HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

American Journal of Plant Physiology

Year: 2006 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 76-81
DOI: 10.3923/ajpp.2006.76.81
In vitro Multiplication of Hypericum heterophyllum, an Endemic Turkish species
Ali Kemal Ayan and Cuneyt Cirak

Abstract: In this research, we aimed to establish an effective in vitro propagation protocol for Hypericum heterophyllum Vent., an endemic Turkish species. The seeds were surface sterilised and transferred to Murashige and Skoog basal medium supplemented with BA (benzyladenine, 0.1, 1 mg L-1) and 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 0.1, 1 mg L-1) under the photoperiod (8/16 h light/dark period, 1200 μmol m-2s-1). Culturing seeds on MS basal medium supplemented with 1 mg L-1 BA and 0.1 mg L-1 2,4-D resulted in greenish and compact callus induction. MS basal medium supplemented with 4.4 mg L-1 BA was used for shoot induction, while the same basal medium supplemented with 1 mg L-1 IAA (indolacetic acid) was employed for the rooting. Regenerated plants were easily acclimatized in greenhouse conditions.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Ali Kemal Ayan and Cuneyt Cirak, 2006. In vitro Multiplication of Hypericum heterophyllum, an Endemic Turkish species. American Journal of Plant Physiology, 1: 76-81.

Keywords: Hypericum heterophyllum, micropropagation, endemic, conservation and Callus culture

Introduction

Medicinal plants have always had an important place in the therapeutic armoury of mankind. Up to 80 % of populations in developing countries are totally dependent on plants for their primary health care. And despite the remarkable progress in synthetic organic chemistry of the twentieth century, over 25% of prescribed medicines in industrialised countries derive directly or indirectly from plants (Newman et al., 2000). Especially, Hypericum species have been used as traditional medicinal plants due to their wound-healing (Yazaki and Okuda, 1990), bactericide (Ishiguro et al., 1998), anti-inflammatory (Dias et al., 1998), diuretic and sedative properties (Holz and Ostrowiski, 1987) for last two hundred years. In particular, extracts of Hypericum perforatum are now widely used in Europe as drugs for the treatment of depression (Brutovska et al., 2001). The Hypericum genus of Guttiferae is represented in Turkey by 89 species of which 43 are endemic. Hypericum heterophyllum Vent. existing in dry clearings in Pinus thickets, etc., 1200-1600 m from northern Turkey is one of these endemic Hypericum species. Its stem is 10-30 cm; leaves on main stem are 5-13 mm, narrowly elliptic-oblong to linear, those on short axillary strobiloid shoots 0.5 mm, broadly ovoid, densely crowded. Sepals 2-3 mm, oblong to lanceolate, acute, entire. Petals 5-8 mm, oblanceolate. Capsule 6-8 mm, ovoid cylindric to cylindric (Davis, 1988). This plant is a source of medicinal compounds and well known with its antifungal activity (Cakir et al., 2004).

Many rare or/and endemic plant species are known to respond well to sterile in vitro conditions, including a nutrient rich medium and also phytohormone supply (Fay, 1992; Pence, 1999) and recent studies have demonstrated that in vitro culture is an option for multiplication of Hypericum species such as H. foliosum (Moura, 1998), H. brasiliense (Cardoso and Oliveira, 1996; Abreu et al., 2003), H. canariense (Mederos, 1991), H. maculatum (Kartnig and Brantner, 1990) and H. perforatum (Cellarova et al., 1992; Murch et al., 2000; Pretto and Santarem, 2000; Bezo and Stefunova, 2001; Santarem and Astarita, 2003, Zobayed et al., 2004, Ayan et al., 2005). In vitro culture has also been reported as a very useful tool for both studying and producing economically important secondary metabolites of the genus (Yazaki and Okuda, 1990; Dias et al., 1998; Kirakosyan et al., 2000, 2001; Bais et al., 2002; Zobayed and Saxena, 2003). Therefore, the objective of the present study was to establish an efficient in vitro propagation protocol for this endemic species.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials
The seeds of H. heterophyllum were obtained from Hypericum plants growing wild in Trabzon province of Turkey. Plant materials were identified by Dr. Hasan Korkmaz, Department of Biology, University of 19 Mayis, Samsun-Turkey. The 2 months-old seeds were surface sterilized in 75% ethanol for 2 min and subsequently in a 15% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution (commercial sodium hypochlorite with 53% active constituent) for 20 min, followed by rinsing in sterile distilled water three times.

Callus Initiation
Surface sterilized seeds were cultured in media supplemented with different culture constituents in magenta boxes. The callus initiation medium contained MS salts and vitamins (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). The pH was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving at 121°C for 20 min. Plant growth regulators BA and 2,4-D and their concentrations (0.1 and 1 mg L-1), selected from previous studies, were tested (Table 1). Medium without plant growth regulators was used as control. Cultures were kept under the photoperiod (8/16 h light/dark period, 1200 μmol m-2s-1) at 26±2°C for 12 weeks with two sub cultures. Ten seeds were cultured per 25 mL magenta boxes with four replications. The frequency of callus induction and callus fresh weight was determined 12 weeks after culture initiation.

Shoot Induction and Multiplication
For shoot induction, calli were transferred to shoot induction medium containing MS salt and vitamins and 4.4 mg L-1 BA, pH: 5.8 and kept under the same conditions employed in callus initiation for 6 weeks. The number of shoots per treatment was recorded at 7 weeks after transferring the calli for shoot induction medium.

Rooting
To induce roots, elongated shoots (1-2 cm) were excised and transferred to MS medium supplemented with 1 mg L-1 IAA, pH: 5.8. Four shoots were placed in 25 mL magenta boxes per treatment. Data were recorded after 4 weeks of culture.

After removal from magenta boxes, the rooted plantlets were washed with tap water to remove rooting medium debris. The young plants were transplanted in boxes containing soil and sand mixture (2:1) autoclaved at 120°C for 20 min under non-sterile conditions and gradually exposed to ambient humidity.

Table 1: The Media used for callus induction

After 10 days, the acclimated plants were transferred to greenhouse, maintained under partial shade and irrigated daily. The percentage of survival was recorded at 2 week-intervals.

Results and Discussion

Callus Initiation
Callus induction and proliferation are useful tools for the studies concerning both micropropagation and biosynthesis of natural products in Hypericum genus (Pretto and Santarem, 2000). However, few species within this genus have been reported to produce callus in response to different in vitro culture conditions such as H. erectum (Yazaki and Okuda, 1990), H. brasiliense (Cardoso and Oliveira, 1996), H. foliosum (Maciel and Moura, 2000), H. maculatum, H. tomentosum, H. bithynicum, H. glandulosum, H. balearicum (Kartnig et al., 1996), H. linarioides, H. lydum, H. origanifolium, H. venustum and H. scabrum (Ayan and Çırak, 2005). In the present study, callus formation was observed only in the MS basal medium supplemented with 1 mg L-1 BA and 0.1 mg L-1 2,4-D. The calli were greenish in color and compact (Fig. 1a). Mean values of frequency of callus induction and callus fresh weight were 43.47% and 44.8 mg/callus, respectively. The results are in accordance with those of previous studies reporting BA and 2,4-D as callus inducing agents in H. erectum (Yazaki and Okuda, 1990), H. brasiliense (Cardoso and Oliveira, 1996) and H. perforatum (Pretto and Santarem, 2000; Bezo and Stefunova, 2001; Santarem and Astarita, 2003; Ayan et al., 2005). But, it should be noted that callus induction in this endemic species in response to in vitro culture is poor when compared to that of aforesaid species of Hypericum. At this point, it will be useful to try other growth regulators for enhancing callus induction.

Shoot Induction
When calli were cultured on medium supplemented with 4.4 mg L-1 BA, a very intensive shoot induction was observed (Fig. 1b) and number of shoots per callus was 69.43. Many studies concerning shoot induction and multiplication in H. perforatum L. have reported an average 30 to 50 shoots, depending on the factors evaluated (Ayan et al., 2005; Santarem and Astarita, 2003).

Fig. 1: (a) Callus formation from seeds cultivated on MS + 1 mg L-1 BA + 0.1 mg L-1 2,4-D. (b) Shoot induction in BA containing medium from callus induced on MS + 1 mg L-1 BA + 0.1 mg L-1 2,4-D. (c) Rooting of shoots cultured on the medium containing 1 mg L-1 IAA. (d) A regenerated plant in greenhouse conditions (Bars represent 1 cm)

We reported a procedure allowing the production of up to 65 shoots per callus in this new species of Hypericum.

BA, alone or in combination with NAA, are known as an effective shoot inducing agents in different species (Blakesley and Constantine, 1992). For H. perforatum, BA was found to be the most efficient in promoting shoot regeneration when leaf (Pretto and Santarem, 2000) or excised seedling parts (Cellarova et al., 1992) were used as explant. Similarly, BA can be used together with NAA in shoot induction from anther-originated callus (Kirakosyan et al., 2000).

Rooting
IBA (indolebutyric acid), IAA and NAA (naphthaleneacetic acid) have been used commonly to improve rooting in different Hypericum species (Pretto and Santarem, 2000). In H. canariense, rooting was obtained in the presence of either IBA or NAA (Mederos, 1991). But, the two growth regulators were fully ineffective in inducing rooting in shoots of H. foliosum (Moura, 1998). IAA and IBA were the most effective for rooting in H. perforatum (Cellarova and Kimakova, 1999).

In this study, elongated shoots were rooted successfully in the presence of 1 mg L-1 IAA (Fig. 1c) and the number of roots per shoot was 8.49. The result is similar that of Ayan et al. (2005) reporting 7-12 roots per shoot in response to IAA in H. perforatum. Regenerated plants were transferred to non-sterile conditions for acclimatization and to conditions which supply progressively lower humidity levels. After 10 days, 30% of regenerants was recorded up to 100 % of survival (Fig. 1d).

Conclusions

Conservation of endemic species by in vitro techniques has been an attractive topic for plant biotechnologist. The present study, it is the first time we have described an effective model concerning micropropagation of H. heterophyllum. If the multiplication of selected clones is required, surface sterilized seeds can be appropriate explants. Once induced, calli are transferred to BA containing medium for shoot induction and shoots can be rooted on MS medium supplemented with 1 mg L-1 IAA. Thus, regenerated plants can be obtained after five months. This is the first report on H. heterophyllum and the poor callus formation and low level of acclimatized regenerants require further in vitro studies on this endemic species.

REFERENCES

  • Abreu, I.N., M.T.A. Azevedo, M.V. Solferini and P. Mazzafera, 2003. In vitro propagation and isoenzyme polymorphism of the medicinal plant Hypericum brasiliense. Biol. Plant., 47: 629-632.
    Direct Link    


  • Ayan, A.K., C. Cirak, K. Kevserolu and A. Sokmen, 2005. The effects of explant types and culture constituents on plant regeneration and hypericin content in Hypericum perforatum L. Turk. J. Agric. For., 29: 197-204.
    Direct Link    


  • Ayan, A.K. and C. Cirak, 2005. Callus induction in some Hypericum species growing in Turkey. Turk. J. Field Crops, 10: 21-29.
    Direct Link    


  • Bais, H.P., T.S. Walker, J.J. McGrew and J.M. Vivanco, 2002. Factors affecting growth of suspension culture of Hypericum perforatum L. and production of hypericin. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant., 38: 58-65.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bezo, M. and M. Stefunova, 2001. Indirect regeneration of Hypericum perforatum L. under in vitro conditions. Acta Fytotech. Zootech., 4: 277-279.


  • Blakesley, D. and D. Constantine, 1992. Uptake and metabolism of 6-benzyadenine in shoot cultures of a range of species. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 28: 183-186.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Brutovska, R., E. Cellarova and I. Schubert, 2001. Cytogenetic characterization of three Hypericum species by in situ hybridization. Theor. Applied Genet., 101: 46-50.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cakir, A., S. Kordali, H. Zengin, S. Izumi and T. Hirata, 2004. Composition and antifungal activity of Hypericum hyssopifolium and Hypericum heterophyllum. Flavour Frag. J., 19: 62-68.
    CrossRef    


  • Cardoso, M.A. and D.E. Oliviera, 1996. Tissue culture of Hypericum brasiliense Choisy: Shoot multiplication and callus induction. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 44: 91-94.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cellarova, E., K. Kimakova and R. Brutovska, 1992. Multiple shoot formation in Hypericum perforatum L. and variability of R0. Theor. Applied Genet., 101: 46-50.


  • Cellarova, E. and K. Kimakova, 1999. Morphoregulatory effect of plant growth regulators on Hypericum perforatum L. seedlings. Acta Biotechnol., 19: 163-169.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Davis, P.H., 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh


  • Dias, A.C.P., A. Francisco, T. Barberan, F.M. Ferreria and F. Ferreres, 1998. Unusual flavanoids produced by callus of Hypericum perforatum L. Phytochemistry, 48: 1165-1168.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fay, M.F., 1992. Conservation of rare and endangered plants using in vitro methods. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 28: 1-4.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Holz, J. and E. Ostrowiski, 1987. St. Johns worth HPLC analysis of main components and their variability in the populations. Deuts. Apothekertz, 127: 1227-1230.


  • Ishiguro, K., N. Nagareya and H. Fukomoto, 1998. A phloroglucinol derivative from cell suspension cultures of Hypericum patulum. Phytochemistry, 47: 1041-1043.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kartnig, T. and A. Brantner, 1990. Secondary constituents in cell cultures of Hypericum perforatum and Hypericum maculatum. Plant. Med., 56: 634-637.


  • Kartnig, T., I. Gobel and B. Heydel, 1996. Production of hypericin, pseudohypericin and flavonoids in cell cultures of various Hypericum species and their chemotypes. Plant. Med., 62: 51-53.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Kirakosyan, A., H. Hayashi, K. Inoue, A. Charchoglyan and H. Vardapetyan, 2000. Stimulation of the production of hypericins by mannan in Hypericum perforatum L. shoot cultures. Phytochemistry, 53: 345-348.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kirakosyan, A., H. Hayashi, K. Inoue, A. Charchoglyan, H. Vardapetyan and H. Yammoto, 2001. The effect of cork pieces on pseudohypericin production in cells of Hypericum perforatum L. shoots. Russian J. Plant Physiol., 48: 816-819.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Maciel, G.B. and M. Moura, 2000. Multiplication strategies for Hypericum foliosum aiton, an endemic Azorean species. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant., 36: 3-3.


  • Mederos, M.S., 1991. In vitro growth and multiplication of Hypericum canariense L. Acta Hortic., 289: 133-135.
    Direct Link    


  • Moura, M., 1998. Conservation of Hypericum foliosum aiton, an endemic Azorean species, by micropropagation. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant., 34: 244-248.
    Direct Link    


  • Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant., 15: 473-497.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Murch, S.J., K.L. Choffe, J.M.R. Victor, T.Y. Slimmon, Y. Krishna and P.K. Saxena, 2000. Thidiazuron-induced plant regeneration from hypocotly cultures of St. Johns wort (Hypericum perforatum cv. Anthos). Plant Cell Rep., 19: 576-581.


  • Newman, D.J., G.M. Cragg and K.M. Snader, 2000. The influence of natural products upon drugdiscovery. Nat. Prod. Rep., 17: 215-234.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Pence, V., 1999. The Application of Biotechnology for the Conservation of Endangered Plants. In: Plant Conservation Biotechnology, Benson, E.E. (Ed.). Chapter 15, Taylor and Francis, London, pp: 227-241


  • Pretto, F.R. and E.R. Santarem, 2000. Callus formation and plant regeneration from Hypericum perforatum L. leaves. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 62: 107-113.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Santarem, E.R. and L.V. Astarita, 2003. Multiple shoot formation in Hypericum perforatum L. and hypericin production. Braz. J. Plant Physiol., 15: 43-47.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yazaki, K. and T. Okuda, 1990. Procyanins in callus and multiple shoots of Hypericum erectum. Planta Med., 56: 490-491.


  • Zobayed, S.M.A., S.J. Murch, H.P.V. Rupasinghe and P.K. Saxena, 2004. In vitro production and chemical characterization of St. Johns wort (Hypericum perforatum L. cv. New Stem). Plant Sci., 166: 333-340.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zobayed, S.M.A. and P.K. Saxena, 2003. In vitro grown roots: A superior explant for prolific shoot regeneration of St. Johns wort (Hypericum perforatum L. cv. New Stem) in a temporary immersion bioreactor. Plant Sci., 165: 463-470.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved