HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Crop Science

Year: 2024 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-5
DOI: 10.3923/ajcs.2024.1.5
Cytotypic Diversity in Selected Taxa of Botanical Garden of Botanical Survey of India, Central Regional Center, Allahabad
Ashutosh Kumar Verma

Abstract: Background and Objective: Botanical gardens are conservatories where living plants are conserved for scientific, academic and awareness programs. Assessments of existing cytotypic diversity at inter and intraspecific levels provide a real pen picture of the genetic diversity of germplasm present in any ex situ conservatory like botanical garden. Therefore, the present investigation was undertaken for the assessment of cytotypic diversity in targeted taxa. Materials and Methods: A total number of 51 species of economically important angiosperms which are growing in the botanical garden of Botanical Survey of India, Central Regional Center and Allahabad were investigated for evaluation of existing cytotypic diversity. Meiotic preparations were made as per the standard squash preparation technique. Results: Among the worked-out species 47 species were represented by a single cytotype and the remaining four by two cytotypes. Besides, new cytotypes were recorded for 07 species of angiosperms which are possibly new to science. Conclusion: The findings of the present investigation are important in terms of the assessment of genetic diversity and conservational aspects of the aforesaid botanical garden. The identified unique germplasm of the concerned species will be utilized by the researchers who are working on genetic improvement and gene identification programs.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Ashutosh Kumar Verma , 2024. Cytotypic Diversity in Selected Taxa of Botanical Garden of Botanical Survey of India, Central Regional Center, Allahabad. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 16: 1-5.

Keywords: Botanical garden, conservation, cytotypes, germplasm and ploidy

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge of available cytotype diversity in any life form provides clues on ongoing evolutionary processes as well as provide information regarding unique germplasm viz., aneuploids, euploids, polyploids, etc. Such germplasm is very important and utilized by researchers in chromosome identification, gene identification, crop improvement programs, etc. Hence their identification, information about their availability and place of availability are very essential. Botanical gardens are sites where plants are gathered together for systematic studies. At present globally 2500 botanic gardens are existing which cumulatively conserve 6 million accessions of living plants, representing around 80000 taxa1,2. According to Dosman3 botanical gardens are favourite sites for taxonomic and systematic studies as plants of different geographical and agroclimatic zones are available under one roof. Although, botanical gardens have great potential to contribute to different streams of biological sciences, inadequate knowledge of existing intraspecific and infraspecific genetic diversity limits their exploration4.

The Botanical Garden of Botanical Survey of India, Central Regional Center, Allahabad (BSI, CRC, Allahabad) is situated at 181 m Altitude, 250 28'North and 810 51'Longitude and covers about 2.5 ha. It nurtures 663 species having medicinal, economically important, ornamental, rare and threatened plants belonging to 118 families5. The garden comprises many sections including aquatics, arboretum, bambusetum, gymnosperms, medicinal plants, net house, ornamental plants, plant introduction, RET species and rosary. Despite of vast gathering of unique germplasm of different species till the year 2019, no effort was made to explore the cytotypic diversity in available germplasm. Hence, in the light of above-mentioned facts, the present investigation was undertaken to explore the existing cytotypic diversity in targeted plant species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: The present investigation was carried out between 2020-2021 at the botanical garden of Botanical Survey of India, Central Regional Center, Allahabad.

Study design: In the case of trees and shrubs, the cytological investigation was performed on an individual plant basis whereas in herbaceous it was on a population basis. For cytological investigations requisite plant materials were collected on each plant basis or population basis which depends on the habit of the species. The chromosomal count in each case was made through male meiotic preparation for which appropriate sized buds were fixed in Carnoy’s fixative (6 Ethanol: 3 Chloroform: 1 Acetic acid v/v) for 24 hrs then the material was transferred into 70% ethanol and stored in the refrigerator at 4°C. The meiotic squash preparations were made in 2% acetocarmine adopting standard methodologies. Slides were observed under the Nikon Eclipse 200 microscope and chromosome counts were made.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the present investigation 51 species of angiosperms belonging to 37 genera and 20 families, conserved in the Botanical Garden of BSI, CRC, Allahabad were cytologically analyzed. In Table 1 the information on available cytotypes, their ploidy level, earlier reported chromosome count, etc. were summarized. Among them, 28 and 23 species were analyzed on a population and individual plant basis, respectively. As per Chromosome Counts Database(http://ccdb.tau.ac.il) and Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants of Indian Subcontinent6 current findings showed close resemblance with the findings of earlier workers. Forty seven species were represented by a single cytotype, the remaining four viz., Cassia fistula (2n = 26, 28), Rauvolfia tetraphylla (2n = 44, 66), Solanum nigrum (2n = 24, 72) and S. villosum (2n = 24, 72) by two cytotypes. Review of the literature indicates that for C. fistula three cytotypes (2n = 24, 26, 28) were reported so far of which 2n = 28 is found most common. The cytotype 2n = 24 and 2n = 26 was found rare and reported by a few workers6-8. The observations on Rauvolfia tetraphylla support the findings of earlier workers9-11. For S. nigrum and S. villosum two cytotypes (2Xi, 6x) were observed which showed consonance with the findings of Melo et al.12, Kumar and Pushpangdhan13.

Bogunić et al.14 opined that genomic and cytotypes diversity is possibly a major cause of reproductive isolation and finally leads to speciation. Discovery of new cytotypes is always challenging but it is desirable because they will be utilized as experimental material for a better understanding of ongoing evolutionary processes15. In the present investigation, new cytotypes were recorded for seven species viz. Allium tuberosum (2n = 28), Chlorophytum nepalense (2n = 26), Chlorophytum tuberosum (2n = 30), Crotalaria spectabilis (2n = 26), Ocimum basilicum (2n = 78), Sansevieria cylindrica (2n = 38) and Sansevieria trifasciata (2n = 56) which are possibly new to science6,7.

Table 1: Study pattern and cytological observations in different taxa
Species Family Study pattern Observed chromosome No. (2n) Ploidy Reported chromosome number (By earlier workers)
Achyranthes aspera L. (x = 7) Amaranthaceae Population basis 28 4x 28, 42,48, 56, 96
Allium tuberosum Rottler ex Spreng. (x = 7) Amaryllidaceae Population basis 28* 4x 24,31,33,32,62
Aloe vera (L.) Burm. F. (x = 7) Xanthorrhoeaceae Population basis 14 2x 14, 21,38
Antigonon leptopus Hook. and Arn. (x = 7) Polygonaceae Population basis 42 6x 14,40, 42, 44,48
Asparagus racemosus Willd (x = 11) Asparagaceae Population basis 22 2x 20, 22, 40
Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (x = 14) Meliaceae Individual plant 28 2x 28, 30
Basella alba L. (Green) (x = 11,12) Basellaceae Individual plant 44 4x 44, 48
Bauhinia purpurea L. (x = 14) Leguminosae Individual plant 28 2x 28
Bauhinia variegata L. (x = 14) Leguminosae Individual plant 28 2x 28
Boerhavia diffusa L. (x = 13) Nyctaginaceae Population basis 56 Aneuploid 26, 52, 116
Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw. (x = 11, 12) Leguminosae Individual plant 28 Aneuploid 22,24,28
Cassia fistula L. (x = 6, 7, 8; x2 = 13) Leguminosae Individual plant 26, 28 2 x2; 2x 24,26, 28
Chlorophytum comosum (Thunb.) Jacques (x = 7) Asparagaceae Population basis 28 4x 28
C. nepalense (Lindl.) Baker (x = 7, 8) Asparagaceae Population basis 26* Aneuploid 28,40,42, 56
C. tuberosum (Roxb.) Baker (x = 7) Asparagaceae Population basis 30* Aneuploid 16
Crotalaria spectabilis Roth (x = 8) Leguminosae Population basis 26* Aneuploid 16,24
Datura stramonium L. (x = 12) Solanaceae Population basis 24 2x 24, 25,36, 48
Delphinium ajacis L. (x = 8) Ranunculaceae Individual Plant basis 16 2x 16, 24
Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.) R. Br. ex Sm. (x = 11) Apocynaceae Individual plant 22 2x 22
Haworthiopsis limifolia (Marloth) G. D. Rowley (x = 7) Xanthorrhoeaceae Population basis 28 4x 14,21,28
Helicteres isora L. (x = 9) Malvaceae Individual plant 18 2x 18,20,24,38
Justicia simplex D. Don (x = 9) Acanthaceae Individual plant 18 2x 18, 36
Justicia adhatoda L. (x = 7, 8, 9; x2 = 17 ) Acanthaceae Population basis 34 2x 34,40,46, 50
Lantana camara L. (x = 11) Verbenaceae Population basis 44 4x 22, 32, 33,36, 44, 55, 66
Lantana montevidensis (Spreng.) Briq. (x = 11, 12) Verbenaceae Individual plant 48 4x 22, 36, 48
Ocimum basilicum L. (x = 8) Lamiaceae Population basis 78* Aneuploid 30, 48, 52, 54, 56, 72,74
Oroxylum indicum (L.) Curz. (x = 14, 15) Bignoniaceae Individual plant 28 2x 28, 30, 38
Papaver rhoeas L. (x = 7) Papaveraceae Population basis 14 2x 14, 15,16,18, 21, 28,30, 42
Phlomoides superba (Royle) Kamelin & Makhm (x = 11) Lamiaceae Individual plant 22 2x 22
Physalis minima L. (x = 12) Solanaceae Population basis 48 4x 24, 48, 72
Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre (x = 10, 11) Leguminosae Individual plant basis 22 2x 20, 22
Rauvolfia serpentina (L.) Benth. ex Kurz (x = 10, 11) Apocynaceae Population basis 22 2x 20, 22, 44
Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. (x = 11) Apocynaceae Population basis 44, 66 4x, 6x 44, 55, 66, 68, 88
Sansevieria cylindrica Bojer ex Hook (x = 14*a) Asparagaceae Individual plant 38* Aneuploid 28, 36, 42
Sansevieria trifasciata Prain (x = 9*a) Asparagaceae Individual plant 56* Aneuploid 18, 40, 84, 92, 102, 103, 104, 112,119, 120
Sansevieria zeylanica (L.) Willd. (x = 20,21) Asparagaceae Individual plant 40 2x 40, 42
Santalum album L. (x = 10) Santalaceae Individual plant 20 2x 10,20,40
Saraca asoca (Roxb.) Willd.(x = 12) Leguminosae Individual plant 24 2x 24
Senna alata (L.) Roxb. (x = 6, 7, 8) Leguminosae Individual plant 28 4x 24, 28
Senna obtusifolia (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby (x = 6, 7, 8) Leguminosae Population basis 28 4x 24, 28, 52, 56
Senna tora L. (x = 6, 7, 8) Leguminosae Population basis 28 4x 26, 28, 52,56
Senna sulfurea (Collad.) H. S. Irwin & Barneby (x = 6, 7, 8) Leguminosae Individual plant (2) 28 4x 28, 56
Solanum diphyllum L. (x = 12) Solanaceae Population basis 24 2x 24
Solanum nigrum L. (x = 12) Solanaceae Population basis 24, 72 2x, 6x 24, 36, 48, 60, 64, 72, 96, 144
Solanum villosum L. (x = 12) Solanaceae Population basis 24,72 2x, 6x 24, 48, 50, 72
Solanum virginianum (x = 12) Solanaceae Population basis 24 2x 24
Tamarindus indica L. (x = 12) Leguminosae Individual plant 24 2x 24, 26, 28
Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers ex Hook.f. and Thoms (x = 12) Menispermaceae Population basis 26 Aneuploid 24, 26
Uraria picta (Jacq.) DC. (x = 8) Leguminosae Individual plant (2) 16 2x 16, 22
Urena lobata L. (x = 7) Malvaceae Population basis 28 4x 14,28, 56
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (x = 12) Solanaceae Population basis 48 4x 24, 48, 72
*: New chromosome count (Cytotype) for particular species, x: Basic chromosome number, x2: Secondary basic chromosome number and *a: Basic chromosome count assumed on the basis of lowest 2n number

A total number of 26 species are identified as diploid, 15 as tetraploid, 04 as hexaploid and 09 as aneuploidy individual-containing species (Table 1). de Queiroz16 and Meudt et al.17 opined that ploidy change is very crucial for the speciation and diversification of plants. According to maximum workers change in the ploidy level of plants affects their qualitative and quantitative attributes and individuals having these changes are important for genetic improvement programs, the study of evolutionary trends, etc. In the case of Boerhavia diffusa, Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Chlorophytum nepalense, C. tuberosum, Crotalaria spectabilis, Ocimum basilicum, Sansevieria cylindrica, S. trifasciata, Tinospora cordifolia aneuploidy individuals were also observed (Table 1). Aneuploids generally formed by the gain or loss of chromosomes from the normal set of chromosomes, are very crucial for locating a linkage group and a gene in a particular chromosome18. Hence, there is a need to conserve these identified elite genotypes including aneuploids18.

Lastly, cytological techniques have a number of limitations viz. time factor, requirement of advanced microscope facility and trend professions but the findings of present investigation prove the potential of the mentioned technique in assessment of existing genetic diversity in any germplasm and identification of the elite genotypes of particular species. The findings were also important in terms of research including genetic improvement program for economically important species, academics and formulation of conservation strategies. Keeping the mentioned facts and requirement of assessment of genetic diversity of any germplasm collection in mind similar types of investigations are recommended for the botanical gardens of India.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present investigation on the one hand demonstrated the importance of cytological studies in the assessment of genetic variability in germplasm holdings of ex situ conservatories like botanical gardens on the other hand demonstrated the urgent need to start similar types of studies. Besides these, this type of studies will definitely provide help to the researchers who want to work on unique germplasm of economically or scientifically important plant species as search, identification and characterization of unique germplasm of any plant species is a tedious task.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The present investigation was undertaken for the assessment of existing cytotypic diversity in germplasm collection of fifty-one targeted plant species. The key findings includes identification of rare cytotype for C. fistula (2n = 26) and new cytotype for Allium tuberosum (2n = 28), Chlorophytum nepalense (2n = 26), Chlorophytum tuberosum (2n = 30), Crotalaria spectabilis (2n = 26), Ocimum basilicum (2n = 78), Sansevieria cylindrica (2n = 38) and Sansevieria trifasciata (2n = 56) which are possibly new to science. Besides these polyploid and aneuploid individuals were identified for 19 and 09 species of angiosperms respectively which are very important in terms of gene identification and genetic improvement programs of economically important species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Present work carried out under Annual Action Plan Project of Botanical Survey of India. The author is grateful to Director, BSI, Kolkata, and HoO BSI, CRC, Allahabad for providing all necessary facilities and support for executing the present research work.

REFERENCES

  • Golding, J., S. Güsewell, H. Kreft, V.Y. Kuzevanov, S. Lehvävirta, I. Parmentier and M. Pautasso, 2010. Species-richness patterns of the living collections of the world's botanic gardens: A matter of socio-economics? Ann. Bot., 105: 689-696.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • O'Donnell, K. and S. Sharrock, 2017. The contribution of botanic gardens to ex situ conservation through seed banking. Plant Divers., 39: 373-378.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dosmann, M.S., 2006. Research in the garden: Averting the collections crisis. Bot. Rev., 72: 207-234.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Blackmore, S., M. Gibby and D. Rae, 2011. Strengthening the scientific contribution of botanic gardens to the second phase of the global strategy for plant conservation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 166: 267-281.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Singh, R.K., 2016. Plants of associated botanic garden, botanical survey of India, Central Regional Centre, Allahabad. J. Non-Timber For. Prod., 23: 37-54.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Irwin, H.S. and B.L. Turner, 1960. Chromosomal relationships and taxonomic considerations in the genus cassia. Am. J. Bot., 47: 309-318.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dutta, A. and B. De, 2002. Cassia fistula: A source of sennoside b (chromosome morphology and sennoside content). Acta Hortic., 576: 45-48.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mohanty, S. and A.B. Das, 2006. Interspecific genetic diversity in 15 species of Cassia L. evident by chromosome and 4C nuclear DNA analysis. J. Biol. Sci., 6: 664-670.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Harun Ar Rashid, M., C.K. Dash, S. Shamimul Alam and S.S. Sultana, 2019. Differential chromosome banding of three Rauvolfia species. Cytologia, 84: 143-146.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tapadar, N.N.R., 1964. Cytotaxonomic studies in apocynaceae and delineation of the different evolutionary tendencies operating within the family. Caryologia, 17: 103-138.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Raghavan, R.S., 1957. Chromosome numbers in Indian medicinal plants. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 45: 294-298.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Melo, C.A.F., M.I.G. Martins, M.B.M. Oliveira, A.M. Benko-Iseppon and R. Carvalho, 2011. Karyotype analysis for diploid and polyploid species of the Solanum L. Plant Syst. Evol., 293: 227-235.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kumar, A. and P. Pushpangadan, 2005. Molecular systematic study of variants of Solanum nigrum L. in India. Cytologia, 70: 33-38.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bogunić, F., S. Iljak-Yakovlev, I. Mahmutović-Dizdarević, A. Hajrudinović-Bogunić, M. Bourge, S.C. Brown and E. Muratović, 2021. Genome size, cytotype diversity and reproductive mode variation of Cotoneaster integerrimus (Rosaceae) from the Balkans. Plants, Vol. 10.
    CrossRef    


  • Peirson, J.A., A.A. Reznicek and J.C. Semple, 2012. Polyploidy, infraspecific cytotype variation, and speciation in Goldenrods: The cytogeography of Solidago subsect. Humiles (Asteraceae) in North America. Taxon, 61: 197-210.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • de Queiroz, K., 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol., 56: 879-886.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Meudt, H.M., D.C. Albach, A.J. Tanentzap, J. Igea and S.C. Newmarch et al., 2021. Polyploidy on Islands: Its emergence and importance for diversification. Front. Plant Sci., Vol. 12.
    CrossRef    


  • Huettel, B., D.P. Kreil, M. Matzke and A.J.M. Matzke, 2008. Effects of aneuploidy on genome structure, expression, and interphase organization in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet., Vol. 4.
    CrossRef    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved