Abstract: In this study, we have introduced an alternative definition of the basic analogue of a generalization of Fox's H-function in terms of I-function using q-Gamma function. This definition has been employed to obtain several results based on q-Integral. Also some special cases have also been discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Saxena et al. (1983) introduced the following basic analogue of I-function in terms of the Mellin-Barnes type basic contour integral as:
(1) |
where, αj, βj, αji, βji, are real and positive, aj, bj, aji, bji are complex numbers and:
where, L is contour of integration running from -i∞ to i∞ in such a manner that all poles of G (qbj-βjs) lie to right of the path and those of G (q1-aj+αjs) are to the left of the path.
Setting r = 1, Ai = A, Bi = B, we get q-analogue of H -function defined by Saxena et al. (1983) as follows:
(2) |
Further, for r = 1, Ai = A, Bi = B, αj = βi = 1, j = 1, 2, 3, ---- A, i = 1, 2, 3, --- B, Eq. 2 reduces to the basic analogue of Meijer's G function given by Saxena et al. (1983).
MAIN RESULTS
In this we establish an alternative definition of basic analogue of I-function by using q-gamma function.
We shall make use of Iq (.) notation for basic analogue of I-function and the same is defined as:
(3) |
Proof: To prove Eq. 3 we consider the expression:
(4) |
On multiplying Eq. 4 by:
and making use of the following identity given by Askey (1978):
the left hand side takes the form:
Hence, we have:
If we take r = 1, Ai = A, Bi = B, we get the following well know basic analogue of Fox's H-function (Saxena and Kumar, 1995):
3 q-integral of Basic analogue of I-function: In this section we establish few number of results based on q-integral defined by Jackson (1904).
Theorem 1:
(5) |
Proof: Consider the L.H.S of (Eq. 3):
Since, It is well known that Jackson (1904):
Hence, makes the form:
Since, by Jackson (1904):
This completes the proof of the theorem.
Similarly we can easily prove the following theorems.
Theorem 2:
(6) |
Theorem 3: Recently a definition for q-analogue of Eulers definition for Gamma function has been given by Kac and Chebing (2002) as:
(7) |
Special cases: If we take r = 1, Ai = A, Bi = B in theorems, we get the well-known results of basic analogue of Foxs H-function (Saxena and Kumar, 1995).
CONCLUSION
In this study, we have obtained some results for basic analogues of I-function. These results are quite general in nature and reduce to corresponding results for G and H- functions and their several special cases. Thus these results can be applied to various problems of mathematical physics.