HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Plant Sciences

Year: 2004 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 480-483
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2004.480.483
Evaluation of Extractants and Critical Limits of Sulphur in Rice Soils of Bangladesh
M.N. Huda, M.R. Islam and M. Jahiruddin

Abstract: An investigation was undertaken to evaluate suitable extractant(s) for available sulphur and critical limits of sulphur for wetland rice soils of Bangladesh. Some 22 soils from 0-15 cm depth were collected from different locations of Old Brahmaputra Floodplains of the country. Sulphur in the soils was extracted with four different extractants, MCP (500 ppm P), CaCl2 (0.15%), NH4OAc (0.5 M) and NaHCO3 (0.5 M). Rice plants were grown in pots treated with and without S for eight weeks. At harvest dry matter of rice was recorded. The critical level of S was determined by both graphical and statistical methods. The extractable S of the soils varied considerably with the soils and the extractants used. The ability of the extractants to extract S followed the order: 0.5 M NH4OAc > 0.5 M NaHCO3, >0.15% CaCl2 > MCP. The MCP extractable S showed significant and positive correlation with organic matter, available P and exchangeable K contents but was significantly and negatively correlated with soil pH. The amount of extractable S by other methods did not show any significant correlation with soil properties. The extractable S by any pair of extractants viz., CaCl2 vs NH4oAc, CaCl2 vs NaHCO3 and NH4oAc vs NaHCO3 were significantly and positively correlated. The critical levels of MCP, CaCl2, NaHCO3 and NH4OAc extractable S were 9.3, 9.7, 15.8 and 17.8 mg kg-1, respectively in both graphical and statistical methods for rice. The critical limit for plant S was found to be 0.12% at 56 days of crop growth.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
M.N. Huda, M.R. Islam and M. Jahiruddin , 2004. Evaluation of Extractants and Critical Limits of Sulphur in Rice Soils of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3: 480-483.

Keywords: Critical limit, extractable sulphur and wetland rice

INTRODUCTION

Rice is the staple food crop in Bangladesh covering an area of 9.95 million ha with a production of 11.19 million tons of rice grain annually[1]. The average yield of rice in Bangladesh is low compared to many rice growing countries of the world. Nutrient deficiency is a good reason for lower productivity of rice in this country. In Bangladesh, sulphur deficiency has been recognized in many areas of Bangladesh, which covers about 44% of the total cropped area. Sulphur application increases the grain yield of rice in different soils of Bangladesh[2-4].

Soil testing has been recognized as an effective tool for determining fertilizer need of a crop under all situations, but its importance is by far the greatest in circumstances when the fertilizer is a scarce and costly commodity with respect to the farmer’s investment ability. The main objectives of soil test crop response correlation study was to obtain a basis for precise quantitative adjustment of fertilizer doses for varying soil test values in farmers’ fields as well as to help cultivators to increase their production and profit considerably through economic and judicious use of fertilizers. It is admissible that when S application is made on the basis of existing soil fertility class, crop response to added S is not always obtained. As such the information on S fertilizer use emanating from soil testing laboratories must primarily be based on critical limits of extractable S for different crops and soils. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the S extractability of four extractants and to determine the critical limit of extractable S for wetland rice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Some 22 soils (0-15 cm depth) were collected from different locations of Old Brahmaputra Floodplain (AEZ9) of Mymensingh district, Bangladesh. The soils represented different soil series such as Sonatala, Silmondi, Lokdeo, Tarakanda and Ghatail. After collection, the soil samples were thoroughly mixed, air dried and ground to pass through a 2 mm sieve. To see the usefulness of the S extractants and also to determine the critical level of soil sulphur for wetland rice (Cv. BRRI Dhan32), a pot culture experiment was conducted with each soil. There were two S treatments viz., 0 and 25 mg S kg-1. Each of the treatments was replicated thrice in a Completely Randomized Design to give a total of 132 pots. A basal dressing was made with 100 mg kg-1 N, 25 mg kg-1 P, 40 mg kg-1 K and 5 mg kg-1 Zn to each pot to support the normal plant growth. Nutrients N, P, K, S and Zn were added in solution through CO(NH2)2, KH2PO4, KCl, CaSO4.2H2O and ZnCl2, respectively and mixed thoroughly with the soil. Three forty five day old seedlings were transplanted in each pot on August 21, 1999. All pots were kept submerged with distilled water to a depth of 5 cm. Weeds were removed as they appeared. In all pots, 25 mg N kg-1 as urea was applied at the maximum tillering stage on September 9, 1999. The plants were grown for eight weeks with a protection from insects and diseases. Plants were cut at ground level on October 16, 1999 followed by washing with distilled water and drying in an oven at 65°C for 24 h. The dry matter yield was recorded. Available sulphur of soil was extracted by four extractants: mono-calcium phosphate (500 ppm P)[5], calcium chloride (0.15%)[6], ammonium acetate (0.5 M)[7] and sodium bicarbonate (0.5 M)(8). The sulphur in the extract was determined turbidimetrically. The critical limit of extractable S for rice was determined by two different approaches, the one was graphical and the other statistical. In graphical approach, the critical levels of extractable S as determined by four extraction procedures were calculated separately using the procedure developed by Cate and Nelson(9). Accordingly the relative yield (known as Bray’s percent yield) was calculated from the following relationship.

In the statistical technique[10] of determining critical level of P, coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated. Accordingly the coefficient of determination (R2) was computed from the following relationship:

Where:

TCSS = Total corrected sum of squares
CSS1 = Corrected sum of squares for population 1
CSS2 = Corrected sum of squares for population 2

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The pH of the soils varied from 5.1 to 7.3; organic matter, 0.98 to 3.29%; total N, 0.04 to 0.15%; available P, 5.1 to 19.9 mg kg-1; exchangeable K, 0.017 to 0.223 me% and CEC, 4.83 to 29.28 me% (Table 1). The amount of extractable S varied markedly depending on the soils and the extraction methods used (Table 2). This is expected because various extractants differ in their extracting power according to conditions of extraction chosen[11,12]. The NH4OAc extracted the maximum amount of S and the MCP did the minimum. The mean values of S extracted by different extractants ranked in the order of MCP<CaCl2<NaHCO3< NH4OAc (Table 2). Islam et al.[12], Jaggi and Sharma[13] have reported similar pattern. The highest amount of CaCl2 extractable S of 86.9 mg kg-1 was found in Boyra-5 soil while the lowest amount of 3.0 mg kg-1 was found in soil from Boyra-1. Sulphur extracted by MCP in different soils ranged from 3.0 in Boyra-1 to 26.0 mg kg-1 in Dugashe soil. The amount of MCP extractable S was significantly correlated with organic matter (r =0.426*), available P (r =0.473*) and exchangeable K (r =0.533*) contents but was negatively correlated with soil pH (r = -0.453*) (Table 3). Results in Table 2 indicated that the sulphur extracted by NH4OAc ranged form 10.83 in Boyra-1 soil to 172.8 mg kg-1 in Boyra-5 soil. The amount of NaHCO3 extractable S in different soils ranged from 8.53 mg kg-1 in Boyra-1 soil to 92.15 mg kg-1 in BAU Farm-2 soil. The differences in the amounts of S extracted by various extractants are mainly due to their selectivity in solubilizing different fractions from soils.

The results of correlation statistics (Table 4) show that the amount of S extracted by pair of extractants (CaCl2 vs NH4OAc, CaCl2 vs NaHCO3 and NH4OAc vs NaHCO3) were significantly and positively correlated. Such result, thus, indicate that although the ability of S extraction was different for these pair of extractants, their trends of S displacement from soil into solution were similar. However, their relationship between the amounts of S extracted by these pair of extractants was not necessarily linear. The best correlation (r = 0.955***) was found between CaCl2-S and NaHCO3-S followed by the correlation between CaCl2-S and NH4OAc-S (r=0.816***) and NH4OAc-S and NaHCO3-S (r = 0.786***).

A paired t-test was performed to compare the mean differences of S removed by different extractants (Table 4). The mean values of extractable S differed significantly between CaCl2 vs. NH4OAc, CaCl2 vs. NaHCO3 and NH4OAc vs. NaHCO3 extraction methods. The mean value of S extracted by CaCl2 was not significantly different from that of MCP. However, the mean value of S extracted by MCP was not significantly different from that by NH4OAc and NaHCO3. The mean values of the amount of S extracted by different extractants followed the order of NH4OAc>NaHCO3> CaCl2>MCP. These results are in agreement with the findings of Tiwari and Sakal[11] who showed the relative efficiency of the extractants as CaCl2> MCP.

Table 1: Physical and chemical properties of soils

Table 2: Range and mean of S (mg kg-1) extracted by various extractants from 22 soils

Jaggi and Sharma[13] who showed the relative efficiency of the extractants as NaHCO3>0.15% CaCl2. Islam et al.[12] reported the available S extracted with different extractants followed the order of MCP > NH4OAc > CaCl2 > NaH2PO4.

An attempt was made to find out the critical level of extractable S for wetland rice by using the scatter diagram procedure of Cate and Nelson[9] and statistical procedure by Waugh et al.[10]. In both graphical and statistical methods, critical levels of S for wetland rice soil were 9.7, 9.3, 17.8 and 15.8 mg kg-1 for CaCl2, MCP, NH4OAc and NaHCO3 extractable S, respectively (Table 5). Similar results of this study were also reported by Mehta et al.[14] for MCP, CaCl2 and NH4OAc extractable S (12.5, 10.0 and 9.0 mg kg-1, respectively), Tiwari et al.[15] for NaHCO3 and NH4OAc extractable S (20 and 16 mg kg-1, respectively). Considering the principle, higher is the r2 value, better is the fit. The r2 values obtained from 0.15% CaCl2, 0.5 M NH4OAc and 0.5 M NaHCO3 extractions procedures were exactly same (r2=0.43), while the value recorded in 0.5 M NaHCO3 extraction procedure was 0.34. All the procedures can be regarded as suitable methods of soil S extraction.

The scatter diagram and statistical methods were also employed to determine the critical S concentration in dry matter for obtaining dry matter yield at 56 days of transplanting. An optimum dry matter yield was recorded with plant (shoot) S concentration at 0.12%. Islam[16] reported similar critical concentration of sulphur (0.11%) in rice plants by using graphical method. Ganeshamurthy et al.[17] estimated that the critical level of sulphur in rice plant was 0.175% at 45 days after sowing.

The present study concludes that 0.15% CaCl2, 0.5 M NH4OAc and 0.5 M NaHCO3 extractants were the same for the soils under study with the critical limit of 9.7, 9.3, 17.8 and 15.8 mg kg-1, respectively.

Table 3: Relationship (r value) of extractable S with selected soil properties
* Significant at 5% level
** Significant at 1% level

Table 4: Correlation and t statistics for comparison of extractable S by different extraction methods
*** = Significance at 0.1% level, ns = not significant

Table 5: Critical level of soil available S for rice by graphical and statistical methods

Besides, S concentration of 0.12% at 56 days of crop growth may be considered as critical limit at which the crop yield would be optimum.

REFERENCES

  • Islam, M.R., M.R. Karim, T.M. Riasat and M. Jahiruddin, 1996. Growth and yield of BR 11 rice under different levels of sulphur, zinc and boron fertilizer at two locations of Bangladesh. Thai J. Agric. Sci., 29: 37-42.


  • Azim, S.M.A., M.M. Rahman, M.R. Islam and M.A. Hoque, 1999. Effects of S, Zn and B supplied from manures and fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake by rice. Prog. Agric., 10: 87-90.


  • Uddin, M.K., M.R. Islam, M.M. Rahman and S.M.K. Alam, 2002. Effects of sulphur, zinc and boron supplied from chemical fertilizers and poultry manure to wetland rice (Cv. BRRI Dhan 30). J. Biol. Sci., 2: 165-167.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fox, R.L., R.A. Olsen and H.F. Rhoades, 1964. Evaluating the sulphur status of soils by plant and soil tests. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 28: 243-246.


  • Williams, C.H. and A. Steinbergs, 1959. Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indicates of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 10: 340-352.


  • Bardsley, C.E. and J.D. Lancaster, 1960. Determination of reserve sulphur and soluble sulphates in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 24: 265-268.


  • Kilmer, V.J. and D.C. Nearpass, 1960. The determination of available sulphur in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 24: 337-340.


  • Tiwari, S. and R. Sakal, 1997. Evaluation of soil test methods for predicting response of rice to sulphur application on alluvial soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 43: 842-844.


  • Islam, M.R., M.S. Hoque and M.R. Islam, 1997. Distribution of different forms of sulphur in some selected soils of Bangladesh. Prog. Agric., 8: 129-132.


  • Jaggi, R.C. and R.K. Sharma, 1999. Evaluation of extractants for available sulphur in soils of Kangra Valley. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 465-467.


  • Mehta, V.S., B. Singh and R.P. Singh, 1988. Evaluation of some test methods for available sulphur in some alluvial soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 35: 743-746.


  • Tiwari, K.N., V. Nigam and A.N. Pathak, 1983. Evaluation of some soil test methods for diagnosing sulphur deficiency in rice in alluvial soils of Uttar Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 31: 245-249.
    Direct Link    


  • Ganeshmurthy, A.N., G. Singh and N.T. Singh, 1995. Sulphur status and response of rice to sulphur on some soils of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 43: 637-641.
    Direct Link    


  • Islam, M.M., 1981. Soil and plant tests for available sulphur in wetland rice soils. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Philippines, Los Banos.


  • BBS, 2002. Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Government Peoples Republications, Bangladesh, pp: 26


  • Waugh, D.L., R.B. Jr. Cate and L.A. Nelson, 1973. Soil fertility evaluation and improvement program. Technical Bulletin.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved