6: AS 200 kg

Pod weight and plant fresh weight per hectare: As shown in Fig. 1, Pod weight and plant fresh weight were not significantly affected by application of cow manure. Source and rate of nitrogen fertilizer influenced both variable, the highest pod weight and plant fresh weight was obtained by the application of 200 kg ammonium sulphate.

DISCUSSION

The rate of cow manure fertilizer has no effect on the variable height of vegetable soybean plants, as well as nitrogen sources (Table 1). However, this is not in accordance with Irfan et al.11 that found that the application of nitrogen dosage of 120 kg ha1 increases the height of the oat feed forage, while Junaedi and Wulandari12 states that the application of chicken manure fertilizer can increase the height of bean plants, the are different report that the application of cattle manure 20 t ha1 rate gave the highest plant height of maiz13. This differs from other research that report the application of ammonium sulphate fertilizer is the best of sources nitrogen for the stem diameter of sorghum plant14.

The number of leaf of vegetable soybean plants is not affected by the rate of cow manure fertilizer (Table 1). The source of urea nitrogen is 75 kg and ammonium sulphate dosage 150 kg ha1 produces more leaf than other sources. This is not supported by the Donatus15 report which states that providing a combination of chicken manure with urea can increase the number of leaf of peanut plants.

The rate of cow manure fertilizer has no effect on observed variables, leaf weight of vegetable soybean (Table 1) while nitrogen sources ammonium sulphate dosage 150 kg produces higher plant weights and 50 kg of urea produces lower plant weights. This is not in accordance with Sutrisno and Yurnawan's opinion16 reported that the combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers could increase the fresh weight of green beans.

Vegetable soybean plants is not affected by the rate of cow manure fertilizer, as well as nitrogen sources both urea and ammonium sulphate. Based on Junaedi and Wulandari's12 report that the combination of organic fertilizer with 50% NPK accelerates the blooming on melons (Cucumis melon L.).

The lowest pod/plant of vegetable soybean yield produced by 50 kg urea, whereas application with other nitrogen sources and dosage yield in higher number of pod. It is not in accordance with the report of Devi et al.17 that the application of a combination of fertilizers increases the weight of soybean pods, as well other research that report the application of combined farm yard manure at 30 t ha1 and nitrogen fertilizer 150 kg ha1 dosages significantly increased the total bulb yield onion plant18. The treatment by using chicken manure fertilizer also increased the bean pods yield, while Kamtchoum et al.19 reported that application of 75 kg N fertilizer could increase the production of castor beans. The rate of cow manure fertilizer has no effect on the variable pod weight per plant, however, the nitrogen source is influential. The lowest pod yield produced by plants treated by 50 kg urea, other plants treated by nitrogen sources produced pod higher than that and no different. It is not in accordance with the report of Devi et al.17 that the application of a combination of fertilizers increases the weight of vegetable soybean pods, that the amount of chicken manure increases the number of bean crop pods, as well as another study reported20,21 that the application of organic fertilizer is the best alternative as a source of nutrient for agronomic parameters of physalis fruits.

The rate of cow manure fertilizer does not affect the variable fresh weight of plants hacter, while the nitrogen source influences (Fig. 1). The lowest fresh plant weights were obtained at 50 kg ha1 of urea. However, another treatment by using various dosages of nitrogen produced different and higher fresh plant weights of vegetable soybean. This is consistent with the report of Irfan et al.11 which states that the application of 120 kg of nitrogen fertilizer per hectare produces a maximum fresh weight of forage, as well as Gusmini et al.22 also reported that cow or chicken manure combined with nitrogen fertilizer of 14 g m2 was able to increase fresh weight of forage rice. This is not according to the report Sindhu et al.23 that application of farmyard manure can increased forage yield of Indigofera tinctoria, as well as Prasanthi et al.4 reported that the application of organic fertilizer increased soybean weight to 1.6 t ha1, so did the opinion of Donatus15 stating that the combination of chicken manure with urea increased the yield of peanut plants. Sutrisno and Yusnawan16 also reported that combination of organic and inorganic fertilizer increased fresh weight of mung bean, where as Otieno et al.24 reported that organic fertilizer with NPK could increase dry weight of soybean plant. Morya et al.25 reported that the combination of vermicompost with NPK fertilizer can increase the dry weight of soybean plants.

The dosage of cow manure fertilizer has no effect on the variable pod weight ha, while the nitrogen source is influential, the low pod weight ha is obtained at 50 kg urea, other sources of nitrogen pod weight ha1 are higher and no difference occur (Fig. 1).

CONCLUSION

Hence, study concluded that, there is no statistical interaction between the rates of cow manure and nitrogen sources to observe the variable of vegetable soybean plant. The source of urea nitrogen 50 kg ha1 did not increase growth and yield, whereas the rate of cow manure fertilizer or other nitrogen dosages increased growth and yield of vegetable soybean plant. The recommended rate is 10 t of cow manure and 200 kg ha1 ammonium sulphate fertilizer to increase growth, yield included fresh weight of pods and forage feed weight of vegetable soybean plant.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Through the cultivation of vegetable soybeans in volcanic soil, two benefits can be obtained, besides being able to harvest fresh pods as functional food it is also forage for animal feed. By application of cow manure and ammonium sulfate fertilizer in volcanic soil the yield of vegetable soybean pods and the fresh weight of forage feed can be increased.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Acknowledgments for research funding assistance to the Research Institute Development and Community Service at Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University through Applied Grant No. 30/UST/LP3M/PUSLIT/PTU/K/IV/2019 so that this research can be carried out.

REFERENCES

  • Guo-Liang Jiang, G.L., L.K. Rutto and S. Ren, 2018. Evaluation of Soybean lines for edamame yield traits and trait genetic correlation. HortScience, 53: 1732-1736.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mahoussi, K.A.D., E.A. Eric, A. Symphorien, J.B.Q.Florent and J.C. Flora et al., 2020. Vegetable soybean, edamame: Research, production, utilization and analysis of its adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa. J. Hortic. For., 12: 1-12.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schultze-Kraft, R., I.M. Rao, M. Peters, R.J. Clements, C.Bai and G.Liu, 2018. Tropical forage legumes for environmental benefits: An overview. Trop. Grassl.-Forrajes Trop., 6: 1-14.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Prasanthi, G., N.G. Kumar, S. Raghu, N. Srinivasa and H. Gurumurthy, 2017. Study on the effect of different levels of organic and inorganic fertilizers on microbial enzymes and soil mesofauna in soybean ecosystem. Legum Res. An Int. J., 40: 155-159.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Capstaff, N.M. and A.J. Miller, 2018. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Front. Plant Sci., Vol. 9.
    CrossRef    


  • 6. Zhang, Q., Y. Li, K. L. Chin, and Y. Qi, 2017. Vegetable soybean: seed composition and production research. Ital. J. of Agron., 120: 276-282.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schultze R., I. Rao,M. Peters,R. J. Clement,C. Bai and G. Liu , 2018. Tropical forage legumes for environmental benefits: An overview. Tropical Grasslands-Forages Tropicales. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales. 6: 1-14.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sari, D.A. and Hadiyanto, 2013. The bioenergy production procee is based on biotechnology. J. Food Technol. App., 2: 107-113.
    Direct Link    


  • Calabro, S., S.D. Urso, M. Banoin, V. Piccolo, and F. Infascelli, 2007. Nutritional characteristics of forages from Niger. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 271-274.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • SAS., 1988. STAT User’s Guide Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA


  • Irfan, M., M. Ansar, A. Sher, A. Wasaya and A. Sattar, 2016. Improving forage yield and morphology of oat varieties trough various row spacing and nitrogen application. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 26: 1718-1724.
    Direct Link    


  • Junaidi and Y.A. Wulandari, 2017. Effect of the combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth and production of melons (Cucumis Melo L). Adv. Intelligent Systems Res., 149: 85-88.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Alhrout, H.H., N. Bani-Hani, M.A. Haddad, J.A.S. Al-Tabbal, H.K. Aldal'in and M.M. Alkharabsheh, 2017. Morphological, yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays l.) grown in cattle manure amended soil in the jordan valley. J. Agron., 16: 174-179.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sebetha, E. and S. Modisapudi, 2019. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer source, soil type and season on growth performance of two sorghum cultivars. Asian J. Plant Sci., 18: 175-180.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Donatus E.O.A. 2017. Effect of poultry manure and urea on soil chemical properties nodulation and syield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Alkana. J. of Advances in Agric. Res., 3: 1-8.
    CrossRef    


  • Sutrisno and E. Yusnawan, 2018. Effect of manure and inorganic fertilizer on vegetative generative characteristic nutrient and secondary metabolit content of mungbean. Biosaintifik, 10: 56-65.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Devi K.N., B.T. Singh, H.S. Athokpam, N. Singh, D. Shamurailatpam, 2013. Influence of inorganic, biology and organic manures on nodulation and yield of soybean (Glycin max L. Merr) and soil properties. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 7: 1407-1415.
    Direct Link    


  • Yohannes, K.W., D. Belew and A. Debela, 2013. Effect of farmyard manure and nitrogen fertilizer rates on growth, yield and yield components of onion (Allium cepa L.) at Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. Asian J. Plant Sci., 12: 228-234.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kamtchoum S.M., P.P.K. Nuemsi, L.B. Tonfack, D.G.M. Edinguele, W.N. Kouahou, E. Youmbi and C.N. Temegne, 2018. Production of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Organo-mineral Fertilization in Humid Forest Agro-Ecological Zone with Bimodal Rainfall Pattern in Cameroon. Ann. Res. Rev. Biol., 29: 1-11.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jamil M., S.S. Hussain, M.A. Qureshi, S.M. Mehdi, and M.Q. Nawas, 2017. Impact of sowing techniques and nitrogen fertilization on castor bean yield in salt affected soils. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 27: 451-456.
    Direct Link    


  • Ariati A.C., M.C. Oleveira, E.M.S. Loss, M.A. Bosse, C.R. Grigolo, and C.O. Bolina, 2017. Effects of mineral and organic Nitrogen on chemical characteristics of physalis fruits. J. Agron., 16: 94-100.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gusmini G., T. Itani, A. Adrinal, T. Ikeda and K. Nishimura, 2015. Effect of nitrogen application from selected manures on growth, nitrogen uptake and biomass production of cultivated forage rice. Intern. J. Advance Sustain. Engin. Inform. Technol., 5: 110-114.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sindhu P.V., M.T. Kanakanamy and C. Beena, 2016. Effect of organic manure and biofertiliser on herbage yield, quality and soil nutrient balance Indigofera tinctoria cultivation. J. of Tropical Agric., 54: 16-20.
    Direct Link    


  • Hillary M. O. Otieno, George N. Chemining’wa and Shamie Zingore 2018. Effect of Farmyard Manure, Lime and Inorganic Fertilizer Applications on Soil pH, Nutrients Uptake, Growth and Nodulation of Soybean in Acid Soils of Western Kenya J. Agric. Sci., 10: 199-208.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Morya J., R.K. Tripathi, N. Kumawat, M. Singh. R.K. Yadav, I.S. Tomarand, and T.K. Sahu, 2018. Influence of organic and inorganic fertilization growth yield and nutrient up take soybean (Glycin max L. Merr.) under Jhabua Hills. Intern. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 7: 725-730.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved