HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Plant Sciences

Year: 2003 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 71-73
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2003.71.73
Heterosis for Some Quantitative Characters in Brassica juncea L.
Tariq Mahmood, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Anwar and Shahid Iqbal

Abstract: Five cross of Brassica juncea viz., SMP 13-78 x Zem-I, SML 31E x Zem-I, DL 8 x Zem-I, SM 83000 x Zem-I, Pr 171-71 x Zem-I were made. These crosses (F1's) along with their parents were sown and heterosis was studied for branches per plant, plant height (cm), number of siliquas and yield per plant (g) in F1 generation. It was found that a cross of SMP 13-78 x Zem-I showed maximum heterosis and heterobeltotic for all the characters studied. Therefore, this cross combination can fruitfully be utilized for improving yield and its components in future breeding programmes.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Tariq Mahmood, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Anwar and Shahid Iqbal, 2003. Heterosis for Some Quantitative Characters in Brassica juncea L.. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2: 71-73.

Keywords: yield components pakistan, Brassica juncea, heterosis and heterobeltosis

Introduction

The rapeseed and mustard yield in Pakistan is generally low in comparison with other countries. A key factor in the poor performance is the scarcity of high yielding, locally adapted cultivars. The breeder, ultimately, looks for better ways and means which can guarantee to raise per unit production. Among other means of boosting productivity, the exploitation of heterosis holds a good promise and has increased the production of various crops enormously. It evidently acknowledged in the literature that hybrid vigour manifests itself both for developmental and economical characters in Rapeseed and Mustard. The effect of the phenomenon on yield and various components is obviously well documented by the breeders and reported to affect the seed yield, branches and pods per plant to an appreciable extent (Grant and Beversdorf, 1985; Katiyar et al., 2000; Khan et al., 1993).

Heterosis for branches per plant, height of the main stem, siliquas and yield per plant had variably been reported by different workers. A little heterotic effect was observed in yield per plant. Additional studies also showed different magnitude of heterosis in siliquas per plant and 1000-seeds weight (Weirong et al., 1999). Heterosis was the highest for seed yield per plant followed by pods and branches per plant. (Ali et al., 2000). Different workers in their studies have reported a considerable degree of heterotic effect for height of the main stem, pods, branches and seed yield per plant (Sernyk and Stefansson, 1983; Varshney, 1985; Parsad and Singh, 1985). Heterotic effect in seed yield per plant was observed upto the extent of 96.4% (Cunkou et al., 2000). The studies revealed highly significant increase over the better parents for height, seed yield and number of branches per plant (Singh et al., 1985).

A varying degree of heterosis was estimated for seed yield, 1000-seeds weight, plant height and yield per pod over mid parent values. It was further confirmed that some of the crosses exhibited heterobeltiosis also (Verma et al., 2000; Khulbe et al., 1998). So, F1 generation comparing mid and superior parents, heterosis occurred for all the characters to varying degree. However, in the proposed study good types with different genetic background are crossed for such information. The amount of heterosis for different characters was assessed and results of the present study were obtained.

Materials and Methods

The following 5 crosses were made to study the heterotic effect for number of branches, plant height, number of siliquas per plant and yield during the year, 2000-2001.

SMP 13-78 x Zem-I
SML 31 E x Zem-I
DL 8 x Zem-I
SM 83000 x Zem-I
Pr 171-71 x Zem-I

The seeds obtained from these crosses were sown as F1 in the following year, i.e. 2001-2002 at Oilseeds Research Institute, Faisalabad. F1 crosses along with their parents were sown by dibbling in four replications.

The following data for ten plants in each replication was recorded.

Number of branches per plant.
Plant height (cm)
Number of siliquas per plant.
Yield per plant (g).

Heterosis in F1 for all these characters were calculated in percentage over the mid parent and heterobeltiosis over the better parent values. The data was subjected to analysis of variance to see whether the differences in the performance of parents and their F1's were real or just incidental.

Results and discussion

Number of branches per plant: It is clear from Table 1 that only the cross of DL 8 x Zem-I could show highly significant differences among F1's and their parents. During the study number of branches per plant, heterosis was observed in crosses over mid parent, ranging from 3.4% (SM 83000 x Zem-I) to 23.8% (DL 8 x Zem-I). The crosses of SMP 13-78, SML 31E and DL 8 with Zem-I showed heterosis over their better parents ranging from 12.1% (SMP 13-78 x Zem-I) to 18.2% (DL 8 x Zem-I) meanings thereby over dominance type of gene action in all these crosses, while heterosis in SM 83000 x Zem-I had showed additive type of gene action with partial dominance. Ali et al. (2000), Varshnay (1985) and Singh et al. (1985) have reported reasonable degree of heterosis on number of branches per plant while studying the F1 generation of Brassica juncea.

Plant height (cm): The data of plant height given in Table 1 four out of five crosses showed significant differences among F1's and their parents. In this case heterosis was observed in all the crosses over their mid parent values while crosses of SMP 13-78, SML 31E, DL 8 and SM 83000 with Zem-I showed heterotic effect even over better parents which reveals the fact that over dominance type of gene action was present in these crosses while heterosis in Pr 171-71 x Zem-I had showed additive type of gene action with partial dominance. The magnitude of heterosis over mid parents ranged from 6.5% (Pr 171-17 x Zem-I) to 15.8% (SML 31E x Zem-I) but the degree of increase over better parents range from 4.2% (SM 83000 x Zem-I) to 8.8% (DL 8 x Zem-I). The above findings confirm those of Weirong et al. (1999), Ali et al. (2000), Verma et al. (2000) and Khulbe et al. (1998) who already reported heterosis for this character.

Number of siliquas per plant: As regards number of siliquas per plant only two crosses, i.e., SMP 13-78 x Zem-I and SML 31E x Zem-I showed significant differences among F1's and their parents (Table 1). The magnitude of hybrid vigour when compared with mid parent values ranged from 5.3% (SM 83000 x Zem-I) to 81.5% (SMP 13-78 x Zem-I) and 3.6% (DL 8 x Zem-I) to 32.5% (SMP 13-78 x Zem-I) when compared with better parental values. The crosses of SMP 13-78, SML 31E and DL 8 with Zem-I showed heterosis over their better parents which indicated the fact that over dominance type of gene action was present in these crosses while heterosis in SM 83000 x Zem-I has additive type of gene action with partial dominance. Hybrid vigour have also been observed for this character by Weirong et al. (1999), Ali et al. (2000), Parsad and Singh (1985) and Katiyar et al. (2000).

Yield per plant (g): In case of yield per plant SMP 13-78 x Zem-I and SML 31E x Zem-I showed highly significant differences among F1's and parents (Table 1). All the crosses showed heterosis when compared with mid parental values with a range of 3.5% (SM 83000 x Zem-I) to 87.2% (SMP 13-78 x Zem-I). Heterobeltiosis values of the crosses depict that over dominance type of gene action was present in these crosses. The range of heterobeltiosis in this case was 1.2% (SM-83000 x Zem-I) to 55.9% (SMP 13-78 x Zem-I).

Table 1: Heterosis in intra specific crosses of Brassica Juncea L.

These results are in accordance with Sernyk and Stefansson (1983), Ali et al. (2000), Cunkou et al. (2000), Singh et al. (1985), Verma et al. (2000) and Khulbe et al. (2000). Who obtained similar results for heterosis in F1 hybrids in B.juncea and B. napus.

REFERENCES

  • Ali, A., S.A. Shah and S. Hassan, 2000. Mutant heterosis in oilseed rape. Cruciferae Newslett., 22: 67-68.
    Direct Link    


  • Cunkou, Q., G. Guanjon and Z. Jiefu, 2000. Analysis of heterosis among varieties or inbred lines in Brassica campestris. J. Agric. Sci., 3: 30-32.


  • Grant, I. and W.D. Beversdorf, 1985. Agronomic performance of triazine-resistant single cross hybrid oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Can. J. Plant Sci., 65: 889-892.


  • Katiyar, R.K., R. Chamola and V.L. Chopra, 2000. Study of heterosis for seed yield in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Cruciferae Newslett., 22: 41-42.


  • Khulbe, R.K., D.P. Part and R.S. Rawat, 1998. Heterosis for yield and its components in Indian mustard. J. Oilseed Res., 15: 227-230.


  • Parsad, R. and B. Singh, 1985. Heterosis for some quantitative characters in Indian rapeseed. Indian J. Agric Sci., 55: 671-673.


  • Sernyk, J.L. and B.R. Stefansson, 1983. Heterosis in summer rape (Brassica napus L.). Can. J. Plant Sci., 63: 407-413.


  • Singh, H., V.S. Lather and D. Singh, 1985. Extent of heterosis in relation to genotypic diversity in indian x exotic cross of indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Genet. Iberica, 37: 97-105.


  • Varshney, S.K., 1985. Heterosis in crosses between parents selected for harvest index and plant height in Indian rapeseed. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 55: 398-402.


  • Verma, O.P., G.D. Kushwaha and H.P. Singh, 2000. Heterosis in relation to genetic diversity in Indian mustard. Cruciferae Newslett., 22: 93-94.
    Direct Link    


  • Weirong, W., H. Liu, G. Fany and H. Zhao, 1999. Analysis of heterosis and combining abilities of five rapeseed cultivars in Brassica napus L. Acta Agric. Shanghai, 15: 45-50.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved