HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Crop Science

Year: 2013 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 338-359
DOI: 10.3923/ajcs.2013.338.359
Response of Achillea santolina L. To Fertilizers under Different Irrigation Intervals
M. A.M. El-Mekawy

Abstract: Most of promising lands in El-Arish are situated near the Mediterranean Sea, as insufficient available water irrigation with high concentration of salinity from wells water is generally used for irrigation. Production of medicinal and aromatic plants using microorganisms in biofertilization to reduce or replace the chemical fertilizers became an essential process to ensure safety for human and environment. The effect of three irrigation intervals (7, 14 and 21 days) and half or full dose of recommended rate inorganic NPK fertilizer as compared with control ones (recommended rate of inorganic NPK fertilizer without microbial inoculation) on vegetative growth, chemical composition and essential oil productivity of Achillea santolina L. Plants was studies at the Experimental Farm of the Faculty of Environmental Agriculture Science, El-Arish, during two seasons (2010/2011 and 2011/2012). Results showed that the moderate irrigation interval every 14-days was the prior for producing higher percentage and yield of volatile than the intervals every 7 and 21 days. The growth and yield parameters of the plants increased as a result of inoculation of symbiotic N2-fixers+phosphobacteria with inorganic fertilizer followed by the same mixture given half dose NPK fertilizer and then control. The interaction between the two factors of study, it could be noticed that growth and yield parameters considerably improved as a result of watering interval at 14 days and inoculation with biofertilizeres and supplemented with half or full dose of inorganic NPK-fertilizer in the two seasons.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
M. A.M. El-Mekawy , 2013. Response of Achillea santolina L. To Fertilizers under Different Irrigation Intervals. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 5: 338-359.

Keywords: oil yield, biofertilization, Irrigation intervals and Achillea santolina L.

INTRODUCTION

Achillea santolina L. (Fam. Asteraceae). Common names: Lavender cotton (English); Qaysûm (Arabic). Plants are white-wooly, with erect stem which attain up to 1 m height, leaves are small, estipulate thick white to grayish-green, oblong, serrate with undivided lamina. Fragrant perennial herbs, yellow corymbose heads (Tackholm, 1974). The part which used is the fresh or dry whole plant, the fresh herb contains volatile oil that reaches about 1% which consists of 59 components of which α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, 1, 8-cineole, linalool, carvacrol, eugenol, artemesia ketone, palustrol sabinen hydrate α- and β-thujones, santolina alcohol and α-terpineol. The plant also contains tannin, flavonoids fatty acids and bitter substances (Mustafa et al., 1995). Achillea santolina was used by Bedouin for the treatments of caught, aromatic bitter stomachic and anthelmintic.

Nowadays, there is the National Project for Sinai Development to increase the National income of Egypt. For this purpose, the answer could be partly found in medicinal plants cultivation which occupies a prominent economic position. Achillea santolina L. is among the medicinal plants that can be cultivated in the new land.

The effective role of water supply on the growth and production of several medicinal plants was observed by many investigators. Silva et al. (2010) on Aloe vera; Al-Kayssi et al. (2011) on black cumin; Sidika et al. (2012) on purple basil; Rebey et al. (2012) on Cumin; Vazin (2013) on Cumin; Lal et al. (2013) on lemon grass found that providing the plants with suitable water amounts resulted in better growth and yield than those grown under drier conditions.

Biofertilizers are very important to produce medicinal and aromatic plants for drugs extraction and manufacturing as a main substance for human disease healing and health care. Producing such drugs has to be clean having no or the least chemical residues of any harmful kinds Additionally, biofertilizers are substitution of chemical fertilizers for healthy and cheap production. (Subba Rao, 1981).The effect of biofertilization on the growth and productivity of medicinal plants Hassan et al. (2010) on khella; Hassan (2012) on roselle; Harb et al. (2011) on black cumin with used chemical fertilizer combined with biofertilzer resulted in higher values of volatile oil yield/plant and per fed.

This investigation aimed to determine of the suitable water interval and biofertilizer on the growth and yield parameters of Achillea santolina L. plants under North Sinai conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This investigation was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the Faculty of Environmental Agriculture Science at El-Arish, Suez Canal University during two successive seasons of 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 to study the effect of three irrigation intervals of 7, 14 and 21 days and inoculation with nitrogen fixing bacteria “NFB” and phosphate dissolving bacteria “PDB” alone and/or in the presence of half or full dose of recommended rate inorganic N, P and K fertilizers 150 kg fed.-1. ammonium sulfate (20.5%N)+200 kg fed.-1. calcium superphosphate (15.5) P2O5+50 kg fed.-1. potassium sulfate (48% K2 O) as compared with control (recommended rate of inorganic N P K fertilizer without microbial inoculation) on vegetative growth, chemical composition and essential oil productivity of Achillea santolina L. plants under North Sinai conditions.

This study included 18 treatments as follows:

Irrigation every 7 days:

N.P.K
NFB+PDB mixture
50% N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture
N.P.K+NFB
N.P.K+PDB
N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture

Irrigation every 14 days:

N.P.K
NFB+PDB mixture
50% N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture
N.P.K+NFB
N.P.K+PDB
N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture

Irrigation every 21 days:

N.P.K
NFB+PDB mixture
50% N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture
N.P.K+NFB
N.P.K+PDB
N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture

The mechanical and chemical analyses of the used soil were determined before cultivation and chemical analyses of organic manure sources are shown in Table 1. The well water was used to obtain water irrigation treatment every 7, 14 and 21 days in the two seasons by using drip irrigation system, as the plants were irrigated by sufficient water to maintain soil moisture at 65-70% of the field capacity and chemical analyses of this water is shown in Table 1.

Layout of the experiment: On 20th October during the two seasons seeds of Achillea santolina L. plants were sown in the nursery, on 5th February the seedling of about 10 cm height were transplanted on pipe lines from plastic material of 16 mm diameter. The space among them was 60 cm and the distance among hills was 50 cm (one plant/hill).

Table 1: Some initial chemical and physical characteristics of soil, well water and used organic manures during 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 seasons
1st: 2010/2011, 2nd: 2011/2012

The plants were irrigated every 7, 14 and 21 days by drip irrigation system was used with droppers of 2.0 L h-1 beside every hill. Organic manure was added to the growing soil before cultivation at rate of 20 m3 fed.-1.

N-fertilizer as ammonium sulphate (20.5%N) added at recommended rate 150 kg fed.-1. Addition to the soil was in 2 equal doses. The first addition was 15 days after transplanting, it was added to all treatments except for the treatment which was contain (nitrogen fixing bacteria “NFB”+phosphate dissolving bacteria “PDB” only). The second doses were added 45 days after transplanting, it was added to all treatments except for the treatments which was contain (nitrogen fixing bacteria “NFB”+phosphate dissolving bacteria “PDB” only) and 50% N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture). P-fertilizer as super phosphate (15.5 P2O5) was added during soil preparation at recommended rate for all treatment except (nitrogen fixing bacteria “NFB”+phosphate dissolving bacteria "PDB" only) while treatment 50% N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture were had half of recommended dose. K-fertilizer as potassium sulphate (48%K2O) were added in 2 equal doses, the first addition was during soil preparation at recommended rate for all treatments except (nitrogen fixing bacteria “NFB”+phosphate dissolving bacteria “PDB” only), the second dose side dressing after 45 days from transplanting for all treatment except (nitrogen fixing bacteria “NFB”+phosphate dissolving bacteria “PDB” only and treatment 50% N.P.K+NFB+PDB mixture).

Experimental design and statistically analyses: Experiment was implemented in randomized complete block design with 3 replicates for every one treatment, each replicate contained 18 plants, the area of each plot was 6 m2 (2x3 m), the three irrigation intervals (7, 14 and 21 days) were assigned for the main plots while the six levels of fertilizer were the sub-plots treatments. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out according to statistical analysis of variance according to Sendecor and Cochran (1981). Duncan’s multiple range tests was used for comparison among means (Duncan, 1955). All the plants received normal agricultural practices whenever needed.

Source of biofertilizer: Cerealin and phosphorine are commercially produced by the General Organization and Equalization Agric. Fund (G.O.A.E.F.) Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt cerealin contain (nitrogen fixing bacteria “NFB”) while phosphoren contain (row phosphate dissolving bacteria “PDB” B. megatherium). The inoculated with cerealin and phosphorine liquid 2 L was diluted two times and roots of Achillea santolina seedlings were dipped into liquid.

Measurements
Vegetative growth: Samples of three plants were randomly taken from each sub-plot to determine the following parameters:

Plant height (cm)
Number of branches/plant
Fresh weight of root/plant (g)
Fresh weight of herb/plant (g)
Dry weight of root/plant (g)
Dry weight of herb/plant (g)

Vegetative growth parameters were recorded one times at 100 days from transplanting. Three plants were randomly taken from each sub-plot.

Plant chemical analysis:
Photothytinthectic pigments:

Chlorophyll a
Chlorophyll b

Chlorophyll a and b were determined (mg g-1 F.W) on fresh leave sample according to Wettstein formula (Von Wettstein, 1957). After 100 days from transplanting were extracted from representative samples of the fresh leaves using 85% acetone. The concentration of Chlorophyll a and b was determined by using spectrophotometer.

Carbohydrate: Total Carbohydrate percentage in dried leaves was determined according to Herbert et al. (1971).

Plant chemical compositions: Total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were determined dry matter of leaves at 100 days after transplanting. All plant parts were dried at 70°C till constant weight:

Total nitrogen was determined by Neslar method described by Bremner and Mulvaney (1982)
Phosphorus content was determined using the method described by Piper (1950)
Potassium was determined photometrical according to Brown and Lilliand (1946)

Yield and its components:

Inflorescences fresh weight plant-1 (g)
Number inflorescences plant-1
Inflorescences dry weight plant-1 (g)

Flowering tops were collected 5 times every 2 weeks during the flowering season, unexpanded flower heads were collected. Also, dry flowers were air-dried yield of five cuttings flowering tops of individual plant was estimated. Air-dried flower tops in each treatment carefully hand crushed to measure the percentage of essential oil (Guenther, 1961) was distilled to determined volatile oil according to Egyptian Pharmacopoeia method.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Vegetative traits
Effect of irrigation intervals
Plant height (cm): Data in Table 2 indicated that irrigation every 7 days generally increased plant height compared to irrigation every 14 and 21 days; the plant height was decreased as the water intervals increased in the two seasons; highly significant between treatments were observed; in this respect the values were 44.50, 41.17 and 39.22 cm for irrigated plants every 7, 14 and 21 days, respectively in the first season while they were 46.11, 43.11 and 40.17 cm for irrigated plants every 7, 14 and 21 days in the second season.

These results may be due to the effect of used short watering intervals on increasing the growth of root system, consequently, increasing the nutrients uptake needed for plant growth.

Table 2: Effect of irrigation intervals and biofertilization on some vegetative growth parameters of Achillea santolina L. in two seasons 2010/2011 and 2011/2012
1st: 2010/2011 season, 2nd: 2011/2012 season

Besides, enhancing the rates of physiological processes and increasing the hydrostatic pressure on the cell wall, this is necessary for the enlargement of cell. Hence, enhancement of the assimilated food and increase the cell elongation and division consequently, the whole growth of plant could be increased (Bouton et al., 1985). These results are similar to those obtained by Farooq et al. (2009) reported that reduced water uptake results in a decrease in tissue water contents and turgor. Therefore, under drought stress conditions, cell elongation in plants is inhibited by reduced turgor pressure. Likewise, drought stress also trims down the photo-assimilation and metabolites required for cell division as a consequence, impaired mitosis, cell elongation and expansion result in reduced plant height and growth. Eiasu et al. (2012) on purple basil plant, Vazin (2013) on Cumin fond that water stress negatively affected plant growth.

Number of branches/plant: Data in Table 2 showed in both seasons that irrigation every 21 days highly significant decreased number of branches/plant compared to irrigation every 7 and 14 days. Also, the number of branches/plant was decreased as the water irrigation intervals increased in the two seasons. Maximum values in this respect were 19.67 and 19.61 for the lowest irrigation interval (7 days) while the minimum values were 17.22, 18.11, 14.72 and 15.28 at the medium longest irrigation intervals (14 and 21 days), respectively for both seasons similarly. These results were found by El-Mekawy (2006) on Achillea santolina L. plants. Alvarez et al. (2011) found that moderate deficit irrigation fore carnations plants showed a slightly reduced total dry weight, plant height and leaf area. While, severe deficit irrigation (SDI) had clearly reduced all the plant size parameters, lower number of shoots. Asrar and Elhindi (2011) on marigold they found that drought stress reduced growth vigor i.e., plant height, fresh and dry weights of shoot and plant.

Fresh and dry weighs of herb/plant: The results given in Table 2 showed that irrigation every 7 days highly significant increase in fresh and dry weights of herb/plant while irrigation every 14 and 21 days gave low values in this respect in the two seasons. The maximum values were at irrigated every 7 days (28.37 and 29.87 g plant-1) for fresh weight in both seasons while dry weight of herb was (15.49 and 16.26 g plant-1) in both seasons. On the other hand the minimum values in this respect were for irrigation every 14 and 21 days, such intervals gave the values of fresh weight of herb (23.98, 24.91, 20.21 and 20.97 g plant-1), respectively while the dry weight were (12.06, 12.96, 19.23 and 10.13 g plant-1), respectively, in this respect.

These results are in harmony with those reported by Khattab et al. (2002) on Salvia splendens plants, Lal et al. (2013) on lemon grass. These results may be due to the role of water availability on increasing the biosyntheses accumulated, consequently increased the dry matter of herb and the role of water availability on increasing the biosynthates accumulated, consequently increased the dry matter of herb (Bouton et al., 1985). Also, Ninou et al. (2013) showed that under higher irrigation regimes more photosynthetically active leaves (higher net assimilation rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance gas) compared with lower irrigation rates.

Fresh and dry weights of root/plant: Data in Table 2 showed that using irrigation every 7 days gave highly significant increase fresh and dry weight of roots/plant, compared with irrigation every 14 and 21 days which gave the lowest values in the two seasons. The maximum values in this respect for irrigated plants every 7 days followed by irrigated every ones 14 days and then those irrigated every 21 days which gave minimum values in this respect for both seasons, Similar results were reported by El-Makawy (1999) on Calotropis procera, Peganum harmala and Marrubium vulgare plants and Shahin et al. (2006) on sisal.

Effect of fertilization
Plant height: Data in Table 2 clearly showed that during the two seasons plant height significantly affected by chemical fertilization and dual inoculation by two bacterization. The maximum values were recorded with the treatment of 150 kg fed.-1 of NPK fertilizer plus inoculation with the mixture of N2-fixing bacteria (cerealin) and phosphate dissolving bacteria(phosphorine), followed by full NPK fertilizer plus inoculation with N2-fixers (Azotobacter and Azospirillum) and then by NPK fertilizer plus inoculation with phosphobacteria and inoculation with non-symbiotic N2-fixers (Azotobacter and Azospirillum) supplemented with half dose of inorganic N-fertilizer in the two seasons, respectively. The obtained results indicated also that the alone inoculation with the mixture of biofertilizer without inorganic N-fertilizer remarkably decreased the plant height compared with the control. On the other hand, it was noticed that adding 75 kg fed.-1 of NPK fertilizer to biofertilizeres (Azotobacter+phosphate solubilizing bacteria) inoculation gave low values compared with control, without significant difference between them. These results may be due to the influence of the biofertilizer on enhancing soil acidity (pH-values) and water retention in the rooting medium hence the availability and absorption of nutrients could be enhanced, leading to more initiation and elongation of cells Mostafa (2002). Similar trend of results were cleared by Parakhia et al. (2000) on fenugreek found that the inoculation of Azotobacter and Rhizobia increased shoot height.

Number of branches: The Data in Table 2 show the effect of NKP level and biofertilizer on Achillea santolina L. plant during two seasons, whereas application of fertilization exerted significant increases on number of branches. Increasing the applied NPK-levels from 75-150 kg fed.-1 mixture with biofertilizer markedly increased number of branches in both seasons. Regarding the effect of biofertilizer, it is clear from such data in Table 1 that number of branches was markedly increased with biofertilizer treatments than with the untreated ones. Furthermore, application of biofertilizer with NPK was more useful than (NFB+PDB) or NPK alone, all levels of NPK fertilizer were generally more effective in the presence than in the absence of biofertilizer. In this regard, plants receiving 150 kg NPK/fed. with mixture of biofertilizer gave the highest values of number of branches in both seasons. Similar results were reported by Sheikh et al. (2000) on Dutch iris, Attia and Saad (2001) on Catharanthus roseus plants, Kandeel and Sharaf (2002) on Ocimum bassilicum plants and El-Mekawy and Mohamed (2005) on Nigella sativa.

Increasing the number of branches/plant resulted from nutrients fertilization might be due to the indirect participation of those nutrients in reducing the apical dominance of steam, resulting in more branching. Besides that, these nutrients might play a direct role in plant metabolism, resulting in enhancing branches growth these results may be due to the influence of the biofertilizer on enhancing soil acidity (pH-values) and water retention in the rooting medium hence the availability and absorption of nutrients could be enhanced, leading to more initiation and elongation of stem cells (Cacciari et al., 1989).

Fresh and dry weights of herb/plant: The Data given in Table 2 indicated that fresh and dry weights of herb/plant significantly increased under the used recommended fertilization plus mixture of biofertilizer compared to other fertilization treatments which gave the heights values. While, the lowest values of fresh and dry weight of herb were resulted from bacterization only in both seasons. These results are in line with those reported by Harridy et al. (2001) on lemongrass they concluded that application of NPK-fertilizer to the plants significantly increased fresh and dry weights compared with the without mineral fertilizer treatment. Moreover, all values were markedly increased with increasing the applied NPK-levels from 75-150 kg fed.-1.

On the other hand, application of biofertilizer exerted significant increase in both fresh and dry weight of Achillea santolina plant than with the untreated ones. Also, fresh and dry weight was generally increased with bioferilizer mixture. These increases in plant growth ascribed to biofertilizer application might be due to the vital role of bacteria which is present in the applied biofertilizer and capable of contributing some hormone substances, such as gibberellins, auxins and cytokinins (Tien et al., 1979; Bouton et al., 1985). These phytohormones may stimulate the cell elongation and division of plant which hence plant growth (Paleg, 1965) Moreover, the increment in bacteria population and its activity into the absorption zone of plant roots might improve soil fertility and plant development by phosphobacteria and N2-fixation and release of certain other nutrients, i.e., Fe, Zn and Mn (Bhonde et al., 1997). The positive interactions between the applied NPK-fertilizer levels and bioferitilizer on plant vegetative growth may be due to the effects of N-element and biofertilizer together on the absorption of established plant roots and nutrient uptake (Wange et al., 1995; Chugh and Dhaliwal, 2013).

Such increase in fresh and dry weights of herb might due to the increase in CO2 fixation and/or enhancing cell division and/or cell enlargement as well as the anabolic processes; leading to more weight. Fertilization might play a direct or indirect role in plant anabolism through activating the photosynthetic processes as well as the accumulation of their products in plant organs, resulting in more plant materials. The enhancing effect of NPK-fertilizer on plant growth may be due to the positive effects of NPK-element on activation of photosynthesis and metabolic processes of organic compounds in plants. Which in turn, encourage the plant vegetative growth. Furthermore, N and P is an essential component of many organic compounds in plant, such as proteins, enzymes, chlorophylls, vitamins, carotenoids, hormones and nucleic acids Gardner et al. (1985).

Fresh and dry weight of root: Data given in Table 2 indicated in both seasons that the used mixture fertilization treatment gave highly significant increment of fresh and dry weights of roots/plant compared to chemical fertilizer alone. The maximum values were obtained due to fertilizing the plants with full NPK dose under the mixture bioferilization treatments, no significant differences were observed among most treatments in this respect. These results are in harmony with those found by Kandeel and Sharaf (2002) on Ocimum basilicum. The increase in fresh and dry weight of roots due to fertilization treatments might be attributed to the enhancing effects of it on root elongation and growth. Also, Harb et al. (2011) on Nigella sativa indicated that the biofertilization (Glomus macrocarpus fungus or Nitrobein bacteria) or organic manure alone or in combination with half or full NPK fertilizer increased plant height (cm), No. of branches and leaves, root length (cm) as well as herb and root dry weight when compared with uninoculated plants and the best significant results of herb and root dry weight were found with mycorrhizal fungus and Azotobacter with full NPK fertilizers treatment as compared to the other treatments.

Effect of the interactions between irrigation intervals and fertilization
Plant height: Data of both seasons in Table 2 revealed that the treatment of fertilization at full dose in combination with biofertilization and watering every 7 days gave significant increase in plant height comparing with irrigation with chemical or biofertilizer only. The used chemical fertilization, under the same irrigation interval increased plant height. But, increasing watering interval under fertilizer treatment decreases it. These results are in line with those of El-Mekawy (2009) noticed the effect of the interaction between the used different watering intervals and fertilization that the growth and yield parameters considerably improved as a result of watering interval at 10-days and inoculation with symbiotic N2-fixers (Azotobacter and Asospirillum) supplemented with half or full dose of inorganic N-fertilizer in the two seasons, against the lowest values resulted from the irrigated plants every 20 or 30-days and inoculated with biofertilizer only of Thymus capitatus L. plant.

The improvement in plant height due to the additions of some chemical fertilization under increase watering intervals might be due to that the used chemical fertilizer overcame the harmful of stress water on plant height (Schaik et al., 1997).

Number of branches/plant: Data of both seasons in Table 2 showed that the treatments of fertilization and irrigation every 7 days gave the maximum values of number branches/plant compared to other treatments. The treatments of mixture fertilization under the used irrigation intervals increased number of branches comparing with those watering chemical fertilizer treatment or biofertilizer treatment alone. Using both fertilizer kinds, under the same irrigation interval increased number of branches/plant. But, increasing watering intervals under the same levels (50 or 100%) of chemical fertilization decreased it. The highest number of branches/plant was obtained by using 100% chemical fertilization level+mixture biofertilizer under irrigation every 7 days comparing to the other ones in the two seasons. Similar results were reported by El-Mekawy (2009) they indicated that plant height and number of branches/plant and fresh and dry weights of Thymus capitatus L. plant increased at the treatment of short irrigation intervals with the mixture of bio and NPK-fertilization and Maheshwari et al. (1998) who recorded that high biomass yields of palmarosa were result by using Azotobacter alone and Azotobacter with 40-80 kg N/ha under rainfed. and irrigated condition, respectively.

Fresh and dry weights of herb/plant: Table 2 indicate that the interaction treatments between mixture fertilization and irrigation every 7 days caused an increase in fresh and dry weights of herb/plant compared to biofertilizer alone or those of other watering intervals. Using biofertilizer treatment, under the same irrigation interval increase fresh and dry weights of herb/plant. But, increasing watering interval under biofertilizer or the same level of NPK fertilizer (half or full) decreased them. Generally, the fresh weight of herb values for different treatments was highly significant among them in the first season and in the second season. Also, the differences among treatments used in case of dry weight were significant in both seasons. Similar results were reported by El-Mekawy and Mohamed (2005) on Nigella sativa. Gholamhoseini et al. (2013) results irrespective of the mycorrhizal and the drought stress intensity that inoculated plants produced more dry matter than did non-inoculated of sunflower under each irrigation regime.

Fresh and dry weights of roots/plant: Data presented in Table 2 show that the interaction treatments between fertilization and irrigation at every 7 days gave the maximum values of fresh and dry weights of root/plant compared to without chemical fertilizer or those of other irrigation intervals. The interaction treatments of chemical+biofertilization and the used irrigation intervals caused an increase the weights of fresh and dry weight of root/plant comparing with that chemical fertilizer alone under used watering intervals. Using application of NPK fertilizer either alone or combined with biofertilization treatment, under the same watering interval increase the fresh and dry weight of roots/plant. But, increasing irrigation intervals under the same level of fertilizer decrease it. The highest weights of fresh and dry of roots/plant were obtained by using NPK fertilization with two bacterization under irrigation every 7 days comparing to other interaction ones or those of irrigation every 14 or 21 days in the two seasons. Maheshwari et al. (1998) on palmarosa, Gholamhoseini et al. (2013) on sunflower. The biofertilizer (BF) improved carbon and nitrogen mineralization by promoting soil microbial activities and narrowed down C:N ratio. Effect of BF on cation exchange capacity of the soil became evident with time. Physical structure of the soil was influenced due to BF as indicated by significant decline in bulk density and increase in water holding capacity, hydraulic conductivity and mean weight Plant growth and yield (Nisha et al., 2007).

CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS

Effect of irrigation intervals
Chlorophyll a and b: Data in Table 3 showed that chlorophyll a and b highly significant decreased with increase irrigation intervals. The irrigation every 7 days gave the highest values of chlorophyll a and b followed by moderate values when irrigation every 14 days while irrigated plants every 21 days gave the minimum values in this respect. However, with increasing irrigation intervals chlorophyll a and b were decrease in both seasons. Similar results were found by Kandeel (2004), on Ocimum basilicum, Salman (2004) on basil plant.

Total carbohydrate content: Results in Table 3 indicated that with increase irrigation intervals the total carbohydrate content in leaves were increased, moderate irrigation interval 14 days gave the highest results followed by irrigation every 21 days and irrigation every 7 days which gave the lowest values in this respect in the two seasons. Similar results were found by Dos Santos et al. (2013) suggest that during the dry season in the semi-arid region, dynamic photoinhibition occurred in the leaves of Jatropha curcas around mid-day, with a rapid recovery during the afternoon. However, chronic photoinhibition may have occurred in some plants with a severe water deficit. A reduction in the effective quantum efficiency was also observed during the driest months. The increase of catalase activity and the accumulation of proline, total soluble sugars and amino acids during periods of low water availability in the soil. Bolla et al. (2010) suggest on rose that mild water stress caused a decline in leaf chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence, negative effect on photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance leading to a limited supply of metabolic energy and therefore to plant growth restriction. Ninou et al. (2013) showed that under higher irrigation regimes more photosynthetically active leaves (higher net assimilation rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance gas) compared with lower irrigation rate.

Total N, P and K percentage: With regard to the effect of irrigation intervals on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, the results in Table 3 showed that highly significant differences among treatments, however short irrigation interval gave the highest values of total nitrogen and phosphorus percentage while potassium gave lowest values in both seasons. Similar findings were also reported by Khattab et al. (2002) found the superiority of increasing water supply on the content of N, P and K elements in the leaves of Salvia splendens plants due to that increasing soil moisture content caused a marked effect on increasing the solubility of such elements in the soil which led to promote the absorbing efficiency of such elements by the plants.

Effect of fertilization
Chlorophyll a and b: The Data were recorded in Table 3 show that chlorophyll a and b exhibited a significant increase by using both mixture biofertilization and chemical fertilization treatments comparing with biofertilizer only or use chemical fertilization in the two seasons.

Table 3: Effect of irrigation intervals and fertilization on volatil of Achillea santolina L. in two seasons (2010/2011 and 2011/2012)
1st: 2010/2011 season, 2nd: 2011/2012 season

These results are in similar to those found by Bolla et al. (2010) suggest on rose that mild water stress caused a decline in leaf chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence, negative effect on photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance leading to a limited supply of metabolic energy and therefore to plant growth restriction.

Such increase might be attributed to know function of some elements like nitrogen which was found in such important molecules as metabolically important compounds in the chlorophylls (Schuch et al., 1995).

Total carbohydrate content: Table 3 indicates that biofertilization treatment increased total carbohydrate content in leaves comparing to untreated plants in the two seasons. Similar results were found Hassan et al. (2010) showed that applying biofertilizers alone or combined with chemical fertilizers significantly improved growth characters of roselle plant In addition, the best treatment in this respect was bacteria inoculation +1/2 recommended dose of chemical fertilizers. Othewise, there were no significant differences in this concern between this treatment and the full RD of chemical fertilizers Such increase in fresh and dry weights of herb might due to the increase in CO2 fixation and/or enhancing cell division and/or cell enlargement as well as the anabolic processes; leading to more weight. Fertilization might play a direct or indirect role in plant anabolism through activating the photosynthetic processes as well as the accumulation of their products in plant organs, resulting in more plant materials (Gardner et al., 1985). The positive interactions between the applied N-fertilizer levels and bioferitilizer on plant vegetative growth may be due to the effects of N-element and biofertilizer together on the absorption of established plant roots and nutrient uptake (Wange et al., 1995; Chugh and Dhaliwal, 2013).

Total nitrogen, phosphours and potassium percentage: With regard to the effect of fertilization on NPK percentage, the results in Table 3 showed that mixture of biofertilizer and chemical fertilization treatments increased N, P and K percentage in leaves, comparing with two bacterization or treated by chemical fertilization treatment only in the two seasons.

Such increase in N, P and K percentage in leaves might be due to the enhancing effect of chemical fertilization on the absorption and/or translocation of the NPK from root to the above ground parts. These results are in line with those reported by Chezhiyan et al. (2003), Marfa et al.(2002) and Khalil et al. (2004) who showed that application of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers at the rate of 100 kg N+140 kg K2O/fed. through irrigation water recorded the maximum values of growth rate and photosynthetic pigments, whereas, application of the balance rate of nitrogen and potassium at the level of (60 kg N+60 kg K2O/fed.) being the superior treatment regarding plant nutritional status (N, P, K content and their total uptake) on plants.

Effect of the interactions between irrigation intervals and fertilization
Chlorophyll a and b contents: Data in Table 3 showed that the interactions between using fertilization and irrigation intervals were significant for chlorophyll a and b in the two seasons. Generally, there was an increase in chlorophyll a and b with using treatments contain NPK plus biofertilization compared to treatment without biofertilizers. Also, increasing the irrigation intervals under the same level of fertilizer treatment decreased chlorophyll a and b. However, using fertilizer treatment under the same level of irrigation interval increased chlorophyll a and b in fresh leaves. Also, using fertilization at short irrigation interval (7 days) gave the maximum values while without biofertilizer treatment at long irrigation interval (21 days) gave the minimum values in this respect. These results are in line with those of Shahin et al. (2006) on sisal.

Total carbohydrate content: Table 3 indicates that the interaction treatments combined between fertilization and irrigation every 14 days caused an increase in total carbohydrate content compared to biofertilizer and irrigated with other watering intervals. Using chemical fertilizer combined with biofertilzer treatment, under the same irrigation interval increased total carbohydrate content. But, increasing watering interval under the same level of NPK fertilizer (half or full) of chemical fertilizer or biofertilizer decreased it. Generally, the differences among treatments were highly significant in the first season and in the second season. Similar results were reported by Gholamhoseini et al. (2013) results irrespective of the mycorrhizal and the drought stress intensity that inoculated plants produced more dry matter than did non-inoculated of sunflower under each irrigation regime. Dos Santos et al. (2013) suggest that during the dry season in the semi-arid region, dynamic photoinhibition occurred in the leaves of Jatropha curcas around mid-day, with a rapid recovery during the afternoon. However, chronic photoinhibition may have occurred in some plants with a severe water deficit. A reduction in the effective quantum efficiency was also observed during the driest months. The increase of catalase activity and the accumulation of proline, total soluble sugars and amino acids during periods of low water availability in the soil.

Total N, P and K percentage: Data in Table 3 show that interactions between fertilization and irrigation every 7 days caused an increase for nitrogen and phosphorus percentage while using chemical and biofertilization treatment with irrigation every 14 or 21 days increased potassium percentage compared to alone fertilizer treatment. Generally, with increasing level of fertilizer from 50-100% NPK kg fed.-1 alone or combined with biofertilizer the percentage of total N, P and K were significant among the treatments and also increasing irrigation intervals caused increase values of potassium and decreased values of nitrogen and phosphorus for fertilizer treatment in the two seasons. Similar results were reported in this respect by El-Khateeb and Boselah (1991) on periwinkle.

FLOWERING CHARACTERS AND OIL YIELD

Effect of watering intervals
Number of inflorescence: Data in Table 4 clearly showed that number of inflorescences/plant increased gradually with decreasing watering intervals and reached the maximum values by watering the plants every 7 day in the two seasons. On the other hand, irrigation every 21 day gave the lowest values in this respect. These results may be due to that the short watering intervals was more suitable for forming more number of inflorescences/plant through enhancing the vegetative biomass which gave large number of flowers, consequently the fruits could be increased. These results are supported with the obtained results by Raju and Sinsinwar (2006) on Indian mustard.

Inflorescence fresh and dry weight: Data are presented in Table 4 indicated that the different irrigation intervals were exerted a marked and significant effect on fresh and dry weight of inflorescences/plants. Whereas, application of irrigation water every 7 days was the most effective and favorable treatment, as well as recorded the maximum values in this respect. On contrary, the lowest values of fresh and dry weight of inflorescences resulted from application of the lowest level of irrigation water and/or increasing soil moisture water stress. Similar results were reported by Shalan (2005) on borage plants (Borago officinalis, L.). The superiority effect of irrigation water every 7 days during the growing seasons on plants is directly owing to the increase in plant growth rate and its dry matter content, as well as, plant minerals uptake so, the flowering can be considered as the final resultant of all physiological and metabolic processes in the plant. Furthermore water use efficiency, leading to increase the availability and absorption of nutrient elements necessary for flowering precursors of a class of compounds which ultimately forms amino acids and hormones leading to an earlier flowering, gave many lateral branches and number of flowers /plant. Also, increasing in flower dry weight may be due to the increase in flower diameter or flower numbers or both. (Devitt et al., 1991).

Table 4: Effect of irrigation intervals and biofertilization on volatil of Achillea santolina L. in two seasons (2010/2011 and 2011/2012)

Oil percentage and yield/plant: It is evident from data in Table 4 that the volatile oil percentage in Achillea plants tended to increase with increasing irrigation intervals in both seasons, the highest values of volatile oil percentage in the flower heads were obtained from plants irrigated every 21 days. The results may be explained by the findings of Penka (1978) who mentioned that essential oils are the product of the respiratory catabolic processes which increase under the dry conditions of the growing site of the plant. On the other hand, the production of essential oil yield per plant (unexpanded flower head) increased by reducing the irrigation intervals as shown in Table 3. The highest essential oil yield per plant was obtained by the treatment of watering every 14 days. Meanwhile, the treatment of irrigation every 21 days resulted in the lowest volatile oil yield per plant in the two seasons. The increment of the essential oil yield as a result of reducing watering intervals could be explained through its effect on increasing the corresponding drug yield as shown in Table 4. Similar results were obtained by on Jasminum grandiflorum, Vazin (2013) the essential oil of cumin were showed a decreasing under deficient water.

Effect of fertilization
Number of inflorescences: It is clear from data in Table 4 that number of inflorescences considerably influenced by inoculation with N2-fixers bacteria and inorganic NPK-fertilizer. The highest number of inflorescence were recorded with the treatment of dual inoculation of Azotobacter+Azospirillum supplemented with full dose of inorganic NPK-fertilizer followed by the treatment of control and half dose of inorganic N-fertilizer, with insignificant differences between the later treatments. It is evident that treating plants with bacterial inoculation alone gave the lowest values in this respect. Similar findings were noticed by Wange et al. (1995) on tuberose, Sheikh et al. (2000) on Dutch iris and Yadav and Khurana (2000) on fennel.

Inflorescences fresh and dry weights: The obtained data in Table 4 indicated that the highest weights of fresh and dry of inflorescences considerably influenced by inoculation with two bacterization and inorganic NPK-fertilizer. The highest values were recorded with the treatment of dual inoculation of (non-symbiotic N2-fixers+phosphobacteria) supplemented with full dose of inorganic NPK-fertilizer (150 kg fed.-1) followed by the treatments of NPK-fertilizer+NFB and NPK-fertilizer+PFB, but with insignificant differences between the later treatments, then the control (150 kg fed.-1) and half dose of inorganic N-fertilizer (75 kg fed.-1), It is evident that treating plants with bacterial inoculation alone gave the lowest values in this respect. Similar findings were noticed by Attia and Saad (2001) on Catharanthus roseus Annamalai et al., (2004) on Phyllanthus amarus and El-Mekawy and Mohamed (2005) Nigella sativa.

Oil percentage and yield/plant: Data in Table 4 showed that oil percentage and yield/plant considerably influenced by inoculation with two bacterias and inorganic NPK-fertilizer. The highest values of oil percentage and yield/plant were recorded with the treatment of dual inoculation (N2-fixers plus bio-phosphate) supplemented with high dose of inorganic NPK-fertilizer, followed by the treatments of NPK-fertilizer+NFB and NPK-fertilizer+PFB, with insignificant difference between the later treatments, then the control and half dose of inorganic N-fertilizer, without significant difference between them. It is evident that treating plants with bacterial inoculation alone gave the lowest values in this respect. Similar findings were noticed by Harridy et al. (2001) observed that, applying Azotobacter+0 NPK, biofertilizers treatments (Azotobacter, Azospirillum and Rhizobium) significantly stimulated the biosynthesis of essential oil in lemongrass plants, the highest oil yield was mostly by the plants inoculated with Azotobacter without NPK in all cuts except the last cuts. In the sometime, inoculation with biofertilizers individually or in combination were produced essential oil with a high percentages of citral (a and b) in comparison with oil produced from control plants (without inoculation) and Massoud (2007) on marjoram plant. Al-Kayssi et al. (2011) the highest Nigellone volatile oil content of black cumin seeds was obtained when increase the available soil water Singh and Guleria (2013) revealed that produced maximum plant weight, herbage and oil yield of rosemary when use combined application of vermicompost 10 t ha-1+fertilizer NPK (100:25:25 kg ha-1) compared no fertilizer which indicated that 50% inorganic fertilizer can supplemented with organic manure without affects the oil yield. Yousefzadeh et al. (2013) conclude that the application of 50% urea with 50% Azocompost is recommended for optimizing the content and composition of essential oils in dragonhead.

Effect of the interactions between irrigation intervals and fertilization
Number of inflorescences: Data in Table 4 showed that the effect of interactions between using fertilization and irrigation intervals were significant on number of inflorescences in the two seasons. Generally, the interaction between treatments caused an increase in number of inflorescence with using chemical fertilization combined with biofertilizer compared to chemical fertilization or biofertilization treatments alone. Also, increasing the irrigation intervals under the same level of fertilizer treatment decreased number of inflorescence. However, using biofertilizer treatment under the same level of irrigation interval increased number of inflorescence. Also, using fertilization at moderate irrigation interval (14 days) gave the maximum values while biofertilizer treatment at long irrigation interval (21 days) gave the minimum values in this respect. These results are in line with those were attained by Abd EL-Latif et al. (2002) on Matricaria chamomilla Badran and Safwat (2004) on fennel, Younis et al. (2004) on Jasminum grandiflorum and El-Mekawy and Mohamed (2005) on Nigella sativa.

Inflorescences fresh and dry weights: Table 4 indicates that the interaction treatments between complex fertilization and irrigation intervals caused an increase in inflorescence fresh and dry weights compared to biofertilizer alone under used irrigation intervals . Using chemical fertilizer combined with biofertilzer treatment, under the same irrigation interval increase inflorescence fresh and dry weight. But, increasing watering interval under the same level of NPK fertilizer (half or full) of chemical fertilizer or biofertlizer decreased it. Generally, inflorescence fresh and dry weight was highly significant in the first season and in the second season. Similar results were reported regarding the effects of interaction treatments between fertilizer and irrigation intervals by Shalan (2005) on borage plants (Borago officinalis, L.).

Oil percentage and yield/plant: Data in Table 4 showed that the volatile oil percentage and yield/plant tended to increase with the mixture of biofertilzer and chemical fertilizer treatment and increasing irrigation intervals in both seasons. The highest values of volatile oil percentage in the inflorescences were obtained from plants irrigated at long every 21 days. The results may be explained by the findings of Penka (1978), who mentioned that essential oils are the product of the respiratory catabolic processes which increase under the dry conditions of the growing site of the plant.

On the other hand, the production of essential oil yield per plant (unexpanded inflorescences) increased by reducing the irrigation intervals as shown in Table 4. Also, using chemical fertilizer combined with biofertilzer treatment, under the same irrigation interval increased values of volatile oil percentage. Also, long watering interval under the same level of NPK fertilizer (half or full) of chemical fertilizer or biofertlizer increased it. The highest essential oil yields per plant and per fed.dan were obtained by the treatment of watering every 14 days. Meanwhile, the treatment of irrigation every 21 days resulted in the lowest volatile oil yield per plant and per fedden in the two seasons. The increment of the essential oil yield as a result of reducing watering intervals could be explained through its effect on increasing the corresponding drug yield as shown in Table 4. Similar results were obtained by Raju and Sinsinwar (2006) on Indian mustard Massoud (2007) on marjoram plant. Gholamhoseini et al. (2013) indicated that under drought stress intensity, inoculated plants of sunflower produced more dry matter, heavier seeds and greater seed and oil yields than did non-inoculated plants. Singh and Guleria (2013) revealed that produced maximum plant weight, herbage and oil yield of rosemary when use combined application of vermicompost 10 t ha-1+fertilizer NPK (100:25:25 kg ha-1) compared no fertilizer which indicated that 50% inorganic fertilizer can supplemented with organic manure without affects the oil yield. Yousefzadeh et al. (2013) conclude that the application of 50% urea with 50% Azocompost is recommended for optimising the content and composition of essential oils in dragonhead.

CONCLUSION

Finally, from the forgoing results and discussion, it could be recommended to use irrigation every 14-day combined with the mixture of dual inoculation of (symbiotic N2-fixers+phosphobacteria) in the presence of half or full dose of inorganic NPK-fertilizer to obtain the best growth parameter and oil yield of Achillea santolina L. plant under North Sinai conditions.

REFERENCES

  • Al-Kayssi, A.W., R.M. Shihab and S.H. Mustafa, 2011. Impact of soil water stress on Nigellone oil content of black cumin seeds grown in calcareous-gypsifereous soils. Agric. Water Manage., 100: 46-57.
    CrossRef    


  • Alvarez, S., A. Navarro, E. Nicolas and M.J. Sanchez-Blanco, 2011. Transpiration, photosynthetic responses, tissue water relations and dry mass partitioning in Callistemon plants during drought conditions. Sci. Hortic., 129: 306-312.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Annamalai, A., P.T.V. Lakshmi, D. Lalithakumar and K. Murugesan, 2004. Optimization of biofertilizers on growth, biomass and seed yield of Phyllanthus amarus (Bhumyamalaki) in sandy loam soil. JMAPS, 26: 717-720.
    Direct Link    


  • Attia, F.A. and O.A.O. Saad, 2001. Biofertilizers as partial alternative of chemical fertilizer for Catharanthus roseus. G. Don. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 26: 7193-7208.


  • Badran, F.S. and M.S. Safwat, 2004. Response of fennel plants to organic manure and bio-fertilizers in replacement of chemical fertilization. Egypt J. Agric. Res., 82: 247-256.


  • Bhonde, S.R., S.B. Sharma and A.B. Chougule, 1997. Effect of bio-fertilizer in combination with nitrogen through organic and inorganic sources on yield and quality of onion. Newslett. Natl. Hortic. Res. Dev. Found., 17: 1-3.


  • Bolla, A., D. Voyiatzis, M. Koukourikou-Petridou and D. Chimonidou, 2010. Photosynthetic parameters and cut-flower yield of rose Eurored (H.T.) are adversely affected by mild water stress irrespective of substrate composition. Sci. Hortic., 126: 390-394.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bouton, J.H., S.L. Albercht and D.A. Zuberer, 1985. Screening and selection of plants for root associated bacteria nitrogen fixation. Field Crop Res., 11: 131-140.


  • Bremner, J.M. and C.S. Mulvaney, 1982. Total Nitrogen. In: Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (Eds.). American Social Agronomy, Madison, WI., USA., pp: 595-624


  • Brown, J.D. and L. Lilleland, 1946. Rapid determination of potassium and sodium in plant material and soil extracts by flame photometry. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 48: 341-346.


  • Cacciari, I., D. Lippi, T. Pietrosanti and W. Pietrosanti, 1989. Phytohormone-like substances produced by single and mixed diazotrophic cultures of Azospirillum and Arthrobacter. Plant Soil, 115: 151-153.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chezhiyan, N., S. Saraswathy and R. Vasumathi, 2003. Studies on organic manure, biofertilizers and plant density on growth, yield and alkaloid content of bhumyamalaki (Phyllanthus amarus Schum. and Thonn). South Indian Hortic., 51: 96-101.
    Direct Link    


  • Chugh, V. and H.S. Dhaliwal, 2013. Biofortification of Staple Crops. In: Agricultural Sustainability: Progress and Prospects in Crop Research, Bhullar, G.S. and N.K. Bhullar (Eds.). Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 177-196


  • Devitt, D.A., R. Li Morris and D.C. Bowman, 1991. Response of tall fescue to composted sewage sludge used as a soil amendment. J. Plant Nutr., 13: 1115-1139.
    CrossRef    


  • Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Eiasu, B.K., J.M. Steyn and P. Soundy, 2012. Physiomorphological response of rose-scented geranium (Pelargonium spp.) to irrigation frequency. South Afr. J. Bot., 78: 96-103.
    CrossRef    


  • El-Khateeb, M.A. and N.A.A. Boselah, 1991. Effect of irrigation intervals and potassium fertilization on perirwinkle. Tanta J. Agric. Res., 17: 113-123.
    Direct Link    


  • El-Makawy, M.A.M., 1999. Effect of certain cultural treatments on growth and chemical composition of some medicinal plants grown under North Sinai conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, El-Arish Sues Canal University, Egypt.


  • El-Mekawy, M.A.M., 2009. Effect of irrigation intervals and biofertilization on growth, chemical composition and oil yield of Thymus capitatus L.under El-Arish condition. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 35: 1050-1068.


  • EL-Mekawy, M.A.M., 2006. Effect of irrigation intervals and salinity of irrigation water on the growth and chemical composition of Achillea santolina L. plants. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 32: 149-172.


  • El-Mekawy, M. and M. Mohamed, 2005. Effect of irrigation intervals and biofertilization on growth, chemical composition and oil yield of Nigella sativa under El-Arish condition. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 31: 72-89.


  • Farooq, M., A. Wahid, N. Kobayashi, D. Fujita and S.M.A. Basra, 2009. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustainable Dev., 29: 185-212.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vazin, F., 2013. Water stress effects on Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) yield and oil essential components. Sci. Hort., 151: 135-141.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gardner, F.P., R.B. Pearce and R.L. Mitchell, 1985. Physiology of Crop Plants. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp: 327


  • Gholamhoseini, M., A. Ghalavand, A. Dolatabadian, E. Jamshidi and A. Khodaei-Joghan, 2013. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and irrigation water productivity of sunflowers grown under drought stress. Agric. Water Manage., 117: 106-114.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Guenther, E., 1961. The Essential Oils. Vol. IV, Nostrand Co. Inc., New York


  • Harb, E.M.Z., A.M. Ghallab and S.H.D. Soliman, 2011. Effect of mycorrhizae, azotobacter and organic manure on the growth, seed yield and oil content of Nigella sativa L. plants grown under two levels of chemical fertilizers, NPK. Bull. Fac. Agric. Cairo Univ., 62: 173-182.
    Direct Link    


  • Harridy, I.M.A., S.G.I. Soliman and M.A.T. Amara, 2001. Physiological, chemical and biological studies on lemongrass. Cymbopogan citralus (DC) stapf in response to diazotrophic bacteria. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 26: 6131-6154.


  • Hassan, E.A., E.A. Hassan and E.H. Hamad, 2010. Microbial solubilization of phosphate-potassium roocks and their effect on khella (Ammi visnaga) growth. Ann. Agric. Sci., 55: 37-53.
    Direct Link    


  • Hassan, F.A.S., 2012. Response of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. plant to some biofertilization treatments. Ann. Agric. Sci., Vol. 54


  • Herbert, D., P.J. Phipps and R.E. Strange, 1971. Chemical analysis of microbial cells. Methods Microbiol., 5: 209-344.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kandeel, A.M. and M.S. Sharaf, 2002. Productivity of Majorana hortensis L. plants as influenced by the interactions between mineral and biological fertilization. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 28: 1373-1389.
    Direct Link    


  • Kandeel, Y.M.R., 2004. Effect of bio, organic and chemical fertilization on growth, essential oil productivity and chemical composition of Ocimum basilicum L. plant. Ann. Agric. Sci., 42: 1253-1270.


  • Khalil, M.A., E.A. El-Ghamriny and I.I. Ayoub, 2004. Effect of irrigation water quantity and application of nitrogen and potassium as fertigation method on sweet potato plants under sandy soil conditions. Zagazig J. Agric. Res., 31: 2139-2168.


  • Khattab, M., O. El-Shennawy, M. Mostafa and N. Gamaa, 2002. Effect of some soil conditioners and irrigation rates on the growth and flowering of Salvia splendens plants. Alex. J. Agric. Res., 48: 163-172.


  • Lal, K., R.K. Yadav, R. Kaur, D.S. Bundela, M.I. Khan et al., 2013. Productivity, essential oil yield and heavy metal accumulation in lemon grass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) under varied wastewater-groundwater irrigation regimes. Ind. Crops Prod., 45: 270-278.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Maheshwari, S.K., R.K. Sharma and S.K. Gangrade, 1998. Response of palmarosa (Cymbopogon martinii var, motia) to biofertilization, nitrogen and phosphorus in a shallow black soil under rainfed condition. Indian J. Agron., 43: 175-178.


  • Marfa, O., F. Lemaire, R. Caceres, F. Giuffrida and V. Guerin, 2002. Relationships between growing media fertility, percolate composition and fertigation strategy in peat-substitute substrates used for growing ornamental shrubs. Sci. Hort., 94: 309-321.
    CrossRef    


  • Massoud, H.Y.A., 2007. Effect of mineral and bio-phosphate fertilization on the growth, essential oil productivity and chemical composition of Marjoram plants. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 32: 1293-1308.


  • Mostafa, M.M., 2002. Effect of biofertilizer, salinity and magnetic technique on the growth of some annual plants. Alexandria J. Agric. Res., 47: 151-162.


  • Mustafa, E.H., M. Abu Zarga, S. Sabri and S. Abdalla, 1995. Effects of cirsiliol, a flavone isolated from Achillea fragrantissima, on rat isolated ileum. Int. J. Pharmacol., 33: 204-209.
    CrossRef    


  • Ninou, E., J.T. Tsialtas, C.A. Dordas and D.K. Papakosta, 2013. Effect of irrigation on the relationships between leaf gas exchange related traits and yield in dwarf dry bean grown under Mediterranean conditions. Agric. Water Manage., 116: 235-241.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nisha, R., A. Kaushik and C.P. Kaushik, 2007. Effect of indigenous cyanobacterial application on structural stability and productivity of an organically poor semi-arid soil. Geoderma, 138: 49-56.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Paleg, L.G., 1965. Physiological effects of gibberellins. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 16: 291-322.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Parakhia, A.M., L.F. Akbari and J.H. Andharia, 2000. Seed bacterization for better quality and more yield of fenugreek. Gujarat Agric. Univ. Res. J., 25: 34-38.
    Direct Link    


  • Penka, M., 1978. Influence of irrigation on the contents of effective substances in officinal plants. Acta Hortic., 73: 181-198.


  • Piper, C.S., 1950. Soil and Plant Analysis. Interscience Publisher, New York, Pages: 368


  • Raju, S. and B.S. Sinsinwar, 2006. Effect of integrated of nutrient management and growth, yield, oil content and nutrient uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in eastern part of Rajasthan. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 76: 322-324.
    Direct Link    


  • Rebey, I.B., I. Jabri-Karoui, I. Hamrouni-Sellami, S. Bourgou, F. Limam and B. Marzouk, 2012. Effect of drought on the biochemical composition and antioxidant activities of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) seeds. Ind. Crops Prod., 36: 238-245.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schuch, U., A.R. Richard and J. Bethke, 1995. Whole-plant response of six poinsettia cultivars to three fertilizer and two irrigation regimes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 121: 69-76.
    Direct Link    


  • Salman, A.S., 2004. Effect of bio-fertilization on Ocimum basilicum L. plant. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt.


  • Dos Santos, C.M., V. Verissimo, H.C.L.W. Filho, V.M. Ferreira, P.G.S. Cavalcante, E.V. Rolim and L. Endres, 2013. Seasonal variations of photosynthesis, gas exchange, quantum efficiency of photosystem II and biochemical responses of Jatropha curcas L. grown in semi-humid and semi-arid areas subject to water stress. Ind. Crops Prod., 41: 203-213.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sendecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran, 1981. Statistical Methods. 7th Edn., Lowa State University Press, USA Pages: 305


  • Shahin, S.M., N.D. Manoly and S.S. Ahmed, 2006. Response Of Sisal (Agave sisalana perrine) to chemical fertilization and water supply. Minufiya, J. Agric. Res., 31: 107-124.
    Direct Link    


  • Shalan, M.N., 2005. Effect of compost and different sources of biofertilizeres, on borage plants Borago officinalis L. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 83: 271-284.


  • Sheikh, M.Q., A.Q. Jhon and M.V. Zargar, 2000. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizeres on vegetative growth and bulb production characteristics of Dutch iris Iris hollandica cv. Prof Blaauw Applied Biol. Res., 2: 62-63.
    Direct Link    


  • Sidika, E., C. Sonmez, E. Ozcakal, Y.S.K. Kurttas, E. Bayram and H. Gurgulu, 2012. The effect of different irrigation water levels on yield and quality characteristics of purple basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Agric. Water Manage., 109: 155-161.
    CrossRef    


  • Silva, H., S. Sagardia, O. Seguel, C. Torres, C. Tapia, N. Franck and L. Cardemil, 2010. Effect of water availability on growth and wateruse efficiency for biomass and gel production in Aloe Vera (Aloe barbadensis M.). Ind. Crops Prod., 31: 20-27.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Singh, M. and N. Guleria, 2013. Influence of harvesting stage and inorganic and organic fertilizers on yield and oil composition of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) in a semi-arid tropical climate. Ind. Crops Prod., 42: 37-40.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Subba Rao, N.S., 1981. Biofertilizers in Agriculture. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta, pp: 69, 77-92, 142-160


  • Tackholm, V., 1974. Student's Flora of Egypt. 2nd Edn., Cairo University Press, Egypt, Pages: 887


  • Tien, T.M., M.H. Gaskins and D.H. Hubbell, 1979. Plant growth substances produced by Azospirillum brasilense and their effect on growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 37: 1016-1024.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schaik, A.H., P.C. Struik and T.G. Damian, 1997. Effects of irrigation and N on the vegetative growth of Aloe barbadensis mill. Trop. Agric., 74: 104-109.


  • Wange, S.S., P. Patil and J.J. Patil, 1995. Effects of biofertilizations alone and with nitrogen levels on tuberose cv. Single petaled. India J. Soil Crops, 19: 484-485.


  • Asrar, A.W.A. and K.M. Elhindi, 2011. Alleviation of drought stress of marigold (Tagetes erecta) plants by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 18: 93-98.
    CrossRef    


  • Von Wettstein, D., 1957. Chlorophyll lethals and submicroscopic morphological changes in plastids. Exptl. Cell, Res., 12: 427-506.
    Direct Link    


  • Yadav, B.D. and S.C. Khurana, 2000. Effect of plant growth substances and Azotobacter on yield and yield attributing characters in fennel. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res., 30: 71-77.
    Direct Link    


  • Younis, S.I., M.M. Souzan and A.M. Fardous, 2004. Effect of different fertilization treatments on Jasminum grandiflorum L. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 30: 97-113.


  • Yousefzadeh, S., S.A. Modarres-Sanavy, F. Sefidkon, A. Asgarzadeh, A. Ghalavand and K. Sadat-Asilan, 2013. Effects of Azocompost and urea on the herbage yield and contents and compositions of essential oils from two genotypes of dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) in two regions of Iran. Food Chem., 138: 1407-1413.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved